Oct. 14, 2008
Bottled Water Impure Too, Study Finds
Finding Of Contaminants Challenges Popular Impression That Bottled Water Is Better Than Tap
-
Photo
(AP (file))
-
Interactive
HealthWatch
Explore health issues including AIDS, cancer and antibiotics.
The findings challenge the popular impression - and marketing pitch - that bottled water is purer than tap water, the researchers say.
However, all the brands met federal health standards for drinking water. Two violated a California state standard, the study said.
An industry group branded the findings "alarmist." Joe Doss, president of the International Bottled Water Association, said the study is based on the faulty premise that a contaminant is a health concern "even if it does not exceed the established regulatory limit or no standard has been set."
The study's lab tests on 10 brands of bottled water detected 38 chemicals including bacteria, caffeine, the pain reliever acetaminophen, fertilizer, solvents, plastic-making chemicals and the radioactive element strontium. Though some probably came from tap water that some companies use for their bottled water, other contaminants probably leached from plastic bottles, the researchers said.
"In some cases, it appears bottled water is no less polluted than tap water and, at 1,900 times the cost, consumers should expect better," said Jane Houlihan, an environmental engineer who co-authored the study.
The two-year study was done by the Washington-based Environmental Working Group, an organization founded by scientists that advocates stricter regulation. It found the contaminants in bottled water purchased in nine states and Washington, D.C.
Researchers tested one batch for each of 10 brands. Eight did not have contaminants high enough to warrant further testing. But two brands did, so more tests were done and those revealed chlorine byproducts above California's standard, the group reported. The researchers identified those two brands as Sam's Choice sold by Wal-Mart and Acadia of Giant Food supermarkets.
In the Wal-Mart and Giant Food bottled water, the highest concentration of chlorine byproducts, known as trihalomethanes, was over 35 parts per billion. California's limit is 10 parts per billion or less, and the industry's International Bottled Water Association makes 10 its voluntary guideline. The federal limit is 80.
Wal-Mart said its own studies did not turn up illegal levels of contaminants. Giant Food officials released a statement asserting that Acadia meets all regulatory standards. Acadia is sold in the mid-Atlantic states, so it isn't held to California's standard. In most places, bottled water must meet roughly the same federal standards as tap water.
The researchers also said the Wal-Mart brand was five times California's limit for one particular chlorine byproduct, bromodichloromethane. The environmental group wants Wal-Mart to label its bottles in California with a warning because the chlorine-based contaminants have been linked with cancer. It has filed a notice of intent to sue.
Wal-Mart spokeswoman Shannon Frederick said the company was "puzzled" by the findings because testing by suppliers and another lab had detected no "reportable amounts" of such contaminants. She said Wal-Mart would investigate further but defended the quality of its bottled water.
The researchers recommend that people worried about water contaminants drink tap water with a carbon filter.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



It wasn''t that long ago that most of the stuff in their stores was made in the USA. Now it''s mostly made in China. It was just a logical step that their food products would become just like those from China --- toxic!
And in this insane world, corporations take no responsibility and very seldom apologize. Profit is more important than integrity, honor, and trust.
Denial is everything.
In the 1950s, the radioactive isotope, strontium-90, featured prominently in reports of the environmental contamination caused by products of nuclear bomb testing.
However, naturally-occurring strontium is not radioactive and its compounds have been used absolutely safely in the refining of sugar.
So, was a RADIOACTIVE or a STABLE isotope of strontium found in the bottled water?
1. The story did not report any bottled water as violating Federal standards. Nobody is "poisoning" anybody.
2. You got the lawsuit direction wrong.
I don''t know about other people, but my main reason for buying bottled water is to make sure I have it away from taps - like in the car and in my office. I often refill bottles to reduce cost and landfill load.
The Government is not going to protect you from the Chemical lobby in Washington.
There has been a move to remove bis-phenol A from plastic food & beverage containers. However a more serious concern lies with the flame retardant system used in plastics.
Antimony oxide & DecaBromo BiPhenyl Ether are a more dangerous concern. This flame retardant system does leach into packaged food from the plastic.
These toxins are not only cumulative, but have deleterious effects on the body.
Kidney & bladder, liver, spleen and lungs can be affected. Also of interest is the effect these chemicals have in decreasing the bodies ability to metabolize fat.
Drink out of glass only. Avoid foods packaged in plastic.
Posted by gop_will_win
somebody tell me, is this guy serious, or does he like to pull our legs?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by berniepeders
=========================
Its a she and yes they are serious.
Posted by gop_will_win
somebody tell me, is this guy serious, or does he like to pull our legs?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by berniepeders at 10:23 AM : Oct 15, 2008------------------------------------------------
He is a troll that hangs out and posts to get a rise out of people, pay no attention.
Posted by icebreaker24
Strntium 90 is a beta emitter with a half-life of 28.1 years - rather short.
Posted by cdfoxtrot4
I''ll bet you voted twice for Bush!
They say just drink tap water, yet at the same time say that this is filtered tap water!!
If the filtered product is bad for you, the original tap water must be REALLY bad for you!
Posted by YourStore
Hey genius, all water is oxygenated. Ya know, H2O?
This is a marketing gimmick and a fraud.
Posted by mrcrosby1
Not accurate. I have toured a bottled water plant, and was very impressed by the high tech reverse osmosis processing equipment and stringent quality control. Bottled water is regulated as a food product by the FDA, and it was apparent in the operation.
By comparison, your tap water comes through miles of iron, copper, and PVC pipe. It is not unusual for the piping to leak and become contaminated from soil or groundwater. It is also not unusual for the water to contain lead from old fittings and pipe.
Drink tap water if you want. I will stick with bottled.
As I pointed out in an earlier Comment, it`s likely the author of this report is mistaken.
NATURAL strontium is not strontium-90 and is not radioactive, so the phrase, "the radioactive element strontium", is misleading.
As you implied, any residual trace of strontium-90 from nuclear tests has already gone through two half-lives of decay, so the threat is negligible -- if there ever was one. Any adverse effects would have shown up by now.
Is the strontium in the bottled water radioactive? We`ll never know unless a clarification is posted.
I`ve just checked the original EWG report and, yes, they DID measure strontium-90 levels -- and found them at 1% of the recommended maximum safe exposure level. However, they also found radium-228 at about 10% of the recommended maximun safe level.
As always, in reports of this type, they included the ridiculous statement, "No level of radioactivity is known to be safe".
In that case, living here on Earth is unsafe. Every cell in every living organism contains hundreds of atoms of the radioactive isotope, carbon-14. Exposure is unavoidable -- it`s generated by the action of the Sun`s cosmic rays with nitrogen atoms, which are UBIQUITOUS.
Maximum level detected in drinking water was 1,400 ppb in May 1982
The current limit for TCE in drinking water is 5 ppb
Other contaminants detected included DCE (trans-1,2-dichloroethylene) at a maximum of 407 ppb in January 1985, PCE and benzene.
If you or your family was ever stationed there please check into this, Our health is in danger:
https://clnr.hqi.usmc.mil/clsurvey/
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/SITES/LEJEUNE/faq_water.html
Posted by mandylou4u
Funny. Bottles hiss for 1 of 2 reasons:
1) Residual ozone from the bottling process.
2) Differential atmospheric pressure between bottling location and "opening" location.
Posted by mandylou4u
Like what "junk"?
Posted by mandylou4u
I hate to burst your "all natural" bubble here. But there are microorganisms naturally present in soil and water that can make you very sick or kill you. For example, google "ecoli" and see what you find. Hand washing is one of the easiest ways to prevent the spread of infectious disease, and hand sanitizer will not "make you sick" unless you drink it :)
Modern water sanitation methods control these risks. Tap water is typically treated with chlorine. Bottled water is sterilized using a combination of reverse osmosis, ozone, micro-filtration, activated granular carbon, and UV.
Posted by thgdriver1
You should test your well once per year for VOCs, metals, and coliform. These tests will indicate whether or not you have a problem. Sample from a spigot nearest the well, and let it run 5 minutes before sampling. Total cost should be around $300 if you collect the samples. The laboratory will provide sample containers and instructions.
"An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure"
Benjamin Franklin
* Families that used hand sanitizer had a 59 percent reduction in the spread of gastrointestinal illnesses in the home compared with those who did not use hand sanitizer.
* Hand sanitizer likely reduces the spread of colds and respiratory illnesses as well, investigators say.
* The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends health care workers use hand sanitizer.
* Soap and water are necessary to remove dirt from skin.
Families that used alcohol-based hand sanitizer gel had a 59 percent reduction in the spread of gastrointestinal illnesses compared with families that didn''t use sanitizer, according to a Harvard Medical School study.
Practice good hygiene:
1. Keep your hands clean by washing thoroughly with soap and water or using an alcohol-based hand sanitizer.
2. Keep cuts and scrapes clean and covered with a bandage until healed.
3. Avoid contact with other people%u2019s wounds or bandages.
4. Avoid sharing personal items such as towels or razors.
Maximum level detected in drinking water was 1,400 ppb in May 1982
The current limit for TCE in drinking water is 5 ppb
Other contaminants detected included DCE (trans-1,2-dichloroethylene) at a maximum of 407 ppb in January 1985, PCE and benzene.
If you or your family was ever stationed there please check into this, Our health is in danger:
https://clnr.hqi.usmc.mil/clsurvey/
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/SITES/LEJE
UNE/faq_water.html
WHO CARES? THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION WAS A HIDEOUS ATROCITY AND THE REPUBLICANS HAVE TO LEAVE NOW:
WITNESS THIS: do you believe a judge should go to prison for attempting to rule that attempted murder by forcible suffocation not only isn''t a crime at all in florida, it isn''t a tort at all in florida, in fact it''s a medical procedure, for which priviledge i''m forced to give the state my whole life savings?
doesn''t that sound bad?
this is a real lawsuit, orange co. case # 2003 ca 5314. i am totally unrepresented, haven''t been able to find a lawyer in 7 years. the judge is cynthia mackinnon, and if i could fire her i would have fired her four years ago. after all this time i still have no clue whether she is republican or democrat.
WHY DON''T YOU "JOURNALISTS" DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT?
The Government is not going to protect you from the Chemical lobby in Washington.
There has been a move to remove bis-phenol A from plastic food & beverage containers. However a more serious concern lies with the flame retardant system used in plastics.
Antimony oxide & DecaBromo BiPhenyl Ether are a more dangerous concern. This flame retardant system does leach into packaged food from the plastic.
These toxins are not only cumulative, but have deleterious effects on the body.
Kidney & bladder, liver, spleen and lungs can be affected. Also of interest is the effect these chemicals have in decreasing the bodies ability to metabolize fat.
Drink out of glass only. Avoid foods packaged in plastic.
-
by skinnyminny2
October 17, 2008 12:06 PM PDT
- Ha ha ha! I''m laughing so hard right now. People in this society run around with their bottles of water as if they''re somehow healthier. "Look at me, I have a bottle of water". And they PAY for this stuff that could just as well come from their own faucet. Stupid. Buy a Nalgene bottle and fill it from the tap. It''s a heck of a lot more convenient than buying a ''product'' that not only is equal to tap water but comes in a container that creates even more waste!
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 49 Comments