Washington Preps Assisted Suicide Plan
Voters Approved It, Now State Prepares Guidelines For Doctors To Aid Suicide
-
(AP)
-
Interactive Dying Wishes Learn about living wills and other steps to protect your end-of-life decisions.
Washington is now the second state in the nation to have such a law, and officials may look to neighboring Oregon for a blueprint.
The measure takes effect March 4. Officials at the attorney general's office and the state Department of Health said they have just started to go through the language of the measure, which passed Tuesday.
Department of Health spokesman Tim Church said it won't have to create a new office or section within the agency. Under the measure, any health care provider writing a prescription or dispensing medication must file a copy of the record with the Health Department, which is required to create an annual statistical report on how the law is used.
Church said questions about other responsibilities the department might have will be determined during the rule-making process, which hasn't started yet.
"We're going to be gathering information over the next few weeks and expect to start the rule-making process by the end of this month," he said.
Anne Martens, spokeswoman for the coalition that supported the measure, said the parties with an interest in the measure likely will study how Oregon's law was put into effect "and see if we can take that experience and make implementation as easy as possible here."
"I don't anticipate any legislative tinkering, but you can never rule that out," she said. "The law as written is identical to the law that's been working in Oregon. We don't see any need to change any part of it."
Opponents said they don't plan to be at the table to help with the process.
"We do not concede that Initiative 1000 is a law in this state," said Eileen Geller, campaign coordinator for the opposition. "Right now for us every option is on the table. Legal is one of them."
Any legal challenge could be difficult since the Washington law mirrors Oregon's law, which was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Under the new Washington law, any patient requesting fatal medication must be at least 18, declared competent and a resident of Washington state.
The patient would have to make two oral requests, 15 days apart, and submit a written request witnessed by two people. One of the witnesses must not be a relative, heir, attending doctor, or connected with a health facility where the requester lives.
Two doctors also would have to certify that the patient has a terminal condition and six months or less to live.
Jennifer Hanscom, spokeswoman for the Washington State Medical Association, which opposed the measure, said the organization has already started educating its more than 9,600 physicians about the new law. Information is on the group's Web site, and a newsletter was being sent to members.
"We respect the wishes of the public and the public has made their wishes known," she said.
She said it will be looking closely at the initiative language to see if there's room for improvements, but "we are not actively seeking any changes."
Under the measure, physicians and pharmacists are not required to write or fill lethal prescriptions if they are opposed to the law.
Since Oregon's law took effect in 1997, more than 340 people - mostly ailing with cancer - have used it to end their lives.
©MMVIII, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- Assisted suicide is a humanitarian law and a good one but it involves many complications. Life insurance: Will assisted suicide void a policy? Health care: Will health insurance pay for it? Justice: How will the supreme court deal with it? Congress: What will be the guidelines and rules for this? Social: In states where it hasn''t been put into law, will assisted suicide still be a crime? I am for the idea of a humanitarian law that shortens the pain of going through a slow death, but what will the rules be for using it?
- Reply to this comment
- Think about it......if you do not agree with the legislation, don''t do it. Don''t live there. Do yourself a favor and stop even thinking about it. No one is putting a gun to your head to make you act a certain way. If you THINK about this, it is really nothing if it doesn''t affect YOU; and vice-versa. But if you go ahead and get your shorts in a knot about all this, leave God out of it. This is government business and you don''t know who my God is anyway and I do not want you to make that decision for me in the midst of stuff about my country that affects thinking people. Thanks.......
- Reply to this comment
- The whaco right will go bonkers on this one !!
- Reply to this comment
- You are nothing but a piece of human garbage to bring politics into a subject like this. I can only hope that you meet a long slow death.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by d7767w at 05:29 PM : Nov 07, 2008
Just move to Washington! A long, slow death can be avoided! - Reply to this comment
- They just want to save hospital costs. It''ll knock four months off hospital and medical costs. That''s a slippery slope.
- Reply to this comment
- Death comes to us all, I have an inalienable rights granted to me by almighty God, not men! When faced with death I am at my liberty to fined what is right for me and my God. I have a right to die slowly or fast, it is my choice to make not this idiot government. In the end I will choose for myself and my wishes will be carried out, I care not what the law says, I only care about my relationship with my God which is not open for the government to aborgate.
- Reply to this comment
- "You know, none of us decided to become a baby."
Posted by truthislife1 at 06:24 PM : Nov 08, 2008
You are correct. I never recall asking to be called into existence, either. - Reply to this comment
- Does Cancer hurt?
Just wondering.
Posted by mainedoggie at 11:58 PM : Nov 07, 2008
Only if you are alive when you have it..... - Reply to this comment
- You know, none of us decided to become a baby. So none of us should decide to become a grave. My mom died from cancer 2 years ago. She knew she had wrecked her body. It was absolutely horrible. Her fight with cancer was an absolute victory, especially because she was a Christian. She knew where she was going, and did not want to go before the Maker said it was time. According to the Bible, death is an appointment and to many people show up early. We never know how God will turn things around, especially in death. Her memorial service was wonderful and painful. I wish I could hold on like she did. It shows how strong someone can be. If they can do it, it may help others to know they have affected someone''s life.
- Reply to this comment
- "One of the witnesses must not be a relative, heir, attending doctor, or connected with a health facility where the requester lives", and not being paid in any way. Otherwise it could turn into a business!
- Reply to this comment
- Hospice programs have been doing this for years all across the country. Family members of the terminally ill are given the morphine and told to give as much as it takes to relieve the pain of the cancer victim. If the cancer victim wants more it is given to them often resulting in death.
- Reply to this comment
- ========
More legislated freedom of death.
Liberals must love this!
Posted by SocialismSux
================
What a dickweed. - Reply to this comment
- ========
Jennifer Hanscom, spokeswoman for the Washington State Medical Association, which opposed the measure
=========
Hi Jennifer,
Does Cancer hurt?
Just wondering. - Reply to this comment
- Certainly not any of the vermin in the Bush administration.
Posted by mick7744 at 02:19 PM : Nov 07, 2008
You are nothing but a piece of human garbage to bring politics into a subject like this. I can only hope that you meet a long slow death.
Posted by d7767w at 05:29 PM : Nov 07, 2008
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Spoken like a true christian. - Reply to this comment
- "It''s ironic that Christians, who preach compassion and tolerance, deny these very benefits to others.
Christ weeps at what has been wrought in His name."
There is nothing ironic in a Christian respect for life (even when suffering). It is the understanding that suffering is part of life, and that all life has value beyond the values that society espouses (monetary, happiness, freedom, etc.) What is ironic is that you speak for Christ, when you do not understand his teachings. Christ brought Lazarus back to life, but he did not make him immortal or free of pain. Lazarus would suffer more and eventually die again. According to your logic, he should have left him in the tomb. - Reply to this comment
- "My wife is also a physician and she would disagree with you 100 percent of the time. You must be a general pract. Because if you had to deal with it and see her when she has to give the news then you might just sing a different song."
Who''s suffering do we care about here? Ours or theres? - Reply to this comment
- One thing''s for sure, this law will definitely fit right in with the Muslim fundamentalists! They specialize in Suicide!
- Reply to this comment
- More legislated freedom of death.
Liberals must love this! - Reply to this comment
- While I can readily agree with someone''s right to die with dignity (all of Dr Kevorkian%u2019s more publicized subjects were overachievers who made the rational decision to end their life on their terms%u2026all well and good.
What we must guard against is the RIGHT to die becoming the OBLIGATION to die%u2026as in an indigent patient taking a bed that could be occupied by a paying customer.
Who, in our fragmented, profit-above-all society can be trusted with such awesome responsibility? Certainly not any of the vermin in the Bush administration. They%u2019d pull a Florida-type confusing ballot scam on them and have selected victims unknowingly signing their lives away to maximize profits.
Take it slow, people%u2026take it slow! - Reply to this comment
- While I can readily agree with someone''s right to die with dignity (all of Dr Kevorkian%u2019s more publicized subjects were overachievers who made the rational decision to end their life on their terms%u2026all well and good.
What we must guard against is the RIGHT to die becoming the OBLIGATION to die%u2026as in an indigent patient taking a bed that could be occupied by a paying customer.
Who, in our fragmented, profit-above-all society can be trusted with such awesome responsibility? Certainly not any of the vermin in the Bush administration. They%u2019d pull a Florida-type confusing ballot scam on them and have selected victims unknowingly signing their lives away to maximize profits.
Take it slow, people%u2026take it slow! - Reply to this comment
The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.



