Truth On Trial
Who Killed A Doctor's Young Beautiful Wife?
-
Play CBS Video Video More From David Tipton Dr. David Tipton talks about the murder of his wife Karen, his daughters' reaction, and how he feels about Daniel Wade Moore's new trial.
-
Video 3D Crime Scene Tour Crime scene analyst and defense witness Bob Tressel discusses the Tipton crime scene using a 3D model.
-
Video Truth On Trial Who killed a doctor?s young, beautiful wife? Erin Moriarty reports for 48 Hours Mystery, Saturday, Nov. 15, at 10 p.m. ET/PT.
But David says, "Am I capable of killing somebody? Yup. Am I capable of killing a loved one? No. Am I capable of torturing my wife to death? That’s crazy."
And there is Daniel's confession to Uncle Sparky that led police to him in the first place. At trial, Daniel tells the jury that he made up that story. He says he was desperate to get back to his drugs, so he wanted his family to leave him alone.
Daniel’s confession notwithstanding, even with the two questionable hairs found at the scene, Powell believed the brutality of Karen's murder pointed to one man, and it wasn't Daniel. "Somebody got very angry and started out slapping her around, beating her and it just exploded from there to torture and murder," Powell said.
The jury deliberated for two days. On Jan. 23, 2003 Daniel was sentenced to death by lethal injection. He might still be on death row, if not for a discovery that saved his life and rocked Decatur.
Daniel's only hope was an appeal, but as Sherman Powell began to work on it, he never dreamed what he would learn just days after Moore's conviction.
First, there was a new witness: a Tipton neighbor who said she saw Karen alive by her mailbox the afternoon of her murder, at a time police believed she was already dead. Pam Smith says she called the police just days after the murder to tell them what she saw.
But Pam she never heard from police after making that initial call.
Police claim they have no record of Smith’s call. Asked if she thinks her call just got lost, Pam says, "I think my story didn't fit with their theory, that's what I think."
Powell was convinced that the state had deliberately suppressed evidence, so he immediately filed a motion for a new trial. What happened next changed Daniel's case forever: prosecutors turned over a 245 page report on Karen's murder, compiled by the FBI - a report that prosecutors had repeatedly denied existed.
In fact, the FBI had been involved from the start. The police had asked them to help develop suspects by analyzing information about the victim.
The report revealed that Karen had been leading a "secret life" which included "extra marital affairs." The FBI believed Karen may have known her killer and recommended that both David and his best friend Mike Ezell be given polygraphs, despite both men having been ruled out as suspects by police.
Why would the police and prosecution withhold information? "Because it shows opportunity and motive - someone other than me," Daniel says.
Prosecutors and police refused 48 Hours' request for an interview.
But David insists that the FBI document is not an official report, but simply an analysis of information gathered by local police. "Nothing that was evidence, as part of the investigation, was hidden from anybody."
Powell says that's not the point. "They're supposed to report all the evidence. All the leads, all the investigation. They didn't do that."
Judge Glenn Thompson, who had sent Daniel to death row two years earlier, agreed. In February 2005, in an extraordinary written decision, the judge accused Assistant Attorney General Don Valeska of intentionally suppressing evidence just to win a conviction.
What the judge did next was even more shocking. Ruling that a new trial would subject Moore to "double jeopardy" - trying him twice for the same crime - the judge did the only thing he felt was fair: he sent Daniel home.
The development was devastating for David and his daughters, who'd moved to North Carolina, 700 miles away from Decatur. "I think that he needs to be dead. I’m not allowed to kill him. The second best is to have the state kill him," he says.
But Daniel would not remain free for long. The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals agreed to review Judge Thompson's decision and stayed all proceedings.
After less than a week of freedom, Daniel was back behind bars at the Morgan County Jail. "Sometimes I think I did die that day in the interview room and that this is hell. Because it's like every time when you finally think it's fixing to be over, something else puts it off," he says.
It was then up to the Court of Criminal Appeals to decide whether to give Daniel a new trial or free him for good, a scary possibility for Karen’s daughters. Catherine and Caroline. "They are afraid that he would come after them. And why not? Everybody should be afraid," David says.
Produced by Jamie Stolz and Susan Mallie
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 41 CommentsThe two hairs that have been mentioned are not two hairs found anywhere. These are hairs found with blood on them in the bloody bed and found in the bloody wash clothe the killer used to cleen up. That absolutely without a doubt places Daniel Moore at the crime scene when the murder took place on that day. With the testing on the hairs being 1 out of 7.5 million it is injustice to the victom and victom's family to not find this killer guilty.
Also I have refused to watch another episode of 48 hour mystery because of their coverage. They have built this to be a movie and have slanted the TRUTH. Because of this all of their reports are tainted and is not worth watching.
GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT.
Hard evidence outweighs rumors and speculation everyday ... unless this is Decator, AL
Also not that only a defence motion can change the venue (location) of the trial. This is so that a "fair" trial can be heard. In this case with the small town local boy mentality the only fair trial would to move it out of that area. The victom's family has rights also and deserve to have a fair trial. This case needed to be moved out of that county.
Good for Daniel that he has a supportive family.
He was not found guilty during a fair and unbiased trial.
The trial where he was voted guilty was thrown out because of the acts of the prosecution. All the evidence and wittnesses were not heard/presented. In a trial where all the evidence was submitted, we had a hung jury.
Meg have you ever watched real murder interrogations on tv. The intensity. The badgering to get a confession. He was a drug addict. He wanted a fix. They were holding him there and hammering him with accusations of murder. That's what interagators do. They torture suspects to get a confession. Deprive them of sleep, make threats, rough them up a bit sometimes.
What about the wet shower at the Tiptons. What about the neighbor that saw her at the mailbox. What about the drugs found in the Tipton home. What about no trail of blood going down the steps. What about the paver saying Daniel was not the person he spoke to. What about the paver saying Tipton got home 90 minutes before the police. What about no blood on Daniels clothing, car, house, motel room. Nothing on his tools.
How about no finger prints at the scene. How bout the "wrong" facts Daniel made when he talked about being there when she was killed. Even the wrong city.
How bout Daniel had been to the house previously which would explain hair at the scene or where they planted. If it was a sexual assault, why was there no *****...or was there and it wasn't Daniels.
Sloppy investigation is the problem....it is not the fault of the defense attorney or Daniels family or the majority of the people in Deatur who say they do not have a case to convict Daniel. It is not the fault of the judge who threw the first trial out. It is that there is too much reasonable doubt to believe this man should be in prison.
I also believe the prosecution "finding" the missing hard drive will be another problem for the prosecution as well as Daniel being put in jail for a positive marijuana drug test the day the trial started only to have a "hair" sample prove he hasn't done any drugs for as long as the hair as grown on his head. I am sure the defense attorney will say...oh tests on his hair are good enough to be used to put him to death but not good enough to prove he didn't violate his probation.
How about the defense motive for murder. Sure makes sense to the majority of the people.
I live in the area and I am afraid of that killer Daniel Moore. He is guilty as sin. He admitted it and stabbed himself while being interviewed.
His has a large, very vocal family who have screamed to anyone who will listen that he is innocent trying to get him off, but his guilt has been proven. If the woman had not been beautiful and living an unconventional lifestyle, he would be in prison.
i have often wondered what happen to her computer hard drive. the prosecutors didnt think her hard drive was important? so it sits somewhere for 10 yrs. after all that has transpired concerning the mishandling of evidence and we are suppose to believe this was lost.
daniel was jailed for marijuana use before the trial began. testing his hair proves he has not used mj or another drug but he is still in jail.
Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. give it up prosecutor. you guys screwed up. big time. and you think a conviction of daniel will vindicate you, wrong
CBS chooses to leave out much of the evidence against Moore, but he provided detailed of slashing and stabbing Karen Tipton that had not been made public. Police also have a DNA match that is 99.8% certain to be Moore, and cannot be the husband.
Moore worked for the alarm company that maintained the Tipton home alarm, malfunctioning the week of the murder, so Karen Tipton would have let him in to fix the alarm. He told a relative that he was in the Tipton home robbing it when she was killed, and his hair was found on the scene.
He''s the killer. And he''s walking the streets free.
The first jury, back in 2002, convicted him, but the conviction was overturned because the judge ruled the defense did not have proper access to some files. The second trial, nine years after Mrs. Tipton''s murder, ended in a mistrial. Of course, this favors the defense. The longer they can drag this out, the more witnesses may die or have less clear memories, and the more lies the defense can spread.
This case has so much evidence pointing to Daniel Wade Moore that it is scary to think of this man out on the streets. There is no doubt in my mind at all that he is guilty.
Like Bundy, Daniel Wade Moore has a cult-like following of people who cannot believe his did this murder, though the evidence is clear.
I think the authorities wanted an easy target and easy conviction. So, they went after the local crack cocaine druggie. He was stupid to confess though.
Interesting how a certain woman saw the wife alive on the afternoon when she was supposedly murdered.
What''s with the GAY PORN on the good doctor''s home computer? Hmmm....
if he didn''t ''volunteer a confession'' to his uncle perhaps the police would have put more of an effort into finding the actual murdered.
due to mr moore''s own actions, the police are refusing to back down. to do so will cause them to look like fools and possibly open them to a lawsuit from mr moore.
i hope the third trail does not end in a hung jury. but i also hope mr moore is barred from suing the state.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 41 Comments