August 20, 2010 3:09 PM

Bush Moves To Shut Down Web Gambling

(AP)  The Bush administration is moving in its last weeks to complete regulations to enforce a controversial law that seeks to block Internet gambling. The move is drawing hot protests from Democratic lawmakers and supporters of online betting.

"This midnight rulemaking will tie the hands of the new administration, burden the financial services industry at a time of economic crisis and contradict the stated intent of the Financial Services Committee," the committee's Democratic chairman, Rep. Barney Frank, wrote this week to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.

Frank asked Paulson to postpone the regulation, which was reviewed by the White House budget office last week, usually a final step before publication in the Federal Register.

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said in response Tuesday that "no regulations are being rushed. They are all going through the process and getting the full due diligence required." She said she could not comment specifically on the Internet gambling rule because it was not yet final.

At issue is a law Congress passed hastily in 2006 when Senate Republicans, pushed by then-Majority Leader Bill Frist, attached it to an unrelated port security bill in a rush of year-end legislation. The law sought to curb online gambling by prohibiting financial institutions from accepting payments from credit cards, checks or electronic fund transfers to settle online wagers.

The result has been a cascade of disputes, because the law offered no clear definition of Internet gambling, instead referring to existing federal and state laws that themselves provoke differing interpretations.

Banks, credit unions and others have protested about being put in the position of enforcing an unclear law complicated by the difficulty of determining where payments are going and the fact that online betting businesses can disguise themselves with relative ease.

Officials with the Treasury and Federal Reserve testified before Frank's committee this year that they struggled to write the implementing regulation because of the law's vagueness. The regulation they proposed would require designated payment systems to establish procedures to identify and prohibit Internet gambling transactions. The regulation does not attempt a definition of illegal online gambling.

Frank's committee passed legislation in September to block the regulation and instead require rulemaking to define the term "unlawful Internet gambling."

The bill never passed the House, and the Treasury Department sent over its proposed final rule for review by the White House budget office late last month.

"It is irresponsible for the Bush administration to rush through a fundamentally flawed regulation that even representatives of the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve have stated on record is unworkable," said Jeffrey Sandman, spokesman for the Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative, which represents online gambling groups.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 52 Comments
by yetimaster November 14, 2008 5:10 AM EST
Actually i think this is the link...
http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/foia/ElectronicCommentForm.cfm?doc_id=R-1298&doc_ver=1&name=Prohibition%20on%20Funding%20of%20Unlawful%20Internet%20Gambling&date=20071001a
Reply to this comment
by yetimaster November 14, 2008 5:08 AM EST
America is land of the free. We invented poker. Now a bill has slipped in to take away our choice to enjoy an online game. This does not help the economy in any away by getting rid of it. Regardless if you agree with online gaming you probably believe in many of our American freedoms. This is just another way goverment can control us. Whats next, they tell us what to read?

Fill out the petition on the link and state:
* The federal agencies responsible for our nation''s economy should not be focused on Internet poker regulations.
* Finalization of the UIGEA rules will add additional burdens on our already crippled financial systems.
* Internet poker is a game of skill and form of recreation for millions of Americans; it should be exempted from the UIGEA.
* Please do not finalize the UIGEA regulations until their impact on our banking systems and average Americans has been fully studied.

Thanks

Please send this on





http://www.stoxpoker.com/blogentry_more.php?blogid=3380&langid=1&memberblog=false#MORE
Reply to this comment
by markavelli2 November 13, 2008 2:17 PM EST
Speculating oil from your home computer is more of a gamble than texas holdem. And Bush has already said he will veto any bills restricting oil speculators.

Bush is a moron. Unethical, synical, spitefull.....
Reply to this comment
by markavelli2 November 13, 2008 2:14 PM EST
Amazing, bush has no probs deregulating whatever he can but i guess a little online gambling is too much for him? Whats the problem Bush? afraid us common folk will go broke before your taxes and corporations can wipe us clean?
Reply to this comment
by choiceshaveconsequences November 13, 2008 12:11 PM EST
The only internet gambling I''m in favor of regulating is the one we make every four years on people we don''t really know saying things we don''t really understand and offering us promises we can''t really believe. Talk about your odds plummeting!
Reply to this comment
by downsteamjim November 12, 2008 9:51 PM EST
What are the odds the regulation fails?
Reply to this comment
by barbaram99 November 12, 2008 8:01 PM EST
yer can''t gamble on the computer in WA state. I live here. It is barred. I don''t buy them lotty tickets. They can choose not to pay the winner. I don''t visit the casinos. If bush can make it illegal to bet on the computer , I am in favour of it. WA state yer can''t. I AM NOT A CHURCHY PERSON.
Reply to this comment
by jt_lancer November 12, 2008 7:13 PM EST
azure11: "Online gambling SHOULD be ended. Or at the very least, taxed extremely heavy. If these morons want to throw their money away, then it may as well do some good for the country."

OR, you could mind your own *** business and let people make their own decisions.....
Reply to this comment
by jt_lancer November 12, 2008 7:12 PM EST
Let''s see... You are a CRIMINAL if you engage in online betting. Yet, states are continuously running TV ads to encourage you a buy Lotto tickets from the state-run, monopolized lottery.

In other words, gambling is only OK if it is sanctioned by the state and they can get a piece of the action?

Sounds more like the mob to me.

Tony Soprano for President!
Reply to this comment
by initialna November 12, 2008 7:04 PM EST
either way if they are "idiots" and want to give thier money away that is thier choice, not uncle sam''s. Many of our forefathers died to provide the same freedom to the "idoit" that you enjoy. And indiana... the seperation of church and state post was intended to contend with the radicalist who posted relegious beliefs as a reason to end online gambling, when that clearly has no place in this discussion.
Reply to this comment
See all 52 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook