WASHINGTON, D.C., Nov. 10, 2008

The Bushes, The Obamas & The White House

CBS' Mark Knoller On The Tradition Of Presidents-Elect And White House Tours

  • President George W. Bush and President-elect Barack Obama at White House, November 10, 2008.  (CBS)


(CBS)  CBS' Mark Knoller covers the White House and Washington politics.

There’s a lot of play-acting involved when a President-elect of the opposition party is received at the White House by the outgoing President.

It’s not quite as awkward as when the incoming Chief Executive actually defeated the incumbent, as was the case in 1980 when Jimmy Carter welcomed Ronald Reagan to the Oval Office; or in 1992, when the first President Bush had to offer smiles and a handshake to Bill Clinton.

Imagine how you’d feel if you’d been fired and were then required to show your replacement around your office and house?

Barack Obama didn’t beat George W. Bush, but he did beat him up rhetorically. Mr. Obama spent most of the last two years repeatedly making the case that Mr. Bush needlessly took the nation to war in Iraq and ran the economy into a ditch. Not the kind of verbiage that makes for instant cordiality.

And the worst thing Mr. Obama felt he could say about John McCain was that his election would amount to a third term for the Bush Administration.

But Messrs. Bush and Obama are both top-flight politicians. They know how to put politics aside - especially when the whole world is watching. And President Bush wants to be seen rolling out the red carpet for his successor.

“Ensuring that this transition is seamless is a top priority for the rest of my time in office,” said Mr. Bush in his weekly radio address on Saturday. “My administration will work hard to ensure that the next president and his team can hit the ground running.”

Quotes

Imagine how you’d feel if you’d been fired and were then required to show your replacement around your office and house?

During 31 years at the White House, retired Chief Usher Gary Walters has been witness to many such meetings of the outgoing and incoming Presidents.

"It’s usually very congenial," he said in a radio interview with CBS News. "I think that people around the world marvel at the transition that the United States has from one president to another - and in this case from one party to another."

Listen to Mark Knoller's report on today's White House meeting with President Bush and first lady Laura Bush and the Obamas
He calls it a "marvelous trait of our American democracy" to see the President arm-in-arm with the President-elect.

It’s also a marvelous example of politicians putting their personal feelings aside for the good of the nation.

By Mark Knoller
©MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 79 Comments
by babooph November 11, 2008 4:14 AM EST
Bush would like to go hide in Texas today -idiot he is,he can still now see the horrible mess he made-his war crimes scream for a trial,though the US propaganda system will cover all up.
Reply to this comment
by n8yvn29 November 11, 2008 1:09 AM EST
If I were Bush, I would treat President Obama with much respect and kindness, too, especially considering Bush is a criminal and will be the subject of investigations and hopefully prosecution by the new administration and Congress for crimes against U.S. citizens, the Constitution, and citizens of other countries. Yes, I would kiss a.. too, if I feared eventual prosecution. Bush may be a criminal and a traitor, but he is not dumb.
Reply to this comment
by huhhh1 November 10, 2008 8:06 PM EST
OMG can journalism get any worse?

Mark, please tell me you''re aware that Bush wasn''t fired? he wasn''t even running.

And we wonder why Americans resort to alternative sources for their news.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica November 10, 2008 8:05 PM EST
Abraham Lincoln would not recognized the Republican party today because it has deviated from its founding ideals in a tremendous way.

Would Lincoln tolerate or support the fanatic religious influence within the Republican party today? No only no, but He ll no.
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq November 10, 2008 7:52 PM EST
End scene?

What does that mean?

I didnt write the definition for liberalism, fool.

The claim to fame of real conservatives is what USED to be called liberalism..
Neocons, meaning "new conservatives" are called new for a reason. They no longer recognize the libertarian principles they used to hold dear.
Which is why Christopher Buckley endorsed Obama.
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq November 10, 2008 7:49 PM EST
has to start paying out for everyone of those "promises" he made



-----
Hmmm.

And while you fear the unknown, here''s something real..
How are we going to pay for the trillion+ dollar debt we have RIGHT NOW, courtesy of Bush??
Hmm?
You complain about some nebulous idea of "paying" for something UN-NAMED and sinister by Obama: yet where''s the comment about a REAL and NAMABLE, MASSIVE DEBT incurred ALREADY??

Exactly what "promise" will we be paying for??
NOBODY PROMISED ME A WAR, and I''m paying for one ANYWAY..

I dont much LIKE paying for war..
Do you?
We could have healthcare or better education many times over for the money ALREADY SPENT on this war, IN REAL LIFE: RIGHT NOW..
Stop repeating your propaganda, the election is over.

parrot.. tax-and-spend liberals! tax-and-spend liberal! SQUAWK!

Trickle down!!
SQUAWK! SQUAWK!!

You are loud, parrot.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica November 10, 2008 7:46 PM EST
GW Bush has dug America such a deep hole it will take almost 2 decades do get out of it. When you look at the promises Bush made during his first campaign, there isn''t one that can be checked off. Mission Accomplished, Cowboy.

After having a cowboy in the White House America could not afford to house a couple of mavericks there. America needs to quit subsidizing housing to mavericks and this should start at the White House and trickle on down through every governor''s mansion as well.

Sarah is afraid to move into Alaska''s governor''s mansion because she knows she won''t be there long enough to unpack half of her wardrobe and make-up boxes before she gets the boot.
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq November 10, 2008 7:42 PM EST
Some of the greatest writers/thinkers of the humanist persuasion contributed to the development of these ideals.

They include: (there are many many more)
** Voltaire.
** Thomas Jefferson.
** Montesqueue
** John Stuart Mill

Can you imagine Sean Hannity screeching about democracy and "freedom" in a debate with these guys?
Ha. Ha.
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq November 10, 2008 7:39 PM EST
freedom of thought and speech, limitations on the power of governments, the rule of law, an individual''''s right to private property,[2] free markets,[2] and a transparent system of government.[3] All liberals, as well as some adherents of other political ideologies, support some variant of the form of government known as liberal democracy, with open and fair elections, where all citizens have equal rights by law.



THAT PART IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT


So: which part should be hated and feared??

I can''t figure it out..
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq November 10, 2008 7:37 PM EST
There seems to be some misunderstanding here about what a liberal is, and what liberalism means.. (As usual)
Despite his best efforts, Limbaugh et al cannot alter the basic definition of an important, historical tenet of political philosophy.

........Read carefully now............

To wit:

Liberalism is a broad class of political philosophies that consider individual liberty to be the most important political goal.[1]

Liberalism emphasizes individual rights and equality of opportunity. Within liberalism there are various streams of thought which compete over the use of the term "liberal" and may propose very different policies, but they are generally united by their support for a number of principles, including freedom of thought and speech, limitations on the power of governments, the rule of law, an individual''s right to private property,[2] free markets,[2] and a transparent system of government.[3] All liberals, as well as some adherents of other political ideologies, support some variant of the form of government known as liberal democracy, with open and fair elections, where all citizens have equal rights by law.[4]

Modern liberalism has its roots in the Age of Enlightenment and rejected many foundational assumptions that dominated most earlier theories of government, such as the Divine Right of Kings, hereditary status, established religion, and economic protectionism.[5][6][


Reply to this comment
by oldguy4truth November 10, 2008 6:52 PM EST
visiously ... viciously. I will correct it for you.
Reply to this comment
by oldguy4truth November 10, 2008 6:45 PM EST
since you are an old guy for truth..... true or false? are you a bad speller?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by jamesm12341

Yes. I have always been a bad speller. So was Einstein. (Which I am not) The fact remains that you have no content of your charactor. You are a last relic of a dying ultra conservative past, that is very ...hard to flush. You keep popping back up, reminding the world that hatred lives on. Why can you not see anything beyond the end of your nose? I started this conversation with you in defense of one you were visiously attacking. I can not spell. You can not tolerate others. That is the point I will leave you with.
Reply to this comment
by oldguy4truth November 10, 2008 6:36 PM EST
Look at Emperor Bushes Face!

------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
----

Posted by arthurcl1 at 03:31 PM : Nov 10, 2008

Bush is your emperor?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by jamesm123

Where is Joe the plumber when you need him
Reply to this comment
by oldguy4truth November 10, 2008 6:31 PM EST
amesm12341... Are you still here? i thought I flushed you.
Reply to this comment
by arthurcl1 November 10, 2008 6:31 PM EST
Look at Emperor Bushes Face! He is so embarrassed he lost it for the GOP! He messed it up for McCain Bad!
Go Obama, what a mess he has in his lap now thanks to Bush!
YES I HAVE SAID THIS SINCE LAST JULY! THANKS PELOSI FOR SPEAKING OUT! BUSH IS A TOTAL FAILURE AND WORST PRESIDENT LIAR TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE GOING OVER U.N. TO INVADE IRAQ WITH NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION FOUND! HE NEEDS TO GET OUT NOW SINCE OUR COUNTRY IS IN HIS RUINS! OUT! OUT! OUT! 2 MONTHS LEFT! OR HE WILL INVADE IRAN NEXT!
"You know, God bless him, bless his heart, president of the United States, a total failure, losing all credibility with the American people on the economy, on the war, on energy, you name the subject," Pelosi replied. She then tsk-tsked Bush for "challenging Congress when we are trying to sweep up after his mess over and over and over again."
Reply to this comment
by oldguy4truth November 10, 2008 6:22 PM EST
jamesm12341 1,2,3,4....1? can you not count past 4?
Reply to this comment
by oldguy4truth November 10, 2008 6:18 PM EST
Yep, with my full brain and your lack of one, that does equal a whole brain!!! Good job on the math oldguy!! You get a cookie!!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by jamesm12341
That is pretty sharp. I see you switched over to coke.
Reply to this comment
by hatesthecolt November 10, 2008 6:17 PM EST
Sadly, I live in one.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by sandy19731

I used to but we went blue this year! Hang in there, there''s hope (for every state except Kansas which is hopeless)!
Reply to this comment
by sandy19731 November 10, 2008 6:14 PM EST
and dont forget that the average mccain supporter will still make more than the average obama supporter in the next 4 years....thus proving that the president doesnt have anything to with self reliance
---
Posted by jamesm12341

Oh you seriously need to provide some statistics to back that up because the likely and registered voter support for Obama was very high in the postgraduate degree categories, so that''''s not ringing true AT ALL.

Posted by hatesthecolt at 02:38 PM : Nov 10, 2008

Hatesthecolt is correct.
Just look at the blue states and the red states. The red states are populated with poorer people, and fewer profitable industries. The money in this country is on the East Coast and the West Coast. Red states are called "flyover states" for a reason. Sadly, I live in one.

Reply to this comment
by oldguy4truth November 10, 2008 6:13 PM EST
Yea, but were you "surprised"? Yes.
Reply to this comment
See all 79 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Obama, GOP Clash over cure for Economy

    (328 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: