Senators, Bankers Clash Over Bailout
Banks Say Taxpayer Money Not Being Used For Salaries, Bonuses, But Some Lawmakers Unconvinced
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Banks On Bailout Money
The billions of tax dollars distributed to banks to jumpstart the economy have not had the anticipated effect. Bankers were grilled before Congress on why not. Sharyl Attkisson reports.
-
Video
Bankers Grilled In Congress
Bankers and lawmakers held a lively discussion on how to best use government funds to revitalize the economy. Some Congress members said the banks are not lending as much as they should. Susan Roberts report.
-
Video
Did Paulson Mislead Congress?
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's original rescue plan was to buy up bad mortgage investments. But now the Fed has announced it won't buy up those bad assets after all. Anthony Mason reports.
-
-
Photo
Panelists testify at a Senate Banking Committee hearing Nov. 13, 2008, on financial institutions' use of federal bailout funds. President Bush signed the $700 billion bailout bill last month, but critics have charged that there is little consistency or oversight in the way the money is distributed or used. (CBS)
-
Photo
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson speaks during a news conference at the Treasury Department in Washington, Nov. 12, 2008. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
-
-
Interactive
Eye On The Economy
In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.
-
Timeline
Bear Stearns Bailout
A look at recent events at the 85-year-old investment firm.
Barry L. Zubrow, chief risk officer with JP Morgan Chase, told the Senate Banking Committee that a portion of the $25 billion capital infusion it received from the Treasury Department was being deployed to "expand the flow of credit" and to assist with rewriting residential mortgages for up to 400,000 families.
Zubrow and executives with Goldman Sachs Inc., Bank of America and Wells Fargo & Co. told the committee that that none of the $85 billion they have received collectively from the government is being used to pay salaries or bonuses.
"The committee has asked whether (bailout) funds would be spent on executive compensation," said Jon Campbell, regional banking president for Wells Fargo & Co. in his testimony. "The answer is no. Wells Fargo doesn't need the government investment to pay for bonuses or compensation."
But lawmakers said there was little evidence that the bailout money had been used to expand lending as intended, and pressed bank leaders for commitments.
"Let me say as clearly as I can," said committee chairman Sen. Christopher Dodd, a Democrat. "Hoarding capital and acquiring healthy banks are not - I repeat are not - reasons why Congress authorized $700 billion in emergency funding."
With foreclosures still on the rise, Dodd said the bailout has done little to "stop the bleeding," reports CBS News investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson.
"It is still confounding to me why the Secretary of the Treasury and others refuse to understand this is the heart of the problem," he said.
Sen. Charles Schumer, a Democrat, said he and other lawmakers are looking at requiring banks to make more loans as a condition for taking part in the $350 billion second half of the bailout. "Any new capital injections must come with tougher requirements," he said.
Treasury has already loaned out or committed $290 billion of the first half. Democrats are working on a bill they hope to pass next week that would devote another $25 billion to the beleaguered auto industry, with the specific intent of helping General Motors Corp. avoid bankruptcy.
Lawmakers hoped that that the infusion of capital to banks would enable them to increase lending. But so far that hasn't happened, lawmakers say.
Sen. Tim Johnson, a Democrat, said he was alarmed by reports of continued generous compensation packages and benefits for executives of companies getting bailout funds.
"The intent of the bailout was to stabilize troubled financial institutions and help those businesses and individuals and Main Street affected by the credit freeze," said Johnson. "Those making the decisions on how to spend the $700 billion, and those receiving the funds, must remember this intended use."
Let me say as clearly as I can. Hoarding capital and acquiring healthy banks are not - I repeat are not - reasons why Congress authorized $700 billion in emergency funding.
Sen. Christopher Dodd, Senate Banking Committee Chairman"It flies in the face of reality that you can somehow draw these bright lines between public monies and private monies and retained earnings when it comes to some of these issues," said Dodd.
Congress can block release of the second $350 billion. It can also rewrite the law to put new conditions on its use.
On The Early Show, Sen. Dodd was asked if he thought bankers who attended Thursday's committee hearing got the message.
"Well, I'd like to tell you they did, but I doubt it," he said.
He blasted bankers for not showing that the billions of dollars in federal assistance that they have received are being put to proper use and accomplishing their intended public benefits.

"And the question everyone asks: Where is the commensurate responsibility to mitigate foreclosures, to get money out the door to lenders, to understand you don't give bonuses or necessarily dividends to shareholders? The major job here is to get credit moving. Only one bank yesterday said they even had a committee established to see if they couldn't seek out credit-worthy bowers to get money out to, to start credit flowing.
"There is more than a level of exasperation," Dodd said. "Without any question, I'm tired of the jaw-boning. I started pleading two years ago, then sort of begging them to do things, then jaw-boning on it. but obviously we're running out of patience on that."
In the light of yesterday's depressing foreclosure numbers - more than a quarter of a million houses in foreclosure, and 84,000 homes reported now vacant where their owners have just walked away, Dodd focused on the families who are hurt.
"Put it in these terms: 9,128 foreclosures per day now. That's every single day, close to 10,000 families are adversely affected by this and that is the root cause of our financial difficulties. If you can put a tourniquet on that you really do begin to get to the bottom of this and reverse this cycle."
Dodd said two courses of action need to be taken: rewriting a provision of the $700 billion bailout package which would help families avert home foreclosures, as backed by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation chairwoman Sheila Bair. "The treasury is still reluctant to move on it as they should," Dodd said.
"The second is, if you have a boat, a vacation home and a principal residence, under bankruptcy law your boat and your vacation home are protected, you get to keep those, but your principal residence goes. Assume you're an American like most people are who only have a principal residence: under that of course the bankruptcy court can take it. Why don't we just change that provision of law? That would get borrowers and lenders to negotiate. Those two things I think would do a tremendous amount."
Hedge Funds Under The Microscope
Separately, the House Oversight Committee met today to examine the role that hedge funds may have played in recent market turbulence.
The broader debate on the use of the bailout fund may not be resolved until President-elect Barack Obama takes office on Jan. 20 and pursues policies for administering the rescue program that are likely to be more closely aligned with his Democratic allies in Congress.
The economic meltdown that Obama will inherit was publicly declared a recession on Thursday by a major global economic cooperative, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, of which the United States is one of 20 members.
The Paris-based OECD said in a statement that the economies of the U.S., Japan, and Europe were in recession, and the developed world's collective economy was on track to shrink 0.3 percent during 2009.
Attkisson reports that the massive taxpayer bailout of the banking system - sold to the American public as transparent - is veiled in secrecy.
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced Wednesday that the administration had decided to scrap what had originally been the centerpiece of the program - a proposal to buy troubled assets to get them off the books of banks as a way of promoting increased lending.
Instead, the government is using tax dollars to buy massive shares in some of the nation's biggest and most successful banks - with virtually no strings attached, reports Attkisson. And that's all allowed under Congress' plan.
Attkisson and the CBS News investigative team decided to ask the banks directly what they are doing with Americans' tax money. Their responses were, on the whole, less than enlightening.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 6
- next
See all 284 CommentsThere are no committees in place as yet and this guy (now) has no clue as to what to do. (a bad diversion from his "no oversight" plan).
If we as a nation would stop spending---just buy what we need--we would bring these banks and corporations to their knees. We are the ones supporting them--the middle class consumers.
The lenders, speculators and the greedy created this problem by lending money with "no questions asked".
The banks might be hurting, but the CEOs and overpaid executives aren''t. The tellers, loan officers, waitresses, clerks, factory workers and in some areas police and fire have either been laid off or had their hours cut. Some got no raises due to the economy---but these big honcho "think tanks" aren''t having a problem.
The government won''t do a thing---it''s up to us--I have already made calls, faxes and emails.
Posted by gop_will_Win
So???? We can just print more, right????? It''s not like we have to back it with anything but our "good" word.
Posted by gop_will_Win
Ahhhhh a voice from the thieving GOP--did you get your Chri$tmas pre$ent from Bush already?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by omega40
=====================
Money can only be printed when republicans are in charge you big dummy!
It look s like the average person is in for a rough time for the forseeable future, We need to make sure that those that caused these problems lose everything. If the innocent have to suffer the guilty need to suffer times ten.
Posted by gop_will_Win at 09:23 AM : Nov 13, 2008
Only an idiot would still spew this garbage---come on big guy---show us where he was raised a Muslim---I''d like to see at least 5 independant links---oh wait--you don''t read and Faux news, Hannity or lintball aren''t smart enough to have any objectivity. Forget it---I know how to find the FACTS and you just stay comfy making an azz of yourself.
the powers that be have us distracted with leftist and rightist arguments and they have successfully divided this country. While we are busy blaming reps or dems the powers that be that could care less about left wing or right wing idealogies are raping the country.
if we the people do not take our heads out of our ***** soon we won''t have much left to argue about.
Both sides need to reel it in and pull together otherwise prepare for the worst.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by FloydZeppd
========================
Is Ramadan when you islamic liberals eat salty chinese noodles?
amen..
Your comment is right on the money. "They" have always tried to keep us at each others throats. "They" don''t want us to unite and work together. "They" enjoy the bickering and back stabbing, it keeps us right where "they" want us.
ha,ha,ha,ha! what a joke
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by usadvisor101
==========================
Only a liberal who lives off government handouts would not understand Rush.
like we need to listen to another pathetic worthless fatazz like you.....yeah you bet clown. typical gop loser, still picking dumbazz limliar as if anyone listens to him!!
ha,ha,ha,ha! what a joke
-----
Posted by usadvisor101
Careful Tina, keep your line taunt, adjust your drag, you don''t want to lose him...
loosing fish is a sin.
See reverse for the answer.
Reverse side;
Why is the GOP so stupid? And doesn''''t understand what they are reading.
See reverse for the answer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by william82281
======================
Because the insurance companies are like the banks, thwey have people who vote republican working for them. Its important to save them silly.
House And Senate Committees Delve Into U.S. Financial Crisis.
What a pile of propaganda. And the PEOPLE believe and have faith in it. LOOK AROUND PEOPLE!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/09/AR2008110902155.html
It is at the point now I hope all of the banks go under and the CEOs and their families are out on the streets where angry mobs chase them down.
This is total B.S. we the American people have been robbed blind and everyone sits on their hands and does nothing.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants"
Thomas Jefferson
In this case it definately needs to be the blood of the tyrants, and their families
Posted by getoffmine1 at 11:02 AM : Nov 13, 2008"
Derivatives
Japanese companies don''t need unions because the Japanese government does the work that the unions do. Those who want to say bad things about unions miss this point. Japan is more socialistic than the US and they were still able to innovate more. When workers are healthy, happy and well-educated, the entire country benefits.
(Congress) https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml
(Senate) http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Posted by berniew4 a
It is the lazy unions fault, they are keeping America from becoming the free market utopia that Ronald Reagan promised us almost twenty eight years ago. We would have had a city on the hill with streets paved in gold from the perennial benefits of trickle down.
The un-American lazy and poor have virtually destroyed this country by forcing bankers to give them loans they could not afford, and by demanding more than their fair share of the company''s success.
Posted by berniew4 at 11:07 AM : Nov 13, 2008
Better quality - lower price.
Better management. Lower workplace safety standards. Less environmental protections and legal protections. Protectionism, including currency exchange rate manipulation.
Take your pick. There''s a MULTITUDE of ways that the USA has been making itself uncompetitive FOR DECADES. Unions are only one small piece of the puzzle.
Posted by berniew4 at 11:07 AM : Nov 13, 2008
Better quality - lower price.
Better management. Lower workplace safety standards. Less environmental protections and legal protections. Protectionism, including currency exchange rate manipulation.
Take your pick. There''''s a MULTITUDE of ways that the USA has been making itself uncompetitive FOR DECADES. Unions are only one small piece of the puzzle.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by txgrouch2007
========================
Foreign car companies are doing just as bad as the big three you sick America hating freaks!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by william82281
=========================
Because they can make more in fees this way.
Isn''t that was the Fed does???
If the bailout plan could find the money, why couldn''t the Fed?
Posted by Element51 at 11:34 AM : Nov 13, 2008
That''s YOUR opinion. My experience was the exact opposite.
Reaganomics was VERY VERY GOOD to me.
Posted by gop_will_win at 11:36 AM : Nov 13, 2008
So who''s bailing THEM out? Are THEY being nationalized???
Is Toyota announcing that it will RUN OUT OF CASH NEXT YEAR???
Put your thinking cap on TIGHTER next time.
Congress is approaching the CAFE gas mileage standards the wrong way. Just create an $8,000 gas hog tax on all vehicles that fail to get 35mpg in the city. If your new car doesn''t get 35mpg city - you pay an extra 8K.
Also, a free marketing tip for GM. Rename all of your cars Cadillac. Call your current Cadillac models - Cadillac Premium. If you can fool Pelosi into giving you billions and billions, you can fool everyone else into believing those cheap Saturn and Chevy models are really Cadillacs.
It is becoming increasingly obvious that the Congress and the average citizen were "railroaded" into a situation believing the country would disintegrate in a week and work had to be done to prevent it immediately!
The Great Emperor Bush II and Hank "Old Baldy" Paulson got what they wanted (almost). Two months have gone by, much of the money has not been spent, and the country is still here, BARELY!
It is obvious that we were all victims of a massive "STING" by the administration and much of that money is going to "fall off the truck" when the Great Emperor Bush II leaves. The Great Emperor Bush II shouted that the "sky is falling" and we were all stupid enough to believe him AGAIN!
When will we ever learned NEVER to trust anyone named BUSH!!!!
SIG HEIL, I''M A "CON MAN" AND PROUD OF IT!!!, BUSH!!!
Posted by william82281 at 11:39 AM : Nov 13, 2008
There are probably DOZENS of reasons why employers want to hire illegal workers. Here are just a few:
- Don''t need to give health insurance
- Don''t need to follow workplace safety standards
- Don''t need to pay minimum wage
- Don''t need to worry about unions
- Easier to make them do illegal stuff for you
- Easier to make them work in inhuman working conditions
- Easier to make them work longer hours for no extra pay
- Less worker complaints in general
The noose of government regulation is much tighter when you hire legal workers. AND OUR GOVERNMENT KNOWS THAT, they want us to be at their mercy.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 6
- next
See all 284 Comments