O.J. Convicted; Life Sentence Possible

Verdict In Vegas Kidnap/Robbery Case Comes 13 Years To Day After His Acquittal In Double Murder Case

(CBS/AP)  O.J. Simpson, who went from American sports idol to celebrity-in-exile after he was acquitted of murder in 1995, was found guilty Friday of robbing two sports-memorabilia dealers at gunpoint in a Las Vegas hotel room.

It only took the jury one day to reach its verdict, reports CBS News correspondent Manuel Gallegus.

A weary and somber Simpson released a heavy sigh as the charges were read by the clerk in Clark County District Court.

The Hall of Fame football star was convicted of kidnapping, armed robbery and 10 other charges for gathering up five men a year ago and storming into a room at a hotel-casino, where the group seized several game balls, plaques and photos. Prosecutors said two of the men with him were armed; one of them said Simpson asked him to bring a gun.

Simpson's co-defendant, Clarence "C.J." Stewart, 54, also was found guilty on all charges in the Las Vegas case.

Sentencing for the 61-year-old former football star was set for Dec. 5.

Journalist Michael Bryant of Legal Edge Network told Early Show anchor Chris Wragge that the verdict could send Simpson to prison for life.

"You're looking at, if you want to do the math here, 132 years to life, if you start calculating each count, plus the enhancement for the use of a gun which could effectively double the years for the count," Bryant said. "Yes, he is 61 years old, and prison at that age is not an easy haul.

"I would be shocked if Simpson gets life in prison based on this," said CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen. "This is a not a 'life in prison' sort of a case. But he's not going to get a slap on the wrist, either, and his chances of getting a new trial on appeal are really remote.

"This was not a complicated case either in law or in fact," Cohen said.

Simpson's girlfriend and his supporters in the courtroom were in tears. The judge then denied a defense request to let the men go free pending appeal.

They were immediately handcuffed cuffed and taken into custody. Simpson showed little emotion as officers walked him out of the courtroom.

His sister, Carmelita Durio, sobbed behind him in the arms of Simpson's friend, Tom Scotto, who said "I love you" as Simpson passed by. As spectators left the courtroom, Durio collapsed.

Simpson's defense was that he only confronted the men so he could get back personal items that were taken from him but prosecutors called it a planned assault with a deadly weapon, saying Simpson was arrogant thinking he could get away with it.

Jurors declined to answer questions after the verdict was read.

The judgment came 13 years to the day after Simpson was cleared of murdering his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman, in Los Angeles in one of the most sensational trials of the 20th century.

"I don't like to use the word payback," defense attorney Yale Galanter said. "I can tell you from the beginning my biggest concern ... was whether or not the jury would be able to separate their very strong feelings about Mr. Simpson and judge him fairly and honestly."

"Theoretically, you would like to think so," Bryant said, "but we can't get in their heads to find that out. They started with 500 jurors to whittle it down to those who could do just that, but is it really possible? Is it possible to take what you learn so much about so many years ago and just wipe the slate clean? "

Bryant said the question may be moot because of the preponderance of evidence in the Las Vegas case. "The thing you can't forget here is there was a lot of evidence that these crimes took place," he said.

Galanter said his client had expected the outcome, and in a courthouse conversation with an Associated Press reporter on Thursday, Simpson had implied as much.

Simpson said he felt melancholy and that he was "afraid that I won't get to go to my kids' college graduations after I managed to get them through college."

Galanter said it was not a happy day for anybody. "His only hope is the appellate process," he said.

Clark County spokesman Dan Kulin said prosecutors would not comment until the case was "completely resolved."

Judge Jackie Glass made no comment other than to thank the jury for its service and to deny motions for the defendants to be released on bail.

She refused to give the lawyers extended time to file a motion for new trial, which under Nevada law must be filed within seven days. The attorneys said they needed time to submit a voluminous record.

"I've sat through the trial," Glass said. "If you want a motion for new trial, send me something."

Stewart's attorney, Brent Bryson, promised to appeal.

"If there was ever a case that should have been severed in the history of jurisprudence, it's this case," he said of unsuccessful attempts to separate Stewart's case from Simpson's because of the "spillover" effect.

From the beginning, Simpson and his lawyers argued the incident was not a robbery, but an attempt to reclaim mementos that had been stolen from him. He said he did not ask anyone to bring a weapon and did not see any guns.

The defense portrayed Simpson as a victim of shady characters who wanted to make a buck off his famous name, and police officers who saw his arrest as an opportunity to "get" him and avenge his acquittal.

Prosecutors said Simpson's ownership of the memorabilia was irrelevant; it was still a crime to try to take things by force.

"When they went into that room and forced the victims to the far side of the room, pulling out guns and yelling, `Don't let anybody out of here!' - six very large people detaining these two victims in the room with the intent to take property through force or violence from them - that's kidnapping," prosecutor David Roger said.

Kidnapping is punishable by five years to life in prison. Armed robbery carries a mandatory sentence of at least two years behind bars, and could bring as much as 30.

Simpson, who now lives in Miami, did not testify but was heard on a recording of the confrontation screaming that the dealers had stolen his property. "Don't let nobody out of this room," he declared and told the other men to scoop up his items, which included a photo of Simpson with former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover.

Four other men charged in the case struck plea bargains that saved them from potential prison sentences in return for their testimony. Some of them had criminal records or were otherwise compromised in some way. One, for example, was an alleged pimp who testified he had a revelation from God telling him to take a plea bargain.

Memorabilia dealer Thomas Riccio, who arranged and secretly recorded the hotel-room confrontation, said he netted $210,000 from the media for the tapes.

Similarly, minutes after the Sept. 13, 2007, incident, one of the alleged victims, sports-memorabilia dealer Alfred Beardsley, was calling news outlets, and the other, Bruce Fromong, spoke of getting "big money" from the case.

"The audiotape recording of the incident overcame, I think, serious doubts that jurors may have had about the credibility and the reliability of the witnesses against Simpson," Cohen told CBS News.

"And when the defense argued that he case turned on Simpson's intent when he went into that hotel room, jurors simply didn’t buy that Simpson had any innocent motives."

Simpson's past haunted the case. Las Vegas police officers were heard in the recordings chuckling over Simpson's misfortune and crowing that if Los Angeles couldn't "get" him, they would.

During jury selection, Simpson's lawyers expressed fears that people who believed he got away with murder might see this case as a chance to right a wrong.

As a result, an unusually large pool of 500 potential jurors was called, and they were given a 26-page questionnaire. Half were almost instantly eliminated after expressing strong feelings that Simpson should have been convicted of murder.

The judge instructed the jurors to put aside Simpson's earlier case.

In closing arguments, Galanter acknowledged that what Simpson did to recover his memorabilia was not right. "But being stupid, and being frustrated is not being a criminal," he said.

He added: "This case has taken on a life of its own because of Mr. Simpson's involvement. You know that. I know that. Every cooperator, every person who had a gun, every person who had an ulterior motive, every person who signed a book deal, every person who got paid money, the police, the district attorney's office, is only interested in one thing: Mr. Simpson."

[princern]

Posted by michaelt302

princern , uh, you''''re obviously not only mentally ill, you''''re as dumb as a box of rocks. Obviously you choose to ignore (or you just don''''t understand) the mountain of DNA evidence in the murder trial. People like you are as hopeless as the criminals themselves.

Yo Mama! Now, I''ll put it to ya like this. O.J. may be guilty, but you can blame that racist furhman for the loss...not the all black jury. If you were on a Jury for a white man with an all white jury and a black cop testified that he hated White people and called them Wiggas and planted eveidence, what would you do? Your job would be to aquit because you can''t convict someone when the police admits it tampered with evidence. That says that possibly all your mountains of DNA evidence is falsefied. But with your pea brain you probably to get that.

[winslowe1]

If he gets out on bail, watch for the white Bronco.

[gaye5]

and just another thought briclipper, lets bring back our responsibility towards each other whether they be black, white, or have purple spots.
The left brought in our rights which immediately took away the rights of 95% of the population, and makes people think of self, where as our responsibility towards each other makes us look outward to the good of everyone.. selfishness verses caring..

[gaye5]

wl7bzh, very good point.. and well written, thanks..

[briclipper]

Everyone needs to look at this perticular incident as it is. With out going back and adding what we all believe may be true into the decision. I too think he was guilty for murder and was very upset that it didn''t turn out different. But just because of his earlier stupidity(my opinion) doesn''t mean I can judge this situation the same. I believe he needs a very strong punishment because guns were invloved and that alone is a huge problem in America, but lets keep each situation apart from each other.
As far as using racial examples? Are we ever going to get away from the exuse of why they were or were not accused right? It has to start somewhere, so why not with us? Don''t look back in the past,and don''t try to see the future, just start at present. There isn''t a need to keep beringing up race. We are all one, under GOD. Lets start by doing our part by getting involved to pass bills that protect us as we are human beings, not black,white,gay,straight. Lets fight the judges we feel are using their personal thoughts instead of the factual thoughts. Lets help the people we see being bullied, ridiculed, verbally victimized. Stand up for America, not go backwards...

[wl7bzh]

wl7bzh in regards rhs648 post, how on earth did you come up with that homosexuality being of the same reasoning, what you said is far from the subject and rhs648 doesnt even implys anything near something like that which could be used for homosexuality.. I know that you were trying to push a point but *** teeth, homosexuality???

Posted by Gaye5 at 10:24 PM : Oct 05, 2008

Gaye5,

RHS648 made the statement:

"Some even believed that criminality was a genetic trait. And yes, some even believed that the size and shape of a head predicted intelligence or lack thereof." Joe Kennedy had a daughter lobotomized in the belief that it for her own good. We know much more today and have made great strides in medicine and science."

Made the correct observation,in my opinion, that behavior such as criminality or even intelligence was not predominately a genetic trait.

Had such behaviors been due to a genetic trait, then it should follow that a person was not responsible for criminal or atypical behavior with the excuse "I am that way because of genetics" or even worse "God made me like this"

Such a concept if carried to the extreme, as some are attempting,would thus alleviate a person of any responsibility for their behavior.

In support of this is your literature research,as refutation of this reasoning, documenting that homosexuality is not a genetic condition. thanx agin

[airboatboy1]

I don''t have much faith in the government or the justice system. Seems money and a good lawyer can get you off in most cases. But if I was in the limelight and found not guilty on murder charges when a majority of the people thought I was a murderer walkin'' the streets, I think I might have chose to do things a little different than OJ. Maybe go through the same system that freed him to get his possessions back? If I was OJ, believe me, I''d have all the faith in the world of our legal system!?

[gaye5]

michaelt302, just because princern sees it differently to us doesn''t make her stupid. You get no where by being derogatory.. She has just as good a brain as anyone else, but years of hurt can cause one to wonder if this is just another case of injustice..

[gaye5]

princern, from what I have heard of America, you are right and unfortunately this is history on all races, but please dont make it worse by backing the wrong horse just because of the injustice..
As I said, unfortunately every race is racist, it breaks my heart and it is starting here in OZ as well as we bring in more and more immigrants and they get into gangs and target us, rape our girls, steal from us etc, so of course if this goes on the racism will get out of hand all over again..
We brought them here because we cared and wanted to help and they reward us with making us live in fear.
As it is happening so much, the good blacks are counted in the same catogory now.. These people just carry on their gang hatreds that they had at home.
There is not a race on this earth where many are racist, and it is this thinking which causes the problems in every race, so it isnt just the blacks and whites it is blacks against another black tribe, or germans (white) against English (white) etc.. Japanese against chinese, tribe against tribe or clan against clan.. it seems to be because of greed and bigots.. Bigots and greed..

[princern]

Gaye5, Generally I wouldn''t want a murder to go free. I could look at the trial and say that justice wasn''t done. But then you see the outrage at the jurors and the system because it didn''t work for whites one time. Like you said, there have been more times than I can count that it hasn''t worked for blacks and mostly we grin and bear it. You might see it on 1 TV show or something then it dies and the injustice is swept away. But in this case, a concerted effort was put in place a majority of entities that made it a point to point it out and never let it die because the shoe is on the other foot. I don''t think it is right to be concerned about injustice only when it suits you (much of white america). They don''t seem to care about other injustices even a 100th as much.

[princern]

Now you have people on here saying that justice was finally done because of the injustice in the first trial. So, (ethics teaches us that in order to be consistent with the argument), that the years of injustices perpetrated in the courts against blacks for so long in the past, that justice was in fact done in the murder trial that somehow makes up for all the injustices before. Again, don''t get me wrong...O.J. is a butt hole, but he isn''t the issue as far as I''m concerned. It is the one sided system, he is only the symptom of the bigger problem. This is the only reason I can condone a murderer walking is because many others have walked and are still walking as the latest KKK leader that has been released by an appeallet court within the last 1 or 2 months.

[gaye5]

guadalcanal3, that is so true, he did get off for that reason, there was too much evidence to say that he had done it..

princern, why would you want a murder to go free regardless of if he is black or not. You seem pretty intelligent so read the evidence for yourself without black glasses and see whether justice has been done. Yes, there have been many terrible things done to the blacks, and there are many white people who should be executed because of it, but please don''t close your eyes to things just because someone is black and there for must be innocent..
I believe that no two races who are different should ever live together, they each should have their own countries where they can live happily without prejudices from other races. It has never worked in history and never will especially if there is also different gods involved. There are bigots in EVERY race, in other words, unfortunately racism is in every race and this will never ever change no matter how many laws our government bring in.. Here in OZ we had very little crime until we started bringing in immigrants, and about that time TV showed people how to do it with their continuous programs of drugs, violence, murders and horrors. It is not just the immigrants being their hatreds and gang warfare into other countries, but the whites also become fractionized and start getting into gangs..

[annd2302]

Yea, everyone needs to own one or two during their life time.......................

[princern]

Not because he''s black but because whites want to use the justice system for their personal vendettas as usual.

[guadalcanal3]

All of you people out there that are saying he got this sentence because he is black...are forgetting one very important thing....He got aquitted of murder...mainly because of one thing...because...he is black...aka..."THE RACE CARD"...remember?

[gaye5]

I put h e els teeth and it *** that word out.. cant even put something in which refers to what the bible talks about.. WOW, yet other swear words are not edited at all..

[gaye5]

wl7bzh in regards rhs648 post, how on earth did you come up with that homosexuality being of the same reasoning, what you said is far from the subject and rhs648 doesnt even implys anything near something like that which could be used for homosexuality.. I know that you were trying to push a point but *** teeth, homosexuality???

[rhs648]

You certainly have a limited knowledge of history and a stilted perception of why things happened. During the Civil War injured soldiers were given arsenic in the belief that this was helpful. There was a time when some scientists and doctors believed that mental illness was genetically passed to a person''s children. Some even believed that criminality was a genetic trait. And yes, some even believed that the size and shape of a head predicted intelligence or lack thereof. Joe Kennedy had a daughter lobotomized in the belief that it for her own good. We know much more today and have made great stides in medicine and science. Hitler had motives far different than the doctors and scientists who believed that sterilization and lobotomies were in the interest of society, the patients, and their families.

Posted by rhs648 at 02:50 PM : Oct 05, 2008

So you''''re suggesting by this line of reasoning that homosexuality is environmental rather than genetic?


Posted by wl7bzh

Not at all. I do not know enough about homosexual behavior to make a statement about whether homosexual behavior is the result of genetics, environment, a combination of both, or neither. Nor am I familiar with the research in this area. My comments were directed toward the practice of sterilization and lobotomies performed by some doctors in the early to mid 1900''s and how medical science and beliefs often change over time.

[gaye5]

Does anyone know what happened to OJ''s children after he was aquitted of killing his wife???
Did they see him do it or do they know anything??? and what are his children doing now, how did they fair in all this... I feel so sorry for the childrens grandparents... here in OZ we dont hear everything...

[princern]

Posted by USCITIZENVET

Alas, what comes around goes around ! He was "Guilty then" and he''''s "Guilty now", except this time he hasn''''t gotten away with it. Sometimes we do get to actually see justice unfold. As for all those others out there that have committed horrendous crimes and haven''''t been caugt yet, there''''s always judgement day and they will not escape that one. Congratulations to a jury that actually saw the light. Hey O.J. , take plenty of vaseline to the big house with you.

_______________

You''re right...we saw justice unfold in the first case. An aquittal which was the right decision. No evidence and 1 man can''t stab two people. It defy''s the laws of physics. No murder weapon either. Glove didn''t fit. Yeah he was innocent...they got it right the first time. Perfect justice. Ask Emmitt Till...he''ll tell you it is.