Oct. 5, 2008
A Look At Wall Street's Shadow Market
60 Minutes: How Some Arcane Wall Street Financial Instruments Magnified Economic Crisis
-
Play CBS Video Video Wall Street's Shadow Market Steve Kroft looks at some of the arcane Wall Street financial instruments that have magnified the economic crisis.
-
(AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)
-
Timeline Financial Meltdown Track major events that lead to one of the most tumultuous times in Wall Street's history.
-
Interactive Eye On The Economy In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.
Related Videos
60 MINUTES
-
Watch past 60 Minutes economy segments:
- July 1995: Derivatives
- October 2002: The Sheriff Of Wall Street
- September 2008: The Bailout
They already dwarf what has been lost on those original risky mortgages. As bad as the mortgage crisis has been, 94 percent of all Americans are still paying off their loans. The problem is Wall Street placed its huge bets and side bets with all of those fancy securities on the 6 percent who are not.
"We wouldn't be in any of this trouble right now if we had just had underlying investments in mortgages. We wouldn't be in any trouble right now," says Partnoy.
He says it’s the side bets.
"You got Wall Street firms, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers. You got insurance companies like AIG. Merrill lost a ton of money on this," Kroft says. "Everybody's lost a ton of money. They're supposed to be the smartest investors in the world. And they did it themselves."
"They did it all on their own," Partnoy agrees. "That's the most incredible thing about this crisis is that they pushed the button themselves. They blew themselves up."
Asked how much of this was incompetence on the part of Wall Street and the people who ran it, Jim Grant tells Kroft, "The truth is that on Wall Street, a lot of people just weren't very good at their jobs. It's as simple as that."
"These people were being paid $50 to $100 million a year. Some of them, the guys that were running the places," Kroft remarks.
"There is no defending," Grant replies. "A trainee making 45,000 a year would have had the common sense not to bet the firm on mortgage contraptions that no one in the firm actually understood. That is not a deep point to comprehend. Somehow, through, I will call it a criminal neglect and incompetence, the people at the top of these firms chose to look away, to take more risk, to enrich themselves and to put the shareholders and, indeed, the country, itself, ultimately, the country's economy at risk. And it is truly not only a shame, it's a crime."
60 Minutes requested interviews with top executives at Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch , Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, and AIG. They all declined.
Produced by L. Franklin Devine
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right


- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 10
- next
See all 184 CommentsThese comments are not a real blog. In real life I''m 45north not north45 (rules). The rule against html is a constraint.
[Posted by deanhix at 11:07 AM : Oct 07, 2008]
did john mccain resist the lobbying efforts of wall street to keep the credit default swaps from remaining unregulated ... being the man of deregulation that he so proudly used to state?
what party controlled congress when mccain called for legislation to control freddie/fannie? why didn''t the republicans push the limits thru?
The metaphor in my mind is like a gambling addict trying to explain to his therapist & family that it''s not his bets that are losing him money, but the horses he''s betting on. It''s a skewed logic that only an addict could understand.
"If only the horses would win, I would win, CAN''T YOU SEE!"
The start of that sentence should include "mathematicians and physicists _working for financial houses_" and end with "eliminate most of the risk to themselves _and the corporations they worked for_."
And judging by some of the hundreds of millions being paid out to the execs who are now leaving the burning buildings cash in hand, it looks like they did their jobs well.
$80 Trillion or so in notional value according to the government agency that monitors banks
http://www.occ.treas.gov/deriv/deriv.htm
Where did you see $80 trillion?
The tables are in "millions" and JP shows
total Derivatives of $83,436,951,000.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 10
- next
See all 184 Comments