February 11, 2009 2:09 PM

China To Help Pakistan Build 2 Nuke Plants

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  The following was written by CBS News' Farhan Bokhari, reporting from Islamabad.

China has agreed to sell two new nuclear reactors to Pakistan to help the increasingly energy-starved country from further disarray in its energy generation, Pakistani officials announced on Saturday.

The agreement for the two reactors, to be located at Chashma, a small city in Pakistan's central Punjab province, follows China's installation of a nuclear power reactor at the same site. Meanwhile, work is continuing on the construction of a second Chinese nuclear reactor in the same city.

"It is a good gesture at a time of growing power shortages (in Pakistan)," Pakistan's foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi said at a press conference in Islamabad on Saturday. Pakistanis have braved up to 12 hours of electricity cuts since the beginning of this year.

But there are broader diplomatic implications of the Chinese gesture. China considers Pakistan a close friend and ally, and has helped the south Asian country through previous nuclear cooperation.

By contrast, the United States has denied a civil nuclear agreement for Pakistan along the lines of its recent agreement to supply civil nuclear reactors to India, the largest south Asian country, which in the past has had a troubled relationship with both China and Pakistan.

The U.S. concern over Pakistan's nuclear ambitions is shared by a number of other western countries.

In 2004, Abdul Qadeer Khan, founder of Pakistan's nuclear weapons program, was found to have traded nuclear know-how and technology with Iran, Libya and North Korea. Khan has since lived practically under house arrest in Islamabad, though he was officially pardoned by former Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf.

Opinion is divided between western and non-western diplomats over China's motive in expanding its nuclear cooperation with Pakistan in spite of the controversy related to Khan. "China will not sign up to a broad agreement of the kind that the U.S. has struck with India, but they will follow a step-by-step approach, almost like a reactor-by-reactor approach," said one senior western diplomat in Islamabad who spoke to CBS News on condition of anonymity.

However, an Asian ambassador based in Islamabad, also speaking to CBS News on condition of anonymity, said that China was driven in part by its reaction to the India-U.S. deal which it sees as "threatening China with the objective of containing China's rise as a major power on the global scene."

The Asian ambassador said, "In spite of international pressure, China will not abandon its nuclear cooperation with Pakistan. China wants to build up its relationship (with Pakistan) because it (China) sees this relationship in its long-term interest, including a counter-balance to U.S.-India ties."

In an apparent reference to the U.S.-India agreement which was cleared by international watchdogs including the Nuclear Suppliers' Group (NSG) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Qureshi said, "They (China) have spoken on international forums that there should be discriminatory treatment (towards any country)."

Privately, Pakistani officials have said that by setting a precedent in the case of the U.S.-India agreement, groups such as the NSG and IAEA must now clear similar agreements between other countries such as China and Pakistan. Qureshi said that Pakistan and China "have a deep understanding" on issues of common interest, including the nuclear affair.

As part of an effort to broaden economic ties between China and Pakistan, Qureshi also announced that Pakistan's president Asif Ali Zardari would travel to China once every quarter for meetings with Chinese leaders.

Additionally, President Zardari has also decided to have a once-a-month consultation with his ministers who will meet him along with the Chinese ambassador in Pakistan, to discuss and instantly resolve any issues faced by Chinese companies operating in Pakistan, added Qureshi.

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 21 Comments
by jellolion October 21, 2008 3:10 PM EDT
Look at China, they have investments all over the middle east and in just about every african country. They have their workers there in those countries building infrastructure, building ties, signing long term contracts. What is the US doing? Killing people, breaking ties. Pakistan was supposed to be our ally. Look for chinese weapons to start turning up in the hands of the Taliban. China is building ties around the world, Bush is breaking ties, making us hated around the world. How is this one going to end? We had better learn to be self sufficient, like south africa under apartheid, because all the resources will be going to china.
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 October 19, 2008 7:03 PM EDT
You can call George Bush whatever you want. He kept all those Al qaida creeps out of United States and kept all of us out of harm''''s way. History will recognize that. He did not surrender to terrorists like Clinton in Somalia and Carter in Iran. I am a Democrat and I remember Iran hostage crisis and Somalia crisis.
Posted by shyam8 at 03:28 PM : Oct 19, 2008


I am a Democrat with his eyes open and brain working. Bushy_baby is the reason for this mess, Alky-Ada is not in a position to do more than aggravate us. Bushy_baby just ticked him off. If we don''t get this mess stopped and get out of the Mid-East they will get serious and we will end up having to nuke them to stop the war. Get real, and open your eyes.
Reply to this comment
by shyam8 October 19, 2008 6:28 PM EDT
You can call George Bush whatever you want. He kept all those Al qaida creeps out of United States and kept all of us out of harm''s way. History will recognize that. He did not surrender to terrorists like Clinton in Somalia and Carter in Iran. I am a Democrat and I remember Iran hostage crisis and Somalia crisis.
Reply to this comment
by nike2me October 19, 2008 4:58 PM EDT
hi,welcome to www.nike2me.com
Reply to this comment
by runningralph October 19, 2008 11:33 AM EDT
The US has no control in what goes on in Asia. No matter who is President. In the long run the struggle between Western civilization and Islamic jihad will be won by the side that perseveres. The US has taken the lead in this struggle, but this will end when Obama becomes President. Europeans have relied on US military for protection since WWII and they have no strategic power. If the West loses this struggle, the next big struggle will be between China and Islam. When Islam has control over Europe and the US, Islam will be a force the Chinese will have to face. Historically, China has absorbed religions and ethnicities and stayed Chinese. They will not be able to absorb Islam and it will come to war. My money is on China due to their ablilty to focus on a goal. India and Russia will cooperate reluctantly with China
Reply to this comment
by payasyougo October 19, 2008 10:14 AM EDT
As the US economy tanks, India will see a reduction in revenue from their current IT boom. Watch for the civil unrest there...
Reply to this comment
by cdfoxtrot4 October 19, 2008 1:29 AM EDT
Yet another foreign policy "achievement" for the moron-in-chief.
Reply to this comment
by brianp55 October 19, 2008 12:39 AM EDT
"China doing spacewalks-developing the 3rd world -owning US debt & best US companies -opening their own NYC banks"....babooph

All of this is true, but their milk is toxic.
Reply to this comment
by babooph October 18, 2008 11:45 PM EDT
China doing spacewalks-developing the 3rd world -owning US debt & best US companies -opening their own NYC banks--US dropping daily-middle class dissapearing-thank you idiot George.Mc Cain does not get it -too bad he is a good guy-BUT TOO OLD & OUT OF TOUCH!!
Reply to this comment
by nincomp October 18, 2008 10:36 PM EDT
And most importantly, it has been proven that China has secretly provided nuclear weapons technology to countries designated as terrorist nations. What weapons technology is China secretly giving Pakistan?

Posted by yongamerica at 01:43 PM : Oct 18, 2008
======================================================
Where is the "central authority" to determine which country is terrorist? BTW, the United states has done exactly the same, like secretly providing nuclear and other technologies to Israel
Reply to this comment
See all 21 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook