Credit Card Terms Taking Turns For Worse
Vera Gibbons On How Issuers Are Tightening The Screws To Protect Themselves
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Changing Credit Card Terms
Financial contributor Vera Gibbons shares tips with Harry Smith for monitoring the terms of your credit card in the changing financial climate.
-
Photo
(IStockPhoto)
-
Special Report
Money Matters
Get words to the wise, from the wise, on handling, making and saving money.
-
Timeline
Credit Crunch
Feeling the squeeze? Here's a look at actions and statements from key players in Washington.
On The Early Show Tuesday, financial contributor Vera Gibbons explained that lenders are tightening terms in numerous ways, and you need to be aware of all of them to avoid possible trouble down the road.
Behind the changes is the simple fact that lenders want to protect themselves from bad debt, so they're tightening standards and practices in hopes of avoiding defaults by credit card users.
What are they up to?
LOWER CREDIT LIMITS
This is the biggest and perhaps most ominous change of all -- and something many consumers won't realize has happened to them until it's too late. Here's what's scary: You don't have to "mess up" in order for a company to lower your credit limit. Big companies such as American Express, Bank of America and others say they can and will change terms at any time, based on market conditions and the economy in general. Any "perceived risk" can also lower your limit. That includes a decline in credit scores or late payments on other bills.
How much are credit limits being cut? In some cases, the cuts are big, Some companies are lowering the limit to right above your balance, and as the balance drops (meaning, as you pay off your debt), the credit limit drops, too. That makes it VERY easy to exceed your credit limit.
Credit card companies DO have to inform you that they're lowering your credit limit, but who really reads those small-print pamphlets that come in the mail? Consumers may not know their limit has dropped until they go over it and incur a large fee. Even worse than a fee, however, is how this affects your credit score. When a credit limit is lowered, it appears that you're using a much larger percentage of your available credit. That lowers your credit score, making it more difficult to obtain a mortgage, car loan, or even another credit card.
INACTIVE ACCOUNTS CANCELLED
Something else to keep your eye on: Banks are cancelling un-used -- and thereby, unprofitable -- accounts to eliminate the costs of maintaining those accounts. An inactive card can also be cancelled if your risk profile changes. That also hurts your credit score. Again, you may not realize this is happened. If you just have the card on hand "for emergencies," you're probably not paying any attention to it. But now, more than ever, you want to protect your credit score and keep it as high as possible.
FEWER CARD OFFERS
If you consider all those credit card offers in your mailbox, you'll be glad to hear that companies are sending out fewer solicitations. HSBC has sent out 54 percent fewer offers this year; Citibank, 45 percent fewer. But if you don't have great credit, that's bad news for you. When you get those offers in the mail, it means you've been pre-approved for a card. But if you have to search out cards and apply on your own it can, once again, lower your credit score. Plus, it's simply a pain in the neck, AND it's getting harder and harder to qualify for good cards. You may have to settle for one with a much higher interest rate.
FEWER ZERO-PERCENT OFFERS
Used to be that no-fee, zero-percent credit card offers were a dime a dozen. Carrying a lot of debt? Transfer to one of these cards for free, and pay zero percent interest for a year. Now, if you even qualify, the offers are more likely to be for six months. You're also likely to pay a balance transfer fee of 3 percent or more. If you're looking for a good zero-percent card offer (AND you have good credit), Chase and Discover still have a few deals.
NO SECOND CHANCES
Mess up once and that's it, you're out of luck. Banks won't hesitate to increase your interest rate or impose big fees if you pay late, etc. It used to be that if you were a good customer, you could call and basically apologize, explain your mistake, and ask that the fee be removed or your rate re-adjusted. But no longer. Card companies are holding firm to their punishments, and no amount of cajoling will change their minds.
Copyright MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from Money Matters
- Latest in Money Matters
- Money Rules For "Boomerang" Kids
- How to Avoid Losing Money to Laziness
- Driving Away Mileage Myths



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 118 CommentsPosted by themroaches at 09:35 AM : Oct 14, 2008
I don''t know, they always made me feel important to get them. But then again, my shredder is not going to require as much maintenance due to minimal use.
Why can''t we just rise up and send these parasites the way of French nobility.
http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/jones.usury
Aaaaargh why does it always break links???
The part I find especially sickening is that although you have a "contract" when you open a credit account, apparently now the lender has all the authority in the world to change credit limits and interest rates as they see fit.
Most of these little tricks they are coming up with sound like they are punishing the people who are making their payments.
In the London Times yesterday, Prime Minister Brown has released an enourmous amount of money into the British Banking System similar to what Bush and Paulson did here. The BIG difference was that he did it with 2 conditions: 1. All the bank executives had to be terminated and 2. There had to be a freeze on bonus''. Brown has not been a very popular PM, but it seems like he is doing a good job.
Posted by Credibility2 at 10:57 AM : Oct 14, 2008
Ruh roh...well, going by the taxes the Treasury receives in comparison to the Republican national debt, you have just condemned the United States of America for being dishonest and unethical.
Not to mention a whole FLOCK of banks and corporations.
But that is different, of course...ethics is a matter of scale to a Republican.
Once you accumulate enough wealth, you are immune to moral, ethical, and most certainly legal judgment in the eyes of a Republican.
It truly is an entirely different world out there, once you have EVER accumulated significant wealth.
People with large monetary reserves just bought up the shares of the smaller investors who got jittery and sold low. Now they want tax protection to protect them from paying for their ill-gotten gains.
Posted by cbsfan731 at 11:50 AM : Oct 14, 2008
It is often necessary to borrow money - no matter your size in economic terms - in order to accomplish great things, so I do not rue the Congress'' ability in that area.
However, what I do believe is that the greatest crime ever committed by our Federal government - second only to Bush''s lies to justify the invasion of another sovereign nation - was Congress'' use of Social Security funds for budget items.
Every Congressperson who authorized such theft and every corporation or individual who lobbied for such theft should have their assets siezed where possible and their estates siezed where not.
You agree with unlimited ability to borrow on your behalf?
Posted by cbsfan731 at 12:06 PM : Oct 14, 2008
Given that I am rather fond of and impressed by our nation''s:
1) System of highways
2) Air traffic control system
3) Military
4) Ports
5) Initiatives in space
6) Research into disease prevention and control
7) Educational system
8) Programs to help the poor and the unborn
(I could go on, but you get my point)
and given that I would rather speak English than German or Japanese...yes, I do not mind some debt.
What disgusts me are those who - although their billions and other assets receive substantially more benefit from our nation''s above listed programs - continually whine about "forced income redistribution".
Going by their outlook, he who owns a $10 million home should have to pay no more in insurance than he who owns a rundown trailor, regardless of the benefit that they receive in the event of catastrophe.
THAT disgusts me.
Poor little jittery guy sold low? Nobody forced him to sell low. How would he feel if stocks skyrockted and he sold high? Guess he would not object to a lower capital gains tax then. You present an assinine argument my friend but it fits with liberal thinking. If you take a risk and loose....you want to be rewarded anyway. Let the rich refund your loss because they have money. Just tax the rich and give it to the poor. I guess Communism still lurks in the minds of the mindless.
You have to be a moron to carry a ballance on a credit card.
My friend, they are out there! who do you think is voting for Obama?
So keep your money under your matress! Only a moron needs a bank.......unless you want to earn interest on savings, on CD''s, need a mortgage, need a home equity loan etc. Just pay out of your MATRESS Money for what you can afford. No one forces you to use a bank. Dummiecrat
a
Posted by IowaCotton at 12:
You have posted one of the few intelligent comments on this site. Both my wife and I agree. When are all those green people going to go after credit card solicitiations versus drilling in Slaska'' ANWAR.
Posted by IowaCotton at 12:
You have posted one of the few intelligent comments on this site. Both my wife and I agree. When are all those green people going to go after credit card solicitiations versus drilling in Slaska'' ANWAR.
a
Posted by foxsmart10 at 12:41 PM : Oct 14, 2008
I use my credit card for just about everything--it''s a convenience. Your problem is that you didn''t pay the entire balance off each month.
You have to be a moron to carry a ballance on a credit card.
My friend, they are out there! who do you think is voting for Obama?
Debt is no respecter of political affiliation. You don''t have the stats to back up your shoot-from-the-hip smacktalk. Grow up and act like an American, babygirl.
Why can''''t we just rise up and send these parasites the way of French nobility.
Posted by summarex at 10:39 AM : Oct 14, 2008"
If that is a motion, I''d like to second. All in favor say aye.
On another note--just because we see beautiful spacious homes on TV or see all the latest technology advertised, it doesn''t mean we can afford them. Advertisers are savvy about making us "need" things we can''t afford and really *don''t* need.
I''ve heard that in the past bankers knew your name, and whether you were good for a loan. Trying talking to a derivative.
WHY WOULD ME OR OBAMA CARE ABOUT YOU PEASANTS?
OBAMA NEVER CARED ABOUT YOU BEFORE, WHY WOULD OBAMA CARE ABOUT YOU NOW? HE DOESN''T..... HA HA HA
Posted by caldwellptr at 01:21 PM : Oct 14, 2008
You just answered your own question. I think there should be an IQ test requirement before a card is issued.
WHY WOULD ME OR OBAMA CARE ABOUT YOU PEASANTS?
OBAMA NEVER CARED ABOUT YOU BEFORE, WHY WOULD OBAMA CARE ABOUT YOU NOW? HE DOESN''''T..... HA HA HA
This is a disgusting, mister. I hope you are kidding, but I fear you are just one of those redneck types who give Americans a bad name. We make over $250K a year also, and yes, we SHOULD pay more taxes than many others!
Once upon a time, that was true.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 118 Comments