S.D. Voters Reject Abortion Ballot Measure
Others Ballot Measures Across U.S. Include Gay Marriage And Affirmative Action
-
Photo
Jan Nicolay, co-chair of South Dakota Campaign for Healthy Families, delivers a speech after the abortion ban ballot measure was declared defeated, Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2008 at the convention center in Sioux Falls, S.D. (AP Photo/Doug Dreyer)
-
Interactive
Election Day 2008
Images, results and reaction from the historic election.
-
Photos
Election Day Images
Snapshots from throughout the historic day.
- Stories
- Barack Obama Wins Presidency
CBS News projects that voters in South Dakota voted down Measure 11, which would have prohibited abortions except in cases where the mother's life or health is at a substantial and irreversible risk, and in cases of reported rape and incest. If it had passed, it would likely have triggered a legal challenge which could have lead to the U.S. Supreme Court and a reconsideration of the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that established the right to abortion.
In Colorado, CBS News projects that voters rejected Amendment 48, which would have defined the term "person" to include any human being from the moment of fertilization.
And in California, voters are deciding on Proposition 4, which would require a waiting period of 48 hours after parental notification before allowing a minor to terminate a pregnancy.
One of the most high-profile ballot initiatives is California's Proposition 8, which would eliminate the right of same-sex couples under the state constitution to marry, and would provide that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. Similar measures have prevailed previously in 27 states, but none were in California's situation - with thousands of gay couples already married in the aftermath of a state Supreme Court ruling in May.
Similar ballot measures were up for vote in Arizona and Florida. CBS News projects that Arizona voters have passed the gay marriage ban.
Reporting on California's Proposition 8, Barbara Simon, Executive Producer of CBS News on LOGO, says polls have gone back and forth with extremely slim margins, and right now, the number on 8's side is leading by three points, according to a poll from our CBS station KPIX-TV in San Francisco. The margin of error is 4.
Colorado voters are deciding on Amendment 46, which would prohibit discrimination by the state or granting preferential treatment to any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting. According to a poll taken in late October by CBS station KCNC in Denver and the Rocky Mountain News, 53 percent of registered voters in Colorado support the amendment.
CBS News projects that Nebraska voters are going to pass Measure 424, which is a constitutional amendment which bans affirmative action, by prohibiting the state from discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, public education or public contracting, although there would exceptions for certain federal programs.
In Massachusetts, voters had to decide on a ballot measure eliminating the state's income tax. Question One proposed eliminating the 5.3 percent income tax by January 2010. According to projections, the ballot question was not passed.
Click here for updated, complete election results by state.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.




Do you really think that that progress will be stifled or reversed under Barack Obama?
Give it up bigots, your time is done. Equality for all, or equality for none.
Posted by heuristic1 at 08:57 PM : Nov 04, 2008
You would rather be Muslim?
Homosexuality as far as Islam is concerned is a profound mistake ( as are all sins if they are not intending to do wrong). Humans are not homosexuals by nature. People become homosexuals because of their environments. Particularly critical is the environment during puberty.
Again you people show your ignorance by speaking. I am a Christian and I have read the Qur''an I suggest you should as well, heuristic1
Homosexuality as far as Islam is concerned is a profound mistake ( as are all sins if they are not intending to do wrong). Humans are not homosexuals by nature. People become homosexuals because of their environments. Particularly critical is the environment during puberty.
Again you people show your ignorance by speaking. I am a Christian and I have read the Qur''an I suggest you should as well, heuristic1
Posted by rchase7 at 09:33 PM : Nov 04, 2008
Oh? It is,nt? I would recommend you take your own advise and read the bible. Homosexuality and perversion is addressed many times in scripture as abominations and of the the depraved of mind, a guaranteed one way ticket to a permanent stay with satan. Many churches are decieving the masses with replacement theology, preaching that being GAY is okay.
Praise the Lord!
And - he also endorses the separation of church and state - Render unto Cesar, that which is Cesars. Which is entirely the point here - your religious beliefs should never dictate my actions, my choices, my rights.
Praise Him. Blessings to all ... as we heal our differences, unite our country, and get behind our new President.
Pro-Choice does not mean Pro-Abortion.
"A marriage is only to make legal babies and a family."
So, Mom_O_Truth, if either partner is infertile, the couple shouldn`t have s-e-x, and also the couple shouldn`t have s-e-x after the woman`s menopause?
There isn''t any society in history that discouraged families that survived in the long term, which is why marriage is one of the few things that is common among all civilizations.
Once you start creating marriages soley for the purpose of creating a marriage, and the resultant family has no intention of creating or of raising children, it turns marriage into a sham of what it is supposed to be. It is just as pointless for a man and a woman to get married, who never intend on having or of raising children, as it is for 2 women or 2 men to get married, who never intend on raising children. I think that everyone unconsciously understands this.
The real problem with gay marriage is that the notion of *** raising children is distasteful to most people. People would rather not have *** raise children, so they feel why do *** really need marriage unless they want to raise children? The tax and inheritance and medical issues can easily be taken care of by civil law changes - the real sticking point is gay couples rearing children. Until the US society accepts that, it will not accept gay marriage.
There are a lot of unwanted crack babies out there that need a mom and dad. I think it''s time for right wing hypocrites to step up to the plate and support all unwanted children until the age of 21. Certainly they should at least pay for all children that would''ve otherwise have been aborted.
How many of you out there think that will happen??
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
now bout this abortion thing..you kill a baby ur a murder...from conception the baby is alive..theres adoption
Posted by fush2
For example: tell us exactly when you chose to be straight?
*YOU* should follow the example of God,but certainly, that is too much to ask......
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
you arent born that way...being gay is a sin like many things thats y god died for us...god loves everyone equally...christians dont hate *** atleast i dont...
Legal Babies can only be made between a Man and a Woman.
---------------
This is an interesting statement because it highlights how marriage is a LEGAL CONTRACT--something authorized by the state, not the church.
Churches don''t determine legality in our democracy, rather, legislation does. So, to make "legal babies" is up to our laws, not to religion. That''s why we have chances to vote on the issue and adapt.
Leave "marriage" to churches. Leave "unions" to the government. One is a holy sacrament between two people and God, the other is a legal arrangement. The fact is, they are distinct and people DO treat them differently. So why confuse the issue by using one word to describe two different things?
-
by klunder3
November 5, 2008 4:29 PM PST
- Responding to Celestial Sea, who wrote in part:
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 26 Comments"I guess for those who don''''t have any Christian convictions, all these so called issues are not really issues at all. I guess if you don''''t have a conscience there''''s really nothing to worry about."
Does this mean, Celestial Sea, that you believe Christians are the only people who have a conscience? If so, that doesn''t should very "Christian" to me. Do you believe that Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, and any other type of religious people who are not Christians live without a conscience?! How about agnostics, would you automatically condemn them also, as people without consciences, simply because they don''t share your culture and your religiosity? That doesn''t sound much like Jesus'' message to me, and I went to private, paroohial Christian grammar schools and high school for 12 years.