Oct. 25, 2008
The GOP Scapegoats ACORN
John McCain And Republicans Are Trying To Blame ACORN For Crisis That Deregulation Helped Bring About
-
Photo
ACORN's homepage ()
-
Timeline
Financial Meltdown
Track major events that lead to one of the most tumultuous times in Wall Street's history.
-
Section
Weathering The Downturn
In this economy, it's smart to save. CBS News shows you how.
An increasingly desperate Republican attack machine has recently identified the community organizing group ACORN as Public Enemy Number One. Among ACORN's alleged crimes, perhaps the most serious is that it caused, nearly single-handedly, the world's financial crisis. That's the fantasy. In the reality-based world, and financial crisis.
Since the 1970s ACORN, which has 400,000 low- and moderate-income "member families" in more than 100 cities in forty states, has been warning Congress to protect borrowers from the banking industry's irresponsible, risky and predatory practices--subprime loans, racial discrimination (called "redlining") and rip-off fees. ACORN has persistently called for stronger regulations on banks, private mortgage companies, mortgage brokers and rating agencies. For years, ACORN has alerted public officials that the industry was hoodwinking many families into taking out risky loans they couldn't afford and whose fine print they couldn't understand.
Now John McCain and his fellow conservatives are accusing ACORN of strong-arming Congress and big Wall Street banks into making subprime loans to poor families who couldn't afford them, thus causing the economic disaster. McCain's campaign is running a one-and-a-half-minute video that claims Barack Obama once worked for ACORN, repeats the accusation that ACORN is responsible for widespread voter registration fraud and accuses ACORN of "bullying banks, intimidation tactics, and disruption of business." The ad claims that ACORN "forced banks to issue risky home loans--the same types of loans that caused the financial crisis we're in today."
For months, the right-wing echo chamber--bloggers, columnists, editorial writers and TV and radio talk-show hosts--has pitched in with a well-orchestrated campaign to blame the mortgage crisis on ACORN and the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), the 1977 anti-redlining law. In a September 27 editorial, the Wall Street Journal wrote that "ACORN has promoted laws like the Community Reinvestment Act, which laid the foundation for the house of cards built out of subprime loans" and then falsely claimed the bailout bill would create a trust fund "pipeline" to fill ACORN's coffers. On October 14 the Journal's lead editorial, Obama and ACORN, described ACORN as a "shady outfit" and accused the group of being "a major contributor to the subprime meltdown by pushing lenders to make home loans on easy terms, conducting 'strikes' against banks so they'd lower credit standards."
Discussing the mortgage crisis on his Fox News show, Your World, Neil Cavuto commented, "Loaning to minorities and risky folks is a disaster."
Over at the Washington Post, columnist Charles Krauthammer complained that the CRA had led banks and other lenders "to extend mortgages to people who were borrowing over their heads." Holding forth on The O'Reilly Factor, Laura Ingraham laid the foreclosure problem on Bill Clinton, who "pushed all these institutions to lend to minority communities." Many of the loans, she said, were "very risky." Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, a putative populist, echoed on the Hannity & Colmes Show: "The truth is that Democrats controlled the ability to fix this [the mortgage crisis]. It was their harsh regulation under the Community Reinvestment Act that started this ball rolling down the hill. "
On September 10 on Fox & Friends, National Review columnist Stanley Kurtz described ACORN as "a group of community organizers [who] specialize in putting pressure, really kind of intimidation tactics, on banks, to get these banks to make high-risk loans to low-credit customers.... They even show up at the homes of bank officials to scare them and their families. They send demonstrators into the lobbies of banks, all to get the banks to make these high-risk loans to people with low credit." McCain's anti-ACORN attack video is almost a word-for-word duplication of Kurtz's comments.
The right-wing case against the CRA is entirely bogus--a diversionary tactic to take the heat off the financial services industry and its allies, like McCain. The CRA applies only to depository institutions, like commercial and savings banks, but thanks to Congress's deregulation mania, there are now many other lenders, including private mortgage companies like CitiMortgage, Household Finance and Countrywide Financial (which was recently bought out by Bank of America). These outfits, which exist in a shadow world without government oversight, account for most of the predatory loans in trouble today.
When Congress enacted the CRA in 1977, the vast majority of all mortgage loans were made by lenders regulated by the law. In 2006 only about 43 percent of home loans were made by companies subject to the CRA. Indeed, the main culprits in the subprime scandal--the nonbank mortgage companies, which successfully grabbed the bulk of the mortgage market away from the CRA-regulated banking industry--were not covered by the CRA.
Wall Street investment firms--including Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns and Citigroup--set up special units, provided mortgage companies with lines of credit, then purchased the subprime mortgages from the lenders, bundled them into "mortgage-backed securities" and sold them for a fat fee to wealthy investors worldwide, typically without scrutiny. By 2007 the subprime business had become a $1.5 trillion global market for investors seeking high returns. Because lenders didn't have to keep the loans on their books, they didn't worry about the risk of losses.
Congress passed the CRA after many studies, using the banks' lending data, had documented widespread racial discrimination in mortgage lending. The CRA encourages federally chartered banks to examine the credit needs of the communities they serve and to lend based on these needs--for small businesses, homes and other types of loans. It does not require banks to make loans to businesses or people who can't repay them. It does not ask banks to engage in charity. It simply tells banks: don't discriminate against qualified borrowers.
At first, many banks were reluctant to make loans to minority borrowers seeking to fix up their homes, buy new ones or start new businesses in urban neighborhoods. In the late 1970s and early '80s, community organizing groups like ACORN, National People's Action and others pushed banks and federal regulators to remove their racial blinders. Once they did so, banks discovered that many working- and middle-class black and Latino borrowers were excellent customers with good credit histories. These new markets generated good profits on stable loans with little risk.
The explosion of subprime mortgages was touched off in the early twenty-first century, as the number of lenders regulated by the government and covered by the CRA dramatically dwindled. In 2002 subprime loans made up 8 percent of all mortgages; by 2006 they had soared to 20 percent. Since 2004 more than 90 percent of subprime mortgages have come with exploding adjustable rates.
Not surprisingly, the foreclosure rates on subprime, adjustable-rate and other exotic mortgage loans have run four to five times higher than the foreclosure rates on conventional CRA mortgages. Testifying before the House Financial Services Committee in February, University of Michigan law professor Michael Barr reported that only about 20 percent of subprime mortgages were issued by banks regulated by the CRA. The other 80 percent of predatory and high-interest subprime loans were offered by financial institutions not covered by the CRA and not subject to routine examination or supervision. "The worst and most widespread abuses occurred in the institutions with the least federal oversight," Barr told Congress.
By Peter Dreier and John Atlas
Reprinted with permission from The Nation.
| If you like this article, check out www.thenation.com for more investigative reports, timely editorials and incisive columns |





Scapegoat??? How typical of the left when wrongdoing on their part is shown to cry foul.
Typical race baiting and class envy.
one positive article on the GOP. The media bias
and bashing continues and America if it isn''t smart
will pay the price. When Hilary was running the media
were all supporting her and not Obama, Obama has not
changed he is who he was and always will be.........
Please American voters wake up before it is indeed
too late for our children, and the future of this
great country.
one positive article on the GOP..........
Posted by dragonfly125 at 12:53 PM : Oct 25, 2008
How utterly GOP - you know you can''t win if you engage besed on the issues because the GOP''s policies have brought us down to where we are. So you folks just try baseless character assasinations, when in fact the lowest of the lowlifes are among your number. Get real for a change!
Why is the ACORN scare a hoax? First, ACORN is actually registering no one. They are taking applications for registration. Then ACORN checks for fraud and throws some out. Then they are presented to the state which also check for fraud and throws some more out. To actually perpetrate fraud a person would have to go to the polling location, present id showing that he/she is the person on the voter registration card, and then actually be given permission to vote. The journey is long and difficult.
If you really want to discuss fraud look to the hanging chads in Florida in 2000, the Supreme Court awarding Bush his first term, and Ohio irregularities both in 2004 and again this year. That is fraud and it is a policy of the Republican National Party.
If ACORN was not associated with blacks and other minorities this attack would never be made; it is only possible because of the ignorance, intolerance and bigotry rampant in the Republican Party and its base.
The Republicans always spin lies into truth and truth into lies.
It''s the GOP''s primary political modus operandi, and it really surprises no one anymore.
If it comes from the GOP as "truth" you can bet your last dime that it''s a lie.
If the GOP claims something is a "lie", then you can rest assured that it is, in fact, the truth.
The Republican party is all about deceit, pure and simple. If they actually stuck to the truth NOBODY would EVER vote for them.
The GOP is the party of lies.
Posted by afmca at 03:23 PM
Actually, it''s against the law for them to throw the bogus registrations out. They flag them and give them to the election officials to approve or disqualify.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by OneAmerican7 at 06:15 PM : Oct 25, 2008
+ report abusea
Ah ... the ties that bind, except for any ties to reality.
The Republicans are also blaming ACORN for the Iraq War, the losing situation in Afghanistan, global warming, the Russian invasion of Georgia, tainted milk from still-RED China, high energy costs, and John McBush McCain unable to remember how many houses and cars he has!
The neocon Fascist Nazi Republicans are convinced that ACORN is a "front" for Al Qeada, that the real brains behind ACORN is Osama Bin Laden (remember him?), and that Bill Ayers is secretly training ACORN for world domination using "terrrrrorist" tactics such as waterboarding, electric shock, sleep deprevation, and using pit bulls with lipstick!!!
SIG HEIL, THAT SOUNDS LIKE MY KIND OF GUY!!!, BUSH!!!
sig heil, I VOTE AGAINST TORTURE, WHEN I''M NOT THERE TO VOTE FOR IT!!!, McBush!!!
sig heil, I HAVEN''T DONE A THING WRONG, NO MATTER WHAT THEY SAY!!!, Palin!!!
America needs a change in direction. America is ready for a change in direction. And McCain just offers more of the same Bush cr@ppola, only he''s even more desperate and pathetic sounding than scrub!
Now is our chance. Barack Obama is the change we''ve been looking for. VOTE!
Posted by afmca
But not impossible. There were many suspected voter fraud occurrences in OHIO in 2004. Oh, that is right, they were in Republican districts. That CAN NOT be voter fraud, we all KNOW how honest the GOP is. Couple this with sending 40% less voting machines to low to middle class districts and cutting off voting, even though there were people in line (some estimates as high as 40,000 in Democratic areas) and out pops 4 more years of dubya. Voter fraud? Never heard of it.
In other words, the CRA, if anything, had regulations that prevented further financial abuse.
Institutions that were not regulated by the CRA should not have been allowed to get involved in offering low-income loans. Either accept the CRA regulations or stay out of this sector.
In any case, the facts show that the CRA did NOT cause this crisis.
Where''s the story on joe biden that was running this morning? Must be the facists at cbs didn''t like some of the posts.
Guess we''re the next Venezuela where the government takes over the media. H(*l, they already have. Just ask the Orlando station.
Let''s vote for more of the McSame and show the world how smart we are. More debt, war, torture, spying and corporate crime.
-
by noloyalisti
October 27, 2008 5:19 PM EDT
- Typical Republi Cons, blaming someone for their failed "free" market policy disaster. I am just glad that this happened now, that Ray Guns has been exposed as the 2nd worst pResident of all time.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 25 CommentsIt''s simple: whatever a Republican says, it is exactly the opposite. That goes for charges of terrorist, communist and claims to be for the people of the United States and patriotic. It is all exactly the opposite.