Scroll Left Scroll Right
February 11, 2009 2:08 PM

Pickens: My Energy Plan Is The "Only Plan"

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  If you've been watching television lately, chances are you've seen a white-haired Texas oil man promising he can save America from foreign oil by using wind power, solar energy and domestic natural gas. He's T. Boone Pickens, and he's playing the role of pioneer and provocateur, in a massive national campaign warning of an energy crisis as dire as the current financial one.

As 60 Minutes contributor Charlie Rose reports, Pickens says he has a solution - a plan that might sound unrealistic in the current economic climate - but one he hopes will be good for the country and good for Boone Pickens.



At 80 years old, T. Boone Pickens acts like a man in the prime of his life, and there's no better place to see that than at Oklahoma State University. He has given his alma mater about $350 million, turned around the school's football team and rebuilt its stadium.

And that has made him a very big man on campus.

But can this billionaire, who has helped his alma mater so much, help break America's addiction to foreign oil?

"It seems to me that Boone Pickens is a guy that needs an idea and a challenge. He almost needs to be at war all the time," Rose comments.

"I know it. They call 'em crusades. I mean, I've been accused, 'You're a crusader, Pickens,'" he says. "I said, 'I don't start out that way.' But I'll have to admit that sometimes it ends up kinda like a crusade."

Pickens is spending $58 million of his own money to promote his biggest crusade yet, and probably the biggest of its kind. He calls it the "Pickens Plan."

The essence of his plan is to reduce oil imports by 30 percent in ten years, and save the country hundreds of billions of dollars. Pickens is an oil man who believes the era of oil is over, and that there's enough natural gas in this country to take its place in millions of cars and trucks.

"We own it. And it's abundant and it's cheap. It's cheaper than the oil. And whatever we spend here for energy at home creates jobs, taxes and the economy goes…," Pickens says.

He believes this would stimulate the economy. "We can do so much here at home with the money here, instead of letting it go out of the country."

The Pickens Plan, which could be overly ambitious in this financial crisis, calls for a conversion from oil products to natural gas in vehicles, first by phasing in two million new heavy trucks - roughly the entire fleet of big rigs that move goods around the country. Trucks account for about a quarter of the amount of oil we import every year.

"If you don't buy into natural gas, you're not buying into the Pickens Plan as a bridge to the future?" Rose asks.

"That's right," Pickens agrees.

"Anybody, whether it's Sarah Palin or George Bush or John McCain, who thinks you can drill your way out of the problem, is?" Rose asks.

"You don't have a chance. There's no way. We're importing 12 million barrels of oil a day. Okay, let's just say that we were gonna replace 12 million barrels by drilling in America. We would be bigger than Saudi Arabia. We are stretched for everything. I mean, we are a marginal producer," Pickens says.

Asked if he thinks his plan is the last, best hope for America to get off its addiction to foreign oil, Pickens tells Rose, "It's the only plan."

Pickens says his father told him, "A fool with a plan can beat a genius with no plan."

In order for his plan to work, Pickens proposes replacing the natural gas that's now used to generate 22 percent of the nation's electricity with a new source of power: wind power, created by thousands of wind farms that would need to be built.

"How do you know the utilities are gonna take wind power as a substitute for natural gas?" Pickens asks. "That may be a mandate."

"So that's a critical point. You may have to have the government demand this happen," Rose says. "Speak to that. Suppose it doesn't work? Suppose the Pickens Plan doesn't happen? What happens to the country?"

"Well, the plan then is foreign oil. You're totally at the mercy of foreign oil. There's no option one, two, three," Pickens says.



Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 192 Comments
by jlillyevv October 30, 2008 8:17 PM EDT
I understand the concern of some, that Mr. Pickens plans is acting without further study. However if we wait for Washington to come up with a plan and act on it we would be decades away from any action until we have another oil embargo.

Using LNG for trucks seems a good start, but do the engine makers like Cummins or Detroit Diesel have engines now that will run on LNG? How does a company set up fueling stations across the country? Are the truck stops able to refuel a LNG truck? I would love to see something done, anything, just to get started.
Reply to this comment
by peteraloha-2009 October 30, 2008 7:09 PM EDT
I can applaud his intention of getting America off it''s dependence on foreign oil. We can also see how Americans have decreased their oil consumption when gas went over $4/gal. Our country has to get over consuming 25% of the oil resources each year with 4% of the population.

I do feel it is a bit arrogant for him to proclaim his is the ONLY plan to save America. His plan included creating energy sources where he can still bill the public. How about putting windmills/solar panels on indvidual homes and having a govt subsidy for that? This would allow many Americans to generate their own power and not be charged for it. Probably unthinkable in Picken''s world.

Also, I lost a lot of respect for him on finding out he funded the Swift Boat attack ads against John Kerry. That was a low point in American politics. Kerry was an American who stepped up to defend his country when the call came and joined an elite Navy unit. Compared to Bush, who hid out in the Texas Air National Guard when his call came and refused to report for duty. Supporting a coward over a decorated war hero tells me he has an agenda that does not include truth, impeccable behavior and high integrity. One''s behavior can either be above reproach or not. Paying to smear Kerry''s reputation is not what I would call "above reproach" but near the bottom of what I would consider ethical behavior.
Reply to this comment
by urboydigger October 30, 2008 6:31 PM EDT
Posted by zacteneagles at 11:50 PM : Oct 28, 2008

So are you going to tell what energy source your talking about or what?
Reply to this comment
by pflabber October 30, 2008 2:11 AM EDT
Pickens PLOT Thickens
Sure, Wind farms and Natural Gas alternatives are a good thing.
Let it be done.

Charlie Rose did a BAD THING! He Did a Very Bad Thing!
Putting The Boone on a pedestal was not funny.

Pickens wants TWO things. Charlie didn''t tell this one.
EVERYONE EVERYWHERE must know that Water is the real motivation and boon for Boone.
Pickens says (to America) "Let''s invest in clean energy and natural gas." What he really wants is for everybody to help him buy our water supply.
This dude is smart, but certainly self-serving.
Know his motives.
Understand his intentions.
And START HOARDING WATER.
HE IS...
Pfishy.

Reply to this comment
by October 29, 2008 2:50 AM EDT
This looks like just another of the "Big Boys" choosing to sell us on the next generation of "billable" usage. Now that Oil is depleting, they want folks to use renewables that are grid tied, so that the folks who can afford large systems get paid, and the rest will still use the juice at the sellers price.

There is a better solution, a technology that was more expensive during the Rural Electrification Act, and was abandoned, but is now cheap in todays economy.

The energy companies are implimenting it internally today to save THEM $$$ while leaving the billable costs to the American people at the same levels. In its original form, it can produce more than all the other alternatives put together, and for far less an initial investment than the cheapest of those choices.

For the length of his term as Montana Governor, I have tried three times to get Brian Schweitzer''s Office interested, but I have been ignored. They are unable to listen to anything but Coal Oil. Many other politicians own stock in every other energy form that is billable, and will not jeopardize their dividends.

If only ONE politician really cared, he could be elected President on this one promise alone, Free Electricity for the nation, forever. One truely interested in implimenting it could free the US from Oil bondage, and in a lot less time than it would take with all the other "billable" alternatives working together.

Too bad, no one listens......
Reply to this comment
by October 29, 2008 2:48 AM EDT
This looks like just another of the "Big Boys" choosing to sell us on the next generation of "billable" usage. Now that Oil is depleting, they want folks to use renewables that are grid tied, so that the folks who can afford large systems get paid, and the rest will still use the juice at the sellers price.

There is a better solution, a technology that was more expensive during the Rural Electrification Act, and was abandoned, but is now cheap in todays economy.

The energy companies are implimenting it internally today to save THEM $$$ while leaving the billable costs to the American people at the same levels. In its original form, it can produce more than all the other alternatives put together, and for far less an initial investment than the cheapest of those choices.

For the length of his term as Montana Governor, I have tried three times to get Brian Schweitzer''s Office interested, but I have been ignored. They are unable to listen to anything but Coal Oil. Many other politicians own stock in every other energy form that is billable, and will not jeopardize their dividends.

If only ONE politician really cared, he could be elected President on this one promise alone, Free Electricity for the nation, forever. One truely interested in implimenting it could free the US from Oil bondage, and in a lot less time than it would take with all the other "billable" alternatives working together.

Too bad, no one listens......
Reply to this comment
by julio0826 October 29, 2008 1:20 AM EDT
sounds great and i''m all for it! we have to understand is it does take time for it to be implamented and to see a return. everything comes down to cost and effect. profits by "big oil" caused consumers to look elsewhere. the world became aware. unfortunatly our attention span is 15 seconds. "big oil''s" money reserve is poised for patience. luckily our attention span has lasted longer usuall and the price has of oil continues to fall. bad side, with new technology comes the fall of old technology. one has to consider that when jobs and money for working blue collar families, suddenly becomes less in demand, cut''s are made. "big oil" is intertwined in our economy as is "big banks". gradual decline of fossil fuels must be observed. we can''t stop cold turkey, change isn''t immediate. the need is here as is the awareness. we must not forget everything is a business. Picken''s plan does create a profit for himself. that he will use his land, is not free. there will be a lease on the land for the US government (meaning tax payers) to pay. that being said, i would gladly pay my tax dollars here in the US than in nations elsewhere. if money is going to be spent, why not spend it on america. one of the best interpritations of America''s role in the world is "when America sneezes the rest of the world get''s a cold." we are obligated to ourselves and to the world to lead the way, more importantly to our future world leading generations. a path has to be created so why not start one!
Reply to this comment
by ercolevita October 29, 2008 1:00 AM EDT
I used to own fiat "124 cuope" in 1973 till I came to the U.S.A. and my car ha two sources of fuel one regular gas and the other was liquefied gas and I was able to switch from one to the other with a flick of a toggle switch the best part was that I left on natural gas most of the time cleaner burning and half of the cost it was great than I sold the car in 1978 and I got more money than I bought it. I am totally for the plane and conversion is very inexpensive and it does not require big work.
Reply to this comment
by bbbirdzmom October 28, 2008 9:07 AM EDT
Excellent interview! Pickens reached millions more to describe the plan , its importance and the urgency of it, too. Good job!
Reply to this comment
by etennchris October 28, 2008 5:13 AM EDT
We need to make energy the number priority of the next adminstration!! Go Pickens.

Also check this 7 min CNBC clip on YouTube from March 2007.
http://www.energybulletin.net/node/28016
It''s Bob Pisani interviewing Matt Simmons and John Kilduff.

And check out links on my previous post. We need to educate our families, friends and neighbors and the media. Congress will be last, of course.
Reply to this comment
See all 192 Comments
.
The Best of Andy Rooney on DVD. Order now! Order Now »
60 Minutes on Facebook