Pelosi Pushes Aid For Auto Industry
House Speaker Calls For "Emergency And Limited Financial Assistance" During Lame Duck Session
-
Photo
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif. gestures during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2008. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
-
Play CBS Video
Video
GM Borders Bankruptcy
General Motors is losing $2 billion a month and is on the brink of bankruptcy. GM, Ford and Chrysler may receive emergency financial aid for the government. Anthony Mason reports.
-
Video
Obama's White House Welcome
Barack Obama met with President Bush in the Oval Office to begin a smooth transition of power while Michelle Obama met with Mrs. Bush and toured Washington, D.C. schools.
-
Video
Obama's Reality Check
President-elect Barack Obama made some expensive promises on the campaign trail. With the federal budget collapsing, Obama must now decide what steps to take next. Wyatt Andrews reports.
-
In-Depth
Q&A: Big Three Bailout?
Why Detroit's automakers might get a rescue package
-
Blog
Enter The Crypt
Read the latest behind-the-scenes news from Capitol Hill in this blog provided by our partner The Politico.
Four days after dismal financial reports from General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co., Pelosi backed legislation to make the automakers eligible for help under the $700 billion bailout measure that cleared Congress in October.
In a written statement, the California Democrat said the aid was needed "in order to prevent the failure of one or more of the major American automobile manufacturers, which would have a devastating impact on our economy, particularly on the men and women who work in that industry."
"Congress and the Bush administration must take immediate action," she added. Administration officials have concluded that the bailout bill that passed earlier does not permit loans to the auto industry, but lawmakers are expected to return to the Capitol for a brief post-election session beginning next week.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., also supports help for the industry, and he issued a statement saying Democrats were "determined to pass legislation that will save the jobs of millions" as part of a post-election session.
"This will only get done if President Bush and Senate Republicans work with us in a bipartisan fashion, and I am confident they will do what is right for our economy," he said.
In 1979, the government famously bailed out Chrysler with a $1.5 billion loan, which the company paid back just four years later. But this time, critics complain General Motors, Ford and Chrysler should not be rewarded for bad management, reports CBS News business correspondent Anthony Mason.
"The Big Three make products that Americans don't want to buy," Dan Ikenson, of the Cato Institute, told CBS News. "So shouldn't you at least do that before you ask for a subsidy from the U.S. taxpayer?"
Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm has a different view.
"This industry supports one in ten jobs in the country," Granholm told CBS' The Early Show on Wednesday.
"If this industry is allowed to fail, there will be a ripple effect throughout the nation," she said. "This government decided that it was going to step in and throw $700 billion at the financial sector. We're just asking for a fraction of that."
The plight of the industry has drawn attention from the White House and the incoming Obama administration in recent days, as well as among lawmakers.
Last week, President-elect Obama prodded the Bush administration to do more to help the industry, and on Monday, aides said he raised the issue with President Bush in an Oval Office conversation meant to underscore a smooth transition of power.
Officials familiar with the conversation said the president replied he was open to the idea.
Before adjourning for the elections, Congress passed legislation providing for $25 billion in government-backed loans to the automakers to prod them to retool their factories to make more efficient vehicles.
Since then, executives from GM, Ford and Chrysler LLC and officials in the United Autoworkers union have called for more than that to avert a possible collapse of one of the nation's most basic industries, including a $25 billion loan to help keep the companies afloat and $25 billion more to help cover future health care payments for about 780,000 retirees and their dependents.
GM and Ford reported last week that they spent down their cash reserves by a combined $14.6 billion in the past three months. Ford said it would slash more than 2,000 white collar jobs.
GM's sales fell 45 percent in October; it's bleeding $2 billion a month and can't borrow, leaving the world's biggest automaker on the brink of bankruptcy, reports Mason.
"We are down to days; maybe a couple of weeks," Rebecca Lindland, an auto analyst at Global Insight, Inc., told CBS News.
If even one of Detroit's Big Three fails, according to a new study, 2.5 million jobs could be lost as the impact spreads from workers to dealers to suppliers, reports Mason.
"This is not a vacuum," said Lindland. "This is not just one company. This is a domino effect. Where one company goes down, you're going to see the industry go down as well."
Pelosi's statement did not specify how large an aid package she prefers.
Instead, she said she had asked Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, to draft legislation.
A companion effort is under way in the Senate.
The Senate is scheduled to meet next week in a post-election session, but until Pelosi issued her statement, it was not clear the House would follow suit.
The House already has passed legislation to provide additional unemployment insurance benefits for some of the growing ranks of the nation's jobless, as well as a separate measure to stimulate the economy.
That meant the Senate could have passed either or both bills and sent them to the White House for Bush's signature without further action by the House.
Pelosi's announcement changed that, and raised the possibility of a post-election session that covers more areas.
The Bush administration, for example, has said that enactment of a free trade agreement with Colombia is its top priority in Congress.
Many Democrats oppose the proposed agreement as written. But it is unclear what, if any, compromise might be possible that would allow auto assistance and a trade agreement to be the last major measures signed into law by the outgoing president.
In her statement, Pelosi said any assistance to the industry should include limits on executive compensation, rigorous government review authority and other taxpayer protections.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.




- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 106 CommentsDemocrats don''t care about the little guy! They''re only for rich corporations!
Of course she does - she''s a dingbat! One hundred years ago she''d have been bailing out the buggy makers.
Lucky for Pelosi she must think she''s playing with Monopoly money. There''s plenty for every badly run business (you listening Circuit City?) as well as for universal health care, our military and, for sure, there''s going to be enough to ensure social security is solvent in twenty years when it''s time for me to starting withdrawing the money I''ve been contributing.
These fools (Repubs and Dems alike) are going to bankrupt the lot of us. Or am I forgetting some gigantic pot of gold that hasn''t been figured into the equation? We keep voting in whoever promises the most goodies, not once considering who will ultimately end up paying.
--
100 years ago, Henry Ford built up his company by paying his workers enough to be able to afford one.
http://www.planetpapers.com/Assets/292.php
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aso/databank/entries/btford.html
Democrats don''''t care about the little guy! They''''re only for rich corporations!
Posted by HawkSprings at 03:58 PM : Nov 11, 2008
---
You''ll find plenty of Republicans supporting it too; and it''s still the President who gets to sign or veto it.
I wish it was as one-sided as you suggest.
Posted by HawkSprings at 04:16 PM : Nov 11, 2008
I know. I''m glad you agree.
I thought trickel down economics worked because if the welathy had more money they would invest it into new technologies and infrastrucutre creating more jobs and making the ocuntry better.... Where did Reaganomics go wrong ???? Didn''t Bush give massive tax breaks to corps and wealthy... so where are all these jobs/infrastructure. Why 8 years later is the country in ruin.
If the middle class is not strong the entire foundation of this country will crack and fall. Guess what is happening. All you people complaining about unions and workers being paid to much are the problem. The wealth of this country shoud be in the hands of the middle class not the ivy elite who protect the few over the many
Republicans need to be willing to return that financial might to the worker or there is no chance of recovery, and that will be followed by a civil war.
It is coming their is no way we can co-exist
So what happened? Toyota, Honda, Volkswagen and a host of others built the cars that Detroit should have built and have been kicking their butts in the marketplace since the early 70%u2019s.
All this time, the big bosses paid themselves very handsome bonuses and fought with the unions to reduce their wages, insurance, and retirement benefits. And what did they do with the money they managed to squeeze out of the unions. Retool their factories? Spend it on new efficient designs and concepts? No, it ended up in their wallets and there it stayed.
Now they come to Washington weeping crocodile tears. Boo-hoo-hoo! We%u2019re going to have to lay people off if you don%u2019t give us more money! They have nobody to blame for their selfish and very shortsighted business plan. They shouldn%u2019t get a dime unless the top two layers of management are thrown out with no golden parachutes. Then , just maybe, they could begin to make a decent product.
The sooner Pelosi disappears from a leadership position the sooner America will be back on track to recovery.
Don''t get me wrong I don''t want good Americans to lose their jobs, but the executives are responsible for running this company into the ground and perching themselves so precariously on the edge of HUGE profits or bankruptcy. It''s rediculous, and they will take their millions and continue to live a "lesser" lifestyle that would be very agreeable to ANY of us down here working for a living.
If they REALLY want to do a bailout, how about taking that money they keep giving to the the insurance companies/banks etc....and go directly to the mortagage companies and pay off mortages? How about going DIRECTLY to the credit card companies and paying off credit cards? Talk about a stimulus...take the money DIRECTLY to where we are having to funnel it ourselves and bailing US out, so that we have more money to spend, so we can go shopping and help the economy. How about doing that?
The Realistic Definition of Capitalism should be changed in all world Dictionaries.
NO MONEY FOR DETROIT PERIOD......
If they REALLY want to do a bailout, how about taking that money they keep giving to the the insurance companies/banks etc....and go directly to the mortagage companies and pay off mortages? How about going DIRECTLY to the credit card companies and paying off credit cards? Talk about a stimulus...take the money DIRECTLY to where we are having to funnel it ourselves and bailing US out, so that we have more money to spend, so we can go shopping and help the economy. How about doing that?
Posted by anitaymoore at 04:42 PM : Nov 11, 2008
Unfortunately most of your fellow country men, will just charge up those debts again and we will re-visit this in another decade. How about self responsibility and if you have too much debt, too bad everyone makes mistakes but how do we stop the mistakes by bailing everyone out? what kind of lesson is this?
