$700B Bailout Plan Won't Rescue CEOs
Officials: Paulson Bows To Lawmakers' Demands To Curb Pay Packages Of Executives
-
-
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2008, before the Joint Economic Committee. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
-
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., left, and Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., the committee's ranking Republican right, question the witness panel of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, right, Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2008, on Capitol Hill in Washington during the committee's hearing. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
-
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, left, and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke defended their reasons for a $700 billion bailout of U.S. investment banks Sept. 22, 2008 to the Senate. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
-
-
Play CBS Video Video GOP, Dems Slam Bailout Bill The Feds' $700 billion bailout plan came under scrutiny at its first congressional hearing. Both parties said the bill would not pass without significant reform. Bob Orr reports.
-
Video What Price Should Fed Pay? No one seems to know what price the Fed should pay to buy bad mortgage backed securities. A high cost would be bad for taxpayers, while a low cost wouldn't help banks. Anthony Mason reports.
-
Video Notebook: Paulson Katie Couric takes a look at Treasury Secretary Paulson's $700 billion bailout plan. The plan would give Paulson the power to decide what debts to buy.
-
Timeline Credit Crunch Feeling the squeeze? Here's a look at actions and statements from key players in Washington.
-
Interactive Eye On The Economy In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.
Republican officials said that Paulson had bowed to demands from critics in both parties to limit the pay packages of executives whose companies benefit from the proposed bailout. They spoke on condition of anonymity because Paulson's decision had not been formally announced.
White House officials said Bush's speech would dwell on the financial crisis.
Press secretary Dana Perino said the president wants to tell the American people how the crisis affects them and help them understand the depth of the problem.
The developments came as the administration sought to overcome obstacles in Congress to speedy enactment of an unprecedented government bailout of the beleaguered financial industry.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told Congress on Tuesday that failure to act quickly could trigger deepening in the credit crisis that would lead to a recession, with rising unemployment and increased home foreclosures.
Appearing before lawmakers for the second day in a row, he added on Wednesday that global financial markets are under "extraordinary stress."
Paulson, who with Bernanke heard withering criticism of the bailout plan on Tuesday, met for the second consecutive day with House Republicans, some of whom have announced their opposition to any federal bailout of the private financial markets that form the backbone of American capitalism.
Other Republicans appear to be more open to legislation, according to congressional and administration officials, although on different terms than the White House proposed last weekend.
Majority Democrats have also criticized the administration's legislation, demanding major changes. At the same time, they have stressed they stand ready to work with the White House to head off an economic catastrophe.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi met with administration officials to discuss the legislation, and told reporters later, "we're moving in a productive direction." She declined to discuss specifics.
Amid speculation that votes on any legislation could slip into next week, she said, "We'll finish it when it's ready. I'd rather it be sooner rather than later."
Numerous Democrats have said privately in recent days they are wary of voting for the administration's proposed legislation without significant Republican support.
But so far, there was little evidence of support within the GOP rank and file.
"It's a tough sell to most of our members," said Rep. Tom Davis, R-Virginia, after a closed-door meeting with Paulson and Bernanke. "It's a terrible plan, but I haven't heard anything better."
Compounding the administraiton's challenge, Republicans and Democrats both say Bush has lost credibility, particularly in cases where he argues there will be dire consequences if Congress doesn't act.
"They sold the war, they sold the stimulus package and some other things. It's the 'wolf at the door' " argument, Davis said.
The presidential campaign added yet another layer of complexity.
Some Democrats expressed concern that they would side with an unpopular Presidnet Bush, only to have Republican presidential candidate John McCain oppose the measure and try to ride his opposition to victory over Barack Obama.
So far, neither McCain nor Obama has indicated how they would vote on the measure.
Paulson has been negotiating for days with Democrats over the details of the legislation, and while his acceptance of some limitation on so-called "Golden Parachutes" for departing executives removed one obstacle, others remained.
Democrats have called for greater protection for taxpayers, possibly by requiring that the government receive partial ownership - and a share of future profits - of companies that accept help through the proposed bailout.
Additionally, they want to allow bankruptcy judges to rewrite mortgages to ease the burden on consumers who are facing foreclosure.
Another demand, for provisions that give Congress greater authority over the bailout, have already been accepted in principle.
For their part, some Republicans have called for a suspension of the capital gains tax to free money for investment.
Law enforcement officials, meanwhile, said Tuesday that the FBI was investigating four major U.S. financial institutions whose collapse helped trigger the bailout plan. In all, 26 high-profile companies are under intense scrutiny, reports CBS News correspondent Bob Orr.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
- Let us not stand in the way of history, lets get 4 more years of Republitard rule and go the way of the doe-doe bird.
- Reply to this comment
- Now by seeking to call off the debate and trying to get Obama to do the same, big John McShame is trying the ole'' "look presidential" by going back to Washington to work on the crisis to get the declining poll numbers up. Even Virginia is sliding away right now.
The translation is: "John McLame, you suck on the campaign trail and so does your cute vp eye candy, and you can do no better than to go back to DC and try to get your picture taken with other serious-looking repubs & democraps to make it look like you have all kinds of GRAVITAS and intellect. - Reply to this comment
- I don''t feel our Congress or Wall Street are capable of using this money wisely and efficiently. I am sorry to say I don''t trust either one of them.
- Reply to this comment
- Yep, inventagod,
The new 700 bil bailout plan will bring the 2008 dole to big business fully over the 1 trillion dollar mark (see Bear Stearns, and Fannie and Freddie, AIG).
What the devil is this? AMERICA, YOU ELECTED THESE PEOPLE WHO WERE WATCHING THIS HEN HOUSE. Oops, in 2000 you didn''t, the Supreme Court did.... - Reply to this comment
- CAP the pay of CEO''s to 40 times the pay of the lowest paid employee of the company. Any benefits or compensation above this tax at 60%.
The BAILOUT is not needed or invest the 700 billion into alternate energy, infrastructure, or refund to the American Taxpayer and see the results of tickle-up economics. - Reply to this comment
- Greed and Sloppiness
Previous gifts I have granted Big Business:
Franklin National Bank 1974 $7.7 billion
Chrysler 1980 $3.9 billion
Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company 1984 $9.5 billion
Savings & Loan 1989 $293.8 billion
Bear Stearns 2008 $30 billion
Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac 2008 $200 billion
American International Group (A.I.G.) 2008 $85 billion
Fat@ss greedy slobs needing a handout?
AGAIN? - Reply to this comment
- THIS $700 BIL PLAN IS BUSH''S ATTEMPT TO FINISH THE WORK THAT THE 9/11 TERRORISTS STARTED. THEY TRIED TO TEAR DOWN THE PHYSICAL SYMBOLS OF OUR ECONOMY, NOW Neo-Bushitsky is moving in for the kill on the actual accounts, deeds, mortgages, etc.,trying to get the titles and deeds to most of not-Republican Amerika under the government''s "care."
- Reply to this comment
- Is there any means of "opting out" of this ''rotten to the core'' plan? And they have to ask why the poor get poorer! With the Bush regime''s push and their rush to sell this stink bomb to us, the rich continue to get richer so I want to know precisely who is benefiting from my portion of this bailout because I suspect they are wealthy enough to pay for it from their own greedy pockets! This is an outrage and grossly unfair to the taxpayers!!!
And don''t forget that McSame now wants us all to believe that he has now [over the past week] changed his core beliefs and is a REGULATOR. And if anyone believes this, I have a bridge to nowhere I want to sell! What did the congress believe would happen with virtually no REGULATION OR ACCOUNTABILITY? Did they actually believe they would self-regulate? I thought these officials were supposed to be more intelligent than the rest of us, so how could they believe this BS? I am LIVID! This is so wrong! - Reply to this comment
- *** Cheney WHERE ARE YOU NOW? Anyone notice how quiet he is? They ran a news piece the other day on his love of fishing. f@t-a$$ed, sneering ba$****,POS.
- Reply to this comment
- Pass a law taxing pro football and basketball players, big-time golfers, big-business CEO''s, CFO''s,etc. about 90%. H-e-ll, they''d all still be making 7-8 figures.
A $15 million/year pro athlete taxed at 90% would earn a net pay of $1,500,000/ year, which is 39 times what I make net each year. Anyone making 39 times my salary should be able to live like a king. The full 15 mil is 390 times my salary.... Our society WANTS it this way, believe it or not... they come to the games, right, they cheer, right, they buy Peyton Manning numbered shirts, right, Michael Jordan look-alike shoes, right. - Reply to this comment
- HEY WALL STREET....WE''RE NOT BUYING THIS KRAP!!!!!
I won''t to see every yacht sold, I want to see Donald Trump in the soup lines before we give you guys ONE DA** PENNY!!!!!!!!!!!
HELL NO!!!! THE CONSTITUTION SAYS NO BAILOUTS!!!!! - Reply to this comment
- This is way too big to trust to Congress. Why not just let the people vote on the bailout, one way or the other? You remember the concept of government "by the people", don''t you? Yes, it would delay things a bit, but that would be a good thing. I hate Paulson and Bernanke''s DEMAND to spend $700 NOW, without taking the time to think about it.
- Reply to this comment
- Are you aware that most Wall Street execs are Democrats?
Posted by whatwhy001
I''ve already seen other responses but I just have to know: what''s your source? I left one in my toilet today also!! - Reply to this comment
- the Atomic bomb was built with the Help of Nazi''''s
Posted by shado269 at 11:08 AM : Sep 24, 2008
While I share your sentiment that the neoCONS are swine, I don''t think the atomic bomb statement is accurate. The Manhattan Project''s success was all due to the team of scientists we had assembled. Most of those scientists were Jews or of Jewish descent who fled Hitler''s Europe to escape a near certain death in the camps. Einstein, Fermi, Szilard, Teller, etc would not have done the work they did if there were overt or covert sympathizers to National Socialism and Hitler in their midst, nor would the US government have allowed anyone with any shred of Nazi sentiment near the project as the ultimate enemy at the time were Nazi scientists who we thought were also developing an atomic bomb and with whom we were in a race to finish first. - Reply to this comment
- The Bush administration has reduced subsidized lunch programs in schools as it being too expensive, yet can easily expect seven hundred billion plus additional dollars to bailout the bad decisions and money rich corporations.
Posted by yongamerica at 11:20 AM : Sep 24, 2008
That has been the defining trademark of the Bush administration. It has consistently decried any appropriation for anything that is American, even the appropriations for the vets returning from Iraq, but continues to advance more appropriations for the rebuilding of Iraq and Georgia(look carefully at McCain''s association with the president of Georgia and why he announced that "we are all Georgians".
Interesting note that shows palin has the same mind set. When Congress stopped the "bridge to nowhere", Tom Coburn, OK-R, advised that Alaska return the money to help with the reconstruction in New Orleans after Katrina, instead palin''s administration kept it and used some of the money to build the "road to nowhere" 3 miles of gravel road costing $8,000,000per mile. - Reply to this comment
- ["I share the outrage that people have," Paulson told the Senate Banking Committee on Tuesday. "It''s embarrassing to look at this. I think it''s embarrassing to the United States of America. There is a lot of blame to go around." ]
really ... you share the outrage henry?
so henry ... start naming names ... and make sure you include all your influential friends ... both on wall street and public service.
the money should be provided contingent on an in-depth analysis of the factors that have not only led to this problem ... but the other questionable practices forwarded by wall street and other financial experts as sound.
if people want to gamble ... there''s plenty of casinos around the world already in place for this activity. wall street should not be a casino w/ various games of chance (financial instruments) w/ the rules so complicated that nobody can understand how they work. - Reply to this comment
- If the payout goes through, every corporation involved in this meltdown should fire those CEOs with NO compensation. After all, they probably all own enough stock in these corporations to support them in style the rest of their lives and still they will get some of the taxpayer''s bailout money. We bailed out the S & L''s with few restrictions and look what has happened again. Then, we not only made rich corporate heads, but also legislators (look up the Keating 5 notes) Everytime , the taxpayer contributes to more millionaires they bite us back. Both Republicans and Democrats in Congress have benefitted from these corporations, now, it is time for both Repulicans and Democrats to forget their individual piggy banks and do what is best for all the citizens, not just the power mongers.
- Reply to this comment
- This disaster is an accumulation of errors. All approved and monitored by the Bush Administration.
The Bush administration has reduced subsidized lunch programs in schools as it being too expensive, yet can easily expect seven hundred billion plus additional dollars to bailout the bad decisions and money rich corporations. - Reply to this comment
- From the Title, "Exec Pay Limits Pushed Amid Bailout Debate
Administration Resists Move, But Lawmakers In Both Parties Demand Changes To $700B Plan"
____________
GOOD!! PLEASE KEEP PUSHING!! Cut the "golden parachute cords and let these execs free-fall out of the system. - Reply to this comment
- Are you aware that most Wall Street execs are Democrats?
Posted by whatwhy001 at 10:29 AM : Sep 24, 2008
Do you guys make this stuff up as you go and then except people to believe your garbage.
Just like you neo cons came out and said Warren Buffet was a Republican. But then he isn''t so you try to sling mud at him. Same thing just throw the mud and hope some will stick.
Swing voters will not be so easily fooled this election. - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




