Obama Boosted By Expanded Voter Rolls
Washington Post: Registration Gains In Key States Poised To Help Democrats
-
Play CBS Video Video Obama, McCain On The Attack With only a month to Election Day, both presidential campaigns are accusing the other of ties to questionable characters, reports Chip Reid. Harry Smith talks to advisers from both campaigns.
-
Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., left, and Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., face off at a presidential debate at the University of Mississippi in Oxford, Miss., Friday, Sept. 26, 2008. (AP)
-
In-Depth Ways To Win Calculate your own path to the presidency with CBSNews.com's electoral vote prediction map.
-
CBS Evening News Presidential Questions Katie Couric asks Barack Obama and John McCain questions of politics, policy and character.
As the deadline for voter registration arrives today in many states, Sen. Barack Obama's campaign is poised to benefit from a wave of newcomers to the rolls in key states in numbers that far outweigh any gains made by Republicans.
In the past year, the rolls have expanded by about 4 million voters in a dozen key states -- 11 Obama targets that were carried by George W. Bush in 2004 (Ohio, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, Indiana, Missouri, Colorado, Iowa, Nevada and New Mexico) plus Pennsylvania, the largest state carried by Sen. John F. Kerry that Sen. John McCain is targeting.
In Florida, Democratic registration gains this year are more than double those made by Republicans; in Colorado and Nevada the ratio is 4 to 1, and in North Carolina it is 6 to 1. Even in states with nonpartisan registration, the trend is clear -- of the 310,000 new voters in Virginia, a disproportionate share live in Democratic strongholds.
Republicans acknowledge the challenge but say Obama still has to prove he can get the new voters to the polls.
"The machine that has been put in place by the Democrats is effective. They have a lot of people holding clipboards," said Brian K. Krolicki (R) , the lieutenant governor of Nevada. But he added: "There's a difference between successful registration and a groundswell. It's mechanics versus momentum."
The Obama campaign says it expects the numbers of new voters in swing states to swell even more later this month as elections offices process the tens of thousands of registrations still pouring in. And it exudes confidence about its ability to turn the new voters out with a vigorous follow-up operation. "This a lesson we learned. The old-fashioned way of registering voters was to stand on the corner of the street, stand on the campus quad and register one by one, which we still do," said Jon Carson, the campaign's national field director. "But another important component is getting people the information they need to participate."
Obama, who led a major voter drive in Chicago in 1992, has stressed voter registration from the outset of his campaign, seeing younger or disaffected Americans as a crucial pool of support. The campaign intensified its outreach over the summer, dispatching hundreds of staff members and volunteers to states with large percentages of unregistered voters.
Complementing its efforts are organizations that have been registering hundreds of thousands on their own, such as Democracia USA, which registers Hispanic voters; ACORN, the anti-poverty group; and Women's Voices, Women Vote, which targets unmarried women. More generally, this year's registration tilt is part of a broader shift since 2004 away from Republican affiliation, particularly among younger and Hispanic voters and among college-educated professionals in former GOP strongholds such as New Hampshire, Colorado, and the suburbs of Philadelphia and Northern Virginia.
In Florida, 800,000 voters have been added to the rolls this year, fewer than were added in 2004. The secretary of state's office attributes the drop to registration efforts reaching a saturation point and to the slowing of the state's population growth since 2004.
But the Democratic edge is still more apparent than it was in 2004, when Republicans made a big push to register evangelical Christians in the state. As of Sept. 1, the most recent date for which new registrations are divided by party, Democratic rolls were up by 316,000 and GOP rolls by 129,000 this year. The GOP figure falls short of the gain of 155,000 among independents.
This year's additions expanded the Democrats' registration edge in Florida to half a million voters, a gap expected to grow by Election Day as the thousands of voters who have signed up since Sept. 1 are added to the party totals.
The ratio is more lopsided in North Carolina, where Democrats have added 208,000 voters this year. The 34,000 voters the Republicans have added lags well behind the 148,000 new independents. Four years ago, when Bush won the state with 56 percent of the vote, the picture was different -- Democrats added 192,000 voters during all of 2004, but Republicans nearly matched them with 179,000 new voters of their own.
A disproportionate share of the new voters in North Carolina are minorities. At the start of the year, white voters in the state outnumbered blacks by nearly 4 to 1, and Hispanic voters by 10 to 1. Yet the 146,000 black and Hispanic voters added to the rolls represented nearly three-quarters of the growth among white voters.
Gary Pearce, a Democratic political consultant in North Carolina, said the gap in new registrations is a big reason he thinks Democrats have a chance of carrying the state for the first time since 1976. "It's huge. You talk about a surge -- we think we're going to see it here," Pearce said.
Many of the registration gains in North Carolina and elsewhere came during the nominating battle between Obama and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. While resulting in a long and costly primary season, it also helped draw voters onto the Democratic rolls.
In Nevada, site of a highly competitive Democratic caucus in late January, the party has this year added 91,000 people to the rolls in a state that Bush carried by 21,000 votes in 2004. Republicans added 22,000 voters, while 26,000 independents have been added. Republicans outnumbered Democrats in the Silver State at the start of 2007, but registered Republicans now trail Democrats by 81,000.
The primaries produced an even bigger boost in Pennsylvania. In addition to several hundred thousand new voters registered as Democrats, tens of thousands of independent voters and Republicans switched their affiliation to vote for Obama or Clinton.Ways To Win
Calculate your own path to the presidency with our Electoral Vote prediction map.
Some of them may vote for McCain, but the numbers are nonetheless eye-catching. This year, 474,000 Democrats have been added to the rolls in Pennsylvania -- while the GOP rolls have actually lost 38,000 voters. In 2004, there were 357,000 Democrats added and 66,000 Republicans.
In Virginia, where Obama volunteers have been a constant presence at Metro stations and grocery stores in Democratic areas, there are 310,000 more voters than at year's start. That compares with 210,000 new voters over the same stretch in 2004.
Although voters do not register by party in Virginia, there have been increases of 10 percent, or close to it, in the Democratic strongholds of Arlington County, Alexandria, Norfolk, Newport News and Richmond, which combined have added 58,000 voters. Similarly, in Missouri, where registration is also nonpartisan, an outsized share of the roughly 200,000 new registrations this year have been in greater St. Louis -- suburban St. Louis County, which now leans Democratic, is close to having one-fifth of the state's voters.
In Colorado, which Bush won by 100,000 votes in 2004, Republicans were well in the lead for registrations at the start of the year but are now on the verge of being overtaken. By Sept. 1, Democratic registration was up by 80,000, partly because of the Democrats-only caucuses in February. That far exceeds the gain of 28,000 unaffiliated voters and 21,000 Republicans. In New Mexico, which Bush won by 6,000 votes in 2004, Democrats have added 40,000 voters since last year, compared with 12,000 Republicans.
Voter drives have been a lower priority in states with less growth and turnover. Michigan has registered an increase of 160,000 voters this year, small for a state its size and less than what it recorded in 2004. Ohio, the scene of such intensive organizing in years past, has seen roughly the same growth in new voters as in 2004 (it does not break down registrations by party). Indiana's growth has been roughly equal to that of 2004; in Wisconsin, voters can register on Election Day.
In several states, registration gains may not be enough for Obama. His campaign deployed dozens of staffers to Georgia, with an emphasis on seeking out the estimated half-million eligible African Americans there who do not vote. Volunteers from across the country spent hours in the summer heat at bus stations and in housing projects in small cities such as Macon and Columbus, and as of Sept. 1, the state's rolls had grown by 350,000 voters, surpassing the gain of 270,000 for all of 2004. But last month, the campaign began pulling staffers out of Georgia, deciding the gap was too wide in a state that Bush won with 58 percent in 2004.
