2004 Tsunami Was Biggest In 600 Years
Geological Studies Suggest It Took Centuries For Enough Stress To Build Up To Cause Big Waves That Killed 230,000
-
Photo
Tsunami survivor Acehnese Rizal Shahputra stands on tree branches and waves to a cargo ship after being spotted by the crew of a container vessel in the Indian Ocean, 100 nautical miles from the shores of Aceh province, Jan. 3, 2005. (AP)
-
Interactive
Tsunami Tragedy
A look back at one of the worst disasters in memory with facts, maps, photos and more.
-
Interactive
Ripple Effect
Watch how the tsunami sent waves as far as America's shores.
That long gap might explain how enough geological stress built up to power the huge undersea earthquake that launched the killer waves four years ago, researchers said.
The work appears in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature. Two research teams report that by digging pits and taking core samples in Thailand and northern Sumatra, they found evidence that the last comparably large tsunami struck between the years 1300 and 1400.
The researchers found deposits of sand that were apparently left by the waves, and estimated their age with carbon dating of associated plant debris.
The December 2004 disaster killed people in 14 countries. Waves more than 100 feet high struck northern Sumatra and deposited sand more than a mile inland, researchers said. In Thailand, the waves also ran more than a mile inland, leaving deposits of sand some 2 to 8 inches thick.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



Pffft. No thank you!
God can off me anytime.
The report says it was the biggest tsunami in the INDIAN Ocean in 600 years.
Krakatoa was in the PACIFIC Ocean -- it may have had peripheral effects in the Indian Ocean, but they were less than the effect of the 2004 tsunami.
Posted by hennighg at 06:17 PM : Oct 29, 2008
In One Hour? I didn''t realize that tsunamis were supersonic.
Through a set of fortuitous circumstances geologists have been able to date precisely the last time the Cascadia Fault cut loose: January 26, 1700; at about 9 PM local time.
http://www.geophys.washington.edu/SEIS/PNSN/HAZARDS/CASCADIA/simple_tree_rings.html outlines tree ring and sediment deposition data to get a rough guestimate of when...and...
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/states/events/1700_01_26.php provides links to the methods used to hone in on January 26, 1700 as the exact date and time as well as the estimated magnitude.
There were no seismgraphs then but it appears this one was AT LEAST as powerful as that awful Sumatran quake and, also since, the Cascadia Fault ruptures on an average frequency of once every 300 years; the clock is now running. The next big one could strike at any time - in a hundred years, or tomorrow.
-
by lloydbest1
October 30, 2008 8:37 PM PDT
- Posted by cockamammy at 06:03 PM : Oct 30, 2008
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 11 CommentsHalf a mile!? Yeah, that could make one a touch nervous....
So, I hunted around a bit and came up with a paper written by Drs. Simon Day and Steven Ward and which can be found here:
http://www.es.ucsc.edu/~ward/papers/La_Palma_grl.pdf
They postualte a catastrophic lateral collapse of La Palma''s main volcano, Cumbre Vieja, during an eruption that could generate a slide block land slip (where the whole she-bang goes at once rather than failure in bits and pieces) of anywhere between 150 and 500 cubic kilometers (36 to 125 cubic miles).
The tsunami generated by such an event, even at the minimum volume would radiate out from the source and inundate Atlantic Basin countries from Iceland to Brazil. Waves would be in the order of 30 feet in height when they made landfall. At the maximum theorized volume, coastal cities from Reykjavic to Halifax to New york, Charleston, Miami, San Juan, all the way to Forteleza and Recife could face an onslaught of 80 foot waves hitting at 60 to 90 mph.
I won''t specualte on death tolls but even with the nine hour lead time some of these places would get, the number of casualties would be astronomical.