February 11, 2009 2:11 PM
- Text
Howard Stern's Switch To Satellite Radio Made Him Lots Of MoneyAnd May Be Costing Him Influence
(PaidContent.org)
This story was written by Staci D. Kramer.
Howard Stern stands to make hundreds of millions of dollars through his move to Sirius (NSDQ: SIRI) from *CBS* Radio but what has he lost? Millions of listenersand with them, relevance and influence, contends the LA Times. The exploits and the FCC battles that made him famous and kept him in the news are in the past. LAT: "So far, the radio personality's leap from traditional media to a niche platform has come at a heavy pricenamely, cultural relevancy. Unlike an Arianna Huffington, who vastly increased her reach on her upstart website, Stern's place in the national conversation has been reduced to a murmur in the din of the exploding entertainment universe."
Then again, Huffington's upstart site is free and Stern's audience is subscription. It's also loyal. The Sirius-XM (NSDQ: XMSR) Radio merger expands his potential audience to about 19 million but in a way that's reminiscent of cable networks available in 70 million homes with only a fraction of those ever tuning in. Analysts peg his audience no higher than 2 million but Sirius says those figures are low. Sirius subscribers get Stern on satellite radio and internet radio as part of the full $12.95 package; as of last week, XM subscribers can add the show, which hasn't changed all that much by most accounts, for $4.
What has changed? The LAT says the quality of Stern's guests: "With a reduced audience, Stern's show is no longer a prime stop on the major film promotion circuit. And the A-list guests who used to submit to Stern's biting personal questions in order to hype their projects have become scarce." He's also missing the sense of controversy stirred up by the fights with the FCC.
Stern is under contract to Sirius through 2010. Would he switch back? Maybe, but as talk-radio host Tom Leykis told the paper: "Even if he does have a smaller audience in terms of his cumulative audience, that won't last forever. Terrestrial radio is hemorrhaging audience as it tries to find its place in the Digital Age, while satellite is up tremendously."
By Staci D. Kramer
Howard Stern stands to make hundreds of millions of dollars through his move to Sirius (NSDQ: SIRI) from *CBS* Radio but what has he lost? Millions of listenersand with them, relevance and influence, contends the LA Times. The exploits and the FCC battles that made him famous and kept him in the news are in the past. LAT: "So far, the radio personality's leap from traditional media to a niche platform has come at a heavy pricenamely, cultural relevancy. Unlike an Arianna Huffington, who vastly increased her reach on her upstart website, Stern's place in the national conversation has been reduced to a murmur in the din of the exploding entertainment universe."
Then again, Huffington's upstart site is free and Stern's audience is subscription. It's also loyal. The Sirius-XM (NSDQ: XMSR) Radio merger expands his potential audience to about 19 million but in a way that's reminiscent of cable networks available in 70 million homes with only a fraction of those ever tuning in. Analysts peg his audience no higher than 2 million but Sirius says those figures are low. Sirius subscribers get Stern on satellite radio and internet radio as part of the full $12.95 package; as of last week, XM subscribers can add the show, which hasn't changed all that much by most accounts, for $4.
What has changed? The LAT says the quality of Stern's guests: "With a reduced audience, Stern's show is no longer a prime stop on the major film promotion circuit. And the A-list guests who used to submit to Stern's biting personal questions in order to hype their projects have become scarce." He's also missing the sense of controversy stirred up by the fights with the FCC.
Stern is under contract to Sirius through 2010. Would he switch back? Maybe, but as talk-radio host Tom Leykis told the paper: "Even if he does have a smaller audience in terms of his cumulative audience, that won't last forever. Terrestrial radio is hemorrhaging audience as it tries to find its place in the Digital Age, while satellite is up tremendously."
By Staci D. Kramer
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Greek Parl't to start debate on austerity laws
- Greek Parliament starts debate on austerity laws
- Santorum says he'll be in 2-man race with Romney
- Thousands rally to support disbarred Spanish judge
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






