Sept. 28, 2008
A Trip Inside The "Big Bang Machine"
60 Minutes Visits One Of The Biggest Science Experiments Ever, The Large Hadron Collider
-
Play CBS Video Video The Big Bang See how the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland operates.
-
Video The Collider Steve Kroft descends into the Large Hadron Collider some call it the "big bang machine" - that took billions of dollars and 9,000 physicists to build in the hope it will provide valuable insights.
-
Video A Universal Effort While the experiments are being conducted under the auspices of CERN, the entire project is a huge, global collaboration of scientists. Everyone will share in the scientific results.
-
(CBS)
-
Photo Essay "Bang" Up Idea European scientists hope to recreate conditions just after "Big Bang" using huge particle collider.
Related Videos
60 MINUTES
-
Watch excerpts of past 60 Minutes science segments:
- October 2002: Hubble
- October 2002: Hubble, Part 2
- January 2005: Stephen Hawking
- April 2007: Vive Les Nukes
Asked why scientists are interested in recreating what the universe was like a nanosecond after the Big Bang, Stanek tells Kroft, "It's in humans' interest to know everything, right? And why wouldn't you want to know that?"
"Well, you'd want to know it but, you know, spending eight billion dollars to find out, it must be important," Kroft remarks.
"So, let me ask you this question: because we've studied the interactions of photons and electrons and elementary particles, we can understand how to take the light that bounces off of me and you into that camera and take that signal and put it into mom and pop's living room. Now, imagine, in 10 years, 20 years, will we be able to take, instead of our photons, me and you and put them in mom and pop's living room? So, you tell me, is that worth it?" Stanek asks.
"Transport people?" Kroft asks.
"You tell me. Is that worth it? Is that worth eight billion dollars?" Stanek asks.
Asked if he thinks that could happen, Stanek replies, "I don't know enough right now. But I can't say it can't happen."
The collider itself is a marvel of precision engineering. Two beams of invisible hydrogen protons will be driven around the tunnel in opposite directions inside ultra-high vacuum tubes propelled and guided by super conducting magnets, chilled with liquid helium to a temperature of minus 271 degrees Celsius, colder than deep space. As the two beams approach speeds of 186,000 miles per second, they will smash into each other at four different parts of the collider.
At the heart of the machine are four massive detectors where the actual collision of the subatomic particles takes place. One of them is seven stories tall - nearly 8,000 tons of lead, steel, wires, plastic and magnets that capture and record everything that's going on inside.
"So you can race these little…protons around this 17-mile track at the speed of light, smash 'em in together in a beam that's the width of a hair. And you can measure what happens in a billionth of a second?" Kroft asks Stanek.
"Billionth of a second, actually 25 nanoseconds. So set the scale," Stanek says. "Here to there is 25 feet. Turn my flashlight on, by the time that beam reaches that wall, is the time that we have to have recorded all this information."
A 60 megapixel camera inside the detector captures what's going on at 40 million frames a second. And the digital data detected by layers of sensors can be converted into pictures the human eye can understand. The information goes to super-fast computers, then out to laboratories and universities all over the world for analysis. There are so many sensors monitoring so many collisions that in just one year, the collider is expected to generate ten times more data than all of the information now on the Internet. To make sure the results are valid, the two main detectors are entirely different.
Stanek says the detectors were created by different teams of scientists, with "different criteria, different motivation and so on."
Asked if there's much competition between the two teams, Stanek tells Kroft, "Friendly competition. But, you know, when we hear those guys are behind, we all laugh a bit, and I'm sure they do the same thing. But, you know, at the end, they both have to work."
Produced by Andy Court and Keith Sharman
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right


- 1
- 2
- next
See all 25 CommentsNow that''''s classic.
You believe everything came from, that''''s right...NOTHING....and yet you have the gall to call others delusional.
You don''''t even realize how insane you sound and how much of a minority you really are.
Posted by StopSocialis at 11:51 PM : Sep 29, 2008
Science and God are not mutually exclusive. It IS possible to belive in god and still be curious about the universe he created. Why can''t you believe in the big bang and also believe that this was god''s way of creating the universe? Why must people blindly follow a god who works behind the scenes? I say the purpose behind our very existence is to gain knowledge of god''s creation(which was not just us), to celebrate it by knowing as much as we can about it.
Now that''''s classic.
You believe everything came from, that''''s right...NOTHING....and yet you have the gall to call others delusional.
Posted by StopSocialis
Rick, the big bang is a theory, based on observations so far from our limited technology and knowledge. I think the big bang theory will be revised or abandoned as new evidence surfaces. The difference between scientists and fundamentally religious folks like you is, when scientists don''t know the answer to something, they keep looking. You religious folks claim God snapped his fingers and it was done, and that must be the answer...no questions asked. I find that behavior delusional and immature. However, that''s only my humble opinion...
Posted by StopSocialis"
I bet if born 500 years ago you would have been amongst the mobs demanding scientists like Copernicus and explorers like Columbus be burnt at the stake for suggesting the earth isn''t flat and the center of the universe like it states in the bible.
If Spain hadn''t "wasted" money on an expedition which the Bible states should have seen Columbus fall off the edge of the earth then America would never even have been discovered!
Thankfully some people are intuitive enough to think for themselves and try to uncover facts rather then blindly accepting what they are told without question (as religion demands).
He sure has observed MILLIONS of years of science, hasn''''t he?
Posted by StopSocialis
Rick, scientists understanding of the universe is constantly growing and the information that is discovered builds from previous ideas that go back to the Greeks. The reason modern science traces its roots to the Greeks is because the Greeks were the first to develop models of nature based on REAL observations. If their models didn''t pass tests, they were abandoned or revised. Same basis with modern day science.
Please educate yourself by picking up a book other than the bible...
I sure hope they are correct and there is not enough matter grabbed as it speeds through Earth, for these possible (but unlikely) created black holes to get stuck (this is like shooting a stellar blackhole through a galaxy and hoping it doesn''t get caught). The blackhole only needs the same amount of mass to go into orbit and get caught like a cancer in the planet, even if it is moving at the speed of light.
Determinism is the true science, and religion.
The other thing that pisses me off about the media was all the "we''re still here" comments we heard when they sent the particles around the loop in one direction, with no smashing. Of course we are, they didn''t smash anything.
"...Bob Stanek believes the collider will go down in history, and not for swallowing the earth."
If Earth is swallowed, the collider won''t be going down in history because all of the historians will be swallowed, too. Unless there are historians elsewhere in the universe...
Posted by ghm1
Although this is housed in Europe, 2000 scientists from all over the world have contributed to this project.
I think your the same person.
Posted by StopSocialis
Could you imagine the trillions of dollars this country would save if we stopped supporting wars based on your mythical creator?
Posted by StopSocialis
Scientist''s version of history is based on actual observations. Not myths and and supernatural fairy tales that your god is created from.
Quit spewing this lie about not building the Supercollider because of the Iraq War or the Bailout and everything else. You don''t have any idea what you are talking about.
http://prl.aps.org/50years/milestones
It is unfortunate that 60 Minutes did not recognize all these theorists %u2013 especially as you were noting the American contributions.
http://prl.aps.org/50years/milestones
It is unfortunate that 60 Minutes did not recognize all these theorists %u2013 especially as you were noting the American contributions.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 25 Comments