Truth On Trial
Who Killed A Doctor's Young Beautiful Wife?
-
Play CBS Video Video More From David Tipton Dr. David Tipton talks about the murder of his wife Karen, his daughters' reaction, and how he feels about Daniel Wade Moore's new trial.
-
Video 3D Crime Scene Tour Crime scene analyst and defense witness Bob Tressel discusses the Tipton crime scene using a 3D model.
-
Video Truth On Trial Who killed a doctor?s young, beautiful wife? Erin Moriarty reports for 48 Hours Mystery, Saturday, Nov. 15, at 10 p.m. ET/PT.
In February 2008, Daniel returned to court for the fight of his life. If possible, the attention focused on Daniel's second trial was even greater than the first. "For this town it’s become huge. People have this mental and vested interest in who killed Karen Tipton," Baggs explains.
Nearly nine years after Karen's brutal murder, Decatur, Ala. was hoping for justice.
Time had also passed for David. He returned to Decatur, this time bringing his daughters, 17-year-old Caroline and 13-year-old Catherine, to attend the murder trial of Daniel Wade Moore.
Virginia Byrd, Daniel's mother has endured her own wait for justice for a son she is certain is no murderer. "As soon as we can get him home, he’s gonna be fine."
But Daniel will never get home if it's up to Assistant State Attorney General Don Valeska. Amazingly, Valeska was again the lead prosecutor, even though he was accused of hiding the FBI report in the first trial.
"It was the most egregious case of prosecutorial misconduct that I have ever been aware of," Powell charges.
For the second time, Daniel’s life was on the line. Twelve new jurors would weigh the state's most compelling evidence.
Cameras weren't allowed in the courtroom, but five jurors from Daniel's second trial took 48 Hours through the case, starting with the prosecution's key evidence: the two hairs in the Tipton house.
"Did you believe that hair was Daniel Moore's hair?" Moriarty asks.
"I believe that particular hair was Daniel Moore's hair," a male juror replied.
The prosecution was very persuasive. They say it wasn't just the two hairs, but Daniel's initial confession to his Uncle Sparky.
A male juror said that was "absolutely" significant. "That's number two on the prosecution hit list."
And Daniel’s failed suicide attempt also troubled some of the jurors. "Why would he just absolutely freak out and start stabbing himself? To me, it just showed he was guilty, he knew that he was cornered," a female juror remarked.
When it was defense attorney Powell's turn, he gave jurors another explanation for the damning evidence against Daniel, especially the hairs inside the home.
"Daniel Moore had been in that house," Powell said. But he says he doesn't believe Daniel had been at the house on the day of the murder.
And several jurors did believe Daniel could have left those hairs months before the murder when he was in the Tipton house to fix the alarm.
As for stabbing himself at the police station, maybe Daniel was just plain scared. "I think so much was going on all of a sudden he wanted to die and just get out of it," one juror remarked.
And some jurors agreed with Uncle Sparky - that Daniel’s entire confession could have been made up. "I don’t know if he’s crying out for attention," another juror said, adding that he doesn't believe Daniel was actually confessing.
Remember, this time around Powell had that FBI report, the document that suggested Karen might have been killed out of jealousy or rage by someone she knew. Among her many wounds, Karen had literally been stabbed through the heart.
"What do you now know about Karen Tipton from that trial?" Moriarty asked a juror.
"She had a secret life," the juror replied.
On the stand, Powell confronted David about the pornography found on the home computer, but David had long grown tired of speculation about his marriage. "I'm the pot and porno guy. I'm the multiple affairs," he said. "I'm the, you know, wild, crazy, sex-party, sex-swap, wife-swapper, king of the sex-swapping club. All of these things have been said about me."
Some jurors were bothered by David's testimony.
"I know the truth about me and Karen and I don’t need a bunch of rumors and silliness to change that. I know the real stuff," David said.
At this trial, besides neighbor Pam Smith, there was also a new witness: a paver, who had been working on the driveway next door, testified he'd seen David's truck arrive home a good 90 minutes before the 911 call was made.
Produced by Jamie Stolz and Susan Mallie
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 41 CommentsThe two hairs that have been mentioned are not two hairs found anywhere. These are hairs found with blood on them in the bloody bed and found in the bloody wash clothe the killer used to cleen up. That absolutely without a doubt places Daniel Moore at the crime scene when the murder took place on that day. With the testing on the hairs being 1 out of 7.5 million it is injustice to the victom and victom's family to not find this killer guilty.
Also I have refused to watch another episode of 48 hour mystery because of their coverage. They have built this to be a movie and have slanted the TRUTH. Because of this all of their reports are tainted and is not worth watching.
GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT.
Hard evidence outweighs rumors and speculation everyday ... unless this is Decator, AL
Also not that only a defence motion can change the venue (location) of the trial. This is so that a "fair" trial can be heard. In this case with the small town local boy mentality the only fair trial would to move it out of that area. The victom's family has rights also and deserve to have a fair trial. This case needed to be moved out of that county.
Good for Daniel that he has a supportive family.
He was not found guilty during a fair and unbiased trial.
The trial where he was voted guilty was thrown out because of the acts of the prosecution. All the evidence and wittnesses were not heard/presented. In a trial where all the evidence was submitted, we had a hung jury.
Meg have you ever watched real murder interrogations on tv. The intensity. The badgering to get a confession. He was a drug addict. He wanted a fix. They were holding him there and hammering him with accusations of murder. That's what interagators do. They torture suspects to get a confession. Deprive them of sleep, make threats, rough them up a bit sometimes.
What about the wet shower at the Tiptons. What about the neighbor that saw her at the mailbox. What about the drugs found in the Tipton home. What about no trail of blood going down the steps. What about the paver saying Daniel was not the person he spoke to. What about the paver saying Tipton got home 90 minutes before the police. What about no blood on Daniels clothing, car, house, motel room. Nothing on his tools.
How about no finger prints at the scene. How bout the "wrong" facts Daniel made when he talked about being there when she was killed. Even the wrong city.
How bout Daniel had been to the house previously which would explain hair at the scene or where they planted. If it was a sexual assault, why was there no *****...or was there and it wasn't Daniels.
Sloppy investigation is the problem....it is not the fault of the defense attorney or Daniels family or the majority of the people in Deatur who say they do not have a case to convict Daniel. It is not the fault of the judge who threw the first trial out. It is that there is too much reasonable doubt to believe this man should be in prison.
I also believe the prosecution "finding" the missing hard drive will be another problem for the prosecution as well as Daniel being put in jail for a positive marijuana drug test the day the trial started only to have a "hair" sample prove he hasn't done any drugs for as long as the hair as grown on his head. I am sure the defense attorney will say...oh tests on his hair are good enough to be used to put him to death but not good enough to prove he didn't violate his probation.
How about the defense motive for murder. Sure makes sense to the majority of the people.
I live in the area and I am afraid of that killer Daniel Moore. He is guilty as sin. He admitted it and stabbed himself while being interviewed.
His has a large, very vocal family who have screamed to anyone who will listen that he is innocent trying to get him off, but his guilt has been proven. If the woman had not been beautiful and living an unconventional lifestyle, he would be in prison.
i have often wondered what happen to her computer hard drive. the prosecutors didnt think her hard drive was important? so it sits somewhere for 10 yrs. after all that has transpired concerning the mishandling of evidence and we are suppose to believe this was lost.
daniel was jailed for marijuana use before the trial began. testing his hair proves he has not used mj or another drug but he is still in jail.
Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. give it up prosecutor. you guys screwed up. big time. and you think a conviction of daniel will vindicate you, wrong
CBS chooses to leave out much of the evidence against Moore, but he provided detailed of slashing and stabbing Karen Tipton that had not been made public. Police also have a DNA match that is 99.8% certain to be Moore, and cannot be the husband.
Moore worked for the alarm company that maintained the Tipton home alarm, malfunctioning the week of the murder, so Karen Tipton would have let him in to fix the alarm. He told a relative that he was in the Tipton home robbing it when she was killed, and his hair was found on the scene.
He''s the killer. And he''s walking the streets free.
The first jury, back in 2002, convicted him, but the conviction was overturned because the judge ruled the defense did not have proper access to some files. The second trial, nine years after Mrs. Tipton''s murder, ended in a mistrial. Of course, this favors the defense. The longer they can drag this out, the more witnesses may die or have less clear memories, and the more lies the defense can spread.
This case has so much evidence pointing to Daniel Wade Moore that it is scary to think of this man out on the streets. There is no doubt in my mind at all that he is guilty.
Like Bundy, Daniel Wade Moore has a cult-like following of people who cannot believe his did this murder, though the evidence is clear.
I think the authorities wanted an easy target and easy conviction. So, they went after the local crack cocaine druggie. He was stupid to confess though.
Interesting how a certain woman saw the wife alive on the afternoon when she was supposedly murdered.
What''s with the GAY PORN on the good doctor''s home computer? Hmmm....
if he didn''t ''volunteer a confession'' to his uncle perhaps the police would have put more of an effort into finding the actual murdered.
due to mr moore''s own actions, the police are refusing to back down. to do so will cause them to look like fools and possibly open them to a lawsuit from mr moore.
i hope the third trail does not end in a hung jury. but i also hope mr moore is barred from suing the state.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 41 Comments