U.S. Working Poor On The Rise, Says Report
Poverty-Level Jobs Increased By 4.7 Million Between 2002 and 2006, According To New Analysis
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive
Living In Poverty
A state-by-state look at U.S. Census Bureau data on income and poverty levels.
A report by The Working Poor Families Project, based on an analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data, found conditions worsened for the working poor in the four years ending in 2006, as the number of low-income working families increased by 350,000. The project is funded by the Annie E. Casey, Ford, Joyce and C.S. Mott Foundations.
The report defines a low-income working family as those earning less than twice the Census definition of poverty. In 2006, the most recent year for available data, a family of four earning $41,228 or less qualified as a low-income family.
The number of jobs with pay below the poverty threshold increased to 29.4 million, or 22 percent of all jobs, in 2006 from 24.7 million, or 19 percent of all jobs, in 2002.
"The real surprising news, the alarming news, is that both the number and percentage of low-income families increased during this period," said Brandon Roberts, co-author of the report. "This was a time when we had solid and robust economic growth."
An increase in poverty "is not just a new phenomena over the last six months," he said.
Poverty-wage jobs increased in part because 2.5 million new jobs paid poverty wages; additionally 2.2 million jobs that paid greater than poverty wages in 2002 became poverty-wage jobs by 2006, as pay failed to keep up with the cost of living, Roberts said.
In two states, Mississippi and New Mexico, 40 percent of working families were low income in 2006, according to the report.
In 11 other states, at least 33 percent of working families were low income: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Louisiana, Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia.
The number of low-income families rose to nearly 9.6 million, or 28 percent of the total population, in 2006 from 9.2 million, or roughly 27 percent, in 2002, according to the report. The number of children in low-income families rose by roughly 800,000 during the same period, climbing to 21 million from 20.2 million.
During the period, the number of working families spending more than one-third of their income on housing grew to 59 percent from 52 percent.
The report sought to address what it called myths about low-income families. For instance, it found 72 percent of low-income families work, with adults in low-income working families working, on average, 2,552 hours per year in 2006, the equivalent of one and one-quarter full-time jobs.
It also found that 52 percent of low-income families are headed by married couples; 69 percent have only American-born parents; 43 percent are white and non-Hispanic and only one-quarter of low-income families receive food stamp assistance.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 67 Comments"If they are poor then they deserve to die if they cannot afford health care!"
"Working poor?" "We need to take care of the Working Rich!"
"See, there are Americans who will do the work of illegal aliens!"
"Maybe I can get a few to take care of the gardens at my 7 houses and do some house cleaning!"
"Cindy wants to know if they drink Bud?"
Why not THREE times, maybe FOUR? Figures dont lie, liars figure. Lets be honest here, $41,000 is a living wage in many states. AVERAGE wages are down in some states (New Mexico?) because they have become havens for illegal aliens who often work cheap and lower the overall wage structure.
I know its fun to bash the politicians but lets not hide the truth from ourselves. We cant fix it if we cant understand it. McCain cant, Obama cant, no one can if we dont first understand. Shut off the lies and the anger that divide us and try to understand so we can unite and fix our country.
Posted by sun247 at 12:27 AM : Oct 15, 2008
Wrong. It worked perfectly. Money trickled down from Nelson Rockefeller to David Rockefeller, just like it was supposed to.
Still blaming the victims, the "illegal migrant workers" take jobs for which greedy employers refuse to pay a decent wage.
Let us look at the cost for a family of four.
$41K = $3416.66
- 1500.00 (rent or mortgage)
- 854.00 (federal income tax)
- 543.80 (basic food cost, thrifty schedule)
- 430.00 (average monthly car note)
- 350.00 (average gasoline costs)
- 250.00 (average home energy cost)
- 280.00 (average state income tax)
- 180.00 (average for 2 children to attend
school)
- 70.00 (auto insurance)
So even before such "luxuries" as TV, phone, life and health insurance, city and municipal taxes we are already at $4457.80, so it defies your logic that that is somehow a living wage, you must assume that you can get away with not paying these bills.
$-1041.00 per month, soon you are $-12501.60 for the year. You have a distinctly Bush/McSame Republican view that you can run a deficit forever, and it will never catch up to you.
It may have worked for you, but for the vast majority of Americans it is a miserable failure.
It is the way Reagan designed it, in case you haven''t noticed, between the fake wars, (Republican generated) tax breaks for big oil (GOP) and the bailouts of the S&L, airline, auto, and now banking and insurance industries, most of whom are GOP contributors, follows exactly the model Reagabn proposed, give the money to the rich, and they would create more jobs.
Read the article again, s l o w l y, and notice that the jobs created were all poverty wage jobs, the decent wage jobs were outsourced to slave labor companies, and migrant workers and illegal aliens are now doing what used to be well paying domestic jobs, construction, roadwork, farming, manufacturing, textile, etc.
This is exactly what Reagan wanted, and it is only testament to the weakness of the Democrats that they could not effectively oppose it.
That is about to change, and not a moment too soon.
Since when is Bush a Democrat? Bush came to us with the bailout BS, claiming that if we didn''t agree to his theft, the economy would collapse, as he said "within days".
The Democrats are guilty of one important flaw, stupidity, they took a proven mega-liar at his word, and once more allowed him to sacrifice more of our future based on his lies.
The Democrats didn''t want to do it, if you watched the Senate hearings, to a person they said they didn''t want to do it, but felt that inaction would be worse, rumors are that certain members were threatened that martial law would be the alternative. In addition they were goaded on international TV by GOP snake-oil salesmen Paulson (ex-CEO, Morgan Stanley, btw.) and Bernanke (Bush-GOP appointee) that they had no choice.
Is there any correlation there?
Of course with the closings of GM plants, and future closings of other plants in the north, we''ll have many more poor people in that region, I believe.
Posted by brianbwb at 04:56 AM : Oct 15, 2008
No, not at all. We charge the remainder to our credit cards until the either the economy goes belly up, or we file for bankruptcy. It''s part and parcel of the New Economy (circa 1998).
Posted by dburfears at 12:38 AM : Oct 15, 2008
Joe six-pack does.
Wasn''t Bud sold to Stella Artois? It is now a Belgian owned beer company, who knows, it might begin to catch up to Stroh''s in quality.
Red Wings rule...
If you aim at nothing, you will hit it every time.
The problem with using statistics to correlate the relationship between the dropping of standards in school and the increasing level of poverty in society is that those tasked with potentially recognizing such a correlation today were educated by those schools therefore don''t have the skill set to recognize the problem. Recognizing the problem is the first step to solving it.
How are parents supposed to be guiding their children when they are both working 2 jobs to keep the roof over their head and food on the table? Education? Who can afford it anymore?
"The real surprising news, the alarming news, is that both the number and percentage of low-income families increased during this period," said Brandon Roberts, co-author of the report. "This was a time when we had solid and robust economic growth."
____________
IOW, while jobs during this time period were being created and maintained, they were poverty level jobs. The rich CEOs continued with their multi $M salaries and let their lower employees provide, what is essentially, slave labor, and without even the decency of providing healthcare.
If we take $1M away from a CEO the company can hire 2o people and pay $40K per year and still have $200K ($10K for each)left over to provide insurance and possibly a little for retirement.
GREED! It is one of the 7 deadly sins.
Posted by jamesm12341 at 08:48 AM : Oct 15, 2008
------------------
Oh I see, we are not supposed to make anything here in this country. Maybe that''s why China has billions of surplus dollars and we the USA are in debt billions of dollars.
Posted by DaVicar1 at 08:36 AM :
--------
You must live in a different world than me. I had my dog to the vet the other day who happens to be black.
Oh by the way, My brother had his hand operated on by a black surgeon. I''m looking out my window and the garbage truck just stopped to pick up the trash. Well what do you know, the driver is black. Oh and by the way, when I was at Wall Mart the other day a young black lady was working the checkout line. But like I said, I may be living in a different world than you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jamesm12341 at 08:48 AM : Oct 15, 2008
Thats one of the most ignorant statements I''ve heard.
A business closes one day, and people are supposed to be re-trained for another job the next day? We all should be ready to jump to another career, on a moments notice?
Moron...
Posted by jamesm12341 at 09:05 AM : Oct 15, 2008
------------------------
Hey if you like buying all of your stuff from china, good for you. I personally would like to see things made in America. But what do I know. I''m just one of those stupid Democrats.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jamesm12341 at 09:09 AM : Oct 15, 2008
I''m retired tweedle dee, thats which one.
It used to be, that you worked at one job, and you could retire from that job. But thanks in large part to the republicans, and their union busting policies, you can forget all that now-a-days.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jamesm12341 at 09:13 AM : Oct 15, 2008
Unions are needed more than ever now. Why? Well because they hold companies accountable, and maintain wages.
And if you can''t see that, then you are blinded by the republican propaganda from washington''s blind leadership of bush.
hmmmmmmmmmmm...................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by DaVicar1 at 09:22 AM : Oct 15, 2008
I didn''t say all unions are good. But apparently, we still need unions, as effident as these companies that would sell out their own kind, and hire illegal immigrants.
So the premise of unions, I think, would hold these companies accountable for such hirings.
Thus, hold the earning power of legal Americans where it should be.
Everyone knows that hiring illegals dwindles our earning power, or erodes Americans pay.
Americans have been left for dead, by these greedy corperations, plain and simple.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jamesm12341 at 09:20 AM : Oct 15, 2008
Clearly, it is you whom has the 6th grade education.
Not to mention, your obsessive love for the down fall of the U.S. by the way of the illegal immigrant invaders.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jamesm12341 at 09:38 AM : Oct 15, 2008
Reading comprehension problems, there tweedledum?
I''m retired, and also I''m crossed train for a multitude of careers, if I choose to go back to work at anytime.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jamesm12341 at 09:46 AM : Oct 15, 2008
Ah yes,,you''ll be sorry when you are making $5.00 per hour. And all your illegal buddies made it all possible.
Hope you are happy there nappy....
Wow what are raging idoit. Obviously you didn''t pass 3 grade geogrpahy. If you check the list again, you will find several states not located in the South. (MT, OK, TX, NM, AZ). Second you didn''t pass history class either. Half of these states were not even states to be part states to be part of the Union when the USA was refered as such.
And I believe their designers were not union!
Go figure!!
Posted by jamesm12341 at 09:46 AM : Oct 15, 2008
In Ohio, the turnpike workers make $20/hr, which translates to over $40 grand a year--more I''m sure with their overtime & holiday pay.
Do you know what they do? They take money & make CHANGE! McDonald''s is a harder job! The funny thing is, a few years ago they actually threatened to strike. That would have crippled the turnpike, because no one could possibly have filled-in and made change.
What a joke.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by gdub35 at 09:52 AM : Oct 15, 2008
Raging idiot?
The union I was talking about was not the union of the U.S, but the labor unions.
Now who is the idiot? Idiot!
You must be taking lessons from james on how to be a moron,,,
Less money earned by American consumers is less money spent.
Second Point on a different subject:
The American car companies ought to do a study to see how many vehicle sales they lose when they lay off one of their auto workers.
Lets see, the worker, the worker''s spouse, their disenchanted kids, perhaps as a sign of support, the layed off workers parents and siblings and their kids.
The American auto industries current troubles may be, in part, seeds it sowed by pisssing off it''s workers years ago.
Can John and Sarah count on your vote in November?
If not for economic policy reasons, for moral and religious reasons?
Go Obama.
hmmmmmmmmmmm...................
Posted by easeup
I know, They should have swept these ugly figures under the rug until after the election.
After all, this story is negativly biased against the party responsible for these economic times.
Posted by rcleveland42 at 10:53 AM : Oct 15, 2008
You have 4 kids before you got a degree & married a drug addict--you are where you''re at based on YOUR decisions. Quit acting like it''s anyone else''s fault.
After all, this story is negativly biased against the party responsible for these economic times.
Posted by mytoosense at 11:05 AM : Oct 15, 2008
I''ll bet you posted about Bush lowering the price of gas before the election.
In America we sell injustice to the rich and force it on the poor.
And I believe their designers were not union!
Go figure!!
----------------------
----------------------------------------
------------------
Posted by slim1h2o at 09:52 AM : Oct 15, 2008
yea thats what they tell the 6th graders at the union meetings
Posted by jamesm12341
I have worked as a supplier to the Big Three as well as Toyota, Mercedes and Honda for the last twenty four years. I can safely confirm the point that Union Workers DO NOT design cars, they build cars and maintain the facilities and machines that build cars.
jamesm12341, As short a list as it is, stick to talking about things that you know.
EXACTLY- economic growth for the rich only..
How can righties whine about dems being socialists?? How can people say Obama is going to redistribute wealth??
The wealth has already been "distributed", straight up..
We all knew this would happen as soon as Bush got elcted, especially the second time..
ITS LIKE CLOCKWORK
What amazes me is that the GOP has brainwashed all the dummies into thinking they are the party for them: the working class..
***?????????
How many indications of reality do you need before you realize that the GOP is by the rich, for the rich, and always will be?
How can self-respecting working people support these bozos?
jamesm12341, As short a list as it is, stick to talking about things that you know.
Posted by mytoosense at 11:21 AM : Oct 15, 2008
And you should also know that the Big 3 pay 30% more in wages & bennies than the foreign automakers.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 67 Comments