February 11, 2009 2:01 PM

General Warns Obama On Missile Defense

(CBS/AP)  The Air Force general who runs the Pentagon's missile defense projects said Wednesday that American interests would be "severely hurt" if President-elect Obama decided to halt plans developed by the Bush administration to install missile interceptors in Eastern Europe.

Lt. Gen. Henry A. Obering III, director of the Missile Defense Agency, told a group of reporters that he is awaiting word from Obama's transition team on their interest in receiving briefings.

Meanwhile, the Kremlin has rejected a second set of U.S. proposals offered to assuage increasingly strident Russian criticism of plans for an American missile-defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic, news agencies reported Wednesday.

During the campaign, Obama was not explicit about his intentions with regard to missile defense. The program has tended to draw less support from Democrats over the years, particularly during the Reagan presidency when it was seen as a "Star Wars" effort to erect an impenetrable shield against nuclear missile attack from the Soviet Union. More recently the project has been scaled back, although it has again created an East-West divide by stirring Russian opposition to the proposed European link.

Obama has said it would be prudent to "explore the possibility of deploying missile defense systems in Europe," in light of what he called active efforts by Iran to develop ballistic missiles as well as nuclear weapons.

Iran's defense minister announced the country has successfully test-fired a new, more accurate generation of its longest-range surface-to-surface missile. Iranian television showed the missile being fired Wednesday from a launching pad in the desert.

But Obama expressed some skepticism about the technical capability of U.S. missile defenses. He said that if elected his administration would work with NATO allies to develop anti-missile technologies.

Obering, who is leaving his post next week after more than four years in charge, said in the interview that his office has pulled together information for a presentation to the Obama team, if asked.

"What we have discovered is that a lot of the folks that have not been in this administration seem to be dated, in terms of the program," he said. "They are kind of calibrated back in the 2000 time frame and we have come a hell of a long way since 2000. Our primary objective is going to be just, frankly, educating them on what we have accomplished, what we have been able to do and why we have confidence in what we are doing."

The Bush administration says the system would protect Europe against potential future attacks by Iranian long-range missiles. Moscow has angrily dismissed those assertions, saying the system could eliminate Russia's nuclear deterrent or spy on its military installations.

In a major speech just hours after Obama won the U.S. presidential vote, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev pledged to base short-range Iskander missiles in the Baltic Sea region of Kaliningrad on the border with Poland if the U.S. goes forward with its plans.

The Bush administration later sent Moscow a new set of proposals, including suggestions about allowing Russian observers at the planned U.S. sites in Poland and the Czech Republic, according to John Rood, the U.S. acting undersecretary of state for arms control.

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said over the weekend the latest U.S. proposals were insufficient. On Wednesday, an unidentified Kremlin official told Russian news agencies that Moscow was prepared to work with Washington on questions of European security but accused the Bush administration of trying to limit the incoming Obama administration's choices on the issue.

The Kremlin did not comment on the report, but Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell did.

"I hope this unnamed Kremlin official does not express his government's true wishes because we still very much wish to partner with Russia to combat the growing ballistic missile threat emanating from Iran," he said.

"They are clearly determined to develop a weapon capable of reaching Europe, and for that matter Russia, so it continues to be in our mutual interest to work together on this issue."

Meanwhile, Obering said Wednesday that Russia has not indicated what part of the new U.S. proposals it objects to.

"We have laid out very common sense approaches here. I think it is time that we ask the Russians to justify why they are taking a stance that internationally is so unreasonable."

The U.S. Embassy in Moscow said the U.S. envoy William Burns met with Lavrov and Kremlin aide Sergei Prikhodko on Wednesday to discuss missile defense talks taking place next month. No further details were released.

An American official said separately the U.S. and Russia will begin talks Thursday in Geneva on finding a successor to the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, which expires at the end of next year. The 1991 START treaty significantly cut U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals.

