The Bushes, The Obamas & The White House
CBS' Mark Knoller On The Tradition Of Presidents-Elect And White House Tours
-
President George W. Bush and President-elect Barack Obama at White House, November 10, 2008. (CBS)
-
Photos Election Day Images Snapshots from throughout the historic day.

There’s a lot of play-acting involved when a President-elect of the opposition party is received at the White House by the outgoing President.
It’s not quite as awkward as when the incoming Chief Executive actually defeated the incumbent, as was the case in 1980 when Jimmy Carter welcomed Ronald Reagan to the Oval Office; or in 1992, when the first President Bush had to offer smiles and a handshake to Bill Clinton.
Imagine how you’d feel if you’d been fired and were then required to show your replacement around your office and house?
Barack Obama didn’t beat George W. Bush, but he did beat him up rhetorically. Mr. Obama spent most of the last two years repeatedly making the case that Mr. Bush needlessly took the nation to war in Iraq and ran the economy into a ditch. Not the kind of verbiage that makes for instant cordiality.
And the worst thing Mr. Obama felt he could say about John McCain was that his election would amount to a third term for the Bush Administration.
But Messrs. Bush and Obama are both top-flight politicians. They know how to put politics aside - especially when the whole world is watching. And President Bush wants to be seen rolling out the red carpet for his successor.
“Ensuring that this transition is seamless is a top priority for the rest of my time in office,” said Mr. Bush in his weekly radio address on Saturday. “My administration will work hard to ensure that the next president and his team can hit the ground running.”
Imagine how you’d feel if you’d been fired and were then required to show your replacement around your office and house?
"It’s usually very congenial," he said in a radio interview with CBS News. "I think that people around the world marvel at the transition that the United States has from one president to another - and in this case from one party to another."
He calls it a "marvelous trait of our American democracy" to see the President arm-in-arm with the President-elect.Listen to Mark Knoller's report on today's White House meeting with President Bush and first lady Laura Bush and the Obamas
It’s also a marvelous example of politicians putting their personal feelings aside for the good of the nation.
By Mark Knoller
©MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
Listen to Mark Knoller's report on today's White House meeting with President Bush and first lady Laura Bush and the Obamas
Michelle Obama tells how her role as the First Lady has changed her perspective.





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 79 CommentsMark, please tell me you''re aware that Bush wasn''t fired? he wasn''t even running.
And we wonder why Americans resort to alternative sources for their news.
Would Lincoln tolerate or support the fanatic religious influence within the Republican party today? No only no, but He ll no.
What does that mean?
I didnt write the definition for liberalism, fool.
The claim to fame of real conservatives is what USED to be called liberalism..
Neocons, meaning "new conservatives" are called new for a reason. They no longer recognize the libertarian principles they used to hold dear.
Which is why Christopher Buckley endorsed Obama.
-----
Hmmm.
And while you fear the unknown, here''s something real..
How are we going to pay for the trillion+ dollar debt we have RIGHT NOW, courtesy of Bush??
Hmm?
You complain about some nebulous idea of "paying" for something UN-NAMED and sinister by Obama: yet where''s the comment about a REAL and NAMABLE, MASSIVE DEBT incurred ALREADY??
Exactly what "promise" will we be paying for??
NOBODY PROMISED ME A WAR, and I''m paying for one ANYWAY..
I dont much LIKE paying for war..
Do you?
We could have healthcare or better education many times over for the money ALREADY SPENT on this war, IN REAL LIFE: RIGHT NOW..
Stop repeating your propaganda, the election is over.
parrot.. tax-and-spend liberals! tax-and-spend liberal! SQUAWK!
Trickle down!!
SQUAWK! SQUAWK!!
You are loud, parrot.
After having a cowboy in the White House America could not afford to house a couple of mavericks there. America needs to quit subsidizing housing to mavericks and this should start at the White House and trickle on down through every governor''s mansion as well.
Sarah is afraid to move into Alaska''s governor''s mansion because she knows she won''t be there long enough to unpack half of her wardrobe and make-up boxes before she gets the boot.
They include: (there are many many more)
** Voltaire.
** Thomas Jefferson.
** Montesqueue
** John Stuart Mill
Can you imagine Sean Hannity screeching about democracy and "freedom" in a debate with these guys?
Ha. Ha.
THAT PART IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT
So: which part should be hated and feared??
I can''t figure it out..
Despite his best efforts, Limbaugh et al cannot alter the basic definition of an important, historical tenet of political philosophy.
........Read carefully now............
To wit:
Liberalism is a broad class of political philosophies that consider individual liberty to be the most important political goal.[1]
Liberalism emphasizes individual rights and equality of opportunity. Within liberalism there are various streams of thought which compete over the use of the term "liberal" and may propose very different policies, but they are generally united by their support for a number of principles, including freedom of thought and speech, limitations on the power of governments, the rule of law, an individual''s right to private property,[2] free markets,[2] and a transparent system of government.[3] All liberals, as well as some adherents of other political ideologies, support some variant of the form of government known as liberal democracy, with open and fair elections, where all citizens have equal rights by law.[4]
Modern liberalism has its roots in the Age of Enlightenment and rejected many foundational assumptions that dominated most earlier theories of government, such as the Divine Right of Kings, hereditary status, established religion, and economic protectionism.[5][6][
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jamesm12341
Yes. I have always been a bad speller. So was Einstein. (Which I am not) The fact remains that you have no content of your charactor. You are a last relic of a dying ultra conservative past, that is very ...hard to flush. You keep popping back up, reminding the world that hatred lives on. Why can you not see anything beyond the end of your nose? I started this conversation with you in defense of one you were visiously attacking. I can not spell. You can not tolerate others. That is the point I will leave you with.
------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
----
Posted by arthurcl1 at 03:31 PM : Nov 10, 2008
Bush is your emperor?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jamesm123
Where is Joe the plumber when you need him
Go Obama, what a mess he has in his lap now thanks to Bush!
YES I HAVE SAID THIS SINCE LAST JULY! THANKS PELOSI FOR SPEAKING OUT! BUSH IS A TOTAL FAILURE AND WORST PRESIDENT LIAR TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE GOING OVER U.N. TO INVADE IRAQ WITH NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION FOUND! HE NEEDS TO GET OUT NOW SINCE OUR COUNTRY IS IN HIS RUINS! OUT! OUT! OUT! 2 MONTHS LEFT! OR HE WILL INVADE IRAN NEXT!
"You know, God bless him, bless his heart, president of the United States, a total failure, losing all credibility with the American people on the economy, on the war, on energy, you name the subject," Pelosi replied. She then tsk-tsked Bush for "challenging Congress when we are trying to sweep up after his mess over and over and over again."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jamesm12341
That is pretty sharp. I see you switched over to coke.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by sandy19731
I used to but we went blue this year! Hang in there, there''s hope (for every state except Kansas which is hopeless)!
---
Posted by jamesm12341
Oh you seriously need to provide some statistics to back that up because the likely and registered voter support for Obama was very high in the postgraduate degree categories, so that''''s not ringing true AT ALL.
Posted by hatesthecolt at 02:38 PM : Nov 10, 2008
Hatesthecolt is correct.
Just look at the blue states and the red states. The red states are populated with poorer people, and fewer profitable industries. The money in this country is on the East Coast and the West Coast. Red states are called "flyover states" for a reason. Sadly, I live in one.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 79 Comments