Iraq Wants Changes Made To Security Pact

Deal Would Allow U.S. Troops To Stay For 3 More Years; Cabinet Asks For Unspecified Revisions

(CBS/ AP)  Iraq's Cabinet decided Tuesday to ask the Americans for unspecified changes in the draft security pact that would allow U.S. troops to remain here another three years, despite warnings that it would be hard to reopen negotiations on the agreement.

Government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said the Cabinet decided amendments were needed to win "national acceptance" for the draft, which must be approved by parliament before the current U.N. mandate expires at the end of this year. Without a new agreement, there would be no legal basis for the U.S.-led military mission.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and his ministers spent over five hours reviewing the draft agreement before deciding Tuesday to request changes, al-Dabbagh said. Their decision came two days after al-Maliki's own Shiite coalition expressed reservations about the accord, hammered out after months of intensive negotiations.

Al-Maliki aide Sami al-Askari said several members of the Shiite coalition wanted to remove language allowing the government to ask U.S. forces to stay beyond the end of 2011 and wanted clarification of some parts of the jurisdiction clause.

The agreement would call for U.S. troops to leave the cities by the end of June and withdraw from the country by Dec. 31, 2011 unless the government asked them to stay. The draft would also provide limited Iraqi jurisdiction over soldiers and contractors accused of major, premeditated crimes committed off post and off duty.

Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari told reporters last week that it would be difficult to reopen negotiations, which have gone on for most of this year.

But Al-Maliki wants his coalition Cabinet to sign off before sending it to parliament. Al-Maliki fears he could end up politically isolated if he pushes forward with the agreement without solid national backing.

Later Tuesday, Al-Dabbagh issued a brief statement saying the Cabinet also was "calling on everyone to view the agreement objectively and responsibly and to consider the public interest."

He was apparently referring to groups that have rejected the agreement outright, like the 30-member bloc in parliament loyal to anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

The Cabinet will meet again in a few days to consider the proposed changes and forward them to the Americans, the spokesman said. He refused to specify the changes or say when the Cabinet would meet again.

On Tuesday, the chairman of parliament's foreign affairs committee, Shiite cleric Humam Hmoudi, told reporters that there was broad agreement that parts of the draft needed changing.

"What they (the Americans) gave by their right hand, they took it away by the left," Hmoudi said. "They brought new conditions and limits such as in the article about leaving the cities. They are still agreed to leave by next June but added that this will be connected to the security situation on the ground."

He ruled out any chance that parliament would sign off on the deal before the Nov. 4 U.S. election.

Zebari agreed, telling Al-Arabiya television late Monday that "I don't think it would be possible" to win ratification by the time of the American election.

In other developments:

After a troubled history, the V-22 Osprey - half-helicopter, half-plane - is gaining popularity in Iraq as it has been ferrying troops and equipment across the country for just over a year without a major incident. Critics say the Osprey, which was designed to replace transport helicopters, lacks firepower for defense in heavy combat. But pilots say the Osprey makes up for that in speed, which one of them says can take the plane "like a bat out of hell" to altitudes safe from small-arms fire.

U.S. and Iraqi officials believe Iraq's security forces still need American support to guarantee the security gains of the past year. Sunni and Shiite extremists have been battered but not defeated. In a sign of the continuing threat, a bomb targeting a police patrol exploded Tuesday in eastern Baghdad, wounding two civilians, Iraqi police said. The injured pair were taken to the capital city's Kindi hospital, said the officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to disclose the information.

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Share:

Digg

Facebook

Yahoo! Buzz

Twitter

Mixx

Video and Galleries from Iraq After Saddam

• Photos Iraq Photos: July 6?July 12
• Photos Iraq Photos: June 29-July 5
• Photos Iraq Photos: June 22 ? June 28

Latest in Iraq After Saddam

Bombs Claim 50 in Iraq

Biden Meets with Key U.S. Leaders in Iraq

Senate Investigates Blackwater Subsidiary

Add a Comment See all 34 Comments

by kphx October 21, 2008 10:25 AM PDT

*** Iraqi politicians, trying to think for themselves or what ? They just need to accept and sign what the US govt says. Not for no reason did we surgically remove their armed forces and made a quagmire of thier country.

Our ultimate goal is to setup a huge and permanent military base in the middle east, so the whole region can be constrolled and ruled as per our whims.

How dare the Iraqi puppet govt is trying to show their spine.