The official spoke Wednesday on condition of anonymity because she was not authorized to be quoted by name.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 153 Comments
by socialismsux November 14, 2008 12:26 AM EST
Iran will be attacked by Isreal between Nov 26-28. Put it on your calendars


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by impeach___w at 04:55 PM : Nov 13, 2008

If you want to see what''s going to happen regarding Israel in the future, read Ezekiel 38-39.

Then read the specific threats against Israel in Psalm 83:4

Iran (Persia) is mentioned along with Rosh (Russia) in Ezekiel 38-39 in an all out assault on Israel in the future.

It''s going to happen. But the Lord will intervene and protect His land of Israel.

Israel will never be defeated by it''s enemies, as it is written.

You mess with God''s chosen land, you mess with Him.
Reply to this comment
by socialismsux November 14, 2008 12:24 AM EST
For God''''s sake it''''s a missle INTERCEPTOR system not nukes. This system will not be up and running until 2011/2012, by then Iran and North Korea will have missile capability (with help from the Russians). Everyone, just drop your "Bush Hate" and wake up. Conservatives have not made Bush the boogey man like libs have, once and for all "terrorists" are the bad guys and deserve our condemnation. Jeez, it''''s soooo stupid to hear libs start to froth at the mouth about "Bush" and then turn around and defend the mentality and rights of terrorist states. Bush is practically out the door, will you please finally join us in the war on terror, intead of fighting republicans?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by promaclaura


Good luck getting libs to join in on the fight against Islamic jihad.

Remember, they cannot handle the concept that there is a such thing as Absolute Good vs Absolute Evil. Their world is blurry, full of inconsistency and doubt.

They don''t grasp the concept that we must defeat evil, in this case Islamic jihad, in order for innocent people to continue to live in liberty and happiness.

They''d rather sit around and "appease" Islam instead. Even Republicans are guilty of this as of late.
Reply to this comment
by brundage3 November 14, 2008 12:21 AM EST
Join "Libs For Hate of Terrorism!"

It''s a new concept even Conservatives can embrace. You know,,, "Conservatives" are what it was hep to call antio-libs before some genius looked up a latin sysllable and started calling them "new conservatives" or "the new version of conservatives" and they thought that was a smart idea so they now say "neo cons" as though the base of Conservative does not exist.

And then,,, we see these highly schooled, intelligent and incisive thinkers blat their anger all over these post areas.

This is the intelligent way of turning those who have thinking which is flawed into people who will re think things and agree with them.

That works.

Sure. That kind of stuff is a GREAT way to convince ME.

Yes. It surely is.
Reply to this comment
by babooph November 13, 2008 9:02 PM EST
The general must have gotten his bribe $ from the war industry guys & is standing up for their profits.
Reply to this comment
by promaclaura November 13, 2008 8:32 PM EST
For God''s sake it''s a missle INTERCEPTOR system not nukes. This system will not be up and running until 2011/2012, by then Iran and North Korea will have missile capability (with help from the Russians). Everyone, just drop your "Bush Hate" and wake up. Conservatives have not made Bush the boogey man like libs have, once and for all "terrorists" are the bad guys and deserve our condemnation. Jeez, it''s soooo stupid to hear libs start to froth at the mouth about "Bush" and then turn around and defend the mentality and rights of terrorist states. Bush is practically out the door, will you please finally join us in the war on terror, intead of fighting republicans?
Reply to this comment
by jb01201a November 13, 2008 8:21 PM EST
Well lookie here: I hope all this concern about Iranan nuclear threat is not the beginning of another mini "cold war". The US should really consider unilaterial disarment, while watching the rest of the world to see if they will joing in. ----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------


Posted by guatom
Now, the "one" does not have to have any type of missile shields to help the US, all he needs to do is wave his "hand" and all those nasty missiles will go away.
The statement above is the kind of blantant stupidity that is you, your party and your media. To think, we should just disarm and to think this kind of thinking was in England before WW2. We are in trouble with the "one" in the whitehouse but you never know, he will decend from the heavens and help us all. I feel real secure now.
Reply to this comment
by indivthinker November 13, 2008 8:15 PM EST
We need to liquidate any differences between Russia and the U.S....Why don''''t we let Russia worry about Nukes coming their way...instead uf sticking our big noses in Russia''''s "backyard"....Europe is their continent...not ours.

Posted by guadalcanal3 at 02:53 PM : Nov 13, 2008

Europe may not be our backyard, but it is the backyard of our closest allies. To turn a blind eye and let Russia dictate policy in Europe is like turning a blind eye to the Middle East by letting Iran have their way with things there.

We have just as much right to protect our interests (our allies and resources) as Russia. Our allies have that right too. Eastern European countries like the Czech Republic and Poland have the right to defend themselves with or without Russia''s consent.

Russia is being the total aggressor here. From their invasion of Georgian territory, the deployment of battle fleets to Venezuela, the selling of weapons to Iran, and the threats made against Poland and Europe, Russia has made it clear that they contradict Western interests as much as they possibly can.

On this specific issue, Russia knows that the missile defense system has no capability to stop Russia''s 3000+ ICBM nuclear warheads. It has the capability to stop about 20 missiles, which is no threat to the magnitude of Russia''s strength. Russia just wants to expand the issue and make a big deal about to justify its other intentions (what ever they be).
Reply to this comment
by indivthinker November 13, 2008 8:15 PM EST
We need to liquidate any differences between Russia and the U.S....Why don''''t we let Russia worry about Nukes coming their way...instead uf sticking our big noses in Russia''''s "backyard"....Europe is their continent...not ours.

Posted by guadalcanal3 at 02:53 PM : Nov 13, 2008

Europe may not be our backyard, but it is the backyard of our closest allies. To turn a blind eye and let Russia dictate policy in Europe is like turning a blind eye to the Middle East by letting Iran have their way with things there.

We have just as much right to protect our interests (our allies and resources) as Russia. Our allies have that right too. Eastern European countries like the Czech Republic and Poland have the right to defend themselves with or without Russia''s consent.

Russia is being the total aggressor here. From their invasion of Georgian territory, the deployment of battle fleets to Venezuela, the selling of weapons to Iran, and the threats made against Poland and Europe, Russia has made it clear that they contradict Western interests as much as they possibly can.

On this specific issue, Russia knows that the missile defense system has no capability to stop Russia''s 3000+ ICBM nuclear warheads. It has the capability to stop about 20 missiles, which is no threat to the magnitude of Russia''s strength. Russia just wants to expand the issue and make a big deal about to justify its other intentions (what ever they be).
Reply to this comment
by indivthinker November 13, 2008 8:04 PM EST
Caiboubarbie, our intelligence agencies also said Sadam had WMD. Do you truly believe there were no terrorists in Iraq before the invasion? Would you consider Sadam and his sons terrorists or were they just genocidal butchers? EVERY COUNTRY in the middle east contains terrorists to believe otherwise is purposeful blind indifferance.

Posted by notblue at 02:56 PM : Nov 13, 2008

You are kidding me, right? Saddam paid $25000 to the families of suicide bombers that struck Israeli targets. He gassed the Kurds in his country. He launched an unprovoked invasion of Kuwait. He defied international law. He kicked out the weapons expectors. He rejected the authority of the UN to come clean about his WMD programs. He provoked the entire world into isolating Iraq, and the US and UK (and allies) were forced to deal with Saddam by military force. The other alternative would be to allow a proven madman to get his hands on WMDs.

He was a terrorist, a human rights genocidal dictator, and insane. Taking him out has made the world a better place.
Reply to this comment
by jimfenton-2009 November 13, 2008 6:00 PM EST
lite the freakin fuse. i''m tired of being threatened by *** war mongers jim f.
Reply to this comment
See all 153 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook