Dems In Congress Wary Of Overreaching

Pelosi Vows To Govern From The Middle Despite Democratic Control Of House, Senate And Presidency

(AP)  President-elect Barack Obama is facing a Congress with bulked-up Democratic majorities in both the House and Senate to put much of his agenda into law.

Obama will inherit a Congress with Democratic House and Senate majorities comparable to those enjoyed by President Clinton when the party last controlled both Congress and the White House in 1992. While Democrats are eager to churn out the new president's legislative programs, they're also anxious to avoid the electoral wipeout that swept them from power in the 1994 congressional elections.

That's one reason top leaders like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi promise not to lurch to the left and give in to pent-up demands from party liberals.

"The country must be governed from the middle," Pelosi, D-Calif., told reporters Wednesday. "You have to bring people together to reach consensus on solutions that are sustainable and acceptable to the American people."

One of the complications for Pelosi and Obama is the demise of GOP moderates like Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., who lost his re-election bid.

"Never in modern day history has the Republican Party been more bereft of a center," said former Rep. Jim Leach, R-Iowa. "So the center has to come from the Democratic Party."

There are other reasons too, such as a coalition of Republicans and a few conservative Democrats in the Senate. In the House, a big bloc of moderate-to-conservative "Blue Dog" Democrats also could put the brakes on overreaching by Obama and allies like Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.

But after 14 years of either a GOP-dominated Congress or a Republican president, Democratic Party regulars are under intense pressure to deliver on an agenda they've been promising long before Obama announced his bid for the White House.

"I'm not worried about overreaching," said Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass. "I'm worried about being too timid and too cautious, and not stepping up to the plate and doing what we promised we would do."

Added Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, "This election ushered in the next progressive era for our nation. From health care to trade to education, progressive values will now be the priority in Washington. It's time to get to work."

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., countered that Democrats would impose "self-discipline" because so many House newcomers come from conservative-leaning districts.

"If we focus on the core issues of jobs, of health care, of education, of the environment ... I think we will not make mistakes," Hoyer said.

Inside Pelosi's caucus of House Democrats, whose numbers will swell to at least 254 from 235 now, some tensions are already apparent.

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., a liberal Pelosi ally, launched a bid to challenge 82-year-old Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., for the chairmanship of the influential House Energy and Commerce Committee, and take the lead on issues like global warming, energy and health care. Dingell is a staunch protector of Detroit automakers, and his battles with Waxman over clean air laws date to the Reagan administration.

Dingell, who has either chaired the committee or been its top Democrat since 1981, was "mounting a full-out war" to save his chairmanship, a top adviser said Wednesday.

Republicans, too, are facing tensions and a shake-up of party leaders in the wake of Tuesday's disappointing election results.

Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia launched a bid to become GOP whip, the No. 2 post, while Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, is seeking to replace Rep. Adam Putnam of Florida as the third-ranking Republican in the House. Putnam announced he would step down after Tuesday's losses for Republicans. The current whip, Rep. Roy Blunt of Missouri, was considering his options but did not immediately announce a bid to keep his job, a sign that he'll likely step aside.

Both Cantor and Hensarling are more conservative than the lawmakers they're seeking to replace, leading some Republicans to grumble that the party was moving to the right when it should be reaching toward the center if it is to regain its majority. House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio said he would seek to keep his post.

Leon Panetta, a former House Democrat and White House chief of staff for Clinton, said Obama "has to make an effort at bipartisan cooperation, which means that he has to reach out to the Republicans and see whether or not they're willing to cooperate on some issues," like education and immigration. He added that Obama will need to develop coalitions on issues that divide Democrats.

Shake-ups also are possible in the Senate, where Democrats have increased their effective majority to at least 56 seats in the 100-member chamber. Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, one of two independents who align with Democrats, is threatened with the loss of his chairmanship of the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee as payback for actively supporting the presidential bid of Republican Sen. John McCain. Reid, the majority leader, said he would meet with Lieberman later in the week to discuss the matter.

"Now that the election is over, it is time to put partisan considerations aside and come together as a nation to solve the difficult challenges we face and make our blessed land stronger and safer," Lieberman said in a written statement. He had harshly criticized Obama in a speech at the GOP nominating convention in September.

Then there's the game of musical chairs in the Senate that has to be played because of the departures of Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden to the White House. Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, a Democrat, will appoint someone to fill out the remaining two years of Obama's term. Speculation has focused on Chicago Reps. Jesse Jackson Jr. and Danny Davis, along with Rep. Jan Schakowsky.

Biden's departure opens up not only his seat - he won a seventh term Tuesday - but also the prestigious chairmanship of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Delaware's departing Democratic governor, Ruth Ann Minner, likely will name a successor to serve until the end of next year, when a special election will be held to fill the remaining four years. Speculation surrounds Lt. Gov. John Carney and Biden's son Beau, who is Delaware's first-term attorney general.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., could be in line to fill the Foreign Relations post, depending on whether Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., decides to stay on as chairman of the Senate Banking Committee to deal with the financial meltdown.

Democrats have added at least five seats in the Senate, to bring their numbers to 56 - for now. But three GOP-held seats - in Oregon, Alaska and Minnesota - have yet to be decided. A fourth still-disputed Senate seat now held by a Republican incumbent will be settled by a Dec. 2 runoff in Georgia.

[treknutz]

Nancy govern from the center? Of what, the center of the extreme? I''m an independant who voted for Obama and I sincerely hope he buys a muzzle and leash for her before the new puppy. She is an idiot who proved nothing except how to run her mouth and walk a crooked line. The fact she is the first woman speaker of the house has made her ego far more dangerous than caraboo-boo Barbie Palin.

[robindallas-2009]

Abandon the bogus Left/Right Democrat/Republican paradigm. They are like Tide and Cheer. They look different and are marketed differently, but they are both owned by the corporate kleptocracy and serve them above all people.

[robindallas-2009]

The only jobs that the corporations have produced are minimum wage food service jobs. They have exported all the manufacturing jobs. Thanks to incentives like NAFTA we only make pizza and bombs in this country.

[bayside1022-2009]

Nancy over 70 per of americans are liberals saying we want change..You said we would get it..Centerist and right wing did this mess to us..If we wanted same old we would have voted MCCain..Appoint some liberals , Get with the program, because you are all on probation and we wont give you a second chance.. No more of same old..

[terribletire]

Remember that for Pelosi "the middle" is where it''s OK to illegally launch wars of aggression, illegally detain people, illegally spy on people, illegally torture people and to never ever ever hold anyone responsible for such crimes accountable. In other words for Pelosi "the middle" is the far far right to 90% of the world.

[robindallas-2009]

When Pelosi says "from the middle" she means from the corporate sweet spot right in the middle of whatever they want. That is the middle she is familiar with. She hasn''t done jack for the working citizens. She was a Bush Crime Family enabler. She took impeachment off the table in spite of the mountain of evidence the required her to do her duty and pursue impeachment. She is bought, just like most of the representatives and senators in our government. It is a corporate kleptocracy which cares not for the average citizens. They don''t represent us.

[robindallas-2009]

If Obama is representing real change, he should remove Pelosi and all the enabling Democrats that gave Bush everything he wanted since 2006. That would prove he is for real and not just selling empty promises. Pelosi is part of the problem. She is a career politician who has been bought off by corporate interests. Pelosi is of no use to someone who represents real change.

[insomniac51]

The country has re-calibrated. The middle is much, much farther left. We voted for change. Change is what we should get.

Americans may not agree with Obama''s every decision, but at least now we''ll have a president we can respect and support. It''s been a long time coming.

[pdchapin]

The goal should be to never pass anything on a party line vote. This means you actually listen to the other side rather than rant at them. It means asking what you can do to make your proposals acceptable at least to the moderates in the Republican party and then actually doing it. It means recognizing that "bipartisanship" doesn''t mean you''ll let them do it your way but that you actually look for compromise solution that everybody can live with if not alway like. If Obama and current congressional leadership can do this, we''ll have one of the great administrations in US history. If not, we have a deadlocked disaster resulting in even lower (if that''s possible) approval of Congress and the President.

One big question is whether the Republican''s want to help govern this country or would rather drive it over a cliff in hopes of running what''s left?

[antoniof123]

I hope Pelosi means what she is saying. Obama will have to keep a real tight rein on her. If these politicians do not start to work in the middle and compromise on the issues this Country faces we will not succeed. We are in this mess because of the extreme right and if you are not with them then you are an enemy, bipartisanship is the only way this Country will recover.
Posted by armydog2 at 07:08 AM : Nov 07, 2008

It will be easier for her then for the Republicans that is a fact. The GOP must give up the division issues that have become their center piece. If not they will never again see any kind of forgiveness from the American swing voter that is a promise.

[antoniof123]

Dems In Congress Wary Of Overreaching

Good stay in the middle and we will reward the Democrats with a generation of power.

I don''t care what you wing nuts say any more you destroyed the GOP; keep it; it''s yours.

[misha128-2009]

Just give Obama a little time and 1/2 of the democrats will become republicans...

Posted by mr22587

Very well said and no doubt about it, a true prophesy. Obama will sever himself from 25% of his own party. This 25% of Democrats will not go very far to the left before they pull back and vote with the Republicans. This is still a conservative country and if they want to keep their seats in congress they will govern from the center.

Posted by commonsence1 at 08:50 AM

You both appear to be out of sync with the latest Republican talking points. Obama won according to the Republicans because he was a center to center-right candidate. How does a far left candidate that has not changed a single position become center to center-right the day after the election?

[au_fait]

There is no middle. It''''s the United States and the Far right. Please tell me how you negotiate with racists and a bunch of Jesus Freaks.


Posted by langs13

wow , it sounds as if you are just as bad as the racists you are whining about. Your views are scewed. There are evils on both extreme sides of the party. So I guess racism does not exist on the liberal side. What black against other color racism?

[armydog2]

I hope Pelosi means what she is saying. Obama will have to keep a real tight rein on her. If these politicians do not start to work in the middle and compromise on the issues this Country faces we will not succeed. We are in this mess because of the extreme right and if you are not with them then you are an enemy, bipartisanship is the only way this Country will recover.

[specialty8]

If Pelosi wants to do her country a favor,just go away or go on another long vacation.

[cfin5]

Added Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, "This election ushered in the next progressive era for our nation. From health care to trade to education, progressive values will now be the priority in Washington. It''s time to get to work." ----- This says it all folks as the grayed up term "PROGRESSIVE" actually means in reality "REGRESSIVE" against our Founding Fathers brilliant work in the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights,.....and that is SOCIALISM, which can only rule through increasingly authoritarian means. This is a historical fact: Neolibs and Neocons love each other as the dirty deeds of one delivers the public outrage the other needs to violate the 9th. Amendment to the Constitution, which is the first amendment that is offended whenever our rights are to be penalized for what government has done,....not the owners of those rights. In easier terms for the slow minded, the right arm (neocons) uses its fist with an upper cut to the American citizens noses, then folks with nowhere else to turn, embrace the left arm (neolibs), not understanding that that fist is coming around with a hay maker.....Tell me what is the difference? The result is the same and why those like me call this two party system a duopoly; the republicrats or demopublicans. Take your pick!

[thcarson-2009]

Let me explain something. In 2004, there were 72 million registered Democrats. In 2004, there were 55 million registered Republicans. Since 2004, in the 29 states that record party affiliation with registration, Democrats added 700,000 and Republicans lost one million registered voters. When you add in the other 21 states, how many more were registered for 2008? This is not a 50/50 country. There is no middle. This is a Democratic country. We have been governed by the wrong party for at least the last eight years. If Madame Speaker doesn''''t understand that, it is our duty as Democrats to remind her. What was it President-Elect Obama said? Oh, yeah: ENOUGH!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Carolab1

I guess all of those registered democrats should have gone out and voted. I could see your point if Obama had won the election by a 60-40 split, but it didn''t shake out that way.

[carolab1]

Let me explain something. In 2004, there were 72 million registered Democrats. In 2004, there were 55 million registered Republicans. Since 2004, in the 29 states that record party affiliation with registration, Democrats added 700,000 and Republicans lost one million registered voters. When you add in the other 21 states, how many more were registered for 2008? This is not a 50/50 country. There is no middle. This is a Democratic country. We have been governed by the wrong party for at least the last eight years. If Madame Speaker doesn''t understand that, it is our duty as Democrats to remind her. What was it President-Elect Obama said? Oh, yeah: ENOUGH!

[hissteps4u]

tuckerndfw They serve no useful purpose and we''''ve had enough of it.We all need to stop doing it now.

Well put the massive challenge we face is somehow forceing our representatives in Government to sit listen and evaulate and learn to work together to accomplish the task at hand.

The Infighting and particenship is killing us. I personally think Term limits would go a long way to end much of the Power hungry brokers in washington yet Washington needs a clean sweep and full wash of the old guard in both parties who''s power baseis based on their party affiliation and not what they are able to accomplish.

I am sick of Politics as usual and hope that Obama has the audacity and the cunning to cut through the garbage and to reign in the folks and bring some sanity to an insane situation as it curently is in my view

[samthetvcat]

Actually though, you know what in the long run it might actually be win-win for Repubs to lay off the filibuster and claim that with so little votes they didn''t want to stand in the way of Dems and that they''d let Dems be judged on their performance.

They might also be better off in the long-run not caving in to the sweeteners - no filibuster, but no votes . . .

Like if Dems start looking for cover rather than truly cultivating bipartisanship with depth, Repubs might be better off resisting business as usual if they truly believe people don''t want an expansive Government and that''s all Dems are offering (?)