Syria: U.S. Attack Kills 8 In Border Area
Helicopters Raid Farm In Syrian Village; Al Qaeda Officer Was Target Of Rare Cross-Border Attack
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Syria Claims Attack By U.S.
Syrian officials are claiming U.S. helicopters an area near the town of Abu Kamal, killing 8 people. Thalia Assuras is monitoring developments from Washington.
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Fast Facts
Syria
Learn about the people, economy and history.
A U.S. military official said the raid by special forces targeted the foreign fighter network that travels through Syria into Iraq. The Americans have been unable to shut the network down in the area because Syria was out of the military's reach.
"We are taking matters into our own hands," the official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because of the political sensitivity of cross-border raids.
CBS News Correspondent Thalia Assuras reports that the attack came just days after the commander of U.S. forces in western Iraq said American troops were redoubling efforts to secure the Syrian border, which he called an "uncontrolled" gateway for fighters entering Iraq.
Another U.S. Military source told Assuras that the leader of the foreign fighters, an al Qaeda officer, was the target of Sunday's cross-border raid. Although that source told CBS News the attack was successful, he stopped short of saying that the terrorist was among those killed in the raid.
A Syrian government statement said the helicopters attacked the Sukkariyeh Farm near the town of Abu Kamal, five miles inside the Syrian border. Four helicopters attacked a civilian building under construction shortly before sundown and fired on workers inside, the statement said.
The government said civilians were among the dead, including four children.
A resident of the nearby village of Hwijeh said some of the helicopters landed and troops exited the aircraft and fired on a building. He said the aircraft flew along the Euphrates River into the area of farms and several brick factories. The witness spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information,
Syria's Foreign Ministry said it summoned the charges d'affaires of the United States and Iraq to protest against the strike.
"Syria condemns this aggression and holds the American forces responsible for this aggression and all its repercussions. Syria also calls on the Iraqi government to shoulder its responsibilities and launch and immediate investigation into this serious violation and prevent the use of Iraqi territory for aggression against Syria," the government statement said.
The area targeted is near the Iraqi border city of Qaim, which had been a major crossing point for fighters, weapons and money coming into Iraq to fuel the Sunni insurgency.
Iraqi travelers making their way home across the border reported hearing many explosions, said Farhan al-Mahalawi, mayor of Qaim.
On Thursday, U.S. Maj. Gen. John Kelly said Iraq's western borders with Saudi Arabia and Jordan were fairly tight as a result of good policing by security forces in those countries but that Syria was a "different story."
"The Syrian side is, I guess, uncontrolled by their side," Kelly said. "We still have a certain level of foreign fighter movement."
He added that the U.S. was helping construct a sand berm and ditches along the border.
"There hasn't been much, in the way of a physical barrier, along that border for years," Kelly said.
The foreign fighters network sends militants from North Africa and elsewhere in the Middle East to Syria, where elements of the Syrian military are in league with al Qaeda and loyalists of Saddam Hussein's Baath party, the U.S. military official said.
He said that while American forces have had considerable success, with Iraqi help, in shutting down the "rat lines" in Iraq, and with foreign government help in North Africa, the Syrian node has been out of reach.
"The one piece of the puzzle we have not been showing success on is the nexus in Syria," the official said.
The White House in August approved similar special forces raids from Afghanistan across the border of Pakistan to target al Qaeda and Taliban operatives. At least one has been carried out.
The flow of foreign fighters into Iraq has been cut to an estimated 20 a month, a senior U.S. military intelligence official told the Associated Press in July. That's a 50 percent decline from six months ago, and just a fifth of the estimated 100 foreign fighters who were infiltrating Iraq a year ago, according to the official.
Ninety percent of the foreign fighters enter through Syria, according to U.S. intelligence. Foreigners are some of the most deadly fighters in Iraq, trained in bomb-making and with small-arms expertise and more likely to be willing suicide bombers than Iraqis.
Foreign fighters toting cash have been al Qaeda in Iraq's chief source of income. They contributed more than 70 percent of operating budgets in one sector in Iraq, according to documents captured in September 2007 on the Syrian border. Most of the fighters were conveyed through professional smuggling networks, according to the report.
Iraqi insurgents seized Qaim in April 2005, forcing U.S. Marines to recapture the town the following month in heavy fighting. The area became secure only after Sunni tribes in Anbar turned against al Qaeda in late 2006 and joined forces with the Americans.
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem accused the United States earlier this year of not giving his country the equipment needed to prevent foreign fighters from crossing into Iraq. He said Washington feared Syria could use such equipment against Israel.
Though Syria has long been viewed by the U.S. as a destabilizing country in the Middle East, in recent months, Damascus has been trying to change its image and end years of global seclusion.
Its president, Bashar Assad, has pursued indirect peace talks with Israel, mediated by Turkey, and says he wants direct talks next year. Syria also has agreed to establish diplomatic ties with Lebanon, a country it used to dominate both politically and militarily, and has worked harder at stemming the flow of militants into Iraq.
The U.S. military in Baghdad did not immediately respond to a request for comment after Sunday's raid.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 84 CommentsHow can we stop the perpetual motion machine of warfare, terrorism, and violence? Getting out of Iraq is an obvious but superficial answer. We need to totally eliminate all imported oil from the Middle East. We can make capital investments into immediate implementation of the Pickens energy plan. We need windfarms on the Plains, solar plants in the desert Southwest, and cars that get 50 MPG. The technology exists to do all of these things immediately. What we are lacking is leadership. As long as we import 7 out of 10 gallons of fuel from places like the Middle East we are providing job security for funeral directors, artificial limb makers, and wheel chair manufacturers. I served in the Persian Gulf war and helped support other wars in 20 years of service. The importation of oil from the Middle East is a permanent death spiral for America. When in the name of God are we going to change?
There should be more coverage of the Bush tactical treachery in Iraq. Another faction out of the way to simplify Iraqi oil negotiations.
They needed some veggies.
Wag the Dog
Wave the Flag
Create an International Situation
To rally the People around the Moron
Bush Mcain and Palin
The Three Stooges!!!
That doesn''t mean we should...
True dat. Add in whats offshore and in Canada in the form of oil sands, also Pickens Plan on nat gas/wind, and there''s no reason to be in the Middle East.
Why are we there, then? Not for Americans.
This is about empire. Its as much for the rulers of Saudi Arabia as ordinary Americans. Its about empire, global empire, NOT energy self-sufficiency.
What more can they do? They also did the US and Iraq a favor when just a few weeks ago they established an embassy in Iraq and sent an embassador over there.
I also don''t understand how is it possible for the US to send terror suspects to Syria so they can torture them for us and then the US attacks Syria?
The US is so blatant in trying to have it both ways in the Middle East it''s not even funny.
I hope the Syrians will forgive the US for this.
Posted by cdfoxtrot4 at 05:54 PM : Oct 26, 2008
Lol, you socialist liberals are never happy. I wonder how happy your going to be if Obama does the same thing on a bigger scale then even now like he has promised to do to Pakistan. I bet your criticism will be A LOT more muted.
True dat. Add in whats offshore and in Canada in the form of oil sands, also Pickens Plan on nat gas/wind, and there''''s no reason to be in the Middle East.
Why are we there, then? Not for Americans.
This is about empire. Its as much for the rulers of Saudi Arabia as ordinary Americans. Its about empire, global empire, NOT energy self-sufficiency."
Posted by ubrew12
actually.... oil has much to do with it. Shale oil and oil sands are expensive in currency as well as severe environmental costs, to extract. Middle East oil is high quality , easily and cheaply exploited.
Posted by ObieBoy at 06:45 PM : Oct 26, 2008
Excuse me, but why did you feel a need to add that last sentence to my post? Feeling sorry for yourself? Has life been a little rough on American fascists like you?
Time to do some growing up, boy.
All invaders and their leaders should be caught and made to suffer exactly like theor victims.
Flag waving morons....please kill yourselves.
Or is this just another of Bush''s drunken ideas - start yet ANOTHER war, on yet another front, when we still haven''t finished either of the first two?
Posted by drivelphobe at 07:14 PM : Oct 26, 2008
For what reason, other than your xenophobic, bigoted hatred?
Posted by DruidFarmer at 07:34 PM : Oct 26, 2008
Since when is it OUR responsibility to "secure their part of the world"?
How would you feel if China or Russia attempted to "secure our their part of the world" with their military?
You are an ignorate uneducated fool. You should keep your opinions to yourself.
You are an ignorate uneducated fool. You should keep your opinions to yourself.
Posted by DruidFarmer at 07:40 PM : Oct 26, 2008
You''re calling for our military to commit genocide and exterminate two whole countries for no apparent reason, and you''re calling someone else "uneducated"?
Posted by ocguy64 at 07:57 PM : Oct 26, 2008
Are you referring to the innocent "female" losers, or the innocent "children" losers?
ME THINKS someone wants to help John McCain change the TOPIC from the Economy.
STAY tune ! bet there is more foreign policy SHENANIGANS to come with only 9 days left.
Posted by racam_us at 08:08 PM : Oct 26, 2008
He''ll be out of office in three months.
What are you hoping for impeachment for?
You complainers must be affiliated or otherwise aligned with one of the middle east muslim nations that HATE America.
Well, you all really need to go take a LONG bath and TRY to scub that STINK off of you, if its possible. Nobody can stand being around you nut cases.
Posted by tfcrow52 at 09:57 PM : Oct 26, 2008
If WW3 does start, Obama wouln''t WANT to win and then inherit Bushs mess. As a matter of fact, why would ANYBODY want to inherit the current Bush messes? Would it be worth all that trouble just to be president? NO THANKS.
Posted by Sky_Five at 10:26 PM : Oct 26, 2008
Like most America haters, you convienently forgot to say the WHOLE story. It goes like this:
If Mexico (or Syria) allowed terrorists (or AlQuieda)to stage attacks on US soldiers inside the US (or Iraq) and allowed suicide bombers (or America haters) to cross into the US (or Iraq) to blow up innocent Americans (or Iraqis), what do you think America would do? Do you think we would DEMAND that our military go INSIDE Mexico (or Syria) to stop it once and for all?
Did you get it? I hope that wasn''t too much for you to wrap your head around.
How is this sentence even possible? This is totally beyond belief!
Posted by bailmeout1 at 10:52 PM : Oct 26, 2008
Seems to me that there has been MANY reports of Russia and Iran arming Syria over the past year or so. But just like the rest of the world, Syria has got their hand stretched out for US money. The only thing the US should give Syria is many many used bombs delivered via overnight air mail.
Posted by bailmeout1 at 10:52 PM : Oct 26, 2008
Seems to me that there has been MANY reports of Russia and Iran arming Syria over the past year or so. But just like the rest of the world, Syria has got their hand stretched out for US money. The only thing the US should give Syria is many many used bombs delivered via overnight air mail.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by edintex at 11:08 PM : Oct 26, 2008
I guess. I am looking at the level though. How does it go from wanting something, or asking for it, all the way to "accusing of not giving it". And then it shoots through the moon by even saying it out loud, and then beyond that, to the press. This whole thing of us giving to the world, only to be hated for it should be the first thing to go in a new economy plan. We have US citizens suffering with terminal illness and we keep on giving money to this crackpot region? All parties included.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 84 Comments