Obama's investment in voter registration has taken some of the burden off the nonprofit groups that did much of that work in 2004, but they are still active. The groups are not allowed to coordinate with the campaign, but they try to target separate areas to avoid overlap.
In Florida, a network of most of the nonprofit groups doing registration work estimates that it has registered about 440,000 of the 800,000 voters added in the state this year, said Bob Schaeffer, a network coordinator.
The Obama campaign predicts that 80 percent of the voters it is registering will support the Democrat, and that 75 percent will turn out, a rate it bases on turnout during the primaries. That means that for every 100,000 voters it registers, it would net a 45,000-vote edge on Election Day. In Virginia, that projection would mean an extra four percentage points from this year's new voters in a state that Bush won by eight points in 2004.
Donald Green, a Yale political scientist, said history suggests turnout rates lower than 75 percent among truly newly registered voters. The Obama campaign's higher rates of turnout during the primaries may have been boosted by voters who were re-registering at a new address or under a new party, he said. "New registrants tend to vote at reasonably high rates but not very high rates," he said. "Most surge in turnout comes from already registered voters."
But Pearce, the North Carolina consultant, speculated that this year's election might shatter some of those expectations, based on the energy he is seeing and the reach of Obama's get-out-the-vote operation there. "It's the enthusiasm gap," he said. He added: "They'll get a lot of them out on Election Day. I'm not an organization guy -- I'm skeptical of the people who think the organization is going to turn it all. But they've made me a believer."
By Alec MacGillis and Alice Crites
© 2008 The Washington Post Company
- Since both signed off on $700 billion bailout that favors corporations, neither have a clue to solve economic crisis. I liked McCain bringing up Obama%u2019s vote to the 2005 Bush/Cheney Energy bill and how Obama and his cronies were the biggest benefactors of Fannie and Freddie Mae.
It is reported that CBS and NBC polls tilt to Obama with intentionally oversampling of African American democratic voters. Are other media polls illegitimate too as they claim the same results?
Is it true that the candidate who bumps off mutual opponent will win in November regardless of debates, issues and poll numbers? Apparently the mutual opponent exposed corruption within both parties and is presently targeted. Will either party use the %u2019sweetheart exchange deals%u2019 where convicted felons are used to commit crimes/murders in exchange of less jail time, conveniently covered up and culprits never suspected? Will Dems use an OJ SImpson-like black convict with jail time to do the bumping off? Will GOP use a Guiliani-like mob ties similar to the ones used by his ex-NYPD commissioner who was indicted and may be jailed up to 140 years? Or Gotti, Jr. who is currently in midst of conspiracy and murder trial?
Do we have to worry about our personal safety too? For example, will our 4 hour car ride next Sunday be safe? Will our car wheels and brakes be tampered with? How about sleeping in the middle of the night inside our home as our habits and plans are known in advanced due to bugging devices? - Reply to this comment
- Since both signed off on $700 billion bailout that favors corporations, neither have a clue to solve economic crisis. I liked McCain bringing up Obama%u2019s vote to the 2005 Bush/Cheney Energy bill and how Obama and his cronies were the biggest benefactors of Fannie and Freddie Mae.
It is reported that CBS and NBC polls tilt to Obama with intentionally oversampling of African American democratic voters. Are other media polls illegitimate too as they claim the same results?
Is it true that the candidate who bumps off mutual opponent will win in November regardless of debates, issues and poll numbers? Apparently the mutual opponent exposed corruption within both parties and is presently targeted. Will either party use the %u2019sweetheart exchange deals%u2019 where convicted felons are used to commit crimes/murders in exchange of less jail time, conveniently covered up and culprits never suspected? Will Dems use an OJ SImpson-like black convict with jail time to do the bumping off? Will GOP use a Guiliani-like mob ties similar to the ones used by his ex-NYPD commissioner who was indicted and may be jailed up to 140 years? Or Gotti, Jr. who is currently in midst of conspiracy and murder trial?
Do we have to worry about our personal safety too? For example, will our 4 hour car ride next Sunday be safe? Will our car wheels and brakes be tampered with? How about sleeping in the middle of the night inside our home as our habits and plans are known in advanced due to bugging devices? - Reply to this comment
- The verdict is in. At a time when the terrible, terrible state of the economy is causing US citizens such as the guy in California to kill this morning his wife, three children, mother-in-law and self, why do we continue to participate in mudslinging. The state of our economy is a very serious and grave issue at this time. We can not waste time engaging in mudslinging that the only purpose it serves is to divert the very, very serious issues of the economy that our country is faced with. I think we as Americans are very capable of determining one%u2019s character, thats our job and we don%u2019t need any help in accomplishing it. Please this is our time (the American People), we have a decision to make on Nov 4, which is only weeks away. We would ask that the candidates not waste any more of our time trying to influence the us whether or not someones character is upstanding, we can do that. What we wish would be done is for the candidates to take time and share a strategy dealing with the economy with us that we don%u2019t loose anymore people as we already have in the case in California to collateral damage.
- Reply to this comment
- Did anyone hear how CBS and NBC polls include the oversampling of African American democrat voters to favor of Obama in the past month? Are current polls legitimate?
Why is media saying Obama is doing better than McCain on economy when BOTH voted for the $700 billion bailout with zeal last Friday when it does NOT benefit working people?
Isn''t that a blatant contradiction? Lie?
Does this mean that Obama has been given tonight''s debate questions beforehand to practice since it is well known that he doesn''t debate well without teleprompters?
Since he dodged McCain''s 10 invitations to town hall style debates this summer?
Since it is all over the internet, wonder if Obama''s homosexual affair with Larry Sinclair in November 1999 be revealed? Just google, "Obama''s closeted homosexual affair...."
Hmmmm....... - Reply to this comment
- Did anyone hear how CBS and NBC polls include the oversampling of African American democrat voters to favor of Obama in the past month? Are current polls legitimate?
Why is media saying Obama is doing better than McCain on economy when BOTH voted for the $700 billion bailout with zeal last Friday when it does NOT benefit working people?
Isn''t that a blatant contradiction? Lie?
Does this mean that Obama has been given tonight''s debate questions beforehand to practice since it is well known that he doesn''t debate well without teleprompters?
Since he dodged McCain''s 10 invitations to town hall style debates this summer?
Since it is all over the internet, wonder if Obama''s homosexual affair with Larry Sinclair in November 1999 be revealed? Just google, "Obama''s closeted homosexual affair...."
Hmmmm....... - Reply to this comment
- Obama campain has paid 810K to subsidiary of ACORN! All reports like this tell me is there has been countless fraudulent voters registered.
- Reply to this comment
- i do not understand the issue with voter registration, in the two decades living in minnesota we have had same day registration, it works well, MN is 1 of the three states with high (77% in 2004) voter participation and very little if any evidence of voter fraud, other states ought to look at what works well and adopt it. but it seems there is more concern at limiting voter participation than encouraging citizens to vote. those raising the concern of voter fraud fail to offer statics or evidence of any voter fraud. so these complex voter registration processes make no sense from somebody living in a state with a reputation of high voter participation and clean politics.
- Reply to this comment
- If your views are the same share this message with others. It is time to take a stand against Fox and look to other networks for fair and accurate news coverage.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by dicktracy200 at 06:53 PM : Oct 06, 2008
+ report abuse
*****************************
Yes, we know. We have been calling it Faux News for years. The only people who watch it are right-wingers who already wouldn''t vote for a Democrat even if you threatened them with an end to beer and Playboy, so anything they put on there isn''t going to hurt Obama. - Reply to this comment
- McCain cannot win on the character issue. He cheated on his wife Carol long before he met Cindy McCain. Read it for yourself. It is all there on Wikipedia.
- Reply to this comment
- It took McSame, and the lipstick on the Government of Pigs (GOP) to make people scared enough of the conservative to come out and vote. I hope they are all ready to fight when the Cons steal the election again.
- Reply to this comment
- The fact that Fox News Network is taking the position of launching a series of all out assaults against senator Obama%u2019s character is a sad day in journalism. They should be ashamed of the immoral and unethical standards that their network displays on a continual basis. What they must be made to understand is that as citizens we rely upon networks for their fair and accurate reporting of events and we will not tolerate anything less, especially when its over the top or maybe I should say as far right as Fox News Network is. If your views are the same share this message with others. It is time to take a stand against Fox and look to other networks for fair and accurate news coverage.
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by FREEDOMBIKER is that all you got. Keep up the good work making yourself and other un-educated people look like shallow fools. Making fun of someone''s NAME for God Sake, how old are you 12?
- Reply to this comment
- Thanks to the Bush Idiocracy we are all scr*wed! As I have said for 7 years now "I would rather have a President who scr*wed his Intern than one who scr*wed the Country" I hope everyone who elected Bush 401Ks, IRAs, Money Markets etc all tank!!!!
- Reply to this comment
- EXCELLENT!!! Here is where Obama really takes the Republicans to the wood shed .. his Voter Registration Programs are unsurpassed in America
Neocons remind me of that old Johnny Kidd song..
Shakin'' All Over! - Reply to this comment
I dont care who won the debate. I was one month ago going to vote for Obama. And then saw an Ad on Obama and Ayers. So I decided to investigate and what I found appalled me. I cannot beleive people are thinking of Voting for Obama when there is a dangerous pattern.
1.Obama and Bill Ayers Annenberg Challenge Coverup
2.Obama and Alwadi, a palestine terrorist
3.Obama and Rev Wright
4.OBama and the socialist demcratic association
5.Obama and Acorn
6.Obmaa and Rev Flaggert
7.Hamas donated 30k to Obama
8.International Solidarity Movement
9.Wheels of Justice
10.Rezko
11.And now ACORN to the list of Obama radical associations
Take all of Obama associates and his comments he has made and ill sum up Obama.
Obama is the most left wing radical terrorist sympathizer who is pro-muslim and anti-Isreal. Obama is pro-black. Obama is arrogant, lies and throws people under the bus to pursue power. Obama is dangerous for this country. In a post 911 World , I dont understand how the Main Stream Media is not reporting or investigating Obama background. CAN anyone name a person in the past besides Michelle, Rev WRight, BIll AYers, Rezko who can VOUCH for Obama.- Reply to this comment
- I guess McCain isn''t the McCain we knew in 2000... I guess his personal code of honor no longer exists.. Attacks from a desperate man...
- Reply to this comment
- linton and the Dembots have the majority of the blame for this.
And the fact that the Mainstream Media is mostly silent about blame should tell you TONS about who''''s fault this really is.
Posted by HawkSprings at 04:21 PM : Oct 06, 2008
You are so wrong. If the speedlimit is raised to 70 mph, and people go 100 mph and DIE, whose fault is it? - Reply to this comment
- CitizenUSA
Sing for your Glorious Leader again. - Reply to this comment
- OBAMA 08''!!!!! Ohio won''t make the same mistake 3 TIMES!!!!
- Reply to this comment
- Oh CitizenUSA,
You need to get off the DNC talking points and do some more research.
10 years ago, and less, thanks to Clinton, mortgage companies were forced into giving home loans to people who didn''t really qualify for them. Many were adjustable rate mortgages, and now those rates are going up, and guess what? They can''t afford a home they shouldn''t have qualified for in the first place.
Clinton and the Dembots have the majority of the blame for this.
And the fact that the Mainstream Media is mostly silent about blame should tell you TONS about who''s fault this really is. - Reply to this comment

Ways To Win
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.


