Paulson Regrets Errors That Created Crisis
Treasury Secretary Laments Inept Regulation, But Insists Economic Rescue Plan Will Work
-
"When there's fear in the marketplace and there's concern in the marketplace, no one wants to raise their hand and say, I need capital," U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Thursday Oct. 16, 2008. (AP / file)
-
Play CBS Video Video Retail Sales Plummet Americans have cut their spending dramatically. Auto sales took the hardest hit while home furnishings and furniture suffered their biggest drop in years. Kelly Wallace reports.
-
Timeline Credit Crunch Feeling the squeeze? Here's a look at actions and statements from key players in Washington.
-
Interactive Eye On The Economy In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.
"We're not proud of all the mistakes that were made by many different people, different parties, failures of our regulatory system, failures of market discipline that got us here," Paulson said in an interview on Fox Business Network.
But he said he had "no regrets" about the steps the government is taking now to address the problem.
"We will mitigate the impact on the real economy and we'll get this financial system working again," he said.
Meanwhile Thursday, fears of recession trumped fears of inflation.
A crucial barometer of U.S. inflation came in flat last month, temporarily halting Wall Street's slide. Stocks ended another volatile day Thursday, with the Dow Jones industrial average climbing around 400 points. Stock prices fell globally, too. Credit markets remained tight and oil prices declined to a nearly 14-month low.
The positive data came too late to save overseas markets, though. They slumped on rising fears that the global economy is sinking into a deep recession.
Thursday's data may not completely alleviate that anxiety. The prices people pay for gas, food, clothes, medicine and other essentials still have risen at an annualized pace of 4.5 percent, faster than the 4.1 percent increase for all of 2007.
Analysts predict it may be the worst holiday shopping season for retailers since the 1991 recession, with surveys showing more than a third of consumers planning to spend less this year, reports CBS News correspondent Kelly Wallace.
And the U.S. economy is already suffering from other woes: falling wages, weak consumer spending, tight credit, slumping home prices and rising job losses.
Even good news on the economy contains worrisome kernels. The number of new people signing up for unemployment benefits last week dropped, but new claims still totaled 461,000 - a figure associated with deep troubles in employment conditions.
"Given the likely drawn-out nature of the prospective adjustments in housing and financial markets, I see the most probable scenario as one in which the performance of the economy remains subpar well into next year and then gradually improves in late 2009 and 2010," Donald Kohn, vice chairman of the Federal Reserve, concluded Wednesday evening.
Worries about the economy sent the Dow Jones industrials down a staggering 733 points Wednesday.
The selling spree carried over to Asia, where stocks fell sharply Thursday. Japan's key stock index plummeted more than 11 percent, South Korean shares shed 9.25 percent, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index was down 4.8 percent.
Following Asia's lead, benchmarks in Britain, Germany and France slipped about 3 percent. Russia's RTS also fell.
Wednesday's daylong stock market sell-off came as retailers reported the biggest drop in sales in three years, while a Federal Reserve snapshot showed Americans are spending less and manufacturing is slowing around the country.
Piling up losses in a rough final hour of trading, the Dow ended the day down nearly 8 percent - its steepest drop since one week after Black Monday in 1987. The Dow has wiped out all but about 127 points of its record-shattering 936-point gain on Monday of this week.
Earlier this week, after governments around the world announced plans to use trillions of dollars to prop up banks, including a U.S. plan to buy about $250 billion in bank stocks, the market appeared to be turning around - or at least calming down.
Instead, relentless selling gave the Dow its 20th triple-digit swing in the past 23 trading sessions, an unprecedented run of volatility. The Dow has finished higher on only one day this month. The loss of 733 points is the second-worst ever for the average, topped only by a 778-point decline Sept. 29.
On Thursday, Paulson rejected criticism about the new approach the administration announced Tuesday to have the government purchase $250 billion in stock from private banks, in effect partially nationalizing the banking system.
He said the initial stock purchases would total $125 billion with the money going to the nine largest U.S. banks, whose executives were summoned to a meeting with Paulson at the Treasury on Monday where he applied pressure to make sure they all participated.
Paulson said it was essential that the nine banks, which hold 50 percent of the U.S. bank deposits, to participate so that there would not be a stigma attached to the program. He said it would encourage other banks who were in greater need of capital to take part.
"When there's fear in the marketplace and there's concern in the marketplace, no one wants to raise their hand and say, I need capital," Paulson said.
Paulson said there had been an interest "from a good number of other banks" for the other $125 billion the government has to spend to purchase bank stock. Potentially thousands of banks could be eligible for a portion of those funds.
The $250 billion is part of the $700 billion bailout program for the financial system that Congress passed on Oct. 3 in an effort to get banks to resume more normal lending.
President George W. Bush plans to speak on the financial crisis early Friday - before the markets open - at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce headquarters across from the White House. Officials said the speech wasn't intended to put forward new policy actions, but rather would give the nation a more detailed explanation of what the government is doing to combat the crisis.
Some analysts believe the economy jolted into reverse in the recently ended third quarter, while others predict it will shrink later this year or early next. The classic definition of a recession is back-to-back quarters of shrinking economic activity.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
- OK, I''ll tell you how I fixed it.
I got my stuff, put it in my truck. Then, I got in my truck. Then, I drove around, until the NY State Police no longer pulled me over every two weeks, so as I could feel privleged and pay for their lawyer. Then, I parked the truck, rented the first dump apartment I found, took out my stuff, and didn''t go back. That''s the very same great wisdom every Fed. Judge I ever heard crapped out, so I''m at least a half a million ahead, this time, although twenty five million behind, for the education.
What he said, "Look at it as an investment." is something you should all count yourselves as ahead by, that much civil servent labor is worth millions, and you should feel honored to be able to pay for such services.
Then "the problem" that your police were telling you about, went away.
Got It? - Reply to this comment
- "Paulson Regrets Errors That Created Crisis
Treasury Secretary Laments Inept Regulation, But Insists Economic Rescue Plan Will Work"
----
And the 80% of Americans that have lived the last 40 years within their means and saved for their own rainy days while forgoing the toy race w/ the family down the street are now disgusted that congress is forcing us pay for their lifestyle rescue.
So, why is our reward for our hard work spent by the government as the governments reward for their bad behavior? - Reply to this comment
- It is nice that Secretary Paulson has regrets. However, the blame for this should be spread wide and deep. Pretty much all players in this were to blame to some degree. The White House, the Fed, Dems in Congress, Republicans in congress, Wall Street and Main Street. It all was driven by greed, by wanting to have more than we could afford to have, at all levels. So, the chore now is to fix the problem as best we can , learn from the errors, and move forward.
- Reply to this comment
- Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, and Henry Paulson used loose credit and low interest rates to get the U.S. into this financial mess. They are now using loose credit and low interest rates to get out of the mess? These guys should be charged with treason, convicted and hung. Their property should be confiscated.
- Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Phil Gramm introduced the Gramm/Leahy/Bliley Act of 1999 that deregulated the financial industry.
Posted by bm6005 at 07:26 PM : Oct 16, 2008
I agree, that was just AWFUL. Whoever the President was, he should have vetoed it. I''m SURE all the Democrats in Congress voted against it.
Didn''t they? What WAS the House vote on that measure?
And why didn''t that awful President veto it? He MUST have been a terrible, terrible leader. He should have been impeached, whoever that was.
What? He was? Oh. Never mind.
THERE''S NO SUCH THING AS VETO PROOF, TROLLS!!!!
FACE IT, THE DEMS ARE AS FILTHY DIRTY AS THE REPS ON THIS ONE. Just ask Barney Frank how much he fought for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Oh, don''t bother. He fought AGAINST it.
THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE TO BLAME
AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE TO BLAME - Reply to this comment
- Yeah right. I''ll believe it when dudes like him start doing the things RON PAUL says should have been done aloooooong time ago. Till then fellas, don''t talk to us current turnip truck riders.
- Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




