February 11, 2009 2:02 PM

Buddy, Can You Spare A Billion?

(CBS/AP)  The government's $700 billion bailout plan, which won Congressional approval in October, was designed to ease the mounting stresses on the nation's economic crisis. But the controversial legislation has invited a chorus of financial rescue pleas from industries nationwide and sparked controversy over which companies, if any, deserve a government lifeline.

Most recently, the situation surrounding insurance giant American International Group has underscored the problem. When the government offered an emergency loan to AIG in September, eyebrows shot up at the $85 billion price tag. Now it looks like pocket change.

The size of the AIG lifeline swelled to more than $150 billion on Monday, a record for a private company. But the head of the broader financial rescue package was cool to other companies reaching for a piece of the bailout pie.

The new AIG package includes a $40 billion chunk of the $700 billion financial bailout. It's the first time money from the big rescue bill has gone to any company other than a bank.

General Motors, Ford and Chrysler, burning through cash and bleeding jobs, are prodding the government for more help. The leaders of the House and Senate have urged Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to get some of the $700 billion to the Big Three.

The automakers, covering all their options, are also pushing to get help as part of a new, multibillion-dollar stimulus package for the economy if Democrats push it through Congress when a lame-duck session convenes next week.

President-elect Barack Obama has said his transition team would explore options to provide relief to the auto industry, and President George W. Bush's press secretary said Monday the White House would "listen to" Congress if they try to help automakers.

Any money would be on top of the $25 billion in loans that Congress passed in September to help retool auto plants to build more fuel-efficient vehicles.

Neel Kashkari, the interim head of the $700 billion bailout program, was cool to the idea of funneling the money to companies beyond banks and AIG.

"This morning's action with AIG was a one-off event necessary for financial stability. It is not the establishment of a new program," he said at a financial conference in New York.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the Treasury has committed all but $60 billion of the first $350 billion in funds granted by Congress under the bailout plan.

In a separate development late Monday, the Fed granted the request of credit card company American Express Co. to become a bank holding company.

Although the new status will subject the company to greater regulatory scrutiny, American Express will also gain access to the Fed's emergency lending program. The company, which last month announced plans to slash its global work force, has been hard hit by the credit crisis as even the more affluent consumers the company caters to struggle to pay off their debts.

The original Fed loan to AIG was $85 billion, and the Fed added a $38 billion loan in October. But that has not been enough to firm up the company, which is so big and interconnected to other firms that its failure would devastate the economy.

Under the new plan, the Fed will provide $60 billion in loans. The Treasury will provide $40 billion to buy up preferred stock. And the government will spend close to $53 billion to buy up mortgage-backed assets and other AIG contracts on debt.

Total package: $153 billion. And AIG has also taken advantage of a federal plan to buy up short-term debt routinely issued by companies, known as commercial paper.

The $40 billion going to AIG will buy preferred shares of company stock, giving taxpayers an ownership stake. In turn, restrictions will be placed on executive pay at the firm.

The Fed stepped in with an $85 billion loan in September because the company is so big - linked to mutual funds and retirement products held by millions of Americans, not to mention ties to U.S. mortgages - that its failure would have devastated the economy.

"The bailout continues, and essentially exemplifies the notion of `too big to fail,' said Anthony Sabino, a professor of law and business at St. John's University. "But the question must be asked: Where does it end?"

AIG also came under fire for spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on a California retreat just days after the Fed loan was announced in September.

In other bailout news Monday, mortgage finance company Fannie Mae said it may have to tap a $100 billion government lifeline as early as next year after posting a massive third-quarter loss.

Fannie Mae, seized by federal regulators more than two months ago, posted a staggering loss of $13 per share for the July-to-September quarter, compared with a loss $1.56 a share, for the same period last year.

The company's net worth - what it owns minus what it owes - fell to $9.4 billion at the end of September, from $44.1 billion at the end of last year. If that number turns negative, Fannie Mae said it would be required to tap Treasury for help.

The new package for AIG was unveiled as the insurer issued new, bleak quarterly results. It lost $24.5 billion in the third quarter after turning a $3.1 billion profit in the third quarter of 2007.

Under the restructuring, AIG also gets easier terms on the Fed loans, reducing the risk AIG will have to sell off assets at firesale prices to pay back the government.

"This is a very big deal for AIG. It essentially plugs two of the biggest holes that the company had," said Rob Haines, analyst at CreditSights.

Fed officials expressed confidence the money would eventually be repaid to taxpayers, and presidential press secretary Dana Perino said it would also be good for the fragile U.S. economy.

The federal help "will allow AIG to continue to restructure themselves in a way that will not hurt the overall economy. AIG is a large, interconnected firm," she said.

AIG Chief Executive Edward Liddy called the plan a "win-win."

"It sends a strong signal to our policy holders, to government, to regulators around the world, to our business partners and counterparts that AIG is in fact on the road to recovery," he said.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 83 Comments
by triplet-man November 12, 2008 12:59 PM EST
There is one word for what the Federal Govt. is doing RIGHT NOW. IT''''s called Socialism - look up the definition.
Taking "ownership" of the banks, loans, credit lines, Automakers. What is next?
Someone else in South America did this. Hugo Chavez - The only difference is, he just said it outright. I''''m "nationalizing" all of this. It''''s MINE now. The Feds are using FEAR tactics to take over this nation.
We the people..... are falling for it.
WAKE UP AMERICA!
Reply to this comment
by cbsblogger November 11, 2008 9:15 PM EST
Regarding the outrageous unfairness of the bailout for the rich. It is not that far fetched to suggest that the backbone of Wall Street is represented by individuals such as wealthy AIPAC members? They have a history of getting what they want while the rest of us pay. Most small businesses and USA individuals are represented by no one.
Reply to this comment
by yeswedid November 11, 2008 8:40 PM EST
I guess I''m just surprised by how passive we are acting as americans with all this business "b.s." going on right in front of us. Why isn''t there an uprising & more public outcry to these bailouts? They are effecting EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN. This is simply unacceptable!
Reply to this comment
by gorgeousm November 11, 2008 8:38 PM EST
The US Govt is protecting major financial, criminal fraudsters who have wrongfully engineered not only the root causes of our financial disaster, and yes, our DEPRESSION, but our US Govt also will make we the workers and taxpayers, pay for what the aforementioned financier-parasites have perpetrated.

This bail-out is an obscene cover-up to protect individuals who are friends, relatives and cronies of US Govt officials, who should be made to serve long-term prison sentences, and in not too few cases, receive the penalty of death for the financial ruin they have indeed caused to tens of millions of people in America alone!
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey November 11, 2008 8:34 PM EST
[Just wanted to add one more thing about AIG getting all this money. I am a small contractor that employs 10-15 people and I am slowing down to unbelievable measures. I could use just $150,000.00. Think our government would bail me out? If so, who do I write to. LOL]
[Posted by jcci1 at 05:25 PM : Nov 11, 2008]

declare yourself to be a bank ... take some deposits ... and you should qualify. your compensation will be limited though ... to something less than $25 million a year.
Reply to this comment
by jcci1 November 11, 2008 8:25 PM EST
Just wanted to add one more thing about AIG getting all this money. I am a small contractor that employs 10-15 people and I am slowing down to unbelievable measures. I could use just $150,000.00. Think our government would bail me out? If so, who do I write to. LOL
Reply to this comment
by jcci1 November 11, 2008 8:18 PM EST
what about giving each taxpayer the bailout money. We would all be able to pay bills, save our homes, put money in the bank (bank bailout). I was told the other day that each taxpayer would get about $250,000.00 each. BOY, wouldn''t that help the economy and we wouldn''t feel so bad about paying it back.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey November 11, 2008 7:50 PM EST
[Does anyone have anything to say about this, or are you all F-U-C-K-I-N-G MORONS? READ THE D-A-M-N STORY.]
[Posted by sincebyjake at 03:30 PM : Nov 11, 2008]

this, as with other subsidy/loan/bailout programs, have a sensitivity toward who are actually the recipients of these funds. acceptance of the money could infer that the institution is troubled ... which undermines confidence. confidence is all that keeps the investment/finance/stock market wheel rolling ... and that''s been undermined of late.

in fact, i believe they made many of the banks take some of the money ... even if they didn''t need it or want it ... so that it wouldn''t be obvious who really needed it.
Reply to this comment
by bobnjersey November 11, 2008 7:40 PM EST
[i didnt give an opinion on either bailout....just pointing out that libs blast business bailouts given by Bush , but will praise any given by obama]
[Posted by jamesm12341 at 03:29 PM : Nov 11, 2008]

james ... if you wave the flag of ''i did it all myself'' ... and ''personal responsibility'' ... and ''free markets are the cure'' ... which are cornerstones of the republican dogma ... a flawed dogma albeit ... it''s an issue when your policies fly in the face of those very foundations.

this is primarily why there''s criticism of republican policies that seem to counter republican fundamentals.

i know ''you'' wont understand ... but this is for everyone else''s benefit ... to point out the complete absurdity of your commentary.
Reply to this comment
by stevador39 November 11, 2008 7:10 PM EST
The bailout is the FLEECING of America. Bush stinks, and every member of congress who voted for this outlandish transfer of money from the taxpayers to the wealthy, stinks. They should be tried, convicted and hung as traitors. I am a lifetime ''liberal.''
Reply to this comment
See all 83 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook