Obama, The Supreme Court And DOJ
Legal Analyst Cohen On Obama Impact On Courts And Dept. Of Justice
-
Play CBS Video Video Obama And The Supreme Court Once Barack Obama takes office, he may be in the position to appoint several Supreme Court justices? Wyatt Andrews takes a look at where he stands on judicial appointments.
-
Interactive The Supreme Court History, traditions and key cases, plus what it takes to get on the bench.
-
Blog Court Watch CBSNews.com Legal Analyst Andrew Cohen's new blog on the big issues and analyzes important cases of the day.
When he looks to select the next Attorney General of the United States, or the next Supreme Court justice, or even just the lower federal courts, President-elect Barack Obama will see plenty of smart options and certainly many opportunities to continue his brand of "new" politics.
Let’s look first at the Attorney General position. It is imperative that Obama select someone who will continue to reform and rebuild the Justice Department in the wake of Alberto Gonzales’ disastrous reign. The candidate must restore professionalism and nonpartisanship within the Department and also continue to adapt to the evolving legal war on terror.
One obvious choice for the position is Eric Holder, a former Justice Department official in the Clinton Administration who has kept a suitably low profile in Washington during the Democrats’ exile from the White House. Holder is a Democrat, but it will be hard for Republicans to tag him as a crony of the Left. He knows the ropes at Justice, has some experience in dealing with terror law and domestic crime (which is up), and has the intelligence and demeanor to generate confidence in the halls of Congress.
If Obama were to look beyond his own party, he could select for Justice either James B. Comey or Patrick J. Fitzgerald, two Republicans who have left deep marks in the law during their time in government. Comey was Deputy Attorney General (to John Ashcroft) during the Bush Administration and showed great integrity during one of the most significant scandals in Justice Department history. It was Comey, sitting in for an ailing Ashcroft, who refused under pressure to certify the White House’s controversial (and, at the time, arguably illegal) "domestic surveillance" operation.
Fitzgerald, too, showed great political courage and legal acumen when he was named special prosecutor in the CIA leak case. A masterful trial lawyer and dogged personality, Fitzgerald successfully prosecuted I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby. His nomination for the AG position clearly would send a “bipartisan” message to the Congress and the courts. He has the talent to reach a new level in government and Obama could do worse than giving him a chance.
Now let’s look to the Supreme Court. Right now, seven of the nine Justices were appointed by Republicans; the oldest members are the most liberal and the youngest are the most conservative. It is very likely that Justices John Paul Stevens (age 88) and Ruth Bader Ginsburg (age 75) will retire within the next four years. “Swing” vote Justice Anthony Kennedy and Antonin Scalia are both 72. So Obama should have an opportunity to appoint several new Justices.
First, forget any talk of big-time Washington lawyer Robert Barnett getting the nod. You can also discount the idea that law professors Cass Sunstein or Laurence Tribe will be called upon by Team Obama. But that’s not to say that he can’t or won’t select a candidate who is not currently an active judge. Indeed, the Supreme Court clearly could use justice who doesn’t come from a federal appeals court; someone with a background like Sandra Day O’Connor, who spent some time as a state legislator in Arizona before becoming a state court judge and then the first female Justice in history.
How about Elena Kagan, dean of the Harvard Law School? She’s brilliant, got some experience in government during the Clinton Administration, and doesn’t appear to raise the hair on the backs of the necks of conservative. Oh, and not incidentally, she clerked for the late Justice Thurgood Marshall, the first black Justice. She’s 48, which means she’s just a tick older that Obama himself.
Another unconventional candidate would be Hillary Rodham Clinton. Don’t laugh. She has a law background and was famously good in her youth as counsel for the Democrats during the Watergate investigation. If she doesn’t want to continue as one voice in 100 in the Senate, or if she no longer has the will to run in 2016, it’s not hard to see a scenario where she parks herself at the Supreme Court. Obama certainly will offer her some sort of position within his Administration - as payback for her wonderful soldier-like work during the campaign. Why not a spot on the Court?
When it comes to trial court vacancies, Obama will have an opportunity over the next few years to begin to rebalance the federal judiciary after 20 of 28 years of Republican rule. Although it is often difficult to label a federal trial judge as "liberal" or "conservative," one recent report suggested that the courts have about a 60-40 balance now in favor of conservative jurists. That balance is sure to change during the Obama Administration. But just how far and how quickly is an open question.
Ironically, it is here, with the question of judicial appointments, where Sen. John McCain can perhaps best help his former rival. McCain is precisely the sort of politician who can work with Senate Democrats to break the logjam of judicial appointments that has marked the last few years of the Bush Administration. He’s done it before. And if he can help fill the many vacancies on the federal bench - and thus help ordinary litigants get their disputes resolved more quickly - he’ll be doing the country and Obama a favor.
It’s a brand new world and it provides Obama with an opportunity to place into power within the world of the law cornerstones of his commitment to a new style of governance. There are plenty of highly capable, integrity-laden people out there, of both parties, who deserve a chance and if Obama is true to his word he will give it to them.
By Andrew Cohen
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Michelle Obama tells how her role as the First Lady has changed her perspective.





- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 45 Comments--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by TheLastVoter at 11:00 PM : Nov 06, 2008
As a liberal Democrat I have to say that was spoken like a true American. Your words of goodwill are encouraging- We''ll need all hands on deck for this one...
1) Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray
2) Senator Hillary Clinton
3) University of Texas'' Larry Sager
Posted by sayfud-deen at 06:33 AM : Nov 06, 2008
This is not an illegal war. It was voted on and passed overwhelmingly by congress. Then when it wasn''t over in a month they claim they were lied to. B. S. facts are coming to light and will continue to that vindicate the decision to go to war with Sadam.
I is of course the American people who will need to lead ourselves out of this mess. We just have to hope and pray Obama works with us to do that.
I did not vote for Obama because I disagreed with him on most everything he stands for. With that said he is my new President Elect and I will support him. I encourage those who are upset by his election to remember we need to do our best to come together while respectfully making our voices heard. We must share our opinions, lobby for our causes and ask our representatives to support us as well as our communities.
So hold on to your hats; history was really made...the worst ever loss after a presidential election continues today....wise American investors know what he is going to do to them so they are getting out!! The facts speak for themselves....suckers!! America has been duped!!
Year Dow S&P Nasdaq President elect
2008 -5.05 -5.27 -5.53 Barack Obama
2004 +1.01 1.12 0.98 George W. Bush
2000 -0.41 -1.58 -5.39 No decision: G.W. Bush v Al Gore*
1996 1.59 1.46 1.34 William Clinton
1992 -0.91 -0.67 0.16 William Clinton
1988 -0.43 -0.66 -0.29 George H. W. Bush
1984 -0.88 -0.73 -0.32 Ronald Reagan
1980 1.70 1.77 1.49 Ronald Reagan
1976 -0.99 -1.14 -1.12 James Carter
1972 -0.11 -0.55 -0.39 Richard Nixon
1968 0.34 0.16 --- Richard Nixon
1964 -0.19 -0.05 --- Lyndon Johnson
1960 0.77 0.44 --- John Kennedy
;-)
First - Lockheed Martin is under investigation for the Deepwater issues. This creates a conflict of interest relative to him leading the DoJ. Second - Mr. Comey has not chosen the ethical path in leading Lockheed Martin in these efforts. He has sided with the contractor when he should not have. There is hand-signed proof of his participation in the fraud. (See the Law.com article from Dec 07). If Mr. Comey were to show true ethical fortitude he would resign from Lockheed and do the right thing. Anything short of that disqualifies him from his return to government service in the capacity suggested.
First - Lockheed Martin is under investigation for the Deepwater issues. This creates a conflict of interest relative to him leading the DoJ. Second - Mr. Comey has not chosen the ethical path in leading Lockheed Martin in these efforts. He has sided with the contractor when he should not have. There is hand-signed proof of his participation in the fraud. (See the Law.com article from Dec 07). If Mr. Comey were to show true ethical fortitude he would resign from Lockheed and do the right thing. Anything short of that disqualifies him from his return to government service in the capacity suggested.
Your one-sided slant on views is more like communism than anything I''ve heard said on these comment boards. You sound more like a dictator with only your extreme right views allowed. You do not love America, you hate it because it allows everyone to take part in our democratic process. I know you don''t like that your party lost, but I am thankful that the people''s voice was heard, whether Obama makes a good president or not. The people decided, and that includes Republicans and Independents. McCain won the majority in Texas, home of the redneck Republican. I''m proud of the people in Texas who voted for him, but there were many people who voted for Obama and I am proud that they voted for him too. Instead of calling for Obama''s administratiaon to fail, you should be praying that it doesn''t. He won''t be perfect, but the people have put their trust in him and I pray he will be a very successful president. We need to pull together and give our new president and administration our help and constructive criticism, not have a temper tantrum. By spewing this hatred, you sound like a spoiled child who only wants things his way and no other way. Let it go and be part of the solution, not part of the problem. Be An American for a change, not just a Republican. I''m proud to be an American and I''m proud the people''s voice was heard and, if you voted, even yours. Let the votes talk, not the hate mongers of any policital affiliation.
Since when did CBS turn into FOX? Don''t you conservative types have some gay pOrn you need to be downloading?
Which reminds most Americans of the Bu$h Adnministration..........
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
.....Reminds me of what happened in Germany in the early 30''''s.
Non of these events had anything to to with the failed republican agenda. Did they????????
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
it''''s enough that the press controlled the election.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 45 Comments