Reply to this comment

by ljb6599 October 21, 2008 12:14 PM PDT

hillaryin012....It seems like you are a Hillary supporter voting for McCain.Since Obama''s and Clinton''s policies were almost identical how could voing for McCain be in your own best interest,particulary when his proposals in most instances are significantly different and not in the best interests of everyday working amercans.Why don''t you just write in Hillary''s name rather than voting for McCan?

Reply to this comment

by frogprophet October 21, 2008 12:16 PM PDT

Bottom line: How much will it cost for the US to put an isolated but sizable base capable of staging a ground strike, near the Iranian boarder?

Reply to this comment

by yongamerica October 21, 2008 12:40 PM PDT

Iraq wants US presence for stability. But doesn''t want US troops for stability. It needs to make up its mind. America should pack up and leave this theater, there was no real mission to accomplish here from the start. The real mission is and always has been Afghanistan and in Pakistan. The US government has ignored both countries for so long that China has made great political inroads by supplying electrical energy infrastructures right under America''s noses. Talk about a Pizz poor example of diplomacy on America''s part. Another failure, another miserable failure in diplomacy.

Reply to this comment

by Thomas1016 October 21, 2008 12:44 PM PDT

unfortunately it does not matter how much the military favors McCain. Many states do not even take into account absentee ballots before they proclaim a winner.

Reply to this comment

by checkthepast October 21, 2008 12:44 PM PDT

Bottom line: How much will it cost for the US to put an isolated but sizable base capable of staging a ground strike, near the Iranian boarder?

Posted by FrogProphet

Answer: Nothing. It is not an accident that we have 200,000 ground troops and 3 Carrier groups surrounding the Iranian border, which is much bigger than 1 base.

Reply to this comment

by checkthepast October 21, 2008 12:46 PM PDT

select someone so dangerous
Posted by WatUsayBoy1

Breaking news... one candidate is named Barrack Hussein and you consider Sarah Palin to be ''dangerous''?

Get real.

Reply to this comment

by checkthepast October 21, 2008 12:50 PM PDT

Key West announced secssion a number of years ago.
Posted by bob5ford

And the rest of Florida says let it go!

Reply to this comment

by frogprophet October 21, 2008 1:01 PM PDT

Answer: Nothing. It is not an accident that we have 200,000 ground troops and 3 Carrier groups surrounding the Iranian border, which is much bigger than 1 base.
Posted by checkthepast

Go Navy!

Reply to this comment

by hissteps4u October 21, 2008 1:10 PM PDT

We need to comply with the iraq government as much as possiable to accomodate their wishs. We need to get out as quickly as possiable from Iraq and to do anything possiable to facilitate our getting out of the country.

Why wouldnt we cooperate as much as possiable and turn over as much authority as humanly possiable and do what we can to accomodate their wishs as long as it does not place americans in danger needlessly.

It is time to do all we can to get out of this country.

Bush brought this upon us for no good real reason except to attempt to save face for his father who failed to get Sadam... Now Sadam is Dead and we need to get out.....

Reply to this comment

by bobnjersey October 21, 2008 1:12 PM PDT

[It is not an accident that we have 200,000 ground troops and 3 Carrier groups surrounding the Iranian border, which is much bigger than 1 base.]
[Posted by checkthepast at 12:44 PM : Oct 21, 2008]

those 200k a bit busy right now ... and you''re right ... it''s not an accident ... it''s a screw up ... of historical proportions.

Reply to this comment

by edward1975-2009 October 21, 2008 1:16 PM PDT

hissteps4u: We will be there beyond 2011, that is the region, and if Obama gets elected we will sending a majority of the troops stationed in Iraq into Afghanistan. So our presence in the region will be for a long term. Get used to it.

Reply to this comment

by rbi149 October 21, 2008 1:31 PM PDT

Breaking news... one candidate is named Barrack Hussein and you consider Sarah Palin to be ''''dangerous''''?

Get real.

Posted by checkthepast

That comment is moronic on so many levels that I won''t even bother to comment on it. Tool.

Reply to this comment

by old300d October 21, 2008 2:06 PM PDT

Obama is going to remove the troops from Iraq ! ! !

HELLO ? ? ?

3 years ? No way ! ! ! Get ready Iraq ! ! !

Reply to this comment

by dogband October 21, 2008 2:34 PM PDT

tell Iraq to shove it up its ***, and lets get the hell out of there.

national acceptance? who the hell is running the show with our kids lives? It should be AMERICA. Grow a spine and tell IRAQ that we are going to take all their ******* oil if they don''t step it up a ton.

Reply to this comment

by ioweign October 21, 2008 2:39 PM PDT

Is that why 67% of the military is voting for McCain?

Posted by hillaryin012 at 02:01 PM : Oct 21, 2008

Oh for sure.

I always vote for someone I know who will or has voted against my Cost of Living Increases and my benefits.

Reply to this comment

by jackp32 October 21, 2008 3:31 PM PDT

Where is the money from their sale of oil that was supposed to reimburse the US for the costs of the war? We saved them from further mass murders by Saddam Hussein. Who got the money?

Reply to this comment

by hermitdave October 21, 2008 3:42 PM PDT

GOSH how petty of them people. How dare they ask some rules against a country that invaded them, killed and maimed their women and children, all to allow western big oil back into their country.

Reply to this comment

by emelder October 21, 2008 3:43 PM PDT

Iraq Wants Changes Made To Security Pact ...

America wants a change of direction in our White House. It''s Obama time.

Reply to this comment

by emelder October 21, 2008 3:44 PM PDT

Well ... Bush said we brought them democracy. So ... let them vote on whether we stay or not. Straight up and down vote ... no stay for a while vote ... do they want us there or not. Bet NOT!

Reply to this comment

by grouchyjohn October 21, 2008 3:59 PM PDT

Better yet, ask God Himself directly and Jesus, if you''''re a Christian. They have all your answers.

Posted by prometheus41 at 03:46 PM : Oct 21, 2008




Didn''t "god" tell bush to invade Iraq in the first place?

Reply to this comment

by grouchyjohn October 21, 2008 4:01 PM PDT

Is that why 67% of the military is voting for McCain?

Posted by hillaryin012 at 02:01 PM : Oct 21, 2008





Still spreading that lie, even though I''ve already quashed it?

Reply to this comment

by credibility2 October 21, 2008 4:32 PM PDT

The US should make it clear that there won''t be any more agreements or amendments to those of understanding until they begin paying the US back from all of their stashed war booty, as well as sending us oil free of charge. The US should also make it clear when it''s in our interests and not the deliberate dragging Iraqi feet who should have been advanced in their road to recovery.

Reply to this comment

by missingamerica October 21, 2008 4:33 PM PDT

"Critics say the Osprey, which was designed to replace transport helicopters, lacks firepower for defense in heavy combat. But pilots say the Osprey makes up for that in speed, which one of them says can take the plane "like a bat out of hell" to altitudes safe from small-arms fire."

lolll...so, it is useful on flat terrain with minimal vegetation.

If somebody has cover enough to fire on it, methinks it would be kind of hard to miss when landing, landed, or taking off.

Reply to this comment

by jojo9357-2009 October 21, 2008 5:00 PM PDT

Biden just told a rally that Bush is following Obama''s plan to get out of IRAQ by June 2009.

Sombody''s lying.

Reply to this comment

by wherenextnow October 21, 2008 5:06 PM PDT

Hell, everybody is telling Republicans to stick it up their arses.

Reply to this comment

by grouchyjohn October 21, 2008 5:22 PM PDT

Biden just told a rally that Bush is following Obama''''s plan to get out of IRAQ by June 2009.

Sombody''''s lying.

Posted by JoJo9357 at 05:00 PM : Oct 21, 2008





How so?

In February, Obama came out with his plan for a 16 month timetable.

Al Maliki said he agreed with it.

McCain said he agreed with Al Maliki.

A month later, bush is negotiating to get us out of Iraq by June 2009 - 16 months after Obama made his first comments!!!

Reply to this comment

by jojo9357-2009 October 21, 2008 5:43 PM PDT

This article says:

Al-Maliki aide Sami al-Askari said several members of the Shiite coalition wanted to remove language allowing the government to ask U.S. forces to stay beyond the end of 2011 and wanted clarification of some parts of the jurisdiction clause.

The agreement would call for U.S. troops to leave the cities by the end of June and withdraw from the country by Dec. 31, 2011 unless the government asked them to stay.

2009--2011 somebody''s not got it right.

Reply to this comment

by bogusbones October 21, 2008 5:45 PM PDT

all this rhetoric about "winning the war" is bunk. iraq and afghanistan are ruining our country and the fighting is ruining their''s as well. come home troops, we love you, but we have to take care of the U.S.A. first - then we can go help others. we''re bankrupting our country to stave off the inevitable - national self determination. what do those countries have that we need? are they really so important to our national security? if we leave - they''ll fight each other and forget about us. we''re the cop in a domestic dispute - they''re turning on us. these are not winnable wars. there is no victory only defeat.

Reply to this comment

by tannerbird October 21, 2008 7:22 PM PDT

Just tell Iraq we are counting up the bill and you have money or oil so now how much will it cost to stay 3 more years well looks like it takes all your money and all your oil. Look who is running the show hear anyway.

Reply to this comment

by tannerbird October 21, 2008 7:26 PM PDT

THATS NOT TRUE 67% OF THE MILITARY IS NOT VOTING FOR MCCAIN YOU HAD BETTER CHECK THAT AGAIN.

Reply to this comment

by ajayvee October 21, 2008 9:48 PM PDT

JackP32 wrote: We saved them from further mass murders by Saddam Hussein.
-------------------
Well, we had to slaughter a few hundred thousand of them in the process but, what the heck, sh*t happens!

Reply to this comment

by samsel3 October 23, 2008 7:20 AM PDT

The PNAC s goal has always been world market domination. In concert with Big Oil the Godfather of the PNAC George HW Bush held meetings with the Saudis at Walker Point in Maine prior to the Iraq invasion.

Iraq with the Russians were the Saudis main competition in global Oil markets. 2.5 million barrels a day of Iraqi crude was sold cheap in world markets angering the Saudis and Big Oil. Iraq was one of seven countries on the administrations hit list. Taking out Iraq did take out the competition enabling Big Oil and the Saudis free reign to drive oil prices up.
The Russians are not to blame. Blame the PNAC.......


Paul Wolfowitz,Don Rumsfeld, Scooter Libby, George Bush, Richard Cheney, Eliot Cohen. Zalmay Khalilzad, Steve Forbes, Donald Kagan, Pete Rodman, Henry S Rowen, Dan Quale, William J.Bennett, Jeb Bush, they are all members of the PNAC Project for a New American Century.

Reply to this comment

by samsel3 October 23, 2008 7:21 AM PDT

The Times of India August 2007 reported : " Iran, Iraq signed an agreement to build pipelines for the transfer of Iraqi crude oil and oil products." Under the deal crude will be refined and sent back to Iraq. Bush opposed this agreement and wanted the Iraqi Parliment to accept and sign a U.S. designed oil law that would result in huge profits for BIG OIL.

Iraqi oil workers and 63% of Iraqis polled are opposed to the Bush law and prefer a hands off Iraq oil policy.

On January 26, 1998 in a letter to the President the PNAC asked Clinton to invade Iraq and get rid of Saddam Hussein.. Clinton refused their request.

Reply to this comment

See all 34 Comments

Add a comment

Comment SUBMIT

Click here to add another comment.

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

Comment reply

Submit Cancel

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

Report offensive content:

If you believe this comment is offensive or violates the CBSNews.com Terms of Use, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the comment). Once reported, our staff will be notified and the comment will be reviewed.

Select type of offense:

Offensive: Sexually explicit or offensive language

Spam: Advertisements or commercial links

Disruptive posting: Flaming or offending other users

Illegal activities: Promote cracked software, or other illegal content

Comments (optional):

Report Cancel

E-mail this comment to a friend.

E-mail this to: (Separate multiple e-mail addresses with commas. Limited to 10 addresses.)

Your e-mail address:

Send me a copy of this message

Note: Your e-mail address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the e-mail and in case of transmission error. Neither your address nor the recipients's address will be used for any other purpose.

Add your own personal message: (Optional)

Hi, I found this user's comment on CBSNews.com and thought you might be interested in reading it. Send e-mail Cancel

[kphx]

*** Iraqi politicians, trying to think for themselves or what ? They just need to accept and sign what the US govt says. Not for no reason did we surgically remove their armed forces and made a quagmire of thier country.

Our ultimate goal is to setup a huge and permanent military base in the middle east, so the whole region can be constrolled and ruled as per our whims.

How dare the Iraqi puppet govt is trying to show their spine.

[ljb6599]

hillaryin012....It seems like you are a Hillary supporter voting for McCain.Since Obama''s and Clinton''s policies were almost identical how could voing for McCain be in your own best interest,particulary when his proposals in most instances are significantly different and not in the best interests of everyday working amercans.Why don''t you just write in Hillary''s name rather than voting for McCan?

[frogprophet]

Bottom line: How much will it cost for the US to put an isolated but sizable base capable of staging a ground strike, near the Iranian boarder?

[yongamerica]

Iraq wants US presence for stability. But doesn''t want US troops for stability. It needs to make up its mind. America should pack up and leave this theater, there was no real mission to accomplish here from the start. The real mission is and always has been Afghanistan and in Pakistan. The US government has ignored both countries for so long that China has made great political inroads by supplying electrical energy infrastructures right under America''s noses. Talk about a Pizz poor example of diplomacy on America''s part. Another failure, another miserable failure in diplomacy.

[Thomas1016]

unfortunately it does not matter how much the military favors McCain. Many states do not even take into account absentee ballots before they proclaim a winner.

[checkthepast]

Bottom line: How much will it cost for the US to put an isolated but sizable base capable of staging a ground strike, near the Iranian boarder?

Posted by FrogProphet

Answer: Nothing. It is not an accident that we have 200,000 ground troops and 3 Carrier groups surrounding the Iranian border, which is much bigger than 1 base.

[checkthepast]

select someone so dangerous
Posted by WatUsayBoy1

Breaking news... one candidate is named Barrack Hussein and you consider Sarah Palin to be ''dangerous''?

Get real.

[checkthepast]

Key West announced secssion a number of years ago.
Posted by bob5ford

And the rest of Florida says let it go!

[frogprophet]

Answer: Nothing. It is not an accident that we have 200,000 ground troops and 3 Carrier groups surrounding the Iranian border, which is much bigger than 1 base.
Posted by checkthepast

Go Navy!

[hissteps4u]

We need to comply with the iraq government as much as possiable to accomodate their wishs. We need to get out as quickly as possiable from Iraq and to do anything possiable to facilitate our getting out of the country.

Why wouldnt we cooperate as much as possiable and turn over as much authority as humanly possiable and do what we can to accomodate their wishs as long as it does not place americans in danger needlessly.

It is time to do all we can to get out of this country.

Bush brought this upon us for no good real reason except to attempt to save face for his father who failed to get Sadam... Now Sadam is Dead and we need to get out.....

[bobnjersey]

[It is not an accident that we have 200,000 ground troops and 3 Carrier groups surrounding the Iranian border, which is much bigger than 1 base.]
[Posted by checkthepast at 12:44 PM : Oct 21, 2008]

those 200k a bit busy right now ... and you''re right ... it''s not an accident ... it''s a screw up ... of historical proportions.

[edward1975-2009]

hissteps4u: We will be there beyond 2011, that is the region, and if Obama gets elected we will sending a majority of the troops stationed in Iraq into Afghanistan. So our presence in the region will be for a long term. Get used to it.

[rbi149]

Breaking news... one candidate is named Barrack Hussein and you consider Sarah Palin to be ''''dangerous''''?

Get real.

Posted by checkthepast

That comment is moronic on so many levels that I won''t even bother to comment on it. Tool.

[old300d]

Obama is going to remove the troops from Iraq ! ! !

HELLO ? ? ?

3 years ? No way ! ! ! Get ready Iraq ! ! !

[dogband]

tell Iraq to shove it up its ***, and lets get the hell out of there.

national acceptance? who the hell is running the show with our kids lives? It should be AMERICA. Grow a spine and tell IRAQ that we are going to take all their ******* oil if they don''t step it up a ton.

[ioweign]

Is that why 67% of the military is voting for McCain?

Posted by hillaryin012 at 02:01 PM : Oct 21, 2008

Oh for sure.

I always vote for someone I know who will or has voted against my Cost of Living Increases and my benefits.

[jackp32]

Where is the money from their sale of oil that was supposed to reimburse the US for the costs of the war? We saved them from further mass murders by Saddam Hussein. Who got the money?

[hermitdave]

GOSH how petty of them people. How dare they ask some rules against a country that invaded them, killed and maimed their women and children, all to allow western big oil back into their country.

[emelder]

Iraq Wants Changes Made To Security Pact ...

America wants a change of direction in our White House. It''s Obama time.

[emelder]

Well ... Bush said we brought them democracy. So ... let them vote on whether we stay or not. Straight up and down vote ... no stay for a while vote ... do they want us there or not. Bet NOT!

[grouchyjohn]

Better yet, ask God Himself directly and Jesus, if you''''re a Christian. They have all your answers.

Posted by prometheus41 at 03:46 PM : Oct 21, 2008




Didn''t "god" tell bush to invade Iraq in the first place?

[grouchyjohn]

Is that why 67% of the military is voting for McCain?

Posted by hillaryin012 at 02:01 PM : Oct 21, 2008





Still spreading that lie, even though I''ve already quashed it?

[credibility2]

The US should make it clear that there won''t be any more agreements or amendments to those of understanding until they begin paying the US back from all of their stashed war booty, as well as sending us oil free of charge. The US should also make it clear when it''s in our interests and not the deliberate dragging Iraqi feet who should have been advanced in their road to recovery.

[missingamerica]

"Critics say the Osprey, which was designed to replace transport helicopters, lacks firepower for defense in heavy combat. But pilots say the Osprey makes up for that in speed, which one of them says can take the plane "like a bat out of hell" to altitudes safe from small-arms fire."

lolll...so, it is useful on flat terrain with minimal vegetation.

If somebody has cover enough to fire on it, methinks it would be kind of hard to miss when landing, landed, or taking off.

[jojo9357-2009]

Biden just told a rally that Bush is following Obama''s plan to get out of IRAQ by June 2009.

Sombody''s lying.

[wherenextnow]

Hell, everybody is telling Republicans to stick it up their arses.

[grouchyjohn]

Biden just told a rally that Bush is following Obama''''s plan to get out of IRAQ by June 2009.

Sombody''''s lying.

Posted by JoJo9357 at 05:00 PM : Oct 21, 2008





How so?

In February, Obama came out with his plan for a 16 month timetable.

Al Maliki said he agreed with it.

McCain said he agreed with Al Maliki.

A month later, bush is negotiating to get us out of Iraq by June 2009 - 16 months after Obama made his first comments!!!

[jojo9357-2009]

This article says:

Al-Maliki aide Sami al-Askari said several members of the Shiite coalition wanted to remove language allowing the government to ask U.S. forces to stay beyond the end of 2011 and wanted clarification of some parts of the jurisdiction clause.

The agreement would call for U.S. troops to leave the cities by the end of June and withdraw from the country by Dec. 31, 2011 unless the government asked them to stay.

2009--2011 somebody''s not got it right.

[bogusbones]

all this rhetoric about "winning the war" is bunk. iraq and afghanistan are ruining our country and the fighting is ruining their''s as well. come home troops, we love you, but we have to take care of the U.S.A. first - then we can go help others. we''re bankrupting our country to stave off the inevitable - national self determination. what do those countries have that we need? are they really so important to our national security? if we leave - they''ll fight each other and forget about us. we''re the cop in a domestic dispute - they''re turning on us. these are not winnable wars. there is no victory only defeat.

[tannerbird]

Just tell Iraq we are counting up the bill and you have money or oil so now how much will it cost to stay 3 more years well looks like it takes all your money and all your oil. Look who is running the show hear anyway.

[tannerbird]

THATS NOT TRUE 67% OF THE MILITARY IS NOT VOTING FOR MCCAIN YOU HAD BETTER CHECK THAT AGAIN.

[ajayvee]

JackP32 wrote: We saved them from further mass murders by Saddam Hussein.
-------------------
Well, we had to slaughter a few hundred thousand of them in the process but, what the heck, sh*t happens!

[samsel3]

The PNAC s goal has always been world market domination. In concert with Big Oil the Godfather of the PNAC George HW Bush held meetings with the Saudis at Walker Point in Maine prior to the Iraq invasion.

Iraq with the Russians were the Saudis main competition in global Oil markets. 2.5 million barrels a day of Iraqi crude was sold cheap in world markets angering the Saudis and Big Oil. Iraq was one of seven countries on the administrations hit list. Taking out Iraq did take out the competition enabling Big Oil and the Saudis free reign to drive oil prices up.
The Russians are not to blame. Blame the PNAC.......


Paul Wolfowitz,Don Rumsfeld, Scooter Libby, George Bush, Richard Cheney, Eliot Cohen. Zalmay Khalilzad, Steve Forbes, Donald Kagan, Pete Rodman, Henry S Rowen, Dan Quale, William J.Bennett, Jeb Bush, they are all members of the PNAC Project for a New American Century.

[samsel3]

The Times of India August 2007 reported : " Iran, Iraq signed an agreement to build pipelines for the transfer of Iraqi crude oil and oil products." Under the deal crude will be refined and sent back to Iraq. Bush opposed this agreement and wanted the Iraqi Parliment to accept and sign a U.S. designed oil law that would result in huge profits for BIG OIL.

Iraqi oil workers and 63% of Iraqis polled are opposed to the Bush law and prefer a hands off Iraq oil policy.

On January 26, 1998 in a letter to the President the PNAC asked Clinton to invade Iraq and get rid of Saddam Hussein.. Clinton refused their request.