February 11, 2009 2:13 PM
- Text
Viacom-YouTube Update: VCs Will Have To File With Court On Decisions To Back YouTube, Sell To Google
(PaidContent.org)
This story was written by Staci D. Kramer.
YouTube's VC backers are being asked to explain to a federal court why they invested in the video ventureand why they sold to Google (NSDQ: GOOG). As part of the $1 billion lawsuit Viacom (NYSE: VIA) filed against YouTube and Google in early 2007, MarketWatch reports, Viacom wants documents from Sequoia Capital, Artis Capital Management and TriplePoint Capital "related to the firms' "actual and potential" investment in YouTube, Google's acquisition of the startup and a "proposed indemnification for copyright infringement relating to this merger." The documents are due Oct. 27, although there have been a lot of delays in this case all along so who knows.
The companies reaped significant rewards in Google stock in the $1.65 billion 2006 sale: Sequoia, $504 million; Artis, $83 million; TriplePoint, $6.4 million. MKTW sees the notion of having VCs explain themselves as unusual but Google senior litigation counsel Catherine Lacavera says it is "not out of the ordinary."
By Staci D. Kramer
YouTube's VC backers are being asked to explain to a federal court why they invested in the video ventureand why they sold to Google (NSDQ: GOOG). As part of the $1 billion lawsuit Viacom (NYSE: VIA) filed against YouTube and Google in early 2007, MarketWatch reports, Viacom wants documents from Sequoia Capital, Artis Capital Management and TriplePoint Capital "related to the firms' "actual and potential" investment in YouTube, Google's acquisition of the startup and a "proposed indemnification for copyright infringement relating to this merger." The documents are due Oct. 27, although there have been a lot of delays in this case all along so who knows.
The companies reaped significant rewards in Google stock in the $1.65 billion 2006 sale: Sequoia, $504 million; Artis, $83 million; TriplePoint, $6.4 million. MKTW sees the notion of having VCs explain themselves as unusual but Google senior litigation counsel Catherine Lacavera says it is "not out of the ordinary."
By Staci D. Kramer
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- UN consultant shot dead in Egyptian capital
- Suarez apologizes for snubbing Evra handshake
- Private jet crashes in Congo, death toll unknown
- How the revolution became digitized
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