This is just ridiculous. we will become a beggar nation before our eyes.
I hate the UAW, I want the Government to send me the money I have lost on my 401K. Why should these UAW *** get their retirement secured and not mine.
Keep this kind of *** up and Obama''s stay to the White House will be very short.
I hate the UAW, I want the Government to send me the money I have lost on my 401K. Why should these UAW *** get their retirement secured and not mine.
Keep this kind of *** up and Obama''''''''s stay to the White House will be very short.
----------------------------------
----------------------------------------
------
Posted by CPelzar at 05:32 PM : Nov 11, 2008
AGREED! maybe if the FN unions weren''''t sucking the blood out of the Big 3, the Big 3 would still be in business!
-- JOIN A UNION !! Then you could have the benefit of a "group" fighting for YOUR rights too!
Join a union. That''s what they are organized for - to protect your rights. grin
Why don''t we all just STOP paying taxes... THEN all the Gov. (Socialist) spending would dry up? LoL
The Auto industry needs to collapse so it can rebuild itself. For decades it has been operating using obsolete manufacturing practices and producing poorly made cars. If it weren''t for the competition from Japanese Automakers, US made cars would still only last barely five years. GM has been selling many models at a loss for years.
Obviously you don''t know the history of Unions in this great country of ours. Go back to High School.
You cannot blame the unions for the companies downfall. The executives are the ones that are running the company too close to the edge of either BANKRUPTCY or Disgusting profits. They don''t seem to be able to manage their wealth.
The workers are just trying to keep up with inflations through collective bargaining.
There''ll be none of this private personal business privateering while we''ve got democrats to run things for us.
Posted by ThatGuy56 at 05:26 PM : Nov 11, 2008
Just pretend it is going to the banks/bankers
Treasury Made Controversial Tax Policy Change Under Cover Of Bailout Debate
Banks enjoy the windfall $140 Billion of Paulson''s secret modification to Section 382 of the Tax Code
Why is everything the GOP does a secret?
Good thing Ohio at least has a few Honda Plants and the 100,000 jobs related to that to offset the job losses the big 3 have inflicted on our state.
As far as I''m concerned, My Honda Civic (89% made in the USA) is more "American" than my Father''s Ford (22% made in USA).
Let''''s see: pre-OSHA, pre-benefits, pre-HR rules, pre-government oversights UNIONS HAD their place...NOW they DON''''T!!! get over it!!!
------------------
Hmmm... are you sure?? Seems to be doing ME some good for about 10 years now. And IF .. they were gone - do you think the GOVT. would continue to take care of you ? And look out for YOU rights? Would they do a better job looking out for you, than YOU can do for yourself.
I hate to see someone so resigned to letting everyone and everyTHING else control their lives. BUt if that''s the way you choose to live. Go on with you hatred.
Just hang in there. WE''ll continue to fight for ALL workers rights in this country, and you can just sit back and enjoy the benefits of it.
Join a UNION and YOU could be "overpaid" too!
I don''t know of ANYONE who really believes they are overpaid. INcluding the Execs that work for the big 3 automakers and the big wigs on Wall Street. Go out and get your own money then! Stop whining that someone else is "...overpaid"
As far as I''''m concerned, My Honda Civic (89% made in the USA) is more "American" than my Father''''s Ford (22% made in USA).
Posted by ralan40
Look for the UAW sticker on the inside of the doorjamb on your precious Honda. It''s there. Made by Americas finest OVERPAID workers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by pelosilover at 06:22 PM : Nov 11, 2008
You HAD your place... at a job ... that you are afraid of losing. I''m not scared of losing mine. Maybe the unions DO still have a place. Hmmm?
I have been a UNION member for 16 years. I mean that THEY have been to MY benefit for at least that long.
Furthermore Toyota and Honda have UAW plants in the United States (cuz they are smart) I know this because I get a list of "approved" (by the union) vehicles to buy to support my union (AMERICAN) brothers and sisters.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by pelosilover
Ahh... now it makes sense. A sales person. Of course you don''t want anyone else to make a decent wage. But I would BET... that I still make more than you ... by the hour. Enjoy your long days and pressure.
How ARE the benefits in sales ? Paid vacation? (nope) paid holidays (nope)
All the time off that you can afford huh? Enjoy. I wouldn''t expect you to understand the REAL WORLD
Thank you for the support. I don''t believe the unions are a "dead horse" as SOME people do.
I can''t believe that some people really believe they have no use anymore. Oh well.
Posted by rxzyu at 07:18 PM : Nov 11, 2008
Up yours.
At this point, straight white males who were born in this country are ENTITLED to have any d@*n attitude they want.
I keep saying - now that we have a "black" President, then either whites should get full minority benefits, or the Affirmative Action program should be ended. We whites have been taking it on the chin for too long.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 106 Comments