Paul Krugman Awarded Economics Nobel
New York Times Columnist And Princeton Professor Receives Prize For Work On Trade Patterns
-
Photo
Paul Krugman is a professor at Princeton and a columnist for The New York Times. (AP)
-
Fast Facts
Nobel Notables
Some curious facts about the Nobel Prizes.
-
Interactive
Nobel Prizes
Awards for the world's best in science, economics, literature and peacemaking.
Krugman was the lone of winner of the 10 million kronor ($1.4 million) award and the latest in a string of American researchers to be honored.
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences praised Krugman for formulating a new theory to answer questions about free trade.
"What are the effects of free trade and globalization? What are the driving forces behind worldwide urbanization? Paul Krugman has formulated a new theory to answer these questions," the academy said in its citation.
"He has thereby integrated the previously disparate research fields of international trade and economic geography," it said.
The award, known as the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, is the last of the six Nobel prizes announced this year and is not one of the original Nobels. It was created in 1968 by the Swedish central bank in Nobel's memory.
In addition to his work as an economist at Princeton University in New Jersey, where he has been since 2000, Krugman also writes about politics and inequality in the United States and other topics for The New York Times.
Commenting on the global economic meltdown, he told a news conference in Stockholm by telephone from the United States that some of his research was linked to currency crises and related issues.
"This is terrifying," he said, comparing it to the financial crisis that gripped Asia in the 1990s.
He said winning the Nobel award won't change his approach to research and writing.
"The prize will enhance visibility," he said, "but I hope it does not lead me into going to a lot of purely celebratory events, aside from the Nobel presentation itself."
The citation said Krugman's approach is based on the premise that many goods and services can be produced at less cost in long series, a concept known as economies of scale.
His research showed the effects of that on trade patterns and on the location of economic activity.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



The hidden costs simply get passed on to correction efforts, liability claims settlements, and other rehabilitation.
Any economic theory that disregards the effects of corruption is flawed, as is the presumption that such corruption is anything less than the norm.
Maybe the Nobel committee should put a clause in the prize that gives them the right to a refund when their prize winners are proven wrong.
Posted by ozonmojo at 08:19 AM : Oct 13, 2008
Unless the Republicans retain control of the White House, in which case I would expect William Kristol to win the Nobels for both Literature and Peace ("fraternity among nations").
[Posted by brianbwb at 08:24 AM : Oct 13, 2008]
say it aint so ... an economic theory that''s incomplete? this can''t be ... seeing that all the others accurately describe the dynamics of economics without exception.
Yeah, all those Nobel Prize winners sure **** me off too.
Seriously, why don''t you wingnuts start a campaign to discredit and mock the Nobel Prize because the research that usually wins completely repudiates every facet of conservative "thought" from evolution to politics to economics. Oh wait, you already have. It''s how you deal with fact you find inconvenient (which is to say everything).
Conservative is a modern America is a synonym for "idiot".
Hmmm, Yasser Arafat.
Read Krugman''s work. It is ***. Re-worded existing philosophies masquerading as original work.
Then to include "his opinions" as important to their decision.
They give Yasser Arrafat (terrorist) a "peace" prize.
They give Al Gore (mr power point) a "peace" prize.
Gimme a break....
Free Markets have the word "Free" in them for a reason.
Honest men and women know that big governments must use coercion and violence to ultimately achieve their desires.
Price controls, protective trade barriers, progressive taxation is the bane of allocating scarce productive resources.
He singlehandedly increased our national debt to $10 TRILLION!!
Now, that takes vision and foresight!
Our children will be paying off the Bush spending spree for years to come!!
The republicans'' winning election strategy:
NO NEW TAXES!!
MORE NEW SPENDING!!!
Then why is your "free market" running to mommy (government) when it stubs its toe? The same reason why those with no jobs and no healthcare: Government can help folks in a crisis. If you have ever tried to support a family with no income or tried to get your sick child good medical care without insurance, you would understand there was a crisis for millions around this country even before Wall Street was bit.
Championship!
I don''t know enough about economics to have an opinion on your ideas, but I regularly read your columns and listen to you as a guest on various shows, and you seem to know what you are talking about.
Congratulations.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 12:51 PM : Oct 13, 2008
Same here. I''ve been following his views for a while because he just makes the most sense. This almost feels like having a friend win the Nobel.
Here''s a man Obama can use in his administration to untangle the economic mess the previous guy, watchamacallim, made.
Krugman is the kind of mind we should have working for all of us in the government instead of a perky teenager like Palin or a neanderthal like Bush.
Hooray for PK!!!
Friedman founded the school of ''supply-side economics''. Friedman''s joke is on you. Pay your $40,000 dollar share of the national debt, and we''ll all laugh with you.
-
by babooph
October 14, 2008 8:38 AM PDT
- Bush bragged of his "B" in economics[maybe,like his military life-he never was there- like Kennedy at Harvard]it seemed to have him think he is not an idiot-too bad for the USA.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 24 Comments