Mentally Ill Benefit From Bailout Bill
Better Health Insurance For Patients With Depression, Schizophrenia Part Of Package
-
Photo
(CBS/iStockphoto)
-
Interactive
HealthWatch
Explore health issues including AIDS, cancer and antibiotics.
-
Timeline
Credit Crunch
Feeling the squeeze? Here's a look at actions and statements from key players in Washington.
The Senate passed the bill, 74-25. It must now go to the House, where a majority of lawmakers rejected the $700 billion rescue earlier this week.
Patients seeking treatment for depression or schizophrenia often face greater restrictions with their health insurance coverage than do patients getting treatment for heart disease or diabetes. For example, they often must pay more out of pocket when seeking treatment than do patients with physical problems. Also, insurers sometimes cover fewer visits for mental health treatments than they will for someone getting care for physical ailments.
Both the House and the Senate have overwhelmingly passed legislation that would prevent group health plans with 51 or more employees from imposing such unequal standards.
Still, the two chambers have to pass an exact, final version of the mental health legislation before it can become law, and supporters are running out of time. The bailout legislation will be one of the last, if not the last major bill of the year. Lawmakers are anxious to get back to their home states and districts to campaign for the Nov. 4 election.
"There is renewed hope for millions of Americans facing mental illness," Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., who has worked for the bill for more than a decade, said in a statement from his home in Hyannis Port, Mass., where he is recovering after treatment for brain cancer. He urged the House to act.
"Millions of Americans are waiting and they've waited too long already," said Kennedy. His son, Rep. Patrick Kennedy, D-R.I. has worked for the bill in the House.
The legislation does not mandate that group health plans cover mental health or addiction treatment, only that when plans do so, the coverage must be equitable to other medical coverage.
Business groups as well as advocacy groups supported the improved insurance coverage, which is expected to cost $3.4 billion over 10 years as private companies deduct more health expenses from federal income taxes. Lawmakers who backed the measure said mental disorders are a leading cause of disability in the United States and that success rates for treatment often equal or surpass those for physical conditions.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



For the moment we will put aside the fac that these supposed illnesses are beyond the understanding of the psychiatric community and the only real goal is to entrap people with curious labels and of course drug everyone in their path. The economic foolishness is enough for today.
Are you kidding when you refer to schizophrenia and depression as "supposed illnesses?" Since you don''t seem to think chemical imbalances are real, perhaps we should stop treating diabetes? I can assure you that mental illnesses are just that; illnesses. Ignorance, however, is not an illness. It''s a state of being. But I guess you already know that.
As for not getting treatment, I don''t know where you live but here in the nanny state of New York they can get treatment. The problem is the compliance with treatment.
As for "helping the least, etc, etc", ask your messiah how he is helping his relatives back in Kenya. The last reports on charibale donations showed that biden donated a whopping $3000 to charity in 2006.
If you bring up the mccains, whatch it, cindy mccain heads up 5 charities, one that delivers medical care to children in 3rd world countries. As for the many homes,family members live in them.
If anything, you are casting a real broad net there.
"Since you don''''t seem to think chemical imbalances are real, perhaps we should stop treating diabetes? "
Chemical Imbalances? If so then why are these imbalances not cured? Instead the goal is to entrap the victem in a fraudulent system where symptoms are augmented with drugs, sophistry and your basic disinformation campaigns to make sure the victem never gets out of the system. A chemical imbalance is a physical problem which is well beyond the ability of the psychiatric comunity.
As for trying to make comparisons to diabetes, this is indeed another scam to a great extent. Most, but not all, cases are avoidable, treatable or curable. The problem is that not all docters (the real kind) try for a cure. They bilk the patient for as long as possible by "treating" the problem instead of curing or better yet teaching the patient to avoid it.
Including Psychiatry as the laughable end of the medical community does help point out deficiencies in real medicine. The other side of the situation is that it encourages formerly good reliable medical professionals to sell out the patients for a fast buck. I guess the rationale is that if they see they can get away with it they give it a try.
Please don''t confuse psychiatric drivel with real medicine. It cheapens the integrity of those that really want to help.
This PORK and EARMARK stuff is
SO out of control!!!
The mentally ill deserve their own bill.
Instead we have corrupt politicians led by Harry Reid, who will no doubt say those of us against the bailout are against the mentally ill. Bull on that.
This is one of the biggest cons in history.
Posted by curious_mind at 12:25 AM : Oct 03, 2008
Stop treating diabetes? You may want to take a look at the stomachs on most type 2 diabetics, which by the way make up about 90% of diabetics.
I wonder what would happen if type 2 diabetics got off the couch walked a minimum of 30 minutes 7 days a week and lost 10% of their body weight?
Posted by adlerman2 at 06:36 PM : Oct 04, 2008
Let''s try it again fatboy.
Look up metabolic syndrome and you will find a "chicken or egg" which came first phenomenon with respect to central obesity and insulin resistance.
Second in your so-called diabetes management you failed to mention your caloric intake.
Third you did not mention medication.
So as before, when you start blathering about a subject, be sure you''ve done your research.
And if you can''t take it, don''t dish it out.
-
by wl7bzh
October 5, 2008 2:56 PM EDT
- As for trying to make comparisons to diabetes, this is indeed another scam to a great extent. Most, but not all, cases are avoidable, treatable or curable. The problem is that not all docters (the real kind) try for a cure. They bilk the patient for as long as possible by "treating" the problem instead of curing or better yet teaching the patient to avoid it.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 18 CommentsPosted by curious_mind at 12:25 AM : Oct 03, 2008
Thank you for the comment about diabetes management.
Truth is diabetes is almost a specialty in itself. Most primary care providers don''t have the training to manage it as you so aptly pointed out.
thanx agin.