Nov. 2, 2008

Campaigns Confident Ahead Of Election Day

Face The Nation: Obama Strategist David Axelrod And GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham Both Like Their Candidate's Chances

  • Play CBS Video Video Face The Nation, 11.2.08

    Bob Schieffer talks with political figures about the presidential race in the battleground states, the candidates' final strategies, and journalistic objectivity in an election.

  • Video Quick Check: The Candidates

    Bob Schieffer talks with Republican and Democratic politicians about their final takes on presidential candidates Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain.

  • Video The Final Days

    Bob Schieffer talks with figures from both Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama's campaigns about the final days of the race in battleground states.

  • Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and David Axelrod, chief strategist for the Obama campaign, on Photo

    Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and David Axelrod, chief strategist for the Obama campaign, on "Face The Nation." 4563908  (CBS)

  • CBS Evening News Presidential Questions

    Katie Couric asks Barack Obama and John McCain questions of politics, policy and character.

  • In-Depth Ways To Win

    Calculate your own path to the presidency with CBSNews.com's electoral vote prediction map.

(CBS)  With just two days before Election Day, top advisers to both Barack Obama and John McCain appear to be confident of their candidate's chances.

"We feel good," Obama chief strategist David Axelrod said on CBS News' Face The Nation. "And it's not just the polls. It's the early voting that we've seen. About a third of the country is going to vote before Tuesday, and those numbers are coming in very strong for us and reversing some historical patterns. In states like North Carolina, it looks like as many as three million people may vote before Tuesday, and where that vote is coming from and the addition of so many new voters is something we're encouraged by.

"And the crowds we're seeing: I'm here in Springfield, Missouri, which is a traditionally Republican part of the state. We had a crowd of 40,000 people here last night, very enthusiastic crowd late at night. Three times as large as any crowd anybody has ever gotten here," he added. "And those things are encouraging, but we still have to win this thing. We have to vote and we can't be complacent. We have to fight to the end, and we will."

But Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina who is one of McCain's staunchest supporters, gave host Bob Schieffer a different view:

"What we've seen in the last two weeks is very much a tightening of the race in the states that matter," Graham said. "I really believe that Senator Obama is the virtual incumbent. And if he's not at 50 percent today in North Carolina, he's not going to win. We see closing in Nevada, New Mexico and Colorado, Missouri, Pennsylvania and Ohio. We have him under 50, in the margin of error. The intensity level in the last couple of weeks has been unbelievable on our side.

"I think the undecided voter in these key states will come our way. We're taking nothing for granted. We're campaigning hard," he added.

Of particular interest to both Graham and Axelrod is Pennsylvania. The state has gone for Democrats in the last four presidential elections, but the McCain campaign is fighting hard there for a Republican pickup, despite some poll numbers showing them well behind.

"The voter demographics in Pennsylvania [are] set up very much for the centrist candidate that Senator McCain is," Graham said. "Senator Obama is becoming more and more an out-of-the-mainstream, left-leaning economic candidate when it comes to redistribution of the wealth, and we see in our narratives that that is sticking, that people have a second look at Senator Obama in Pennsylvania, and they question his economic policies, his role of the court, and his experience to make us safe."

Axelrod points to a registration edge and organization as the keys to victory for his campaign.

"I feel good about what I see in Pennsylvania, starting with the fact that we have a registration edge that's twice as large as we had four years ago. It went from 300,000 in favor of Democrats to 600,000, so that right away gives me encouragement," Axelrod said. "I know that there have been a couple of late polls that suggest otherwise, but I've seen many more that work in our direction. And beyond which, I just feel, based on the organization we have on the ground, the reaction that we're getting, that we're going to do very well in Pennsylvania. We're going to work really hard at it."

On Election Day, in addition to the presidential race, there are several Senate seats up for grabs. Democrats appear likely to increase their advantage in the chamber, but Republicans look to minimize their losses. The heads of each party's campaign committees - Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, N.Y., and Republican Sen. John Ensign, Nev. - talked with Schieffer on Face The Nation.

(CBS)
Schumer (left) said that he thinks Democrats will get a "whole bunch" of seats, but also that it's "unlikely" they will reach the magic number of 60 for a filibuster proof Democratic-controlled Senate.

"As for 60, that's very, very difficult. It's possible, but unlikely," he said. "And the reason is because the terrain is so tough. In other words, of the 11 contested states, none are deeply blue. A whole bunch are deeply red. So even though the wind is at our back, it's hard."

Ensign agreed the Democrats are poised for some pickups, but said that many races were close.

"There's no question that we are facing a fairly strong political headwind at this point," he said. "And the Democrats are poised to pick up some seats. The exact number we don't know, because there's so many races that are within the margin of error.

(CBS)
"There's six or seven races out there right now," said Ensign (left), "including the race in Louisiana, where the Democrats are defending down there. We have that race dead even now. So it's going to be an interesting night on election night."

Schieffer also asked Ensign and Schumer asked about specific senators in the news recently - one up for reelection and one who is not.

Republican Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska was convicted of seven charges this past week. Ensign said he thought Stevens should step down.

"I think it would have been better, first of all, for this to have happened last year. The Justice Department had the information. They should have done this last year, so the people of Alaska, if he was convicted, like he was, they could have had a clear choice between a Republican and a Democrat," he said. "Mark Begich couldn't have won that state if it would have been a clear choice between a Republican - a normal Republican running up there. The only way he can win - possibly win, is because Ted Stevens was convicted. I have said that it would be the best thing for Ted Stevens to step down and I said that last week."

Schumer, meanwhile, responded to speculation that Sen. Joe Lieberman, an Independent who endorsed and campaigns with McCain, would leave the Democratic caucus, or be kicked out.

"Leader Reid, who's a good friend of Joe's, has said we're not going to debate that, discuss it until after Tuesday, And I'm sticking with Leader Reid on that one," Schumer said. "So I'm waiting. We're going to wait until Wednesday to even discuss that, publicly or privately. There have been no discussions about it among our Senate leadership or in the caucus."

Ensign's response: "If Joe wants to leave the Democrat Party and join us, we'd welcome him with open arms."



Read the full "Face the Nation" transcript here.

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Candidate Profiles & RSS Feeds


Video and Galleries from Face The Nation

Add a Comment See all 42 Comments
by misha128-2009 November 2, 2008 3:18 PM PST
I would say the Republican confidence probably was shaken when they learned Gov Palin was telling their supporters to vote on Nov 5th.

Everyone that wants their vote to count should vote on Nov 4th.
Reply to this comment
by misha128-2009 November 2, 2008 3:38 PM PST
Just today that Republican confidence has taken two hits ...

With Gov Palin opening by telling supporters to vote on Nov 5th (Nov 4th or before is the election day for everyone including Republicans).

Now Gov Palin says the McCain / Palin Administration, if they win, will be addressing the wars in Iraq and IRAN in the first 100 days! Will we shortly be declaring war on Iran Or will that be done by McCain and Palin in their first 100 days?

Reply to this comment
by kayebradley November 2, 2008 4:23 PM PST
Frankly, Sen. Lindsey Graham should have been McCain''s choice. He wouldn''t be in the position he is now if he had...What am I thinking?!! That would take good judgement and sound wisdom to make decision like that. Neither which has been shown by McCain.

GO OBAMA!!!
Reply to this comment
by kayebradley November 2, 2008 4:25 PM PST
You know what, Sarah Palin is the gift that just keeps on giving!

GO Sarah!
Reply to this comment
by hofkurz November 2, 2008 4:41 PM PST
I wish someone would give Sen. Graham a new script. Sen. Obama, the Out-of-the-mainstream candidate? With Sen. McCain having so many houses he forgot how many? And a VP candidate that wears a $2500 Valentino blazer without batting an eye? Are Americans really buying this drivel?
I was happy to hear that Springfield, MO turned out with 40,000 to hear Sen. Obama. That is indeed the red part of the state.
Reply to this comment
by dredigga November 2, 2008 5:36 PM PST
The GOP should lose this election! If they had any honor at all, they shouldn''t have even fielded a candidate (Hmmmmmm.Let me think...,"McCain and Palin"? They have a heart after all :)
Reply to this comment
by nmsuip November 2, 2008 6:09 PM PST
I''d like to encourage the Republicans to get out and vote on Tuesday. In order to have a winner, there has to be a loser. John McCain is that loser, and your Republican votes will make this loss possible!
Reply to this comment
by tincup356 November 2, 2008 6:23 PM PST
Fellow Americans , we are under the worst kind of terror attack we can face.The first wave of the attack was the 7oo billion SELLOUT.The next wave will come after the election if the congressmen who voted for the bailout are re-elected.mark my word , these people are not through.If they are re-elected , you will hear that they under estimated the problems and they are going to need many billions more.They only await to be re-elected to finish us off.YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
Reply to this comment
by melpol1 November 2, 2008 6:29 PM PST
Those that call themselves patriotic Americans and harbor racist views will have a headache when the nation gets its first black president. It is a contradiction to call yourself patriotic when you dislike the skin color of the president . The only mental relief for them would be to enter a reorientation clinic to learn what it means to be an American.

African American fashions and music will become the rage with the new presidency. Some are calling it the second civil rights movement and the end of racism. Old racial prejudices might remain in the hearts of the ignorant. But they will be eliminated as they accept the reality that the first lady in America and her family is black. Racial integration will take on a new meaning as it becomes fashionable to have a black lover or friend. These events will be good news to a world that has been suffering over racial division for centuries.


Reply to this comment
by tincup356 November 2, 2008 6:35 PM PST
who said they abolished slavery? looks like it is making a big comeback..only this time it knows no color ...just how you sit on the economic ladder.
Reply to this comment
by shoebox119 November 2, 2008 6:43 PM PST
Lindsey Graham is queer. He lacks good judgement.

Posted by Sky_Five

Lindsey Graham not only lacks good judgement, he has lost all credibility with his ridiculous remarks suggesting this is going be neck-and-neck down to the wire. What a joke.
Reply to this comment
by paulstewart9 November 2, 2008 6:56 PM PST
Maybe we are too awestruck by Obama''s success so far to hope there could be more in this man. I think he will be able to drive forward his grass roots political movement. I will say though, and you can mark these words, that it will not be a Democratic movement, a liberal movement, or a radical movement. It will be simply an American movement that is lucid, inclusive, and cohesive....

I would not say Obama is the person America has been waiting for, but I argue he is the leadership she is waiting for.... His person and history is a great surprise and challenge for America. A surprise that I believe will ultimately delight her and a challenge, one that is long over due by the way, that she will not only embrace but meet as well....

On Tuesday, when America gives Obama the wheel, he will astutely point the train in America''s direction....

Obama will drive an American restoration. In good time, we will once again see that shining light on the hill, that glowing torch in the harbor, that open door to the neighbors, and once again that American Dream.....

America needs to move quickly though, she has drifted too long and is far behind. There is indeed the fierce urgency of now.....
Reply to this comment
by paulstewart9 November 2, 2008 6:58 PM PST
America will be voting for the change she clearly needs. And America realizes she must vote out the partisan gridlock to ensure the change can happen. She knows the Republicans, under current leadership, are incapable of dealing in good faith on that matter. And I would say that if there is a risk with giving Obama the House and Senate, it pales in comparison to the opportunity to put America right.

Obama is seeking change. Big change, yes; but not to some new radical thing. The change is just a restoration of America to her fundamentals. A rejuvenation to her founding moral principles, to her bedrock of freedom, democracy and the American Way. It is incredible that revolutionary change is needed to restore America to her own bedrock. Indeed she has drifted, or more accurately, been driven far asunder. She is almost a fiction today, so far is she from her own truth.
Reply to this comment
by paulstewart9 November 2, 2008 6:59 PM PST
I see the difference between Obama and McCain as more gut instinctive. Its not about this fear stuff being thrown around and its not about minimizing Obama into something less than McCain on the economy. Nor is it about this socialism or radical nonsense.

The polls are showing the truth here. The American people are finally seeing what McCain and Obama stand for. They see a stronger leader in Obama, something they hope for and with bated breath are hoping is not just too good to be true.

The more they see of both of them, the more this moves to Obama. With good reason I might add. You can''t watch this long and not get it that Obama is genuine, capable and altruistic.

And, you can''t miss that McCain''s campaign is all about "spin" to understate rather dramatically. The problem is that the truth is so far off what McCain needs to spin it into, that the spinning takes a legion of spiders. And the web spun from all that spinning, is just tying the ticket to the floor.....
Reply to this comment
by nearl4511 November 2, 2008 7:11 PM PST
I thought Joseph McCarthy was dead. I guesss not.
Reply to this comment
by nearl4511 November 2, 2008 7:15 PM PST
Actually, I always get a hunorous kick out of listening to Graham... y far the funniest story was the one about buying cheap Persion rugs in Iraq in a market after being surrounded with platoons of soldiers and fortified with Helicopter back up....as evidence of a "safe" open free marketplace.

That and threats in 2006 that the Republicans were going "Clean our" Democrat "clocks".

Priceless.
Reply to this comment
by geek143 November 2, 2008 7:22 PM PST
This fixation on the $700 billion bailout shows how little people pay attention to anything.

Where were all you experts while the deficit went from $3 trillion to $10 Trillion ?

Guess talking about that requires real research and knowledge about what is going on.
Reply to this comment
by lightnin001 November 2, 2008 7:36 PM PST
Think one-party government is a good idea?

Think the democrats are %u201Cprotecting%u201D Social Security for you?

When Social Security was introduced, the "democrats" promised that:

Participation would be voluntary
Contributions would be tax-deductible
The funds would not be used for any other purpose
Retirement benefits would never be taxed

When there was a "democratic" President, Senate, and House, they:

Made contributions taxable

Put the funds into the General Fund (Lyndon Johnson, with a "democratic" House and Senate) so that they could use them as they wished (Pork and liberal projects), now the Social Security funds do not grow interest to add to the funds.

Made retirement payouts taxable (Clinton administration, with Al Gore casting the deciding vote)

Gave Social Security benefits to new immigrants who never paid into Social Security

And now, Obama wants to give it to Illegal Immigrants!

And now they and their media groupies try to blame the Republicans for the state that Social Security is in!

This should give the American people some idea of what can happen when the "democrats" control the Presidency, Senate and House, which will be the case if Obama wins, aided and abetted by the fact that the liberal press will keep it quiet! If he does get in, they''ll soon control the Supreme Court as well, as they''ll get to fill the vacancies as they see fit!

Reply to this comment
by andor3 November 2, 2008 7:47 PM PST
Republicans are PANICKED--if the Democrats are allowed to fix things Repubs will look like the villains they are. The Repubs will use any power they can get to be obstructionist and force Americans to suffer to save face.

Democrats need to have the power to push Republicans aside to fix things!
Reply to this comment
by mydogdylan6 November 2, 2008 9:55 PM PST
No votes for Chimp from around here.

But then we are not Urban Black Power Gang bangers either.
==================
No you are the racist biggot vote. And yes, McCain does have his "base" sewn up.

More educated whotes are voting for Obma than McCain. I guess the key word is "educated".
Reply to this comment
by targaray-2009 November 2, 2008 10:32 PM PST
A THIRD BUSH TERM? WHY???
Reply to this comment
by neederbaur November 2, 2008 11:35 PM PST
WHO IS OBAMA WE DON''T KNOW.WHAT HAS HE DONE?VOTED PRESENT.YIKES.WHAT IF J.F.K. VOTED PRESENT.From Dreams of My Father: "I ceased to advertise my mother''''s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites."

From Dreams of My Father: "I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother''''s race."

From Dreams of My Father: "There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white."

From Dreams of My Father: ; "It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names."

From Dreams of My Father: "I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn''''t speak to my own. It was into my father''''s image, the black man, son of Africa, that I''''d packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, Dubois and Mandela."

From Audacity of Hope: "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."
Reply to this comment
by iamdemocrat November 2, 2008 11:41 PM PST
I believe many Americans are uneasy because Obama has masked himself (with the media''s aid). He''s masked his past, his friendships and alliances, his philosophy, and even his family details. But every now and then the mask slips and reveals a cultural radical; a constitutional radical; a socialist radical; a foreign affairs radical. And though the mask is quickly fixed back on, and the slip duly papered over by the MSM, I think doubts linger with middle America.
There is much to dislike about John McCain. But he is transparent, and Americans can know and weigh his flaws. I think Americans sense that they haven''t been let in on Obama''s true identity; they''re buying a pig in a poke. And the MSM''s increasingly absurd lengths to prop him up and tear down anyone opposed to him are backfiring. The MSM isn''t just running defence, they''re seen to be running defence -- the Los Angeles Times'' partisan decision not to release a videotape of Obama meeting with a Palestinian radical being the perfect example. Americans don''t know many details about Obama -- but they know they don''t know, and they know they don''t know because the media won''t investigate Obama. A steady stream of disconcerting reports of voter registration fraud, combined with an extremely heavy-handed approach to dealing with mild critics (like the illegal release of Joe the Plumber''s private tax and divorce data) only adds to the feeling of unease.
I bet McCain will win.
-Ezra Levant
Reply to this comment
by ecs1749-2009 November 2, 2008 11:41 PM PST
''More educated whotes are voting for Obma than McCain. I guess the key word is "educated".''

Educated?

Obama said today in San Francisco, "I will bankrupt the coal industry" "You can build clean coal plants, but I will bankrupt them". Video was shown on Hannity. It is also on Drudgereport.

He can handle the economy better? He will bankrupt the US economy. That''''s what he will bring to the table
Reply to this comment
by angels4light November 3, 2008 12:13 AM PST
"In the states that matter". Really - so out of our nation of 50 states and commonwealths and our protectorates, there are only some that matter, the rest are irrelevant? Which states don''t matter, Senator Graham?
Reply to this comment
by angels4light November 3, 2008 12:19 AM PST
neederbaur needs to read the books he claims to cite, or read the debunking of the myths he HAS been reading at truthorfiction.com, snopes.com, or even probably somewhere on this website - just search for "dreams of my father" and you will probably find it. iamdemocrat, why do you claim Senator Obama is masked in any way? Where do you get your "secret" information - emails or worldnetdaily?
Reply to this comment
by angels4light November 3, 2008 12:32 AM PST
Perhaps we need a new political party, one founded on the principles of fiscal conservatism and social liberalism, one that believes in the rule of law, the application of the constitution to the laws and constitutions of all states and the United States of America. One that is already centrist, which works with both the R and D, builds coalitions to solve issues of concern to ALL of America, not just one state or constituency. Lets call it the Constitutional Centrist Party, Centrists for short.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti November 3, 2008 12:35 AM PST
Has McSame and McQuaylin endorsed Obama yet. It sure would save a lot of time and trouble. And money that we don''t have. I thought they were for country first. Oh, I get it for then and their supporters the government is made of up of multi-national fascist corporations that have more rights than people. Sieg heil to the GOP.
Reply to this comment
by neederbaur November 3, 2008 1:33 AM PST
THERE ARE ALOT OF PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY LOVE THIS COUNTRY.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z
HAFmFsb9XMI WANT TO SEE U.S. MARSHAL''S RAID ALL ACORN OFFICES.FRAUD IS FRAUD.From Dreams of My Father: "I ceased to advertise my mother''s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites."

From Dreams of My Father: "I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother''s race."

From Dreams of My Father: "There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white."

From Dreams of My Father"It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names."

From Dreams of My Father: "I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn''t speak to my own. It was into my father''s image, the black man, son of Africa, that I''d packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, Dubois and Mandela."

From Audacity of Hope: "I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."
Reply to this comment
by ffoulkes-2009 November 3, 2008 2:36 AM PST
I left America to become a citizen of France.

Posted by endrepubs at 02:40 PM : Nov 02, 2008

______________________________________________________

If you truly gave up your American Citizenship to live in France, then you are not welcome to participate in this election cycle.
Reply to this comment
by birdyspice7 November 3, 2008 3:56 AM PST
WE''RE NOT BEING SEXIST AGAINST SARAH PALIN,

WE''RE JUST PREJUDICED AGAINST STUPID PEOPLE.
Reply to this comment
by skeezix06 November 3, 2008 5:31 AM PST
Thanks to the Rove doctrine, Lindsay Graham has completely lost touch with reality. There is little or nothing about Obama that is even remotely liberal. I don''t like Axelrod either.

I could have voted for the McCain who ran against Bush. I can''t vote for this one. It''s time the republicans realized that the rightwing neo-cons who came with Reagan and have now taken over the party are now destroying it.

I''ll be voting independent this time around.
Reply to this comment
by ffoulkes-2009 November 3, 2008 5:49 AM PST
Thanks to the Rove doctrine, Lindsay Graham has completely lost touch with reality. There is little or nothing about Obama that is even remotely liberal???

Posted by skeezix06 at 05:31 AM : Nov 03, 2008

________________________________________________________

Obama is on record as the most liberal Senator in the Nation. He''ll twist us so far to the left we''ll be seeing chiropractors for decades.
Reply to this comment
by aladdin49 November 3, 2008 6:59 AM PST
Endrepubs - I don''t believe you became a citizen of France. I''ve been married to a Frenchman for 30 years and it took me 2 years to become a citizen, going back to my husband''s great grandfather to prove that he was indeed French, and lots of administrative stuff. This said, being a citizen of France isn''t the worst thing in the world - good universal health care - we choose our doctors, can go to as many as we want, no unacceptable waits, etc. , good retirement, relative job security, and at least 5 weeks annual vacation.
Reply to this comment
by olivia4441 November 3, 2008 7:45 AM PST
Help spread the word! "Flush Obama!" The 2008 presidential election takes place Tuesday, Nov. 4. Americans who love freedom and still believe in The American Dream must vote for John McCain. The alternative? Well, it%u2019s equivalent to flushing more than two centuries of greatness down the toilet.
Reply to this comment
by Confidential416 November 3, 2008 10:46 AM PST

I am tired of republicans same ole'' politics... I''m tired of their fear tactics and mudslinging....They destroyed this country financially and our global creditbility.. now mccain wants to privatize social security, and tax your health benefits... keep the rich getting richer while telling the american people it will trickle down....
I am an independent voter PA - voting Obama.
A vote for mccain is a vote for the same
A vote for Obama is a vote for change
Vote obama
Reply to this comment
by joe68sg1 November 3, 2008 10:55 AM PST
Article from Yahoo! Just another example of republiCON distain for our country.

Bush team rushes environment policy changes

Whether it''s getting wolves off the Endangered Species List, allowing power plants to operate near national parks, loosening regulations for factory farm waste or making it easier for mountaintop coal-mining operations, these proposed changes have found little favor with environmental groups.

Even some free-market organizations have joined conservation groups to urge a moratorium on last-minute rules proposed by the Interior Department and the Environmental Protection Agency, among others.

John Kostyack of the National Wildlife Federation, which joined Lehrer''s group to call for a ban on these last-minute rules, said citizens are cut out of the process, allowing changes in U.S. law that the public opposes, such as rolling back protections under the Endangered Species Act.

Industry is likely to benefit if Bush''s rules on the environment become effective, Madia said.

"Whether it''s the electricity industry or the mining industry or the agriculture industry, this is going to remove government restrictions on their activity and in turn they''re going to be allowed to pollute more and that ends up harming the public," Madia said in a telephone interview.

What is unusual is the speedy trip some of these environmental measures are taking through the process.
Reply to this comment
by aussiebat November 3, 2008 11:26 AM PST
Obama should be confident because people have really become energized to cast their vote for change. the description provided on this blog is just one of the stories of people wanting to be heard by their vote:

http://coactivedreams.blogspot.com/2008/10/voting-for-bama.html
Reply to this comment
by olivia4441 November 3, 2008 12:15 PM PST
Obama will also turn democracy and capitalism on it%u2019s head, and villainize the affluent and successful in our society, in order to rally the masses behind him.

With evangelical zeal Obama will convince his followers to replace reason with hope and belief %u2026 to blindly follow him %u2026 never challenge him %u2026 and embrace his words as gospel.

In the real, and unforgiving world of economics however, when you immediately gratify everyone by feasting on the goose that lays the golden eggs, the economy looses it%u2019s ability to continue generating growth and wealth.

Obama is promising everyone a piece of the pie, whether they helped bake it, or not %u2026 but, only in a socialistic, or communist state do the non-contributors demand to share equally in the property that belongs to others.

Immediate gratification, and getting something for nothing, is like a drug to the malcontents, but in the big picture, every farmer knows that even if you get hungry, you never eat your seed crop %u2026 unless you want it to be your last meal.

If Obama gets elected, America will turn into a third world country, with massive government welfare programs, unable to generate jobs for it%u2019s citizens, and unable to compete in the global markets. Keep America safe, free and strong %u2026

Elect McCain/Palin on November 4th.

Reply to this comment
by freedom_2008 November 3, 2008 12:55 PM PST
The last 8 years have been such a nightmare. The world''s largest economy at the brink of collapse? War in Iraq? Absolute nonsense. It''s time for a change.

I wonder if McCain can see the giant tidal wave of Obama''s support that is sweeping the nation.

Enjoy your retirement Mr. McCain.
Reply to this comment
by birdyspice7 November 3, 2008 3:05 PM PST
Sorry.. McCain/Palin fans..

Most people aren''t discrimination against McCain/Palin because of age or ***.

We''re just prejudiced against dumb people.

They are the least educated ticket in all of U.S. history. Our forefathers would turn over in their grave if this proudly ignorant woman got close to the White House.

Sorry.. the American people don''t want the blind leading the blind. We want leaders that read books and understand the constitution. We want leaders that don''t cost the taxpayers millions of dollars like the Keating incident. We don''t want a leader that spent his youth gambling, drinking and hanging out in wh*rehouses. We don''t want a leader that couldn''t be faithful to his wife if his life depended on it.

Sarah Palin and John McCain are no role models for families. Just look at their families and then compare them to Obama/Biden. McCain/Palin''s families look better suited for the Jerry Springer show.

If they can''t run their own families, then they certainly shouldn''t be making decisions regarding mine.
Reply to this comment
by skeezix06 November 4, 2008 6:38 AM PST
Vote your conscience.
Reply to this comment
See all 42 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs