Bill Clinton: "We Blew It" On Global Food
Ex-President Tells U.N. World Erred In Treating Food As A Commodity Instead Of Vital Right
-
Photo
(AP Photo/Jason DeCrow)
-
Interactive
United Nations
For more than 60 years, the United Nations has struggled to forge peace, end poverty and heal the world.
The former president, addressing a high-level event marking Oct. 16's World Food Day, also saluted U.S. President George W. Bush - "one thing he got right" - for pushing for a change in U.S. food-aid policy. He chided the bipartisan coalition in the U.S. Congress that killed the idea.
Clinton took aim at decades of international policymaking by the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and others, encouraged by the U.S., that pressured Africans in particular into dropping government subsidies for fertilizer, improved seed and other farm inputs, in economic "structural adjustments" required to win northern aid. Africa's food self-sufficiency subsequently declined and food imports rose.
Now skyrocketing prices in the international grain trade - on average more than doubling between 2006 and early 2008 - have pushed many in poor countries deeper into poverty.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told the U.N. gathering that prices on some food items are "500 percent higher than normal" in Haiti and Ethiopia, for example. The U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization estimates the number of undernourished people worldwide rose to 923 million last year.
"Food is not a commodity like others," Clinton said. "We should go back to a policy of maximum food self-sufficiency. It is crazy for us to think we can develop countries around the world without increasing their ability to feed themselves."
He noted that northern food aid could itself be a tool for boosting African agriculture.
It is crazy for us to think we can develop countries around the world without increasing their ability to feed themselves.
Former President Bill Clinton"A bipartisan coalition (in Congress) defeated him," the Democratic ex-president said of his Republican successor. "He was right, and both parties that defeated him were wrong."
Clinton also criticized the heavy U.S. reliance on a food crop, corn, to produce ethanol for fuel, which helped drive up grain prices worldwide.
"If we're going to do biofuels, we ought to look at the more efficient kind," he said, referring, for example, to the jatropha shrub, a nonfood source that grows on land not suitable for grain.
The U.N. General Assembly president, Nicaragua's Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann, agreed, speaking of the "madness of converting crops into fuel."
D'Escoto expressed disappointment that of $22 billion pledged by richer nations to help poorer nations' agriculture in this year of food crisis, only $2.2 billion has been made available.
Opening the hour-long meeting, U.N. chief Ban expressed dismay at the potential impact of the global financial crisis on world hunger.
"While the international community is focused on turmoil in the global economy, I am extremely concerned that not enough is being done to help those who are suffering most: the poorest of the poor," he said.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



Biofuels should have returned all farmland to active agriculture and put the farmers back to work.
Sounds like Slick Willy DID inhale this time...
I am also in favor of repealing the 53 cent per gallon tax on ethanol imported from sugar cane, which is far more efficient to grow per sqaure acre than corn.
Bvllsh*t, all UN agreements are ''statements of intent'', NOT requirements or laws.
Just like Kyoto: Kyoto was never a requirement imposed on the U.S. (indeed, its possible most of its signatories never met its conditions). Its a ''statement of intent'' i.e. we INTEND to work toward solving this problem!!
You naval-gazers on the right will never get it.
Had these people never heard the old adage--"GIVE a (man) a FISH and he eats for a DAY--TEACH HIM HOW to fish and he EATS for a LIFETIME!!?"
Teach him how to fish and he will not be forced to buy your fish.
That''s the point.
Better to see once than a thousand times to hear or read!
Better to see once than a thousand times to hear or read!
Better to see once than a thousand times to hear or read!
Better to see once than a thousand times to hear or read!
Better to see once than a thousand times to hear or read!
All that money spent on moose clothes!
$150,000.00 Could have fed thousands of families!
Just burn the moose dud smelling clothes! Charity my behind!!!!
You know what i changed my mind about Obama! I think he will be better for national security and the economy!
Besides I think Sarah Palin is really a Terrorist
Breaking News: The Terrorist Group AKA Alaska Independent party Calling on Russia to help secede from the Union
www.chilitoz.com
Extremists Mark Chryson and Steve Stoll former leaders of the Alaska Terrorist group AKA Independence Party and friends of Sarah Palin are calling on Russia to help them gain independence from the United States.
Watch video of Sarah palin addressing The Alaska Terrorist Group also known as The Independence party. They are calling for a civil war against the mainland.
www.chilitoz.com
America is simply out of people who can lead. We just don''t have anything going.
Working on 300 billion people, and this is where we are in 2008.
Pathetic.
In Texas and Californi. Who cleans their streets, serve you in restaurants, cook you dinners, take care of you children? The just arrived immigrant with no school, no knowledge of anything. Their families are so big, they couldn''t afford learning. And why is it that the poor have so many children when they actually know that they are poor? Simple. Lack of entertaiment. If you don''t have money to buy a TV, be social, go to movies, get around to baseball or baskeball games, the typical enjoyments of any American person, then what? *** is the only joy in town. Whether in America or Africa, it''s the same story.
And the Pope and religioues happy. The poorer the people, the more workers for their factories.
It is not harsh at all.
The recipient countries then have the choice of going back to subsidizing their agriculture, something they should not have stopped, or accept foreign interference in their food infrastructure, which will only benefit the foreign countries.
It is time for the world to take a time out from "globalization, return to isolationism, until we are ready to open trade on a more equitable foundation, with a global minimum wage, then we can rethink how, when, and in what areas we want to globalize.
Posted by imprisonrove
Poverty is the by-product of greed. On a finite planet, which dictates a zero-sum economy regardless of what idiots posing as economists posit, the excessive gain of one results in loss for another.
Eliminate excessive greed, and you eliminate poverty, but it is the fight against the excessively greedy that no one has the sack to figure out.
"A bipartisan coalition (in Congress) defeated him," the Democratic ex-president said of his Republican successor. "He was right, and both parties that defeated him were wrong."
Though very little publicity is given to his efforts, Bush has made more efforts to assist Africans in reaching health and prosperity than any other President. That will be part of of historical legacy though few average Americans are even aware of it.
What did putting China and India''s economies into overdrive do?
a) Cost us our jobs - and as is now becoming apparent - our economy
b) Ramped up the unregulated generation of air and water pollution in both China and India
c) Caused energy demand to soar, with the result that oil prices rose in sync (which, unfortunately, attracted the attention of the hedge funds and funny-money like CDOs, but that is another story)
And when you make fertilizer with petroleum products, the price of fertilizer must go up too....
And BAM!
Billie Clinton got to fly around on Vinod Gupta''s private jets, even as more and more countries were being forced to the brink of starvation by soaring fertilizer prices.
Of course, I could blame it on the Republicans, I suppose - Clinton had their full backing for "free trade", because they too have eyes that can see no further than the wealth that they are accumulating right now.
Though very little publicity is given to his efforts, Bush has made more efforts to assist Africans in reaching health and prosperity than any other President. That will be part of of historical legacy though few average Americans are even aware of it.
Posted by Meg001 at 08:18 AM : Oct 24, 2008
lolll...my, you are generous.
Bush''s weak attempt to balance his personal karma - and save his reputation in the history books - is more than offset by his deregulatory actions and his deliberate weakening of the enforcement role of agencies like the SEC.
Those Bush actions are resulting in the world''s economic engines crumpling like an empty can placed in a vacuum chamber - and charity to third-world countries naturally follows the same slope as the world''s economies do.
Not to mention the fact that Bush''s adventures in Iraq continuously added to the perception of instability in the Middle East, enabling much speculation in the oil commodities markets which viciously and negatively impacted global fertilizer prices.
All in all, Bush and the Republicans can take great pride in the knowledge that they have managed to harm more of the world''s citizens than anybody but a - small - handful of history''s major villians have managed.
I am quite certain that you meant 300 million people.
-
by downsteamjim
October 26, 2008 1:43 PM PDT
- ''We blew it.'' That''s what Monica said.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 36 Comments