NAIROBI, Kenya, Sept. 29, 2008

U.S. Copters Buzz Hijacked Arms Shipment

Officials Fear Weapons On Ship Seized By Somali Pirates Could End Up In Hands Of Militants

  • In this picture released by U.S. Navy, Sunday, Sept. 28, 2008, Somali pirates in small boats are seen alongside the hijacked Photo

    In this picture released by U.S. Navy, Sunday, Sept. 28, 2008, Somali pirates in small boats are seen alongside the hijacked "Faina". The captain of a hijacked Ukrainian ship off the coast of Somalia says one crew member has died and he can see a U.S. ship about a mile from his freighter.  (AP PHOTO)

  • Fast Facts Somalia

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

(AP)  U.S. helicopters on Monday buzzed a hijacked Ukrainian cargo ship carrying 33 Soviet-designed tanks and other weapons that officials fear could end up in the hands of al Qaeda-linked militants in Somalia if the pirates are allowed to escape.

Thursday's seizure of the MV Faina off Somalia, a failed state seen as a key battleground in the war on terrorism, could bring dangerous effects across the Horn of Africa and the Gulf of Aden, one of the world's busiest shipping lanes.

Piracy has become a lucrative criminal racket in impoverished Somalia, bringing in millions of dollars in ransom.

The pirates aboard the blue-and-white Ukrainian-operated freighter are demanding $20 million to release the ship, its 21 crew members, one of whom has died of an apparent heart attack, and its cargo of T-72 tanks, rifles and ammunition.

The ship, now anchored off Somalia's coast near the central town of Hobyo, apparently was destined for Sudan when armed pirates overtook it, likely from a speedboat, and climbed up the side of the ship.

"We maintain a vigilant watch over the ship and we will remain on station while negotiations between the pirates and the shipping company are going on," Lt. Nathan Christensen, a deputy spokesman for the U.S. Navy's Bahrain-based 5th Fleet, told The Associated Press.

Although the pirates have not been allowed to take anything off the Faina, they have been allowed to resupply, one U.S. official said when asked if those aboard needed anything such as food. The official declined to comment on whether the negotiations between the pirates and the shipping company are being monitored.

U.S. Navy destroyers and cruisers have been deployed within 10 miles of the hijacked vessel and helicopters were circling overhead because of "great concern" over the possibility of the cargo falling "into the wrong hands," Christensen said. At one point on Sunday, the captain of the Faina said a warship was about two miles away.

"Our goal is to ensure the safety of the crew, to not allow off-loading of dangerous cargo and to make certain Faina can return to legitimate shipping," said Rear Adm. Kendall Card, commander of the task force monitoring the ship.

Although analysts say the pirates will likely be unable to unload the tanks, the other military hardware or a huge ransom could exacerbate the two-decade-old civil war in a country where nearly every building is pockmarked with bullet holes and all major civil institutions have crumbled.

The U.S. fears the armaments may end up with al Qaeda-linked Islamic insurgents who have been fighting the shaky, U.N.-backed Somali transitional government since late 2006, when they were driven out after six months in power. More than 9,000 people have been killed in the Iraq-style insurgency, most of them civilians.

Mark Bellamy, senior fellow in the Africa program at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the pirates "are more interested in the money than disposing of the cargo."

"There's theoretically a possibility these weapons can fall into the wrong hands, but what is al Qaeda going to do with tanks in Somalia?" he said.

Christensen said the arms shipment was destined for Sudan - not Kenya, which had been claiming to be the arms' destination. "We are aware that the actual cargo was intended for Sudan, not Kenya," he said.

The 5th Fleet said the ship was headed for the Kenyan port of Mombasa, but that "additional reports state the cargo was intended for Sudan."

U.N. officials said there is no blanket arms embargo on Sudan's government, but any movement of military equipment and supplies into the Darfur region would violate a U.N. arms embargo if it were not first requested by the government and approved by the Security Council's Sudan sanctions committee.

The United States has expressed opposition to all arms transfers to Sudan, which it considers a state sponsor of terrorism. U.S. officials also have warned that the transfer of lethal military equipment to state sponsors of terrorism could lead to sanctions under U.S. law.

A Western diplomat in Nairobi, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to talk to the media, said the shipment was destined for autonomous southern Sudan - not Darfur - and did not violate the embargo.

Bellamy said it was not illegal to send weapons to the north or south Sudanese governments.

"There are lots of ways that weapons can get into Sudan, and this happens to be one boatload," Bellamy said. "The bigger thing is this continuing problem of piracy. It's been escalating for three years and they're becoming more brazen and emboldened. They're being paid and they then turn around and step up activities."

Jervasio Okot, spokesman for southern Sudan's mission to Kenya, said officials there were "surprised" to hear reports that the tanks and arms were destined for their region.

"Our government has no contract for the importation of arms with the Russian or Ukrainian governments," Okot said.

U.S. intelligence reports said the cargo's ultimate destination was Sudan and that Kenya was only a transit point, said a Western official in Washington who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was discussing classified material.

Ukrainian Defense Ministry spokesman Valentyn Mandriyevsky said the ministry was not participating in the arms trade and didn't know where the cargo was bound. A spokesman for Ukraine's arms trader, Ukrspetexport, would not comment.

The 5th Fleet said the Faina is owned and operated by Kaalbye Shipping Ukraine. A woman who answered phone at the Odessa-based shipping company and declined to identify herself said the company was not involved with the Faina.

Ukrainian and Russian media have said the Faina is operated by Tomex Team, a company based in Odessa. Its representatives have repeatedly declined to comment.

A Russian-based registry indicates the ship, sailing under a Belize flag, is also owned by Tomex Team. It lists the owner as Waterlux AG, with a Panama address but the Odessa phone number of Tomex Team, which it indicates is a subsidiary.

Russia dispatched a warship to the area, and it will take about a week to get there. The Neustrashnimy, or Intrepid, was in the Atlantic near the English Channel on Monday and will have to go through the Strait of Gibraltar, the Mediterranean and the Suez Canal to get to the Somali coast, said Capt. Igor Dygalo, a spokesman for the Russian navy.

Christensen said the U.S. Navy maintains "standard bridge-to-bridge communication" with Faina's crew via radio, but stressed that they are not taking part in or facilitating any negotiations.

The 21-member crew was from Ukraine, Russia and Latvia. A Latvian Foreign Ministry spokesman said one man from Latvia was a "non-citizen," a term authorities typically refer to ethnic Russians who have not obtained Latvian citizenship.

There have been 24 reported attacks in Somalia this year, according to the International Maritime Bureau's piracy reporting center. In June, the U.N. Security Council voted to allow international warships to enter Somali waters to combat the problem, but its 1,880-mile coastline - the longest in Africa - remains virtually unpoliced.

Nick Brown, the editor of Jane's International Defense Review, said it was unlikely the pirates would be able to use the tanks without specialized training and mechanics.

Mogadishu's arms markets are teeming with heavy weapons - including rocket-propelled grenades, AK-47s and mortars.

© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from World

Add a Comment See all 76 Comments
by palin0808 September 29, 2008 3:04 AM PDT
Obama should give a speech to the pirates about hope, and change. Then they would just give everything back
Reply to this comment
by lewiston14 September 29, 2008 5:02 AM PDT
I hope the Russian Navy get there soon to take over operations. Shooting out the ships rudder would not make it sink but prevent it from going anywhere.
Reply to this comment
by thcarson-2009 September 29, 2008 5:53 AM PDT
The Ruskies will drop a Spetznaz team onboard and that will be the end of the pirates, they''re quite the nasty bunch.
Reply to this comment
by twistedsister1959 September 29, 2008 6:28 AM PDT
Fill a couple of these older ships with the garbage from our major cities, offer prisoners a cruise and let them set sail toward Somalia. Kinding of like wrapping up your garbage in a nice box during a garbage strike and leaving it in an open car. Just wait for the Darwin award contestents to take the bait. Garbage problem solved and the pirates get squat. But something tells me the pirates knew what was onboard these vessels. Now they have made the Russkies angry and the only ransom they will see is the one needed to save their own lives. Hope they enjoy fireworks. You would think that after seizing the Iranian ship, that has made the pirates ill from God knows what (radiation posinoning or chemical posioning), they would be more careful. I guess commom sense and higher IQ''s are not a job requirement.
Reply to this comment
by timrek10567 September 29, 2008 8:46 AM PDT
Somalia: a classic example of what happens when the rest of the world is left to make a decision. No wonder the US so often acts alone.
Reply to this comment
by bob5ford September 29, 2008 8:52 AM PDT
Thirty-three tanks versus the lives of twenty remaining crew? Sink the ship or storm it. Then continue on to the port and eliminate it, completely. Make it look like Dresden after WW2. That should stop the pirates. Allowing cargo ships to be armed might also be a decent idea, prevent the hijackings before they happen.
Reply to this comment
by gop_will_win September 29, 2008 9:07 AM PDT
Why are we wasting our tax money on this? Its the Ukranias ship, their problem.
Reply to this comment
by michtop September 29, 2008 9:20 AM PDT
Quit playing games storm the ship and kill all the outlaws. This should have been done as soon as a force could be assembled.
Reply to this comment
by xmanborg September 29, 2008 9:33 AM PDT
Just sink the ship, get rid of the Pirates and get rid of the tanks.
Reply to this comment
by cheetah-man7 September 29, 2008 9:50 AM PDT
Nuke ''Em right out of the water! Between Somali pirates and Nigerian spammers, I think it''s time to re-colonize Africa again!
Reply to this comment
by hoodwinked3 September 29, 2008 9:53 AM PDT
Let''s call upon Rufus Excalibur Ffolkes!
Reply to this comment
by cheetah-man7 September 29, 2008 9:54 AM PDT
Cheetah-Man7 me boy, have ye ever been lost at sea? Aye Aye Cpt. Hindgrinder, I haven''''t but I''''ve been blown ashore a few times

LOL.... I''m glad to see a healthy sense of humour!
Reply to this comment
by newsjunky5 September 29, 2008 10:00 AM PDT
It''s reasuring to hear that international pirates are still dealing in the U.S. dollar.
Reply to this comment
by newsjunky5 September 29, 2008 10:03 AM PDT
Time to deploy "Q"-boats.
Reply to this comment
by xlib September 29, 2008 10:45 AM PDT
Here''s some fuel for you lefties. I am a conservative woman and have been for the past 15 years. My take on this, Somolia should have been blow off the face of the earth (if I may take a phrase from the president nut case of Iran)when our military was drug through the streets for the world to see.
Reply to this comment
by gop_will_win September 29, 2008 10:51 AM PDT
See you liberals! And you say the American dollar is worthless, these pirates prize the dollar and pirates know the value of stuff.
Reply to this comment
by September 29, 2008 11:42 AM PDT
Here''''''''s some fuel for you lefties. I am a conservative woman and have been for the past 15 years. My take on this, Somolia should have been blow off the face of the earth (if I may take a phrase from the president nut case of Iran)when our military was drug through the streets for the world to see.
Posted by Xlib at 10:45 AM : Sep 29, 2008
----
My condolences for your loss. October''s Mogo-1 was a disaster and the Clinton response was reprehensible. But the men who died at the hands of these thugs didn''t die for Republicans. Or Democrats. They answered a call for their Country. The worst thing we could do is turn that country and its military over to a party whose leadership answers every challenge, no matter how far away and how small, with a military bugle "to arms." When all we have is a hammer, every problem seems to require a hammer for a solution. A fist isn''t always the answer, is it? It wasn''t the answer in Mogo-1. And we pay and pay and pay for Clinton''s tool selection. (pun)
Reply to this comment
by zhynaryll September 29, 2008 12:02 PM PDT
These pirates should be dealt with as we dealt with the Barbary Pirates many years ago - sink them all, and hang the survivors - if any!! Where are the SEALS when we really need them? Forget the Russians - they aren''t willing to help Ukraine, unless they get a big political payback!! Is this on Petraeus'' watch, or Mullen''s? Where are they now? I had thought Ukraine was a ''friend'' of ours. Hmmmmmmm....
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10-2009 September 29, 2008 6:20 PM PDT
U.S. Navy destroyers and cruisers have been deployed within 10 miles of the hijacked vessel and helicopters were circling overhead because of "great concern" over the possibility of the cargo falling "into the wrong hands..."
---

And you say these T72 tanks were headed for Kenya?

Tsk, tsk. Poor Robert Mugabe will have to repurchase his toys with the insurance settlement, because this cargo is very, very fragile and subject to water damage.

You can imagine Mugabe''s anguish when his troops must face unarmed demonstrators without the protection of T72 tanks, flamethrowers and rocket and grenade launchers.

Perhaps this is occasion to salute Somali "pirates" as the free-lance, high-seas entrepreneurs they are.
Reply to this comment
by cdfoxtrot3 September 29, 2008 6:44 PM PDT
Why is it that the world''s poorest countries, like Sudan, are unable to provide enough food for their people, but can afford the latest and greatest tanks for their military?
Reply to this comment
by cdfoxtrot3 September 29, 2008 6:45 PM PDT
+ report abuse
Here''''s some fuel for you lefties. I am a conservative woman and have been for the past 15 years. My take on this, Somolia should have been blow off the face of the earth (if I may take a phrase from the president nut case of Iran)when our military was drug through the streets for the world to see.

Posted by Xlib


Keep venting. You have no power and cannot commit mass murder on this scale. Which is just as well.
Reply to this comment
by hamhock8 September 29, 2008 6:55 PM PDT
Alpha10 - Robert Mugabe is co-president of Zimbabwe - not Kenya.
Reply to this comment
by yakshasa September 29, 2008 6:56 PM PDT
Hello, aalpha10? Robert Mugabe is president of Zimbabwe, not Kenya.
Reply to this comment
by gce65 September 29, 2008 7:12 PM PDT
Copters buzzing the ship? Good way to get shot down. Just takes a shot or two to the engine, tail rotor or fuselage.
And what are the copters or US destroyer gonna do, sink the ship with all those Ukrainian tanks aboard? Ukraine is a BOB (Buddy Of Bush).
Reply to this comment
by gce65 September 29, 2008 7:15 PM PDT
Come on US Navy SEALs! Storm the ship at dark of night and take out all the terrorists (or hijackers or whatever) with single shots to the head. I know it can be done; I saw it in a movie once..... Ha!
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage September 29, 2008 7:18 PM PDT
I find it ironic that our government is evidently negotiating with these pirates, when in the article it is suggested their intent is to sale this arms cargo to terrorist linked sources!

Personally, I doubt very many of this doped-up Somali warlords are connected to al Quaeda! They just want to do dope, have an easy life, and make a pile of money!

If it were me---I''d give these pirates two minutes to ''come about'' and proceed to a point 12 miles or so offshore! Then, all pirates should proceed to the bow of the ship on the port side and place their hands clearly visible on top of their heads! At which point, I''d board and arrest all of them!

If they didn''t obey these instructions, I''d strafe and missile fire their conning tower! If they continued to resist, I''d sink the vessel! The end of story---crisis OVER! Period.
Reply to this comment
by lmartink September 29, 2008 7:32 PM PDT
Whatever the solution, the Q ship idea is most appealing to me --- I think it''s time the nations of the world start eliminating piracy. Our attack helicopters could stand off at long range and blow these pirates out of the water before theey got close. And it would be fun to watch on TV, as our forces crushed these waterborne terrorists.

We could use some good news.
Reply to this comment
by libluv2cnsor September 29, 2008 7:58 PM PDT
scuttle the ship...the only person who looses money is the arms dealer.
Reply to this comment
by libluv2cnsor September 29, 2008 8:00 PM PDT
Why is it that the world''''s poorest countries, like Sudan, are unable to provide enough food for their people, but can afford the latest and greatest tanks for their military?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by cdfoxtrot3 at 06:44 PM : Sep 29, 2008
+ report abuse


**********

because liberal morons like Bono and Geldof DEMANDS THAT Sudan''s debts be forgiven so they can buy weapons..
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq September 29, 2008 8:58 PM PDT
Gee, Xlib, a conservative.. Gee, I couldn''t tell by your bright idea.
Blow somalia off the face of the earth?
Are you retarded?
So kill all the innocent women and children?
and the farmers and merchants who want NO PART of the tribal violence/ethnic cleansing?
Comments like yours give justification to others'' comments that neo-cons are sick in the head, glorifying death and destruction, just to save them the trouble of thinking for ten seconds.
You are as bad as the nazis, and you sicken me with your complete in-humanity..
Cant you understand that you are ill?
It''s people like you in Somalia (and other places) that bring about bad situations like this IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Don''t you understand that??
Naaaah, go crack open a beer and call Obama a Muslim terrorist, then check out the wrestling match on TV instead.
Sure beats having a soul, huh?
Reply to this comment
by gaye5 September 29, 2008 9:02 PM PDT
WHAT, pirates have been allowed to resupply,!!!!

Let them live off what is on the ship and when they have run out they will come crawling. Let them resupply and they can hold out forever.. I hae come to the conclusion that there is more to this world porblems than meets the eyes, our governments can be this stupid surely... even children could do it better so there has to be some other reason for there stupidity.. It couldnt possibly a new world order could it.. Because democracy has up until now been doing so well for almost 200 years perhaps they have to deliberatly cause world problems so as the people themselves will say that we need a new system.. A one world government, after all we know that this is what they are pushing for, and how else could they bring all the people of the world together than to cause problems so as the people want a world government hoping that it will be able to stop all these problems... Sounds good, well I aure that is what I have read in some of the communistic articles, has anyone else read/heard this.
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage September 29, 2008 9:12 PM PDT
WHAT, pirates have been allowed to resupply,!!!!...
Posted by Gaye5 at 09:02 PM : Sep 29, 2008
---------------
Yes, I too, thought that was a bit ODD! Probably most of the posters here were wondering about that, too!

If you really WANTED to stop these guys and END the situation, you shouldn''t be RESUPPLYING them!

It makes you wonder, doesn''t it?!
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage September 29, 2008 9:16 PM PDT
These are some cheap pirates. They''''re only asking for twenty million dollars. Just one of those tanks is worth more than that.

Posted by One_Texan at 09:02 PM : Sep 29, 2008
-------------------
True! But twenty million bucks in half a dozen small suitcases isn''t anything to snivel at, either!

If they''re not complete idiots, that would provide a lifetime of financial security!

I''m out of here.
Reply to this comment
by missingamerica September 29, 2008 9:32 PM PDT
"Buzzed" them, huh? I betcha that ship has grown the most awesome limpet-looking collection of barnacles ever...
Reply to this comment
by missingamerica September 29, 2008 9:33 PM PDT
oh, wait...mebbe that is barnacle-looking set of limpets...is so confusing...
Reply to this comment
by newsjunky5 September 29, 2008 9:49 PM PDT
"There''s theoretically a possibility these weapons can fall into the wrong hands, but what is al Qaeda going to do with tanks in Somalia?"
---------------------------------------

They''re fighting against other groups there I''m sure. A tank would be very valuable. But in the absence of war, a tank could be a hoot to drive around. The only thing better might be grabbing a freighter full of firetrucks.
I wonder if the pirates knew what the cargo was before they boarded.
Reply to this comment
by searun1 September 29, 2008 9:52 PM PDT
problem solved=four sharpshooters armed with .50 cal scoped rifles, twelve hand grenades each and .308 sniper rifles each ship, also install a 500,00 volt wire around the ships hull similar to a hot wine for cattle.
Reply to this comment
by inketolstoy September 29, 2008 10:30 PM PDT
Maybe they want to exchange the tanks for firetrucks, the ladder ones with the wheel in the back. Hope they were not paying attention to what happened to the guys that took those hostages in Egypt.
Reply to this comment
by newsjunky5 September 29, 2008 10:39 PM PDT
"If you really WANTED to stop these guys and END the situation, you shouldn''''t be RESUPPLYING them!"
--------------------------------------
But if you wanted to save the crew, which is what makes this so complicated, you don''t want the pirates getting hungry and desperate and start shooting.
If you wanted to listen in on them, you would send supplies.
Reply to this comment
by newsjunky5 September 29, 2008 10:43 PM PDT
"Maybe they want to exchange the tanks for firetrucks, the ladder ones with the wheel in the back. Hope they were not paying attention to what happened to the guys that took those hostages in Egypt. "
---------------------------------

That''s good detective work. We can now deduce that there is an even number of pirates. (takes two to drive each hook and ladder truck)
What did happen to those guys who took hostages in Egypt? I don''t get to listen to as much news as I''d like.
Reply to this comment
by beehive21-2009 September 29, 2008 10:52 PM PDT
Pirates, Long John Silver,it''s been going on since the first ship sailed,worst than Cockroaches.The Russians should sink the ship ,what are they doing shipping tanks to a African nation ? Time to stop the arming of third world countries.
Reply to this comment
by newsjunky5 September 29, 2008 10:53 PM PDT
The Russians are on their way with a warship, and they don''t fool around. We are already there, and have little to do with this, so we are cordial to the pirates. Are we playing, "Good Nation, Bad Nation" with them?
Reply to this comment
by caliengineer September 29, 2008 10:57 PM PDT
5 of 10 hostage takers were "eliminated." The hostages are OK.
Reply to this comment
by September 30, 2008 1:18 AM PDT
Sink the dam*n ship, and be done with it. Then start sinking every pirate boat they can find for the next 2 years.

End this stupid cr*ap. We have tons of navy ships with plenty of fire power, and crews that need combat training. Might as well train with real blood.

Reply to this comment
by emeraldblue September 30, 2008 2:48 AM PDT
When their warship arrives, the Russians will communicate briefly with the pirates: "Your choice, you may die running away in your little boats, or you may go down with the ship." Then they''ll fire torpedoes. Game over. Fewer pirates. Hostages considered collateral damage.

Then it''s off to the Black Sea to monitor U.S. ships supplying Georgia.
Reply to this comment
by gaye5 September 30, 2008 3:50 AM PDT
stn_sage, I have wondered about many things, look up TheOPINIONATOR, their reporting is something that most of the media dont tell us..
Why is it that there is non stop world wide Muslim violence and the media only tells us sensored bits.

We hear from people living overseas, of many horrors in different parts of the world so why doesnt the media print it???..
IF, notice that I said "IF"!!! Muslims holy books were peaceful, (and indeed the first quarter of the quran is), then Muslims world wide and their clerics, leaders and Imams would be out there stopping these horrors, instead they preach to their people to hate us, not to be friends with us unless it is for the cause of Allah, plus when their numbers have grown enough to become a force and the time is right, and the weapons have become availiable to them they are to attack and kill the infidel to make all the world for Allah..

For goodness sake everyone, read the last three quarters of the quran and others of the Muslim holy books and see for yourselves just what they have in store for us.. Our politicians are to stupid to read them so we have to become aware of our future. If our politicians did read these books we would not be in this position now.
Reply to this comment
by pirmin3 September 30, 2008 6:16 AM PDT
Sink all pirate boats on site. A few drones with hellfires would help a lot and not be too expensive. Bomb all known pirate strongholds. Good practice for our sailors who are probably bored stiff.
Reply to this comment
by promaclaura September 30, 2008 7:05 AM PDT
Who is the owner of the ship? It seems to be a confusing issue according to this article. Russian tanks and arms for Sudan? Maybe Russia will destroy this ship, as cover to eliminate finding anything else we don''t know about? It''s so sick, Sudan is probably h ell on earth and that''s just all those people need. This will be another black eye to the U.N., helpless to enforce treaties in the face of aggressive Russia.
Reply to this comment
by abmitus September 30, 2008 7:12 AM PDT
Invite the Pirates over for tea and crumpets and make friends. Maybe they will watch a move with us too. Might I suggest Sinbad The Sailor.
Reply to this comment
by charlieot September 30, 2008 8:13 AM PDT
I love American why not blow up everything now start with Washington you a holes.

On Sunday Jesus is your answewr the other 6 days your a violent buch of holes

Posted by Jerryomara at 07:17 AM : Sep 30, 2008

Jerry,

I think you''re taking away a bit of an exaggerated impression here. What you are seeing here are a few emotional remarks from a few people. The reality is, most of us realize that you can''t just blow up the ship and be done with it.
What many of use *don''t* get is the idea that you can negotiate with these people and expect them to go away. The only way the piracy will end is if we don''t permit ourselves to become victims. The only solution that will work is to refuse to negotiate with the pirates and make it completely clear that piracy will neither profitable nor tolerated. If the only way to make those points is by killing the pirates, then a value judgment must be made. If the judgment is that course is unacceptable, then we must realize that lawlessness will be the norm and innocent people will die at the hands of the lawbreakers. Sadly, the choice is that black and white.
Reply to this comment
See all 76 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs