
Oct. 29, 2008
Reality Check: The Cost Of Obama's Pledges
CBS Evening News: If Victorious, Barack Obama May Find Fewer Resources Than He Needs For His Campaign Promises
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Obama Gets A Reality Check
During his prime-time special, Barack Obama made a lot of promises to the American people, but are those promises realistic? Wyatt Andrews gives Obama a reality check.
-
Video
Obama's TV Blitz
Sen. Barack Obama appeared at a rally, on "The Daily Show" and in his own primetime spot, reports Jeff Glor. Harry Smith talks to Bob Schieffer about how Sen. John McCain will react.
-
Video
Obama's TV Ad Aimed At Middle Class
Democratic Presidential Nominee Barack Obama aired a 30 minute prime time TV special in hopes of getting his message out to the middle class. Daniel Libit, Reporter for Politico, discusses whether or not it was effective.
-
Photo
In this image from video provided by the Obama Campaign, Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama., speaks during a 30-minute infomercial to be broadcast on prime-time television Wednesday, Oct. 29, 2008. (AP/Obama Campaign)
-
Blog
Campaign Ads
From uplifting messages to nasty attacks, see the political TV spots meant to sway voters.
-
CBS Evening News
Where They Stand
The CBS Evening News provides an in-depth look at the issues facing the 44th president.
Without question, the Barack Obama infomercial served as a very slick and powerful recitation of the biggest promises he's made as a presidential candidate. But the very bigness of his ideas is the problem: he seems blind to the concept his numbers don't add up.
Obama has already proposed a new stimulus package of $188 billion over two years. His tax cuts will cost $85 billion a year. His "army of new teachers": $18 billion; Renewable energy: $15 billion. CBS News and various independent experts estimate Obama's total first year spending could exceed $280 billion.
Still Obama repeated his claim he can find the money to pay for every proposal.
"I've offered spending cuts above and beyond their cost," he has said.
The fact is the savings Obama has identified do not cover his spending. According to a CBS News estimate, he's around $90 billion short. The Obama campaign disputes this, saying everything including the stimulus is paid for over 10 years. But other analysts say - even presuming Obama saves money in Iraq and chops the federal budget as promised - he falls short.
Let's break all of this down, starting with his highly suspect, and widely discredited, claim that he can find federal "spending cuts beyond the costs" of his promises. Very few independent economists believe he has identified the savings needed to offset his remarkable list of tax credits, tax cuts and spending pledges.
Fact: Even if you believe Obama intends to fix health care, most independent analysts say the cost is massive - $1.2 trillion over ten years, according to the highly respected Lewin Group. When the new Congress wakes up next year to a $1 trillion deficit, and answers the overwhelming new demands for another stimulus package, will the leadership really bite on a health care reform package that digs the deficit hole so much deeper?
And that's just the beginning of what Obama would spend.
Fact: The tax cuts he promises, which are mostly refundable tax credits (code for cash back), will cost $60 billion just in year one, according the National Taxpayers Union, though the Obama campaign's own estimates in July put that figure at $130 billion.
Fact: His new promise to give businesses a $3,000 tax credit for each new job created will cost $40 billion. But economists say this credit is far more likely to benefit companies already planning to expand and will likely not be enough to help companies create new jobs or forestall layoffs.
Fact: Obama's claim he will lower health care premiums by $2,500 is: 1.) guesswork, which is 2.) based on health care savings that might, in a perfect world, happen over 10 years - a fact Obama neatly glosses over.
Fact: Obama, when referring to savings he can make by leaving Iraq ($90 billion, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates), has spent these savings several times over, across several different promises depending on the crowd he's addressing.
Most of the time he spends the Iraq savings in the context of the roads he wants to build; sometimes it's for the teachers he wants to hire. Tonight, he riffed rhetorically on the savings, asking how many scholarships could be funded, or how many schools could be built. In the end though, presuming he really saves $90 billion, he can only spend it once.
Remember he also mentioned rebuilding the military ($7 billion/yr); his education initiative ($18 billion/yr); and his energy initiative ($15 billion/yr). He did not mention the $188 billion that he would spend on the brand new stimulus package he has proposed.
