February 11, 2009 2:08 PM

Report: Drug Deaths, Problems Set Record

By
CBSNews
(CBS/ AP)  The number of serious problems and deaths linked to medications reported to the government set a record in the first three months of this year, a health industry watchdog group said Wednesday.

The Food and Drug Administration received nearly 21,000 reports of serious drug reactions, including over 4,800 deaths, said an analysis of federal data by the nonprofit Institute for Safe Medication Practices, which scrutinized data going back to 2004, and yearly totals dating to the 1990s.

Two drugs accounted for a disproportionately large share of the latest reports. One was heparin, the tainted blood thinner from China that caused an international safety scandal. The other was Chantix, a new kind of anti-smoking drug from Pfizer.

Chantix, which had the most reports of any medication, works directly in a smoker's brain to ease withdrawal symptoms. It also blocks the pleasurable effects of nicotine if the patient tries to light up again. But earlier this year, the FDA warned that Chantix may be linked to psychiatric problems, including suicidal behavior and vivid dreams. The government banned it for pilots. Pfizer said Wednesday it stands by Chantix, and that the volume of reports might be linked to publicity about the drug's side effects.

But the patient safety group says stronger Chantix warnings are needed, and the general trend deserves more attention, reports CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson.

The authors of today's report say there's a lesson: prescription drugs help millions but also have risks - and the FDA should do a better job at reducing them, reports Attkisson.

The FDA had no immediate response to the report.

The watchdog group, known as ISMP, has served hospitals and pharmacists for years as a clearinghouse for information on drug safety and medication errors. It is now reaching out to consumers with regular reports on drug safety trends, drawn from FDA records.

"We believe that one of the most important tools to promote is to monitor trends on a regular basis," said Thomas J. Moore, a senior scientist with the group. "Knowing which drugs are causing injuries and how many people are being hurt is the raw material we need to fashion sound measures to promote patient safety."

The FDA defines serious drug reactions as ones that cause hospitalization, require medical intervention, or place a life in jeopardy. The agency's monitoring system relies on voluntary reports from doctors and is only believed to capture a fraction of overall problems.

The total of 20,745 cases reported from Jan.-March was 38 percent higher than the average for the previous four calendar quarters, and the highest for any quarter, the report said.

Fatalities accounted for 23 percent of the cases. The total number of deaths, 4,824, was an increase of nearly 3 percent from the last calendar quarter of 2007.

Previous research from ISMP has shown that serious drug safety problems reported to the FDA increased markedly from 1998-2005. The FDA case reports provide a signal of possible problems with a drug, but a cause-and-effect connection can only be established through painstaking investigation. If the FDA were a police agency, the reports would indicate "probable cause," but not necessarily "guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."

The ISMP study found that heparin accounted for 779 reports of serious problems, including 102 deaths. The FDA, using data that covers a longer time period has reported 238 deaths possibly linked to heparin.

Heparin "illustrates an example of a significant drug safety problem that was promptly and effectively resolved by the drug manufacturers and the FDA once the issue was detected and understood," the report said.

Not so with Chantix, it concluded.

The FDA should forcefully warn patients taking Chantix that they may have blackouts and other problems that could lead to accidents, the report said. The current warnings say that patients may be too impaired to drive or operate heavy machinery, but such language is standard for many medications.

The report found 15 cases of Chantix patients who appeared to have been involved in traffic accidents, and 52 additional cases involving blackouts or loss of consciousness. The FDA received 1,001 reports of serious injuries possibly linked to Chantix, more than for the ten best-selling brand name drugs combined.

Chantix "continued to provide a striking signal of safety issues that require investigation and action," the report said. The authors acknowledged Pfizer's concern that publicity may be driving up the number of reports, but nonetheless concluded that there are enough to warrant further action by the FDA.

Pfizer said the total sum of its data on Chantix, including results from clinical trials, show that the drug's benefits clearly outweigh its risks.

"We stand by the efficacy and safety profile of Chantix," the company said in a statement. "There are few things that provide greater health benefits than quitting smoking. Pfizer is committed to reducing the prevalence of smoking globally. As part of that mission, we want to increase peoples' understanding of the dangers of smoking and the benefits of quitting."

CBS/ AP
Add a Comment See all 14 Comments
by jordan1978-2009 October 23, 2008 7:53 PM EDT
THANK you for continuing to do stories that show
there are MAJOR problems with prescription drugs,
at least for some people.....even with drugs that
are assumed to be "safe."

My sister has been extremely sick ever since the
FDA said it was OK for the thyroid drug Synthroid
to change from its formula used before 1982 without
it being required, by law, to be tested for safety
and effectiveness on ANYONE. No other thyroid drug
has helped her correctly, since, and she''s lost
years of productive living because she hasn''t been
able to get anyone to help with this...the FDA and
doctors just don''t care.

We know of other thyroid patients who were really
harmed or killed by this, too...including our Mom,
and some who aren''t even relatives of ours.

When Dan Rather was anchoring your show, my mom and
sister even spoke by phone to Sheryl Atkisson about
their story, because she''d been doing Rezulin pieces
at the time and they hoped maybe CBS could do a
story about these thyroid meds. For whatever reason,
she didn''t get back to them after the original call.

But we''re at least glad your current news team feels
this topic, in general, is important. And if you ever
want to contact us, some of us are still here....
jordanindowney@msn.com
Reply to this comment
by payasyougo October 23, 2008 11:27 AM EDT
I met a 105 yr old lady on her birthday. Asked what her secret was to such a long life she gripped my arm with not quite a vice grip, looked me in the eyes and said:

"Stay away from doctors. They''ll kill ya.".
Reply to this comment
by lastdance128 October 23, 2008 10:28 AM EDT
A Different Type of Legal : Murder
_______
FDA Allowed Testing of Artificial Blood Despite Risk of Death
Washington Post - Monday, April 28, 2008; 2:02 PM

The Food and Drug Administration approved experiments with artificial blood
substitutes even after studies showed that the controversial products posed
a clear risk of causing heart attacks and death.

The review of combined data from more than 3,711 patients who participated
in 16 studies testing five different types of artificial blood, released today, found
the products nearly tripled the risk for heart attacks and boosted the chances of
dying by 30 percent.

Some products have been studied under rules allowing researchers to administer
them without obtaining consent from individual patients.

Trials were permitted based on the argument that there was no alternative
because patients were often unconscious and time too limited to obtain consent
from a family member.

Based on the available data, he FDA could have been aware of the risk as early
as 2000. A 2004 study involving 714 patients in which 11 patients receiving an
artificial blood product had heart attacks and 47 other patients died.

The Navy requested to conduct another study of Hemopure, an artificial blood product
made by Biopure Corp. of Cambridge, Mass., on 334 trauma patients.
____
Most likely - Unaware War wounded from Iraq and Afghanistan

Research : (Review: FDA Allowed Testing of Artificial Blood Despite Risk of Death)
(Copy and Paste) Google
Reply to this comment
by downtowner97 October 23, 2008 10:12 AM EDT
I was a nurse for ten years. I quit because I realized we were giving people prescriptions for drugs that were bad for them, or just didn''t help. Now that more people are unable to afford to go to a doctor for pills, the truth will come out that we don''t need pills.

The French invented perfume so they wouldn''t have to bathe. Americans invented pills so they wouldn''t have to take care of their bodies.
Reply to this comment
by lastdance128 October 23, 2008 9:33 AM EDT
Pharmaceutical Corporations taken before the The World Court :
June 14, 2003 / The Hague

1.2. EVIDENCE ABOUT THE CRIMINAL MARKETING
SCHEMES OF THE ACCUSED

1.2.1 Deliberately Expanding Diseases and Causing New Diseases in
Patients to Expand Pharmaceutical Drug Markets

To expand their markets the following groups of drugs are manufactured
and marketed by the accused deliberately, in spite of their
known detrimental side effects.

In a criminal manner, the accused are deliberately causing new
diseases under the pretense of fighting existing ones.

The fact that these new diseases caused by the side effects of these
drugs surface many years later is used as an additional cover for this
deceptive scheme:

Research : Pharmaceutical corporations accused of
Genocide before ICC in The Hague
(copy and paste - Google)
Reply to this comment
by tannerbird October 23, 2008 9:21 AM EDT
It''s all about the money! MONEY TALKS AND BULLSHI!WALKS
Reply to this comment
by revolvindoor October 23, 2008 3:42 AM EDT
I believe part of the blame for the "drug interactions" should be placed upon the patient''s shoulders. They should learn to use only ONE PHARMACY. No more than one. Pharmacists check for drug interactions every time a script is filled. However, some patient''s enjoy the coupons that some pharmacies give out and fill numerous prescriptions at different chains. Maybe we should put out a story on how you should choose only ONE PHARMACY??
Reply to this comment
by revolvindoor October 23, 2008 3:41 AM EDT
I believe part of the blame for the "drug interactions" should be placed upon the patient''s shoulders. They should learn to use only ONE PHARMACY. No more than one. Pharmacists check for drug interactions every time a script is filled. However, some patient''s enjoy the coupons that some pharmacies give out and fill numerous prescriptions at different chains. Maybe we should put out a story on how you should choose only ONE PHARMACY??
Reply to this comment
by andrew_693 October 23, 2008 12:15 AM EDT
hey you got to make the rich richer, or how else are we going to keep the GOP women barefoot, pregnant and ignorant? if they want to test pills on people, it''s their god given right, just like in medieval times it''s all about making money, it''s what america is all about according to Macshame and "waste state money on personal vacation" Palin.
Reply to this comment
by lastdance128 October 22, 2008 10:15 PM EDT
The FDA

Killing People - For Drug Testing Purposes - The Result of :
Politically Motivated and Gross Negligence Will Commit :
A Criminal Act of : Political Nepotism and Political Patronization To :
Political Criminal : Pharmaceutical Corporations
____

The FDA
The Same Organization That Brought You : Lead Painted Toys
The Same Organization That Brought You : Poisoned - Cat and Dog Food
The Same Organization That Brought You : Poisoned Food
The Same Organization That Brought You : Contaminated Baby Formula

The FDA - The Perfect Example of :
Federal Employees always running Amock

No Real Management
No Real Supervision

The Federal Employee, Who has Never been in Competition for their Jobs
The Federal Employee, Who has never learned how to Work
The Federal Employee, Who Has NEVER Had to Make Production
The Federal Employee, Who works at a LEISURELY PACE
Making Little or no Production ! !

The Federal Civil Service is made up of nothing but - POLITICAL
Moviated Patronization and Nepotism

NOT - Professional Attributes or Professional Skills
The Federal Civil Service Needs a Complete - NEW OVERHAUL
Reply to this comment
See all 14 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
Better Information. Better Health.
CBS News on Facebook