Sept. 27, 2008

Conservative Columnist: Palin Must Go

Former Backer Says V.P. Nominee Is "Out Of Her League," Should Quit Ticket For Good Of GOP

  • Following the flack that has trailed Gov. Sarah Palin after her interviews with <B>CBS News</B>, ABC and Fox, a former backer of the GOP vice presidential nominee now calls Palin Photo

    Following the flack that has trailed Gov. Sarah Palin after her interviews with CBS News, ABC and Fox, a former backer of the GOP vice presidential nominee now calls Palin "a dud" and says she should bow out form the race.  (AP Photo/Vinny Tennis)

  • Timeline Palin's Path

    A look at Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's life and career

(CBS/AP)  A conservative columnist who welcomed Sarah Palin's entry in national politics now says she's proven to be a dud, and called on her to step aside as John McCain's running mate.

Kathleen Parker, writing in the National Review Online, says her "cringe reflex is exhausted" after watching the Alaska governor stumble through TV interviews and it's become clear to her that Palin is out of her league.

"No one hates saying that more than I do," Parker writes. "Like so many women, I've been pulling for Palin, wishing her the best, hoping she will perform brilliantly. I've also noticed that I watch her interviews with the held breath of an anxious parent, my finger poised over the mute button in case it gets too painful. Unfortunately, it often does."

Palin, new to national politics, boosted Republican presidential nominee John McCain in polls and excited the party's core conservatives when he chose the first-term governor for his ticket.

Some of that shine has since worn off in polls.

Parker said she thought Palin was a "refreshing feminist of a different order" when she joined the ticket, but it's become clear she doesn't know enough about economics or foreign policy to be president should that become necessary in a McCain administration.

Writes Parker:
"Palin filibusters. She repeats words, filling space with deadwood. Cut the verbiage and there’s not much content there. Here’s but one example of many from her interview with Hannity: “Well, there is a danger in allowing some obsessive partisanship to get into the issue that we’re talking about today. And that’s something that John McCain, too, his track record, proving that he can work both sides of the aisle, he can surpass the partisanship that must be surpassed to deal with an issue like this.”

When Couric pointed to polls showing that the financial crisis had boosted Obama’s numbers, Palin blustered wordily: “I’m not looking at poll numbers. What I think Americans at the end of the day are going to be able to go back and look at track records and see who’s more apt to be talking about solutions and wishing for and hoping for solutions for some opportunity to change, and who’s actually done it?”

If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself."
Parker suggests that Palin could bow out for "personal reasons," such as to care for her infant son: "No one would criticize a mother who puts her family first."

Parker wasn't the only national Review writer to call for a shake-up in the McCain campaign. Kathryn Jean Lopez wrote that Palin is not coming off at her best in interviews, and notes that in keeping Palin on a tight media leash the campaign is potentially hurting the ticket more:
" If Sarah Palin is John McCain’s secret weapon, let her go, whoever is holding her back. And, frankly, if it turns out that the 'authentic' Palin of rallies and the Republican convention is just good speech delivery in a woman with some good spirit, I want to know that sooner rather than later. (Mitt’s still available … "


© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Video and Galleries from Politics

Add a Comment See all 402 Comments
by bob5ford September 27, 2008 1:28 PM PDT
Either Obama or McCain will be the next president. That will only change if one of them drops out. That means that everyone who wants to be a real part of the process will have to pick one or the other and vote for them. With Obama you get full blown socialism, without any apologies. With McCain you get a curious mix of socialism and big business. The difference will be noticed most by people making over $75,000 or under $20,000 a year. If you''''re over and have been a good steward of your money it will be taken from you quicker with Obama than McCain. That includes taxes on your 401k or IRA dividends which means smaller returns on your money and less retirement funds. Those making much over $50,000 will be forced to buy health insurance or pay a hefty penalty, like Massachusetts does now. If you make under $20,000 the welfare state will embrace you more with Obama and less with McCain. Then there is the "war". With Obama Iraq becomes another Vietnam with America running in disgrace as a cowardly looser. With McCain we will develop a face saving way out by saying the Iraqi military can handle it and shifting focus to Afghanistan and Pakistan, where it should have been all along. All that being said, I, as a lifelong republican, was actively supporting Clinton. I can not and will not support Obama. I still have pride and faith in America, something he has repeatedly demonstrated he does not have. My choice, and I believe the only choice for real Hilary supporters, is McCain.
Reply to this comment
by dburfears September 27, 2008 1:28 PM PDT
Palin must STAY! PLEASE!

I have a party planned for Oct 4. The "debate" will be funnier than SNL''s comedy take on the "moose candidate"!

PALIN MUST STAY!
Reply to this comment
by blackyowe September 27, 2008 1:31 PM PDT
Palin is a such a white trash looser. Everyone should watch the video on YouTube of her African Voodoo preacher, Thomas Muthee anointing her to protect her from witches, its a hoot but also scary as H E double L.
Reply to this comment
by vincan-2009 September 27, 2008 1:34 PM PDT
Palin was the big hit of the republican convention. What did that tell me? That she could lie just like all the rest of the republicans who got on stage. She was parroting the words of one of Bush''s speehwriter. Not a good sell for most of us who are not rich like the attendees at the republican convention. We are the real people here in the country that need a better government that is not corrupt. A government that is not owned and run by corporate bigwigs. America is in trouble. Bush and republicans have caused these terrible consequences for all of us. Corruption was not what we needed from the president and vice president. But that is what we got, and got, and got.
Reply to this comment
by xraytwonine September 27, 2008 1:42 PM PDT
it''s just a game, doesn''t really matter who gets elected, 50% of americans are guaranteed to hate the result
Reply to this comment
by tx2democrats September 27, 2008 1:44 PM PDT
I can''t believe that she has stayed on the repub ticket this long, my bet was that she would be gone by 9/15, her numbers tanked by then, no question, but halfwit is holding on, the next debate should eliminate her, please repug''s, the rest of the world is watching, we''ve just given the world 8 years of BUSH, why would you even think that Qualin Palin could save your party and the world, whats wrong with you people, you bunch of freaks, you''re making those 3rd world counties look good.

She must go for the better of the country, Country First.
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage September 27, 2008 1:45 PM PDT
Politically speaking, I doubt I''d have very much in common with Kathleen Parker, but I do agree it would be best if she''d step down! The job is beyond her capacity!

She may be doing a good job as governor of Alaska! She can go back there, and continue it!

There is precedence for McCain''s campaign: Thomas Eagleton stepped down when it was learned that at one time he had been to see a psychiatrist.

Personally, I think HE was mentally saner than a lot of the politicians we have in Washington today! But, back then he looked TEN times steadier than Palin does TODAY!
Reply to this comment
by toby2957 September 27, 2008 1:50 PM PDT
Palin should stay in the race. She''s the best thing for the Democratic Party and the Obama/Biden ticket ever! I can''t wait til she disembowels a large mammal on live tv as an example of her foreign policy experience!
Reply to this comment
by toby2957 September 27, 2008 1:52 PM PDT
My choice, and I believe the only choice for real Hilary supporters, is McCain.

Posted by Bob5ford at 01:28 PM

LOL Hillary herself is voting for Obama. She has very strongly urged all her supporters to do the same? What does that make you?

Oh yes, a neocon shill, who never would have voted for Hillary in the first place.

We understand.
Reply to this comment
by smurfcrusher September 27, 2008 1:52 PM PDT
C''mon! Sarah has personality! And makes a great mooseburger. She was extremely well vetted by McCain, and the people love her!

Please make sure she stays on the Republican ticket, for the good of the country. Country First, right??
Reply to this comment
by smurfcrusher September 27, 2008 1:53 PM PDT
"Maybe she could start with Cheney. (Too large?)"

Posted by onemoretim

Cheney''s a lizard (reptile), not a mammal.
Reply to this comment
by smurfcrusher September 27, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
Oh, and she''s pretty. You don''t want to kill the enthusiasm for McCain again, do you??
Reply to this comment
by tx2democrats September 27, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
Palin should stay in the race. She''''''''s the best thing for the Democratic Party and the Obama/Biden ticket ever! I can''''''''t wait til she disembowels a large mammal on live tv as an example of her foreign policy experience!

Posted by Toby2957 at 01:50 PM

Maybe she could start with Cheney. (Too large?)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by onemoretim

-------

cold dudes, can''t stop laughing my a$$ off.
love it.
Reply to this comment
by smurfcrusher September 27, 2008 1:59 PM PDT
I''m quite Liberal and I have to say, I''m terrified that Palin could cause the election to go to the Republicans.

Her experience raising five kids far eclipses Obama''s mere two. She handles one family crisis after another with ease. She lives FAR closer to Russia than Obama, OR Biden.

Please, withdraw Palin NOW, it''s unfair not to give the Democrats at least a tiny chance of winning!
Reply to this comment
by smurfcrusher September 27, 2008 2:00 PM PDT
""Maybe she could start with Cheney. (Too large?)"
Posted by onemoretim

Cheney''''s a lizard (reptile), not a mammal.
Posted by smurfcrusher at 01:53 PM

How about Rove?"

Posted by onemoretim

Different! Rove is a Deneevian Slime-devil.
Reply to this comment
by smurfcrusher September 27, 2008 2:03 PM PDT
Let''s just say they wouldn''t make good burgers! ;)
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage September 27, 2008 2:04 PM PDT
Why doesn''''t McCorpse choose Ron Paul as a running mate?

Posted by onemoretim at 01:47 PM : Sep 27, 2008
---------------
He SHOULD HAVE! That would have been a great choice!

But, he didn''t, because Paul is an EQUAL if not superior to McCain himself! Most Republican presidential nominees won''t pick someone they consicer to be an equal or greater than them!
Reply to this comment
by cfrym September 27, 2008 2:05 PM PDT
Bod5ford, better go back and study the issues more. you are completely wrong about the taxes, it''s $250,000 not $75,000. no one is being forced to buy health insurance. with the war, it''s never going to get any better than it is right now, why stay? obama 08
Reply to this comment
by smurfcrusher September 27, 2008 2:08 PM PDT
"Why doesn''''''''t McCorpse choose Ron Paul as a running mate?

Posted by onemoretim at 01:47 PM : Sep 27, 2008
---------------
He SHOULD HAVE! That would have been a great choice!

But, he didn''''t, because Paul is an EQUAL if not superior to McCain himself! Most Republican presidential nominees won''''t pick someone they consicer to be an equal or greater than them!"

Posted by stn_sage

McCorpse. Hahahaha!! Sounds like a new Zombie burger. It''s so much less fattening than mooseburger! LOL !
Reply to this comment
by eddom949 September 27, 2008 2:26 PM PDT
Unfortunately I don''t know what either Mitt or Sarah believe, so I don''t know how to vote between the two. However, Mr. McCain made the choice, so there must be something there that is needed...
Reply to this comment
by barbjc1 September 27, 2008 2:28 PM PDT
Kathleen Parker should be slapped for what she wrote in the Nationa Review online. Sarah Palin unfortunately is having to repeat the John McCain blah blah blah. Republican Party let her speak for herself. Take the leash off, this woman knows her stuff without you making her a parrot.
I have said this before and I will state it again. I am contacting my county election board and if I can write in Hillary Clinton for President and Sarah Biden for VP.
My daughter looked it up and no where does it state, the President and VP have to be from the same party.
Anyone of you out there voting for Obama just because he is on the Democratic ticket had better look into your other choices, such as a write in ballot.
Somehing is VERY wrong with the Obama picture.
Reply to this comment
by ramos937 September 27, 2008 2:31 PM PDT
I feel so sad for McCain. I saw a major part of these interviews and Palin is so far out of her depth, it is painful to watch. The McCain camp has taken over her life and those of her family and associates trying so far to conceal her capabilities. But once the VP debate starts, her true capabilities will emerge and the McCain campaign is doomed. By then it will be far too late to fire Palin and replace her with someone else.

Reply to this comment
by idnnsg September 27, 2008 2:43 PM PDT
Whether she stays or goes, doesn''t matter. McCain is going LOSE BIG TIME either way.

Picking Palin was a desperate attempt to gain the support of evangelical nut-jobs who don''t trust him, and it was a big mistake by McCain. She is totally unqualified to be president, and that''s what she will have to be when he kicks the bucket. Keeping her just reinforces what bad judgement he has.

Dumping her, on the other hand, also reinforces what bad judgement he has! How could he have been so stu.pid as to pick someone he is forced to dump due to her absolute unsuitability for the job?

Any way you look at it, McCain has BAD JUDGEMENT and does not deserve to be president.
Reply to this comment
by idnnsg September 27, 2008 2:44 PM PDT
Any way you look at it, McCain has BAD JUDGEMENT...

Which reminds me. Did you all hear about the candidtate who "suspended his campaign" so he could "rush back to washington" to "solve the economic crisis" but then (1) didn''t actually rush back to washington but instead did a TV interview with Katie Couric and then spent the night in NYC and then went to a big shindig the next morning, and (2) couldn''t do anything to solve the problem when he got to washington and (3) had the gall to suggest MORE DEREGULATION when it was deregulation that caused this mess in the first place!?

That same candidate swore he would NOT resume his campaign until AFTER the problem was solved, but then with no solution in sight, he showed up at the debate and refused to look his opponent in the eye as he repeated lie after lie from his stump speeches!

Who was that serial liar with the guilty conscience? Why, none other than Bad Judgement McCain!

McCain was WRONG about the economy. (He''s been saying, "It''s fundamentally sound"???).

McCain was WRONG about Iraq (He said, "It will be a piece of cake"???)

McCain is WRONG about deregulation. (It''s the SOURCE of the problem, not the cure!)

McCain was WRONG to pick an air-headed bimbo as a running mate. (She "speaks in tongues", wants to destroy the world to "bring back jesus", and thinks she can see Russia from her back yard and that that somehow qualifies her to handle foreign policy!)

McCain is just WRONG in every possible way.
Reply to this comment
by caroji September 27, 2008 2:47 PM PDT
Is it just me or does McCain''s one eye remind you of Katheryn Ross character meeting face to face with her unfinished "clone" with those blank dialated eyes in 70''s movie Stepford Wives? Has McCain turned into a Stepford Republican in order to win? Does he have Sarah closeted at the "Men''s Club" to complete her transition also? McCain rushes in to get the Republicans lined out on the Wall Street mess, the "Exocism" on them looked sloppy. Sarah (I mean Wonder Woman) need to come in and lay some hands on them. I guess she is too busy trying to come up with something for Katie Couric, remember she said "I''ll find something and I''ll get back to ''YA. I can''t wait until Thursday, you are comin'' aren''t ''ya, Sarah?
Reply to this comment
by idnnsg September 27, 2008 2:49 PM PDT
BarbJC1 -- another McCain operative, trying to reduce the number of votes for Obama by pushing the utterly stu.pid idea of voting for Hillary.

NOBODY is fooled by this BS! Hillary says she is voting for Obama! If you love Hillary so much, why the hell would you vote for anyone other than the person she is voting for?
Reply to this comment
by cdfoxtrot3 September 27, 2008 2:49 PM PDT
My God! Palin sounds like one of those Miss America pageant competitors. What comes out of her mouth seems to be a garbled mix of words that suggest she has been cramming for an exam but hasn''t quite absorbed any of the material. Is this really the best that McCain could find? I can''t stand the high profile alternatives like Romney or Guiliani, but couldn''t McCain have found SOMEONE who can actually put some coherent sentences together?? I know I must sound like one of those "elitists" to the rapid Republicans, but Jeez, doesn''t this country and the world deserve better?

Reply to this comment
by caliguy55 September 27, 2008 2:49 PM PDT
Whether Palin goes or not, Johnny "Depends" McSame is going to lose the election big time. People have finally seen Johnny McSame for what he really is, i.e., a person who has sold his soul to the devil to win the upcoming Presidential election. Unfortunately, for Johnny McSame he cannot even win the upcoming election with the devil on his side. Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Reply to this comment
by sandy19731 September 27, 2008 2:54 PM PDT
Palin go?
Are you kidding?
She can field dress a moose!
She has five children!
She''s hot!
Obviously that is needed in Washington.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 September 27, 2008 3:03 PM PDT
Former Backer Says V.P. Nominee Is "Out Of Her League," Should Quit Ticket For Good Of GOP

This is what bothers me for the good of the party?

Hey nut case what about the GOOD OF THE COUNTRY!

So the party for the conservatives comes before country. Well, I am sure you helped a lot of swing voters out on that one. Good luck with it you clowns will need it.
Reply to this comment
by September 27, 2008 3:04 PM PDT
Whaddaya know, a conservative telling the truth!! Wouldn''t it be nice, if now, the truth takes hold and begins to grow within the conservative movement. Especially after all these years of Karl Rove ("No such thing as objective, verifiable reality") and the deceit of the idiot-son and Darth Cheney.
The core of this argument shouldn''t center around Palin, it should be about McCains judgement! He picked her. Just one of many "what the he** was he thinkin''?" actions he has taken in his campaign.
Reply to this comment
by jsilver2th September 27, 2008 3:09 PM PDT
Too late for that- gosh dar ned if he does and gosh dar ned if he don''t...

She''s really starting to get that First Dude were not in Alaska anymore look...
Reply to this comment
by jockh September 27, 2008 3:16 PM PDT
Stoip attacking Sarah Palin, she is the most qualified to be President.

She can see Russia from Alaska so she is an expert on foreign relations.

She can also see the moon from Alaska so she is also qulified to be an astronaut !!
Reply to this comment
by jerr11 September 27, 2008 3:20 PM PDT
Palin brings a witch doctor pastor to the ticket.

That should sway a few votes!

I hear these witch doctors can weave a spell or two to make the undecideds change their minds!!
Reply to this comment
by jmcchange September 27, 2008 3:21 PM PDT
Someone should tell this Kathleen Parker cat to watch last nights debates if she really wanted to see someone running for first chair who is completely without a clue or a qualification.

When I see women like this Kathleen Parker character so quick to want to eat her own, it truly does bring out the sexist in me.

I''m reminded of how my very easy going son is always coming home worn out and complaining about his job....A job I know down deep he loves with a passion. But, he''s a senior manager over 32 people, of which 28 are females.

He simply doesn''t have a clue about how to keep the females passified. He says he never hears a word from the four men, but the women seem to invent reasons to fight with each other.
Reply to this comment
by obamaslady September 27, 2008 3:23 PM PDT
I am INSULTED to think that this woman could represent me, but I am HORRIFIED to think that she could represent our country! OMG what would the rest of the world think once they hear her speak to any foreign dignitary? Currently we are hated for our arrogant pre-emptive war in Iraq, we are viewed suspiciously on our financial disaster which affects global markets, and if he should win, we would be also be considered the "LAUGHING STOCK" of the world. I am LIVID that McCain would have the gall to force this unprepared woman on us! My country means too much to me to think that this CHARADE posing as a viable VP or, God forbid our next POTUS, cannot construct a proper sentence so that whatever she utters makes absolutely NO SENSE! She makes Bush look like an intellectual.

So for these reasons, John McCain has lost all HONOR and should NEVER be allowed to make another decision regarding our country because in making this one decision [in which he had many other very qualified people], his JUDGMENT was unacceptable and he made the WRONG DECISION. He has jeopardized our country on a world level. He should be ASHAMED of himself because with this judgmenmt he has not only put "himself first", but he put our "country dead last".

I say, "THANKS, BUT NO THANKS ON THIS BRIDGE TO DISPAIR, DANGER AND DISASTER"!
Reply to this comment
by jmcchange September 27, 2008 3:26 PM PDT
Someone should tell this Kathleen Parker cat to watch last nights debates if she really wanted to see someone running for first chair who is completely without a clue or a qualification.

When I see women like this Kathleen Parker character so quick to want to screw over their own, it truly does bring out the sexist in me.

I''m reminded of how my very easy going son is always coming home worn out and complaining about his job....A job I know down deep he loves with a passion. But, he''s a senior manager over 32 people, of which 28 are females. And, I''m talking college educated, professionals...Not your average line worker types. All of them far more educated than this Parker woman, no doubt.

He simply doesn''t have a clue about how to keep the females passified.

He says he never hears a word from the four men, but the women seem to invent reasons to fight with each other.
Reply to this comment
by jmmalone2 September 27, 2008 3:32 PM PDT
If You were The Boss... which team would you hire?

With America facing historic debt, multiple war fronts,
stumbling health care, a weakened dollar, all-time high
prison population, skyrocketing Federal spending, mortgage
crises, bank foreclosures, etc. etc., this is an unusually
critical election year.

Let''s look at the educational background of the
candidates and see what they bring to the job:

Obama:
Occidental College - Two years.
Columbia University - B.A. political science with a
specialization in international relations.
Harvard - Juris Doctor (J.D.) Magna *** Laude

Biden:
University of Delaware - B.A. in history and B.A. in
political science.
Syracuse University College of Law - Juris Doctor (J.D.)

vs.

McCain:
United States Naval Academy - Class rank 894 out of 899
(meaning that, like George Bush, McCain was at the bottom of
his class)


Palin:
Hawaii Pacific University - 1 semester
North Idaho College - 2 semesters - general study
University of Idaho - 2 semesters - journalism
Matanuska-Susitna College - 1 semester
University of Idaho - 3 semesters - B.A. in journalism

Now, which team are you going to hire to lead the most
influential nation in the world?







Reply to this comment
by lindaredtail September 27, 2008 3:33 PM PDT
McCain picked Palin because he thought that the Hillary voters would go for any woman. He calculated wrong. Palin is as far removed from Hillary as it gets. No one should pay attention to these ''stealth operatives'' trying to get people to vote for Hillary and reduce Obama''s vote. In some states it could be important. This is between McCain and Obama. Our choice is clear. Change (Obama) or continuation of disaster. (Palin). The McCain campaign even tried to get the VP debate pushed aside by switching last night''s to its slot on Oct. 2. There were far more articulate Republican women he could have chosen. Elizabeth Dole and Kay Bailey Hutchinson to name 2. But they are tied to Bush policies and votes. Palin is uninformed and an extremist. Bad choice. America and the Forces of change benefit.
Reply to this comment
by nextgenman September 27, 2008 3:37 PM PDT
What do you mean go? She''s already gone. Tripped the Light Psychotic. has a Majic Kenyan Witch Hunter Pastor lay hands on her. Thinks, like Osama Bin Laden, that the Iraq War was God''s Plan.

LoonieTune Barbie.
Reply to this comment
by nextgenman September 27, 2008 3:38 PM PDT
Princess Moose Whisperer. Sheesh.
Reply to this comment
by September 27, 2008 3:45 PM PDT
Posted by JMMALONE2
-----------------------
You have just deliniated why McCain/Palin is so attractive to the "dumb as a box of rocks is really cool" streak we have in our culture.
Reply to this comment
by negro-vote- September 27, 2008 3:47 PM PDT










That critique appears to be selectively and unfairly targeted at Palin. Why single her out.

It applies equally to Obama, and that is more disturbing because Obama want to be the president.

CBS practices censorship of criticism of Obama.









Reply to this comment
by obamaslady September 27, 2008 3:52 PM PDT
During the second portion of her interview with Couric, she looked like one of the moose she puts in a spotlight when she shoots and kills it. When asked about McCain''s 26 year record on DE-REGULATION, she said, "well I don''t know, but I''ll try to git ''em for ya and brin'' ''em to ya"!

I am OUTRAGED that McCain would do this to America. In selecting her based upon her looks and placing ''himself first'' in his effort to win this election, he completely lost sight of his once oft touted honor. SHAME ON McCAIN for "using" Palin to win an election. But then again he has always hid behind some woman''s skirt and never been good to women! He has not only lost his HONOR, but he has lost his MIND as well!
Reply to this comment
by janeysue2002 September 27, 2008 3:58 PM PDT
Yeah, let''s add it up.

John McCain can''t win because he doesn''t inspire the conservatives. Add Palin and the entire base plus Reagan Democrats are inspired to vote for the Republican ticket, instead of just voting against Obama. And now you''re talking subtracting Palin?

Yeah right.

I''m sure the better alternative is Obama, who''s expertise on foreign affairs brought forth this wisdom, "Iran is just a little country. It can''t do us any harm."

Yeah, big problem.

Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat September 27, 2008 3:59 PM PDT
pt 2

But the reality is is that after 8 years of Bush, with the economy being the number one concern, with McCain so obviously subscribing to the same economic philosophies as Bush for the most part, HE''s the true drag on the ticket.

What I said yesterday is that if McCain could switch out Palin for an economic expert who''s also a populist who also doesn''t upset the conservative base, he might win - that''s not just everything Palin''s not, it''s everything McCain, Obama, and Biden aren''t as well. Implicit in that is that the person would have to be exceptionally smart, be good with theory, and have empathy.

That''s the height of weakness for women use disassociation from another woman to shore up their feelings of vulnerability. Street rules dictate you only turn to disrespect as a counterattack with people who display disrespect to others to garner respect. If you were all so much smarter and tougher you ought to know that and be able to show it on your own steam without having to put Palin down to draw the contrast. IF . . .
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat September 27, 2008 3:59 PM PDT
pt 1

---"Kathleen Parker, writing in the National Review Online, says her "cringe reflex is exhausted" after watching the Alaska governor stumble through TV interviews and it''s become clear to her that Palin is out of her league."---

Well look, a large part of Obama''s allure is that he''s exceptionally smart, excels at theory, and has empathy for peoples suffering - all contrasts to George Bush. That''s as much a part of what constitutes ''change'' as is the policy shift, and the level of experience (with both he and Palin having that as a plus).

On some level people appreciate career-long politicians with decades of experience, and experience insulates McCain and Biden who are equally gaffe-prone from criticism, which Palin doesn''t have.
Reply to this comment
by blackyowe September 27, 2008 4:02 PM PDT
If the Republicans win it will be the Jerry Springer show every day on Fox! The country is so sick how did we sink so low. You gotta go watch Palin get prayed over by the VooDoo man, Muthee on YouTube folks, it''s priceless. We are entering a new Dark Age for sure.
Reply to this comment
by cerberusii September 27, 2008 4:02 PM PDT
Yeah...let go of the chain of that mutt with lipstick and let the Republicans sink at a slower rate...she is that heavy rock at the end of your chain dragging you to the bottom of the lake, by cutting her lose you''ll only slow the process because your heavy chain is still attached! ; )
Reply to this comment
by missingamerica September 27, 2008 4:10 PM PDT
[bq]
A conservative columnist who welcomed Sarah Palin''s entry in national politics now says she''s proven to be a dud [...]
[eq]

That makes me laugh...the conservatives are still "Republicans" though, even though time after time the people who really control the RNC use them not for America, not for conservative principals, but solely as a vehicle to get them to more wealth.

lolll...in the meantime, those things that are truly the core of America - its citizens - suffer under the onslaught of Republican greed in lockstep with the decay of America''s infrastructure and economy.

"Conservatives"...fools who are just tools.
Reply to this comment
See all 402 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs