WASHINGTON, Nov. 6, 2008

Lieberman May Caucus With Senate GOP

Having Angered Democrats, McCain Supporting Connecticut Independent May Lose Top Role On Senate Committee

  • Play CBS Video Video What About Lieberman?

    Conn. Sen. Joe Lieberman faces the possible loss of his chairmanship of the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee after backing John McCain over President-Elect Obama.

  • Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn. makes a statement on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 6, 2008, after meeting with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada.

    Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn. makes a statement on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 6, 2008, after meeting with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada.  (AP)

(AP)  Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell is talking to Connecticut independent Sen. Joe Lieberman about the possibility of Lieberman caucusing with the GOP.

Lieberman's affiliation with Democrats is up in the air. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, angered by Lieberman's support of Republican John McCain for president, is considering yanking Lieberman's chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee as punishment.

Lieberman and Reid met Thursday to discuss Lieberman's options, including possible committee and subcommittee posts for him. Those talks are ongoing.

A Lieberman aide, who requested anonymity because the talks are confidential, said Friday that Lieberman and McConnell, R-Ky., have spoken in recent days about the possibility of Lieberman joining the GOP conference. McConnell spokesman Don Stewart would only confirm that the two men have had recent discussions.

Lieberman was Democrat Al Gore's vice presidential running mate eight years ago. He became an independent after he failed to win the Democratic Senate primary in Connecticut in 2006. Lieberman won the general election as an independent but is still registered as a Democrat.

Although he caucuses with Senate Democrats, Lieberman angered Democrats by criticizing Barack Obama during the presidential race.

Since 2006, Democrats had tolerated Lieberman's political straddling because he gave them a 51-49 majority by being part of their caucus. With Democrats tightening their hold on the Senate to at least 55 seats in Tuesday's election, Lieberman no longer plays that role.

Lieberman aligned himself with McCain and President Bush on the war in Iraq but tended to vote with Democrats on most domestic issues.

© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 51 Comments
by briannorwood November 10, 2008 5:44 PM EST
Joe Lieberman is a reeking political corpse. He took a big gamble with McCain because he knew his senate career was finished (no self-respecting Connecticut Democrat would dare vote for him again). And Obama would have been nuts to even give him the time of day.

So, his only hope was a big appointment in a McCain cabinet.

Sorry Joe. You need to be pitched from the Democratic caucus. And I feel not one iota of regret about it. As they say, if you want to run with the big dogs, you can expect to get pissed on the head!
Reply to this comment
by bienhoa1968 November 10, 2008 3:29 AM EST
Joe Lieberman is a draft dodging Republican snake who needs to join the rest of his draft dodging Republican snakes in their right wing whacko nest.
Reply to this comment
by blackyowe November 10, 2008 1:32 AM EST
I say pitch the traitor overboard. Who needs friends like Joe?! Get a plumbers license and join the workforce you are a disgrace to your country, Joe Lieberman!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by tlparp November 10, 2008 1:31 AM EST
If Joe Lieberman loses the chairmanship and joins the Republican party, then he was never a true Democrat to begin with. The ideals of the Democratic party don''t change based on who your friends are, or who is in charge of a particular committee. You either believe in those ideals, or you don''t.
Reply to this comment
by butterflyxo November 9, 2008 1:46 AM EST
MizzerZ,
Yes Joe Liarman did promise his constituents that although he was independant, he would never go the Republican Party.
He also promised the Democratic Party that although he supported McCain, he would not trash Obama. Liarman is not under scrutiny because he supported McCain, it''s that he went around trashing Obama and campaigning for McCain.
When Liarman was up for election in Connecticut, guess who went out campaigning for him??? Barack Obama.
Liarman is one two faced shady cat.
The GOP can have him!
Reply to this comment
by blackyowe November 8, 2008 9:45 PM EST
I don''t want to see this guys face ever again he is a creep!
Reply to this comment
by babooph November 8, 2008 7:02 PM EST
Surely he should caucus with the Israeli govt. ?
Reply to this comment
by flreason November 8, 2008 12:39 PM EST
The Democratic Party supported the candidate who defeated him in the ''06 primary election. I think his stumping for McCain was his revenge. His need to punish Democrats as a whole for his hurt is his undoing. The Republicans have exploited the situation, bolstering his ego as they paraded him as a freak. How sad. Now he is left to either take his Democratic medicine, or permanently change his party alliance. I hope he understands that the moment his votes on the environment or gay rights conflict with their party line, they will turn on him and let loose their attack dogs. That has always been the fate of collaborators.
Reply to this comment
by pr_boxer November 8, 2008 12:32 PM EST
Good riddance to bad rubbage. I can''t believe those intelligent Democrats in Connecticut re-elected that change-coat.

The GOP deserve and can have him!
Reply to this comment
by alanrobisch November 8, 2008 12:26 AM EST
The Republicans are just sucking up to him because of his support for their stupid war and his support of McCain. They will chew his face off when he votes against them on choice and g a y rights. He is a man in limbo. That is why I am an independent. Allows me to think (and speak) for myself.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by kansas1946 at 08:23 PM : Nov 07, 2008
+ report

It would seem to me that by this definition he is true independent just as you are. Plus I find it nauseating how you alleged independents think that because one supports a party they are stepford wives.

Its a bunch of baloney and btw how do independents organize the congress. Do independents help elect people or do they just sit on the sidelines and attack anyone who tries and fails
Reply to this comment
See all 51 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy.. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Sarah Palin's Popularity Grows, Poll Finds

    (381 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: