The Race For The Electric Car
Competition To Build A Viable Electric Car Heats Up, As Silicon Valley Gets Into The Game
-
Play CBS Video
Video
The Race For The Electric Car
Lesley Stahl reports on the race to develop and produce a viable electric car being waged between Silicon Valley entrepreneurs and Detroit auto executives.
-
Video
The $109,000 E-Car
Tesla Motors chairman Elon Musk says the company's Roadster model is twice as efficient as a Toyota Prius. But that efficiency comes with a steep price tag: $109,000. Musk says it's "a deal."
-
Video
A Jolt For GM?
GM vice chairman Bob Lutz says Silicon Valley's foray into the electric car business gave the Detroit automaker a jolt to develop their own new models.
-
Photo
The Aptera (CBS)
-
Photo Essay
2008 Detroit Auto Show
Fuel-efficient vehicles push aside traditional displays of speed and chrome.
-
Watch past 60 Minutes automotive segments:
- February 2002: How Well Oiled Are We?
- November 2002: Dean Kamen's Amazing Machines
"I think even our lawyers now would admit that perhaps crushing them was not the smartest thing in the world to do. I get e-mails that say, 'I hope you enjoy the billions that you got from the oil companies, you swine,'" Lutz says.
It's that history and his record of promoting SUVs and the Hummer that make people wonder about Lutz's role in developing GM's new green cars.
Speaking about his own personal carbon footprint, Lutz acknowledges he and his wife own two helicopters and two jets.
"You have a terrible reputation with environmentalists, as you well know," Stahl points out.
"Well, actually some of them like me but go ahead…," Lutz replies.
"Well they don't like what you said about global warming," Stahl says. "Do you want to repeat what you said about global warming?"
"Of course not, because this is a family network," Lutz says.
"You don't think there's global warming? Is that really true?" Stahl asks.
"I'm not going to get into this. Because…," Lutz replies.
"Because you got into so much trouble when you said it the first time?" Stahl asks.
"That could be right. Yeah," Lutz admits.
What Lutz said in January is, "man-made global warming is a crock of s…t." So he's no environmentalist. But he is a realist. Gone are gas guzzlers. To save GM, he knows he has to come up with gas efficient cars. But Detroit is broke, while in California things are buzzing.
The venture capitalists, who funded the information superhighway, are now pouring money into the actual highway, backing at least 30 small start-up companies.
Produced by Shachar Bar-On
© MMVIII, CBS Worldwide Inc. All Rights Reserved.


- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 101 CommentsGet lost. And, welcome the future of people with the interest and intent to make a clean & safe car for a fair price with a reasonable wage & benefit package for their employees ... w/o the US Gov''t telling they "have to."
You''ve outlived your worth. Do something positive ... donate your factories to those like Tesla who can hire your ex-employees.
Tell Lesley Stahl to show me an electric car without a drop of oil and I will sell her Ocean front property in Michigan.
I do not think a 200 foot extension cord is practical.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFDG6KUJ9N8
Follow the lead of this man and contact your city and state leaders. America does need jobs. Have your leaders bring this technology manufactured here in the U.S.:
http://www.newsadvance.com/lna/business/local/article/evington_man_cant_wait_to_get_hands_on_air_car/6177/
WHY the negatively in a electric car CBS
The bottom line is that all of the car companies already have the technology - so what is holding them back? Could it be governments in thrall to large controlling oil companies? It''s about time we cut the umbilical cord filled with oil, and forced our governments to pass legislation to make a percentage of these cars mandatory for the entire country!
Also search for: Evington man can%u2019t wait to get hands on %u2018air car%u2019
Thank you for your patience. It is well worth looking at.
And another thing-Bob Lutz had better watch his mouth. Bigger companies than General Motors have gone out of business. Every major car company on the planet is going to have an electric car for sale at the same time the Volt comes out. If anything, he''s late.
And another thing-Bob Lutz had better watch his mouth. Bigger companies than General Motors have gone out of business. Every major car company on the planet is going to have an electric car for sale at the same time the Volt comes out. If anything, he''s late.
It is presumptuous to say that the only view on global warming is that it is real, it is caused by humans, and that the conservation efforts we are all trying will really have any significant effect. All of these are questionable at best, but Leslie Stahl just had to hit Lutz with that presumption.
Why not ask the Tesla CEO about HIS carbon footprint? With $55 million to invest, I am guessing that he is driving his Tesla to his helicopter pad or to the airport to board his private jet. Or... how about Leslie''s personal carbon footprint? I am willing to bet that she isn''t all that evergy efficient either.
Just report the interesting stories and leave the libberal claptrap editorializing and sermonizing out.
But, I am very disappointed that CBS did not focus more on the EV1 and it''s evolution & disappearance. This car would run 300+ miles per charge, and seemed to have no issues. And you could charge up at a "filling station" in a matter of minutes, if you did not have access to charge at home. I would definitely like to see a follow-up to this story, and hopefully it will push a bit harder on GM and what happened to the EV1. Why this new Volt? Why not harness the technology that they developed years ago? If anyone has questions about it, rent "Who Killed the Electric Car"... very insightful.
P.S. I second haesteve88''s comment.
WWW.eco-fueler.com
The story is out there. Free Lesley Stahl.
WOW!!!! What an embarrassment! I think California should secede ffrom the Union and Detroit should just implode.
No wonder America has gotten so bad. Maybe if we actually got out of our cars and walked two blocks, and stop living on Cheetos, Americans wouldn''t be a bunch of retarted fat people.
It gets most of its energy from solar panels on its roof.
It uses the latest Lithium Fe P batteries. There is more
information at www.sunzeecar.com. You can get more
information by calling Andy Schoenberg 801 274 7423
or e-mail wfaut@comcast.net
It gets most of its energy from solar panels on its roof.
It uses the latest Lithium Fe P batteries. There is more
information at www.sunzeecar.com. You can get more
information by calling Andy Schoenberg 801 274 7423
or e-mail wfaut@comcast.net
However, the problem here is GM is apparently threatened by Tesla''s insignificant output of electrics and somehow fails to notice that Toyota has pulled in $20 BILLION in revenue from a MILLION hybrids over the last few years. That the Prius outsells most of the vehicles in GM''s lineup.
And I''m apalled that you could do this story without mentioning the Prius.
By the way, blablablabla, who expects you to believe anything in the realm of science because politicians have something to say on it? I certainly don''t. I don''t believe in Creation "science," for example, although quite a few politicians do.
However, I believe Anthropogenic Climate change is a real effect because many SCIENTISTS believe it is a real effect and have worked diligently to discover and define it. The SCIENCE goes back a hundred years. However, I am grateful to a politician for pointing the situation out. From scientists, we get science. From politicians, if we are lucky, we get leadership. From a few, anyway.
A battery powered car would shift the resource from oil in other countries, to various means of electrical generation here. Some may be coal, but clean coal is being worked on. Some may be hydroelectric or nuclear. The point is, it is not oil, and puts more options on the table to get off oil from other nations.
The whole idea of a car run by batteries is short term, and these people must understand that. A fuel cell car with a hydrogen tank is also an electric car, though people don''t think of it that way. It could also go hundreds of miles on a tank of hydrogen, and could be refilled from your own unit in your house charged by wind or sun, if you like.
A proper response to that comment would take more than the 1500 words you restrict us to, but if she contacts any reputable source of data on the subject she''ll find that is grossly untrue. In part, EVs are far, far more efficient than gas guzzlers- the equivalent of more than 100 mpg; in California, we use NO coal plants, and much of our electricity is renewable. Gasoline cars use engines that change speeds, load & temperature, idle frequently, and are moving vehicles that must carry their compact smog control systems with them, smog equipment that can and do go bad for years at a time before they are checked for emissions and corrected.
All of these factors make fueled vehicles a nightmare to control emissions. Stationary power plants running at constant speeds and temperatures, with as much room as they need for smog equipment that is monitored constantly is far cleaner than the best gasoline engine in a moving vehicle.
Even in worst-case scenarios-- states that use the dirtiest coals-- an EV would still be better than a gasoline car in many ways: for one, it''s domestically-produced fuel rather than fuel from, say, Saudi Arabia, who financed the 9/11 attacks and continues to finance terrorism in Iraq and elsewhere.
Everything is changing, including just how much of our power is derived from dirty sources. Nanosolar, for instance, a maker of revolutionary new solar panels that are just a fraction of the cost of conventional brittle solar panels, is currently making enough solar panels to "solarize" 100,000 homes per year; if they make more of their manufacturing plants, that number can increase dramatically. And as solar panels cover more and more roofs across our country, it will make more and more sense to drive EVs.
Even if oil supplies are your energy source of choice, are quickly dwindling-- especially since India and China are suddenly putting millions of their countrymen in gas-powered cars every year, depleting supplies ever faster, so gasoline prices will inevitably climb regardless of the best intentions of federal regulators.
At today''s gasoline prices, it would not take long to pay off an otherwise expensive EV. And once the car is paid for, you''d only be paying a few dollars a week for electricity rather than the hundred or so you''d spend for a week''s worth of gasoline-- and if you install solar panels, that cost could drop to nearly nothing, while your neighbors in their gas guzzlers will see the wisdom of the EV you drive.
Lesley also dismisses EVs as some kind of flash-in-the-pan like hydrogen fuel cells, ethanol and others, but it did not take a genius to see the folly of these other "alternative-wannabes".
Even if oil supplies are your energy source of choice, they are quickly dwindling-- especially since India and China are suddenly putting millions of their countrymen in gas-powered cars every year, depleting supplies ever faster, so gasoline prices will inevitably climb regardless of the best intentions of federal regulators.
At today''s gasoline prices, it would not take long to pay off an otherwise expensive EV. And once the car is paid for, you''d only be paying a few dollars a week for electricity rather than the hundred or so you''d spend for a week''s worth of gasoline-- and if you install solar panels on the roof of your house to charge your EV, that cost could drop to nearly nothing, while your neighbors in their gas guzzlers will see the wisdom of the EV you drive.
Lesley also dismisses EVs as some kind of flash-in-the-pan like hydrogen fuel cells, ethanol and others, but it did not take a genius to see the folly of these other "alternative-wannabes".
Even if oil supplies are your energy source of choice, they are quickly dwindling-- especially since India and China are suddenly putting millions of their countrymen in gas-powered cars every year, depleting supplies ever faster, so gasoline prices will inevitably climb regardless of the best intentions of federal regulators.
At today''s gasoline prices, it would not take long to pay off an otherwise expensive EV. And once the car is paid for, you''d only be paying a few dollars a week for electricity rather than the hundred or so you''d spend for a week''s worth of gasoline-- and if you install solar panels on the roof of your house to charge your EV, that cost could drop to nearly nothing, while your neighbors in their gas guzzlers will see the wisdom of the EV you drive.
Lesley also dismisses EVs as some kind of flash-in-the-pan like hydrogen fuel cells, ethanol and others, but it did not take a genius to see the folly of these other "alternative-wannabes".
Even if oil supplies are your energy source of choice, they are quickly dwindling-- especially since India and China are suddenly putting millions of their countrymen in gas-powered cars every year, depleting supplies ever faster, so gasoline prices will inevitably climb regardless of the best intentions of federal regulators.
At today''s gasoline prices, it would not take long to pay off an otherwise expensive EV. And once the car is paid for, you''d only be paying a few dollars a week for electricity rather than the hundred or so you''d spend for a week''s worth of gasoline-- and if you install solar panels on the roof of your house to charge your EV, that cost could drop to nearly nothing, while your neighbors in their gas guzzlers will see the wisdom of the EV you drive.
Lesley also dismisses EVs as some kind of flash-in-the-pan like hydrogen fuel cells, ethanol and others, but it did not take a genius to see the folly of these other "alternative-wannabes".
How else do you explain the 40% reduction in the price of oil, when I have seen no figures to date that show the reduction in the demand for oil in the face of this Republican economic collapse to be more than 5%?
Not a very good track record if you should ask me.
The fact that it may be good for the environment and reduce one''s "carbon footprint" will be purely an ancillary benefit - one which some will care deeply about and others not at all. Tying the search for alternatives to our current energy use and production to the environmental movement is - unfortunately - not a boon to the search and may end up being a hidrance by confusing the issue with the general population. The majority of people just want what they have now (warm homes, decent-sized cars that will run for hundreds of miles when need be, etc) but have it cost less. I wish the best of luck to Mr. Lutz in his chase - I only wish that he or someone had the foresight to position their company for this inevitability much earlier.
Perfect solutions don''t exist but given some time and initial series of vehicles even "Detroit" can develop some responsible solutions.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 101 Comments