February 11, 2009 2:02 PM

MySpace Trial Judge: Suicide Not Relevant

(AP)  Prosecutors in the trial of a woman accused of a MySpace hoax that allegedly led a 13-year-old girl to kill herself will likely be prohibited from presenting evidence of the suicide, a U.S. District Court judge said Monday.

Judge George H. Wu told attorneys he was leaning toward excluding the evidence from the trial of Lori Drew, who is accused of using a fictitious profile on the social networking site to drive Megan Meier, her daughter's former friend, to hang herself.

Drew has pleaded not guilty to one count of conspiracy and three counts of accessing computers without authorization.

"I don't necessarily think the suicide is relevant to the crime charged," Wu said, adding he thought details of Meier's death would unfairly prejudice the jury. He said he planned to announce his final decision Friday.

Prosecutors say Drew, 49, of O'Fallon, Mo., helped create a false-identity MySpace account and harassed Meier with cruel messages.

Meier, who was being treated for depression, hanged herself after allegedly receiving messages saying the world would be better off without her.

The government is prosecuting Drew under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which has never before been used in connection with a Web site's terms of service barring misrepresentation by users setting up new accounts.

Drew's attorneys have argued that cyber-bullying is not a violation of the act, which is typically used to prosecute hackers and those committing high-tech crimes.

On Wednesday, defense lawyer Dean Steward waived Drew's right to a jury trial in an effort to have the case decided by a judge, not jurors. But prosecutors refused to agree with the defense waiver, which automatically resulted in a jury trial.

Jury selection is set to begin Nov. 18.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 34 Comments
by akpals November 11, 2008 11:58 PM EST
I think it''s sad enough when a teen can''t take the bullying and ends their life, but it''s just sick that a woman would bully a kid the way she did. Why in the world would she get so far involved in teen drama? Like OMG!! this woman is sick.
Reply to this comment
by nothappyatall November 11, 2008 11:09 PM EST
for those of you confused on whether or not harassment is a crime.

Posted by UrboyDigger

It doesnt count when YOU are the one willingly participating in the contact as the kid was to this fake "Josh" who the mother never bothered to check, phone or verify ANYTHING about him, including his age- could have been a pedo and she would havebeen just as clueless
Reply to this comment
by hambonehd November 11, 2008 5:33 PM EST
CBS won''t let anyone comment on this article below. Talk about a piece of ***... and she is going to be let go too! Some system.


Doctors: Baby Arm-Slicing Mom Mentally OK
Woman Who Killed Her 10-Month-Old Daughter Will Be Released From Texas Mental Hospital
Reply to this comment
by zendigity November 11, 2008 5:30 PM EST
You know, the world doesn''t seem like a worse place without her here...maybe she made the best choice for everyone.
Reply to this comment
by lilly1232 November 11, 2008 4:37 PM EST
I cannot believe a judge would do thisL. She is supposedly an adult woman. You talk about the girl being sick? How sick is this woman that she would enter into this, instead of teaching her daughter this is not the way to behave? Not only should she be prosicuted to the fullest extent of the law. She should also loose custody if her children. The last thing we need is more screwed up kids.
Reply to this comment
by mydiatribe November 11, 2008 4:28 PM EST
This woman''s Real Fear ought to be for the Ultimate Judgment! No doubt that doesn''t concern her in the least because if it did this whole thing would never have happened.
Reply to this comment
by rillifane November 11, 2008 4:13 PM EST
Its hardly surprising that the Prosecution wants a jury trial and that the defendant wants a bench trial. This case is utterly absurd and exists only because the public "wants something done" without respect to what the law is. The idea that it is a criminal offense to hurt someone''s feelings is so blantantly ridiculous that the prosecution must try to base its case on a bizarre misreading of the law and then get itself a jury it can present teary eyed witnesses to.
Reply to this comment
by nobdehom November 11, 2008 3:41 PM EST
Weather or not the court chooses to prosecute is the least of her problems she will have to face herself and the angry public....The Girl would have faced alot more verbal abuse in the future, that is just the sick society we live in. The fact of the matter is learning to let it all "roll of your back"! It is hard going through changes when you are a teen girl and dealing with your strong changing emotions.
My thoughts are with her parents.
Reply to this comment
by eggy1620 November 11, 2008 3:19 PM EST
The victims parents should also be charged with the neglect of their obviously mentally ill daughter.
Reply to this comment
by gramto8 November 11, 2008 3:02 PM EST
To all of you who are calling the girl who died ''nutty'':

Clinical depression is not ''being nutty''. It is a physical disorder caused by a chemical imbalance.

The witch that did this to the girl knew the family and knew she was on medication for this problem. She also knew that the meds hadn''t taken their full effect yet. She went ahead and did this to the girl, knowing full well that it would affect this child in a bad way.

Clinical depression is NOT a reason to forbid anyone from accessing the Internet. If that were the case, I would be blocked from my computer and I would go insane. This is my only link to the outside world, as I am disabled.

Don''t blame the child or her parents for what this person did to her. She knew she was doing evil and intended for it to be evil when she did it.
Reply to this comment
See all 34 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook