Lieberman May Caucus With Senate GOP
Having Angered Democrats, McCain Supporting Connecticut Independent May Lose Top Role On Senate Committee
-
Play CBS Video
Video
What About Lieberman?
Conn. Sen. Joe Lieberman faces the possible loss of his chairmanship of the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee after backing John McCain over President-Elect Obama.
-
Photo
Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn. makes a statement on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 6, 2008, after meeting with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada. (AP)
Lieberman's affiliation with Democrats is up in the air. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, angered by Lieberman's support of Republican John McCain for president, is considering yanking Lieberman's chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee as punishment.
Lieberman and Reid met Thursday to discuss Lieberman's options, including possible committee and subcommittee posts for him. Those talks are ongoing.
A Lieberman aide, who requested anonymity because the talks are confidential, said Friday that Lieberman and McConnell, R-Ky., have spoken in recent days about the possibility of Lieberman joining the GOP conference. McConnell spokesman Don Stewart would only confirm that the two men have had recent discussions.
Lieberman was Democrat Al Gore's vice presidential running mate eight years ago. He became an independent after he failed to win the Democratic Senate primary in Connecticut in 2006. Lieberman won the general election as an independent but is still registered as a Democrat.
Although he caucuses with Senate Democrats, Lieberman angered Democrats by criticizing Barack Obama during the presidential race.
Since 2006, Democrats had tolerated Lieberman's political straddling because he gave them a 51-49 majority by being part of their caucus. With Democrats tightening their hold on the Senate to at least 55 seats in Tuesday's election, Lieberman no longer plays that role.
Lieberman aligned himself with McCain and President Bush on the war in Iraq but tended to vote with Democrats on most domestic issues.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.




- 1
- 2
- next
See all 53 Comments--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by TheMasses10
It had to happen. The nutcase republicans have called Obama an elitist, a celebrity, a terrorist, a socialist, a communist, and now the anti-christ!!! If you people would put as much energy into developing policies to benefit our country as you do into name-calling you might get elected to something.
You are seeking to inspire violence through your deceit.
You should stop that.
Also, he obviously didn''t go against democracy when he switched to an independent to win his senate seat-he did it to keep a Republican from winning! And considering he absolutely trounced his opponent, how did democracy not occur? He got the majority of the state''s vote!
Get over it you over reacting, ignorant losers.
Lieberman-a TRUE rogue.
Does he really think the Democrats would welcome him back after he spent the entire campaign following the Republican ticket around slobering all over them like a drunk puppy?
HA HA HA
I wouldn''t even give him a key to the john.
It is important to have principles and expect others to have principles also. Lieberman was given the gift of being treated as a tenured Democrat after he ran against the Democratic party nominee and won as a freshman Independent. He then sought to help the Republican nominee for President defeat the Democratic nominee. That went too far.
There is too much deceit in Lieberman. He cannot and should not be trusted.
Let him win for himself by his own efforts whatever he can without Democrats playing the fool by enabling him.
Pelosi doesn''t know when to shut up and honestly thinks she''s smarter than all of them put together and fully prepared to hatchet anyone who disagrees. Reid is her b.itch and Frank can''t keep his big head separate from his little head with his high profile se.xual exploits with key players in what ever arena makes him feel most important (the Fannie mess, most recent)...but they all took credit for the biggest bailout at tax payer''s expense in the history of this nation...and really think to this day they got away with it. Why would any one with an ounce of integrity want to be picked to play on their team?
He went over the line and deserted principle for personal friendship considerations. The question is now, What do we do with him? Answer...
Allow him to keep his committee chairmanship because he has enough expertise to handle "homeland security."
But tell Lieberman that his "loyalty" to principle is expected to be maintained over and above personal issues like friendship. He must work toward common goals just like others, as he keeps his right to differ on single issues.
Then back up whatever agreement is made with him to the letter. If he waivers, jerk him out of committee and caucus "leadership" positions.
If you think all politicians aren''t beholden to personal friendships and otherwise in how they vote, you are sadly mistaken! Could it have ANYTHING to do with the fact that Lieberman actually supports John McCain for his policy in Iraq? I mean, 90% of you slobs were one issue voters-how is it so inconceivable that Lieberman is the same?
The way he went about supporting McCain? You mean, by supporting him? Still not really a valid argument for how he''s any different than any other registered whatever who supports a different candidate. Since when is being a liberal like being a cult? "ONE OF US, ONE OF US". His last name is Lieberman, not Stepford.
I think the DEMS should dump you. You might be a snake. And birds of a feather, flock together........
Hey Joe, you dance with the people what brung ya.
Posted by Element51 at 10:57 PM : Nov 06, 2008
Or maybe he should look for another barbed wire fence to ride.
If Lieberman was a Republican and had actively supported the Democratic candidate, the Republican leadership would have stripped him of his chairmanship.
Harry Reid, on the other hand, hems and haws and talks about the "concerns" of his members.
If Democrats want to grow a pair, they should start by dumping Reid, Pelosi, and weenieman Steny Hoyer.
Why are you trotting out those tired old lies? The election is over. Your candidate lost. The scare tactics didn''t work because voters were a lot more scared at the thought of another four years of Bush/Republican policies than they were of a candidate who spent two years in a public school that offered religious classes for Muslim students. CNN and other news sources debunked the "madrassa" story almost as soon as it aired. The other two of the "formative years" he spent in Indonesia, he attended a Catholic school.
Obama is trying to reach across party lines. The current economic situation requires all Americans to work cooperatively. Bigots and whiners have nothing to offer if we''re going to successfully clean up the mess left by Bush and complicit Republicans.
LOYALTY.
A virtue absent from Joe Lieberman.
He should fit in well with the "win at any cost" Neo-republican Party.
I thought reid was magnanimous in allowing Lieberman a subcommittee chairmanship. Lieberman take your medicine
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by kansas1946 at 08:23 PM : Nov 07, 2008
+ report
It would seem to me that by this definition he is true independent just as you are. Plus I find it nauseating how you alleged independents think that because one supports a party they are stepford wives.
Its a bunch of baloney and btw how do independents organize the congress. Do independents help elect people or do they just sit on the sidelines and attack anyone who tries and fails
The GOP deserve and can have him!
Yes Joe Liarman did promise his constituents that although he was independant, he would never go the Republican Party.
He also promised the Democratic Party that although he supported McCain, he would not trash Obama. Liarman is not under scrutiny because he supported McCain, it''s that he went around trashing Obama and campaigning for McCain.
When Liarman was up for election in Connecticut, guess who went out campaigning for him??? Barack Obama.
Liarman is one two faced shady cat.
The GOP can have him!
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 53 Comments