
NEW YORK, Sept. 26, 2008
Greenfield's Tips For A Successful Debate
CBS Evening News: The Good, The Bad And The Ugly From Past Debates
-
Play CBS Video Video History Of The Debates For better or for worse, debates can greatly influence the outcome of presidential elections. Jeff Greenfield has more.
-
Sen. Lloyd Bentsen, left, D-IN, and Sen. Dan Quayle, R-TX, shake hands after their vice presidential debate in Omaha, Neb., Oct. 5, 1988. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)
-
CBS Evening News Presidential Questions Katie Couric asks Barack Obama and John McCain questions of politics, policy and character.
-
CBS Evening News Where They Stand The CBS Evening News provides an in-depth look at the issues facing the 44th president.
The Good: The Right Words
If you're under attack, it's a good idea to have a quick comeback.
"There you go again," Ronald Reagan said in a 1984 debate.
If voters are wondering if you're too old for the job, take another cue from The Gipper.
"I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent's youth and inexperience," said Ronald Reagan.
If you're being accused of inexperience, take a hint from Ross Perot: "I've had no experience in running up a five trillion dollar debt."
And know your opponent's favorite arguments. So, for instance, Lloyd Bentsen knew that Dan Quayle sometimes compared his experience to John Kennedy's.
"Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine," Bentsen said. "Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy."
The Bad: Self-Inflicted Wounds
Now, here's what not to do. Do not declare a captive nation free - when it isn't: "I don't believe the Poles consider themselves dominated by the Soviet Union," said Gerald Ford in 1976.
Don't look at your watch. It suggests you can't wait to leave.
And remember when in a 2000 town hall meeting, Gore walked up behind Bush, who gave him dismissive look?
Don't "stalk" your opponent. It'll look weird.
The Ugly: Frozen Solid
Finally, if the audio goes out - as it did back in 1976 - don't stand rooted in silence at your podiums for 27 minutes.
If either Ford or Jimmy Carter had acted like a human being - with a laugh, chatting with the other guy, they might have won hands down.
And speaking of "ugly": Could this please be the year that no pundit declares that the candidates have to act "presidential"? What are they supposed to do - wear a stovepipe hat and grow a beard?
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- that debate was not a free-format debate. In a free-format debate the monitor gives a subject and each debater states his position.
Subsequently, the debaters go back and forth arguing their point of view. I am surprise that Mr. Lehrer and the University of Mississippi missed a golden opportunity to foster a true debate that could be compared to the Linclon-Douglas debate. - Reply to this comment
- Obama was over the head on McCain. He hasn''t played those political games of agreeing to gain favor, but has and is addressing the issues with a plan in mind. So many Americans can relate to the fact that this is a war that we never should have been involved in and want our family members serving home. We need a change from the same old bad politics!
- Reply to this comment
- Obama agreeing with McCain is both magnanimous and bipartisan, a word that McCain likes to use as a soundbyte rather than implement it. We have had enough of presidents who rigidly and stubbornly hold onto their views long after they''ve been proven wrong.
- Reply to this comment
- Obama looked like he was just speaking from his books he had just read, McCain spoke from experience. Since Obama just seemed to agree with McCain and his experience all night, what will Obama do when confronted with a crisis that has no book or McCain?
- Reply to this comment
- McCain....Looked Ready To Lead
Obama.....Looked Like A Wannabe
Nothing else needs to be said. - Reply to this comment
- ... wow. Obama agreed with McCain a LOT.
- Reply to this comment



