February 11, 2009 2:01 PM
- Text
Obama Makes Plans To Close Guantanamo
Scroll Left Scroll Right
-
play SCOTUS: States can't require voters to prove citizenship; Couple ... -
play Couple reeling from recession rewrites story, publishes romance novels -
play Snowden: "U.S. Government is not going to be able ... -
play SCOTUS: States can't require voters to prove citizenship -
play Colo. Black Forest fire has died down, yet danger remains -
play Syria tensions make for chilly meeting between Obama, Putin -
play 6/18: Officials say NSA stopped over 50 potential terror ... -
play Ghost army: How a group of artists helped win WWII -
play David Coleman Headley: Terror sleeper agent foiled by NSA -
play 6/16: Protesters seek refuge in Istanbul hotel; Pope blesses ... -
play Okla. tornado survivor finds dog buried alive under rubble -
play The power of a uniquely American song
After he takes office, Barack Obama wants to close the prison for terror suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. But if it's shut down, what does the government do with all those detainees?
CBS News national security correspondent David Martin has exclusively learned that the president-elect's transition team has already asked the Pentagon what it would take to move the prisoners at Guantanamo to the Navy base at Charleston, S.C.
It's a clear sign that the new president intends to make good on one of his most emphatic campaign promises.
One high profile terrorist, Jose Padilla, was held at the Charleston brig before facing trial. But major construction and extraordinary security would be required to house all 250 Guantanamo inmates there. Other military bases, including Camp Pendleton, Calif. are also being considered.
Whatever the location, moving the prisoners to the U.S. will open a Pandora's box of legal issues, says Benjamin Wittes of the Brookings Institution.
"The real question is what is our detainee policy in the war on terrorism and that's a question that is, you know, is going to be very wrenching," Wittes said.
Would prisoners held in the U.S. be tried by military commissions as they would at Guantanamo or by civilian courts? The waterboarding of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohmmed could jeopardize even that case in a civilian court, warns former federal prosecutor David Laufman.
"Everything that comes out of a detainee's mouth afterward is likely to be tainted," Laufman said.
More than 100 of the inmates are considered too dangerous to release but not guilty enough to prosecute because the evidence against them can not be used in court. Would an Obama administration hold those prisoners without trial?
"There is going to be a sobering moment when they get into office and they actually look at these files," Wittes said.
The real question facing Obama: Will he change the rules under which captured terrorists are held, or just their address?
Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved. CBS News national security correspondent David Martin has exclusively learned that the president-elect's transition team has already asked the Pentagon what it would take to move the prisoners at Guantanamo to the Navy base at Charleston, S.C.
It's a clear sign that the new president intends to make good on one of his most emphatic campaign promises.
One high profile terrorist, Jose Padilla, was held at the Charleston brig before facing trial. But major construction and extraordinary security would be required to house all 250 Guantanamo inmates there. Other military bases, including Camp Pendleton, Calif. are also being considered.
Whatever the location, moving the prisoners to the U.S. will open a Pandora's box of legal issues, says Benjamin Wittes of the Brookings Institution.
"The real question is what is our detainee policy in the war on terrorism and that's a question that is, you know, is going to be very wrenching," Wittes said.
Would prisoners held in the U.S. be tried by military commissions as they would at Guantanamo or by civilian courts? The waterboarding of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohmmed could jeopardize even that case in a civilian court, warns former federal prosecutor David Laufman.
"Everything that comes out of a detainee's mouth afterward is likely to be tainted," Laufman said.
More than 100 of the inmates are considered too dangerous to release but not guilty enough to prosecute because the evidence against them can not be used in court. Would an Obama administration hold those prisoners without trial?
"There is going to be a sobering moment when they get into office and they actually look at these files," Wittes said.
The real question facing Obama: Will he change the rules under which captured terrorists are held, or just their address?
195 Comments +
Popular Now in CBS Evening News
- Couple's steamy romance e-books save their home
- Colo. senator who pushed for gun control may lose job
- Couple reeling from recession rewrites story, publishes romance novels
- SCOTUS: States can't require voters to prove citizenship; Couple reeling from recession publishes novels
- Innovative Ariz. class turns students' dreams into reality
- Iran's new president-elect seen as bridge-builder
- 6/18: Officials say NSA stopped over 50 potential terror attacks; Hi-tech giant creates next generation of Edisons
- David Coleman Headley: Terror sleeper agent foiled by NSA
- Parents of mentally ill child may have averted mass shooting
- Ghost army: How a group of artists helped win WWII
- Snowden: "U.S. Government is not going to be able to cover this up"
- Colo. Black Forest fire has died down, yet danger remains
- Syria tensions make for chilly meeting between Obama, Putin
- Okla. tornado survivor finds dog buried alive under rubble
- SCOTUS: States can't require voters to prove citizenship
- Officials say NSA programs stopped over 50 potential terror attacks