If he closes every loophole as promised, saves every dime from Iraq, raises taxes on the rich and trims the federal budget as he's promised to do "line by line," he still doesn't pay for his list. If he's elected, the first fact hitting his desk will be the figure projecting how much less of a budget he has to work with - thanks to the recession. He gave us a very compelling vision with his ad buy tonight. What he did not give us was any hint of the cold reality he's facing or a sense of how he might prioritize his promises if voters trust him with the White House.
By Wyatt Andrews
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News: Reality Check
- Latest in CBS Evening News: Reality Check
- Senators Dive Into Health Overhaul Details
- Senators Tackle $1T Health Care Challenge
- How Will We Pay For The Health Care Plan?





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 11
- next
See all 549 CommentsCBS is now, here in the last six days of the election, finally willing to admit what us real Americans have been preaching for months now.
Barack NObama simply does not have what it takes.
His whole campaign is founded on stilts made of pure ka,ka.
Even the FACTS CBS is offering above is very likely nothing compared to what the real cost of having the most libturd member riding first chair in the Executive Branch, with the #3 most libturd member riding second chair, compounded with SanFranNan Peelosely and Harry "Palms" Reid running Congress.
Like I have been attempting to point out.....America, drop your pants and break on over like a breech loading bird gun, cause you are about to be loaded!!!!
Enough said. Hey NObama, your inexperience is showing.
Give Obama a chance. You might be glad you did.
Posted by arvinont at 12:28 AM : Oct 30, 2008
================
You know, my country obviously means a bit more to me than it does to you, so let us find something of value to you for this analogy....
They have discovered you have a brain tumor the size of a baseball on your brain and it has to come out immediately or you will die....
But, the experienced brain surgeon is on vacation in the backwoods of Canda fishing and can''t be reached.
But, they do have this guy who plays a brain surgeon on TV ready to step up.....
Do you repeat your above? "Give the rookie a chance, I might be glad I did!"
Posted by republic1776 at 12:58 AM : Oct 30, 2008
=================
You meant to say, a Jimah Carter movement didn''t ya??
Cause I know reading the idocy being demonstrated on this board alone by these NObama worshippers is most certainly scaring the Jimah Carter out of me!! :)
As for economic growth - the stock market just voted. As the odds have shifted to Democratic control of the government, business has gone into flight. There is no economic recovery in higher taxes, persecution of the existing energy industry (CO2 regulation), taxation of family businesses, siphoning money from efficient producers to subsidize the inefficient ("alternative" energy from sources that can''t meet our needs), creation of massive new federal bureaucracy that will be a drain on us forever...
Like didn''t Bill Clinton promise not to raise taxes when he was elected, and then he did. And the economy was great and he got re-elected no problem.
But then didn''t Bush''s Dad promise not to raise taxes when he was elected, and then he did and the economy wasn''t great and he lost his re-election.
Maybe the length of time their party had held the White House made a difference, but if broken campaign promises also take on more significance when the election''s not so great, then I guess it''s in Barack''s hands now to get the job done assuming he wins the election as it looks like he will. Otherwise maybe he''s just given the next crop of contenders for 2012 a platform for winning over the Presidency (?)
Then again who knows maybe blaming Bush has enough juice to push Barack all the way through the next 8 years (?)
Since Obama has voted 130 times present we cannot have a full view of who he is without looking not only at his record but who he associates with.
Obama praised Rashid Khalidi %u2013 Palestinian PLO promoter, who has radical views on Israel.
Obama endorsed a book in 2001 for William Ayers who is a self proclaimed Marxist and still as of 2001 proud of being a terrorist.
Obama said William Wright was a good friend, mentor and pastor for 20 years yet Wright preaches Liberation Theology which Wright admits is based on Marxism.
His mentor as a young man from his book - Yup you guessed it Marxist.
"To each according to their ability to each according to their need" - Karl Marx
"We need to redistribute the wealth..." Obama has an undeniable lifetime pattern of Socialism.
http://www.bornalivetruth.org/ - Obama believes in allowing born alive children to die if they are not wanted.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/28/AR2008102803413_pf.html - a link on Obama''s untraceable donations.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article5042571.ece - Poor Aunt of Obama found in Boston Slum. Will you end up in a slum if Obama is elected???
http://www.hypemovie.com/index.html - Great 1 hour movie that shows that Obama is the greatest speaker but has no character and no substance and no record to back up what he says.
Maybe someone got wise that they would be, like in Venezuela, Nicaragua, North Korea and other countries that have the same lean as Mr. Obama, the first ones to get the ye olde axe. The dictatorship of the proletariat depends on total control of the propaganda machine and dissent is not tolerated. Ask the Venezuelans. A little too late, but at least someone at CBS is smelling the coffee finally.
TXU planned to built 11 of the world''s most efficient, cleanest, cheapest coal fired power plants, but the plan ran into Obama''s promise to regulate CO2 - so much so that the mayor of Waco, TX, which was to benefit from one of the new electric plants, feared a government crackdown and initiated the hue and cry. The result was no new electric plants, and a hostile takeover of TXU.
The terrifying news is that what Obama promises to do to our energy industry, is seconded by "Me Too Mccain" who has betrayed us all - he at least should know better. (Obama is a hopeless case of Hyde Park elitism who doesn''t know any better.)
Posted by Undecided9
I guess the flipside of Barack maybe needing the economy to turn around under his watch is that the GOP for their rise back to power maybe need for Barack to not do that great as President . . .
Like 4 years from now or even possibly 2 years from now, if the economy''s in terrible shape and the GOP stand up and say that Barack''s in over his head, the Dem supermajority''s been a disaster, the two together are twice the trouble, etc is there at all a chance people are going to think oh they just need more time?
It''ll be interesting to see how long the GOP go from being the problem to being seen as the solution, even if the reality may be that the economy''s going to need more time or that it''s largely out of the Government''s hands, or whatever (?)
Posted by billpl
LOL You''re like the 5th or 6th person under this one article to make the same comment LOL
It feels like they feel like Barack''s got it in the bag so it''s not going to hurt (?)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by BBinFla at 01:51 AM : Oct 30, 2008
Turns out it will. The more our government spends, the less we have. Its simple, whatever we make and whatever we do, there is just so many of us making and doing. We can do it for each other or we can do it for the government. If they are spending we arent.
Posted by billpl
LOL You''''re like the 5th or 6th person under this one article to make the same comment LOL
It feels like they feel like Barack''''s got it in the bag so it''''s not going to hurt (?)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by SamTheTVCat at 02:08 AM : Oct 30, 2008
Im shocked!!! The mass media is questioning "the one". Thats blasphemy.
The question is :are people are buying it.
For one time CBS has the courage to question Obama!!!!!!!
Another ignorant person who buys into Obama''s lie without actually checking the facts.
This is coupled with a $5000 TAX CREDIT. That means that if you were in the 35% tax bracket (very high), and your employer paid $10,000 a year for your health insurance (again very high), you would still get $1500 back that you don''t get now.
If you are in the 25% bracket and your employer pays the average $5200 a year for your insurance, you would get THRITY SEVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS back that you don''t get now. I don''t know how stupid YOU are, but if McCain wants to tax my health insurance and give me that money back in a tax credit, plus $3700 more, I''m not going to complain about that.
This is just one of the MANY MANY ways that Obama and the DNC have misled you and lied to you for the past few monts.
Carter threw us into the worst recession this country had suffered since the Great Depression, and Obama''s policies are disturbingly similar to Carter''s, except he goes much much further down the road Carter paved than Carter was comfortable with. Obama won''t have that restraint, and this country will suffer mightily for buying into his glib lies and promises should he be elected.
I will not argue here with the writer''s opinions.
But publishing this asa News Story is a dark shame.
When Ed Murrow spoke an oppinion, we saw or heard it clearly as opinion, as when he did it AFTER a long news report in which there was a legitimate attempt at objectivity.
At thelvery least this should have been labeled as an OPINION column. It does not rise to the level of news journalism.
It certainly is a black mark upon the edifice that is the reputation for ehtics that CBS has been.
Not a ***** in the armor. A Very Large hole from a self inflicted cannon wound.
I have been proud to be a member of the same "media" as CBS. Yoday,,, I am ashamed.
Scott Brundage
If anyone of you had a child who consistently hung around extremely bad influences.... you would DEFINATELY NOT reward your child. Yet... you same idiots are willing to overlook the horrendous people Barack has accepted into his life both personally, politically, and spiritually because you don%u2019t like the economy and are too stupid to look past the political RHETORIC that has been spoken by every politician since the beginning of time... "I will bring Change"... are you f''''n kidding me...???
I dare anyone of you Barack cool-aid drinking idiots.... to show me significant evidence that he has done ANYTHING in his brief political career to back up the CHANGES his mouth has been spouting off since the start of the primaries.
The guy is a fraud and the pied piper of lies... and so many stupid people in this country are willing to close their eyes and follow his music. Not surprised considering this country was stupid enough to LISTEN and then VOTE George W Bush into office TWICE!
NO experience managing an economy on any level, NO foreign policy experience, and very questionable allegiances... so lets make him President! HAHAHAHA.....
Posted by mikekleber
___________________________________
New and different isn''t a guarantee of "better". Things can get worse, and economically will if this article is anywhere near being accurate. As for better ideas, as a nation we will need to make hard choices about how we spend our money. Although no one likes this word, "sacrifice" will become important. Not everyone''s favorite program can be funded. We will need to make spending cuts. No one should claim that this would be easy or painless. But at some point we cannot put off the inevitable. We can''t continue to mortgage the future of our children (and grandchildren). Someone will have to pay off our debts. We might as well start to do that now and live within our means. As far as specific details on how to accomplish this, I suppose everyone will have their own ideas. But there must be a consensus that this type of attitude and approach is necessary, or our economic health will continue to deteriorate.
If you want to be fair, compare each and every part to whatever it is John McCain is going to do, which no one knows.
McCain spends so much time telling people what Senator Obama is going to do, no one at his rallies know what McCain is going to do. He will not give a true solid straight answer to any thing, he lies and dances around the issues.
Maybe the high school dropout Todd Palin can do better.
CBS just won''t let this country move forward and heal.
When is McCain going to stop talking aout Senator Obama''s plans and give us straight talk about his?
Shame on you CBS, Shame on you.
they are proposal that they try to fulfill.
Do you want to vote for someone like McCain who has no plan other than Bush?
Anyone paying attentipon knows that Obama is a slick politician, capable of telemprompted speeches with out any substance.
Glad to see the media scrutining the liar Obama and his unfunded policies.
Remember that "universal health care" is a FAILURE in every country with the possible exception of New Zealand where it has been tried. All those countries have 50%+ tax rates, BTW.
There is no basis for the "McCain is a continuation of Bush" argument. Bush has proven himself both ignorant and incompetent, and (I suspect) has a Messianic complex.
McCain is a leader, genuine hero, and far from being a socialist. I don''t like his social positions (i.e. I am opposed to abortion, but don''t think the Government can cross the line of controlling a woman''s body; I think science classes should be based on scientific texts, not the Bible) but will accept those risks to avoid socialism - which is exactly what Obama preaches.
If you want higher taxes, with worse and rationed health care, THEN vote for Obama.
Yea, the Republican Party has done such a wonderful job. Wyatt Andrews is drunk on Moronic Republican garbage. Stupidity still Reigns supreme in the Republican Party. The fact Obama is willing to try to do something, shows Middle Class America that he is offering something to reverse this corruption and decay of Washington. The Republican Party is saying it will continue its special interest,lobbyist, Corporate policies.
No Thanks McCain!
Raising taxes on small business will kill jobs, Obama does''nt understand that.
Obama wants to spread the wealth around and have a European social welfare system, then taxes has to raise or Obama will cut the defense budget.
It is pretty clear that Obama is a liar who will say anything for votes.
Posted by bsb53 at 05:51 AM : Oct 30, 2008
Actually that would be a wonderful place to start! For fiscal year 2008, DOD''s budget was $693,214,000,000 give or take a dollar here or there. That is just about what Bush gave the banks, true, but with the DOD it is every year and doesn''t include any ''Oh, by the way, we need'' type spending, such as things like bombing Iran, or starting a war with Russia. Those are just little items that McCain and Palin would toss in afterward for fun like Bush did with Iraq.
--------
No kidding. The Republicans already wasted them on two wars they''ve failed in and a big Socialist Bailout for Banks.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 11
- next
See all 549 Comments