Obama Apologizes For Reagan Seance Joke
President-Elect Calls Former First Lady After Making Remark During First News Conference
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Obama Holds Press Conference
"In Full:" Barack Obama held his first press conference as President-elect, stressing economy as a top issue for his presidency. Katie Couric and a panel of CBS News correspondents provide analysis.
-
Photo
Nancy Reagan speaks during "A Nation Honors Nancy Reagan" event in Washington, DC in 2005. (AP)
-
Photo Essay
Celebrating History
Supporters cheer victorious candidate at huge Chicago gathering.
At a news conference in Chicago, Obama said he had spoken with all the living presidents as he prepares to take office in January. Then he smiled and said, "I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about doing any seances."
The 87-year-old former first lady had consulted with astrologers during her husband's presidency. But she did not hold conversations with the dead.
Obama spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter said the president-elect later called Mrs. Reagan "to apologize for the careless and offhanded remark." She said Obama "expressed his admiration and affection for Mrs. Reagan that so many Americans share, and they had a warm conversation."
It actually wasn't Nancy Reagan who was linked to conversations with the dead; it was Obama's top Democratic challenger for the presidency, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y.
In either case, use of the word "seance" might be overstated.
Nancy Reagan consulted an astrologer to help set her husband's schedule, wrote former White House chief of staff Donald T. Regan. The revelation created a furor and President Reagan even broke with his policy of not commenting on books by former White House staffers.
"No policy or decision in my mind has ever been influenced by astrology," Reagan said.
In his book "The Choice," Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward described how Clinton consulted with a spiritual adviser who led her through imaginary conversations with her personal hero, Eleanor Roosevelt. Newsweek magazine, which was promoting the book, characterized the visits as "seances," a term that White House officials quickly tried to squelch.
"These were people who were helping her laugh, helping her think," said Neel Lattimore, Clinton's spokeswoman. "These were not seances."
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.




- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 128 CommentsWhat''s smug about that.
Do you look at everything through crab colored eyes?
Now I just hope he can lead us out of this mess, fast.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by hadenough43 at 01:15 AM : Nov 08, 2008
You would be wrong on your bet. Now are you classy enough to apologize?
Posted by model67a
************************
I have, and there are good reasons why they are alienated from their own children!!
On the one hand, I hope he does well. He''s driving the ship now, so it''s kinda important we don''t sink because, well, I''m on board, too! So with that line of thinking, I really do hope things go well.
On the other hand, I didn''t vote for him because I knew he''d get elected, and if things go down the hole some day I wanted to be able to say, "Don''t blame me, I voted McCain!"
*sigh* what am I to do?
At least the dude can speak friggan ENGLISH...and he doesn''t completely butcher the entire language every time he flaps his yap.....unlike our current basturd president, who never bothered learning to speak it because he was raised in a barn.
At least the dude can speak friggan ENGLISH...and he doesn''''t completely butcher the entire language every time he flaps his yap.....unlike our current basturd president, who never bothered learning to speak it because he was raised in a barn.
Posted by shanev137
Our current President isn''t a BS''ing lawyer, like your messiah OsameA.
Speaking of butchering the English language, when are you going to get your GED?
Posted by airboatboy1
This mess was started in the 1990''s by Clintons boys and girls. Bush never had a chance and even the Historians are saying that.
Here, have a little history and truth and reality, if you can handle it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/business/19cisneros.html
If you can''t handle reality here''s a web site you might enjoy:
http://library.thinkquest.org/20991/alg2/trig.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19
/business/19cisneros.html
If you can''''t handle reality here''''s a web site you might enjoy:
http://library.thinkquest.org/
20991/alg2/trig.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by brianwbw at 04:37 AM : Nov 08, 2008
I can handle it, and i will read it, thanks. So does this mean no matter who was in office for the last eight years it would make do difference, that we would have the same results, that nothing could have been done?
In short, we''re human.
Wrong first lady though. Obama just had to throw that out even though it had nothing to do with the question. Between his mouth and Biden''s, it''s going to be a LONG 4 yrs.
Posted by callistemon
----------
So Bush wasn''t....get over it. Oh, Clinton was impeached LOL
Posted by OneWayRight at 07:03 AM : Nov 08, 2008
LOL Right and WHO would you propose to put in his place? More "Trickle Down" idiots? ROFLMAO It''s going to be 8 years for this Young Man followed by another Democrat. The Republican''s represent no one outside the Fascist South and no one outside that area is taking them serious!
:)
Posted by OneWayRight at 07:10 AM : Nov 08, 2008
LOL What history are YOU reading? LOL After the Great Depression we had, for the most part, one party rule for 80 years! LOL Now we had a Republican President off and on yes but the the Policies and the Congress was basically Democrat for that entire time period! FIVE terms, FDR and Truman, together makes 20 years of ONE PARTY RULE unbroken.
:-)
In the final analysis...much ado about nothing but let''s face it this is all the neocons have.
Posted by etherAvatar
---------------
YOU are why there are NeoCons.
Obama makes a huge gaffe so to cover himself he throws someone else under the bus, Nancy Reagan.
And the FACT is Nancy never had seances but Hillary Clinton did.
And the self-righteous liberals are out here defended this?
It''s seems like this is really "undefenseable"
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 128 Comments