ISLAMABAD, Oct. 16, 2008

China Aiding Pakistan's Nuclear Ambitions

China Privately Agrees To Provide Nuclear Reactors Used For Energy Production

  •  (CBS/AP)

  • Fast Facts Pakistan

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

  • Interactive Focus On China

    Explore the history, people and economy of China, the world’s most populous nation.

(CBS)  The following was written by CBS News' Farhan Bokhari, reporting from Islamabad.


China has privately agreed to follow a "step-by-step" approach to fulfilling Pakistan’s aspiration for an expanded nuclear energy program, rather than sign an ambitious civil nuclear program of the kind recently struck between the U.S. and India, senior Pakistani and Western officials said on Thursday.

Private discussions are believed to have been held on expanded nuclear cooperation between Pakistan’s president Asif Ali Zardari and Chinese leaders during Zardari’s four-day visit to China, which began Tuesday.

A senior Pakistani government official, familiar with discussions between Zardari and Chinese officials, claimed Thursday that China had agreed to “consider further nuclear power reactors to fulfill our needs. The relationship (on the nuclear issue) remains intact”. Speaking to CBS News on condition of anonymity, the official added, “there is now a complete understanding on our future cooperation”.

China has installed a 325-Megawatts nuclear power reactor at Chashma, in Pakistan’s central Punjab province. Beijing is also currently working to install a second power reactor of the same capacity there. In ten years, Pakistan plans to produce up to 8,000 Megawatts of electricity using nuclear energy.

In addition to the two Chashma reactors, Pakistan has one Canadian-supplied nuclear energy reactor with a capacity of 137-Megawatts. Western diplomats say Pakistan is seeking to bridge the large gap between its installed capacity and future ambitions with Chinese help.

Western diplomats say China is interested in maintaining a stable relationship with Pakistan for a number of reasons: China sees its relationship with Pakistan as a way to counter-balance growing U.S. ties with India. In the long term, China also considers Pakistan as a conduit to expand trade with the oil rich Middle East to improve its economic and energy-related interests.

However, a second Pakistani official who spoke to CBS News on condition of anonymity said China is eager to avoid a direct confrontation with the West on its nuclear energy cooperation with Pakistan. “China is not seeking a head-on clash with anyone. It wants to broaden its relations with Pakistan but without the risk of a stiff U.S. reaction,” said the official.

U.S. reluctance to offer a civil nuclear power agreement to Pakistan stems mainly from revelations in 2004 that Abdul Qadeer Khan, the founder of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program, traded nuclear secrets and technology with Iran, Libya and North Korea. Khan has remained effectively under house arrest since then.

Requests from the Western officials, notably the U.S., to interview Khan have all been denied by the Pakistani government.

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 24 Comments
by explorubus October 18, 2008 7:15 AM EDT
...and they just had to officialize this hypocracy.
Reply to this comment
by explorubus October 18, 2008 7:11 AM EDT
the west secretlty helped india get nucs in the i970s in response to chinese nuclear tests. not everyone knows this fact. worse, they kept on helping india in its nucs program till 2001. I am pretty sure they regret it all now, since india is emerging as a future competitor and a threat to the western interests.
Reply to this comment
by good4always October 17, 2008 6:15 PM EDT
WHO GAVE NUKE TECH TO INDIA? ...... (I so really want to know that how many people really know the REAL answer.)
Reply to this comment
by good4always October 17, 2008 4:27 PM EDT
USA IS SCARED OF PAKISTAN SO BIG TIME THAT IT GIVES MONEY AND ALL KIND OF THINGS TO KEEP THEM FROM NOT ATTACKING USA.

PAKISTAN DOES NOT NEED AMERICA HELP IN ANYTHING ANYWAY. PAKISTAN CAN WIPE OFF AMERICA IN ANY MINUTE ANY TIME IT WISHES.....

NOW THE USA MIGHT BE LOOKING DESPARATELY FOR PAKISTAN''S HELP TO HELP THEM IN THEIR FINANCIAL CRISIS.
Reply to this comment
by good4always October 17, 2008 4:23 PM EDT
PAKISTAN HAS CREATED THE FINANCIAL CRISIS IN USA.

PAKISTAN DOES NOT NEED AMERICA HELP IN ANYTHING ANYWAY. PAKISTAN CAN WIPE OFF AMERICA IN ANY MINUTE ANY TIME IT WISHES.....

....AND THAT IS THE ONLY REASON USA IS SCARED OF PAKISTAN SO BIG TIME THAT IT GIVES MONEY AND ALL KIND OF THINGS TO KEEP THEM FROM NOT ATTACKING USA.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 October 17, 2008 3:12 PM EDT
Posted by legacyABQ at 11:19 AM : Oct 17, 2008

I totally agree with you but here is another reason.

Bikini Island was destroyed by a 15 megaton blast leaving a hole in the ocean floor over 200 feet deep. Now a few years after that in the mid 1950''s not to be out done the Soviet Union let lose with a 50 megaton blast in the Artic circle. Now while many will argue over it usefullness understand this people for 52 nano seconds it realeased 2 PERCENT OF THE SUNS OUTPUT. They were going to test a 100 megaton bomb but decided against it. They claimed radition but the truth is when they saw the power of just 50 megatons (the shock wave was felt 4 times around the earth) they knew that there was no telling what the final effect would be.

Now think about this we have over 14,000 nukes so does Russia and China. Add all that up and see what a thermal nuclar war leads too.
Reply to this comment
by nincomp October 17, 2008 3:08 PM EDT
The U.S. prefers to do business with foreign nations who play by the rules and who have strong moral values in line with Christian values as much as possible.

Posted by downtooearth at 02:14 AM : Oct 17, 2008
+ report abuse

If US had played by the rules it wouldn''t have signed Nuclear deal with India, since Congress passed the law that US will not transfer nuclear technology to any country that hadn''t signed the NPT. And India is not a christian country. They are actually killing christians in india these days.
Reply to this comment
by markavelli2 October 17, 2008 2:30 PM EDT
Gotta love that, nothing like Other countries selling technology we gave/sold them to countries our Gov isnt so fond of. Then again, Russia could have given the chinese Nuke tech...but the U.S. gave Canada its nuke Tech.
Reply to this comment
by easeup-2009 October 17, 2008 2:29 PM EDT
That''s it. I am boycotting every 7-11, Kwik-E-Mart & Convenient store from now on!! My SlimJims, Slushies and lottery tickets are NOT going to fund a nuclear Pakistan!
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq October 17, 2008 2:22 PM EDT
Sorry everyone I have no idea why it repeated my post like that!!!

SORRY
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq October 17, 2008 2:21 PM EDT
..imagine what everyone else will say about it!!

LOL
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq October 17, 2008 2:19 PM EDT
Good4Always:
OK, pakistan has an army, but, really, let''s get serious:
"pakistan could wipe out america any time it wants"???????

Get a grip dude, you have been badly misinformed.
Pakistan does NOT have ICBM''s, like we do, so if thats what you mean, well, yer wrong..
Short range nukes, yes..ICBM''s? No.
Anyway, what country do you think this is bucko??
America may have embarrassaed itself of late,
buy by God we''re still the USA, and our military is frighteningly awesome when it''s in full force..
And I''m a liberal, so you can imag
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq October 17, 2008 2:19 PM EDT
Good4Always:
OK, pakistan has an army, but, really, let''s get serious:
"pakistan could wipe out america any time it wants"???????

Get a grip dude, you have been badly misinformed.
Pakistan does NOT have ICBM''s, like we do, so if thats what you mean, well, yer wrong..
Short range nukes, yes..ICBM''s? No.
Anyway, what country do you think this is bucko??
America may have embarrassaed itself of late,
buy by God we''re still the USA, and our military is frighteningly awesome when it''s in full force..
And I''m a liberal, so you can imag
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq October 17, 2008 2:19 PM EDT
Good4Always:
OK, pakistan has an army, but, really, let''s get serious:
"pakistan could wipe out america any time it wants"???????

Get a grip dude, you have been badly misinformed.
Pakistan does NOT have ICBM''s, like we do, so if thats what you mean, well, yer wrong..
Short range nukes, yes..ICBM''s? No.
Anyway, what country do you think this is bucko??
America may have embarrassaed itself of late,
buy by God we''re still the USA, and our military is frighteningly awesome when it''s in full force..
And I''m a liberal, so you can imag
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq October 17, 2008 2:19 PM EDT
Good4Always:
OK, pakistan has an army, but, really, let''s get serious:
"pakistan could wipe out america any time it wants"???????

Get a grip dude, you have been badly misinformed.
Pakistan does NOT have ICBM''s, like we do, so if thats what you mean, well, yer wrong..
Short range nukes, yes..ICBM''s? No.
Anyway, what country do you think this is bucko??
America may have embarrassaed itself of late,
buy by God we''re still the USA, and our military is frighteningly awesome when it''s in full force..
And I''m a liberal, so you can imag
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq October 17, 2008 2:19 PM EDT
Good4Always:
OK, pakistan has an army, but, really, let''s get serious:
"pakistan could wipe out america any time it wants"???????

Get a grip dude, you have been badly misinformed.
Pakistan does NOT have ICBM''s, like we do, so if thats what you mean, well, yer wrong..
Short range nukes, yes..ICBM''s? No.
Anyway, what country do you think this is bucko??
America may have embarrassaed itself of late,
buy by God we''re still the USA, and our military is frighteningly awesome when it''s in full force..
And I''m a liberal, so you can imag
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq October 17, 2008 2:19 PM EDT
Good4Always:
OK, pakistan has an army, but, really, let''s get serious:
"pakistan could wipe out america any time it wants"???????

Get a grip dude, you have been badly misinformed.
Pakistan does NOT have ICBM''s, like we do, so if thats what you mean, well, yer wrong..
Short range nukes, yes..ICBM''s? No.
Anyway, what country do you think this is bucko??
America may have embarrassaed itself of late,
buy by God we''re still the USA, and our military is frighteningly awesome when it''s in full force..
And I''m a liberal, so you can imag
Reply to this comment
by good4always October 17, 2008 1:56 PM EDT
PAKISTAN DOES NOT NEED AMERICA HELP IN ANYTHING ANYWAY. PAKISTAN CAN WIPE OFF AMERICA IN ANY MINUTE ANY TIME IT WISHES.....

....AND THAT IS THE ONLY REASON USA IS SCARED OF PAKISTAN SO BIG TIME THAT IT GIVES MONEY AND ALL KIND OF THINGS TO KEEP THEM FROM NOT ATTACKING USA.
Reply to this comment
by petro49l October 17, 2008 1:40 PM EDT
The Middle East region has bumper crops of a standard cannabis and poppies. Plants make excellent medicine. But, what about Al Qada''s narcotics deals? They make street heroin from illegally-graded poppies. The sales for Junkies reaps a tremendous profit. Al Qada is a powerful crime syndicate. They have money to do what they want.
Reply to this comment
by summarex October 17, 2008 1:21 PM EDT
What nuclear ambitions?
Pakistan is already a nuclear state.
What are you servants of Israel trying to pull?
Whatever it is stop using America.
Reply to this comment
See all 24 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: