WASHINGTON, Sept. 24, 2008

$700B Bailout Plan Won't Rescue CEOs

Officials: Paulson Bows To Lawmakers' Demands To Curb Pay Packages Of Executives

    • Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2008, before the Joint Economic Committee.

      Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2008, before the Joint Economic Committee.  (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

    • Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., left, and Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., the committee's ranking Republican right, question the witness panel of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, right, Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2008, on Capitol Hill in Washington during the committee's hearing.

      Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., left, and Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., the committee's ranking Republican right, question the witness panel of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, right, Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2008, on Capitol Hill in Washington during the committee's hearing.  (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

    • Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, left, and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke defended their reasons for a $700 billion bailout of U.S. investment banks Sept. 22, 2008 to the Senate.

      Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, left, and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke defended their reasons for a $700 billion bailout of U.S. investment banks Sept. 22, 2008 to the Senate.  (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Play CBS Video Video GOP, Dems Slam Bailout Bill

    The Feds' $700 billion bailout plan came under scrutiny at its first congressional hearing. Both parties said the bill would not pass without significant reform. Bob Orr reports.

  • Video What Price Should Fed Pay?

    No one seems to know what price the Fed should pay to buy bad mortgage backed securities. A high cost would be bad for taxpayers, while a low cost wouldn't help banks. Anthony Mason reports.

  • Video Notebook: Paulson

    Katie Couric takes a look at Treasury Secretary Paulson's $700 billion bailout plan. The plan would give Paulson the power to decide what debts to buy.

  • Timeline Credit Crunch

    Feeling the squeeze? Here's a look at actions and statements from key players in Washington.

  • Interactive Eye On The Economy

    In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.

(CBS/ AP)  President Bush readied a prime time speech to the nation and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson accepted a major change in legislation for a $700 billion bailout of the financial industry on Wednesday as the administration scrambled to prevent further deterioration in the economy.

Republican officials said that Paulson had bowed to demands from critics in both parties to limit the pay packages of executives whose companies benefit from the proposed bailout. They spoke on condition of anonymity because Paulson's decision had not been formally announced.

White House officials said Bush's speech would dwell on the financial crisis.

Press secretary Dana Perino said the president wants to tell the American people how the crisis affects them and help them understand the depth of the problem.

The developments came as the administration sought to overcome obstacles in Congress to speedy enactment of an unprecedented government bailout of the beleaguered financial industry.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told Congress on Tuesday that failure to act quickly could trigger deepening in the credit crisis that would lead to a recession, with rising unemployment and increased home foreclosures.

Appearing before lawmakers for the second day in a row, he added on Wednesday that global financial markets are under "extraordinary stress."

Paulson, who with Bernanke heard withering criticism of the bailout plan on Tuesday, met for the second consecutive day with House Republicans, some of whom have announced their opposition to any federal bailout of the private financial markets that form the backbone of American capitalism.

Other Republicans appear to be more open to legislation, according to congressional and administration officials, although on different terms than the White House proposed last weekend.

Majority Democrats have also criticized the administration's legislation, demanding major changes. At the same time, they have stressed they stand ready to work with the White House to head off an economic catastrophe.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi met with administration officials to discuss the legislation, and told reporters later, "we're moving in a productive direction." She declined to discuss specifics.

Amid speculation that votes on any legislation could slip into next week, she said, "We'll finish it when it's ready. I'd rather it be sooner rather than later."

Numerous Democrats have said privately in recent days they are wary of voting for the administration's proposed legislation without significant Republican support.

But so far, there was little evidence of support within the GOP rank and file.

"It's a tough sell to most of our members," said Rep. Tom Davis, R-Virginia, after a closed-door meeting with Paulson and Bernanke. "It's a terrible plan, but I haven't heard anything better."

Compounding the administraiton's challenge, Republicans and Democrats both say Bush has lost credibility, particularly in cases where he argues there will be dire consequences if Congress doesn't act.

"They sold the war, they sold the stimulus package and some other things. It's the 'wolf at the door' " argument, Davis said.

The presidential campaign added yet another layer of complexity.

Some Democrats expressed concern that they would side with an unpopular Presidnet Bush, only to have Republican presidential candidate John McCain oppose the measure and try to ride his opposition to victory over Barack Obama.

So far, neither McCain nor Obama has indicated how they would vote on the measure.

Paulson has been negotiating for days with Democrats over the details of the legislation, and while his acceptance of some limitation on so-called "Golden Parachutes" for departing executives removed one obstacle, others remained.

Democrats have called for greater protection for taxpayers, possibly by requiring that the government receive partial ownership - and a share of future profits - of companies that accept help through the proposed bailout.

Additionally, they want to allow bankruptcy judges to rewrite mortgages to ease the burden on consumers who are facing foreclosure.

Another demand, for provisions that give Congress greater authority over the bailout, have already been accepted in principle.

For their part, some Republicans have called for a suspension of the capital gains tax to free money for investment.

Law enforcement officials, meanwhile, said Tuesday that the FBI was investigating four major U.S. financial institutions whose collapse helped trigger the bailout plan. In all, 26 high-profile companies are under intense scrutiny, reports CBS News correspondent Bob Orr.


© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx

CBSNews.com On Digg

Add a Comment See all 27 Comments
by enriquecaliente September 24, 2008 9:32 PM EDT
Let us not stand in the way of history, lets get 4 more years of Republitard rule and go the way of the doe-doe bird.
Reply to this comment
by rjs1955 September 24, 2008 7:00 PM EDT
Now by seeking to call off the debate and trying to get Obama to do the same, big John McShame is trying the ole'' "look presidential" by going back to Washington to work on the crisis to get the declining poll numbers up. Even Virginia is sliding away right now.

The translation is: "John McLame, you suck on the campaign trail and so does your cute vp eye candy, and you can do no better than to go back to DC and try to get your picture taken with other serious-looking repubs & democraps to make it look like you have all kinds of GRAVITAS and intellect.
Reply to this comment
by jd2408 September 24, 2008 6:43 PM EDT
I don''t feel our Congress or Wall Street are capable of using this money wisely and efficiently. I am sorry to say I don''t trust either one of them.
Reply to this comment
by rjs1955 September 24, 2008 6:42 PM EDT
Yep, inventagod,

The new 700 bil bailout plan will bring the 2008 dole to big business fully over the 1 trillion dollar mark (see Bear Stearns, and Fannie and Freddie, AIG).

What the devil is this? AMERICA, YOU ELECTED THESE PEOPLE WHO WERE WATCHING THIS HEN HOUSE. Oops, in 2000 you didn''t, the Supreme Court did....
Reply to this comment
by edthelight September 24, 2008 6:38 PM EDT
CAP the pay of CEO''s to 40 times the pay of the lowest paid employee of the company. Any benefits or compensation above this tax at 60%.

The BAILOUT is not needed or invest the 700 billion into alternate energy, infrastructure, or refund to the American Taxpayer and see the results of tickle-up economics.
Reply to this comment
by inventagod2 September 24, 2008 5:55 PM EDT
Greed and Sloppiness

Previous gifts I have granted Big Business:

Franklin National Bank 1974 $7.7 billion
Chrysler 1980 $3.9 billion
Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company 1984 $9.5 billion
Savings & Loan 1989 $293.8 billion
Bear Stearns 2008 $30 billion
Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac 2008 $200 billion
American International Group (A.I.G.) 2008 $85 billion

Fat@ss greedy slobs needing a handout?
AGAIN?
Reply to this comment
by rjs1955 September 24, 2008 5:41 PM EDT
THIS $700 BIL PLAN IS BUSH''S ATTEMPT TO FINISH THE WORK THAT THE 9/11 TERRORISTS STARTED. THEY TRIED TO TEAR DOWN THE PHYSICAL SYMBOLS OF OUR ECONOMY, NOW Neo-Bushitsky is moving in for the kill on the actual accounts, deeds, mortgages, etc.,trying to get the titles and deeds to most of not-Republican Amerika under the government''s "care."
Reply to this comment
by obamaslady September 24, 2008 5:31 PM EDT
Is there any means of "opting out" of this ''rotten to the core'' plan? And they have to ask why the poor get poorer! With the Bush regime''s push and their rush to sell this stink bomb to us, the rich continue to get richer so I want to know precisely who is benefiting from my portion of this bailout because I suspect they are wealthy enough to pay for it from their own greedy pockets! This is an outrage and grossly unfair to the taxpayers!!!

And don''t forget that McSame now wants us all to believe that he has now [over the past week] changed his core beliefs and is a REGULATOR. And if anyone believes this, I have a bridge to nowhere I want to sell! What did the congress believe would happen with virtually no REGULATION OR ACCOUNTABILITY? Did they actually believe they would self-regulate? I thought these officials were supposed to be more intelligent than the rest of us, so how could they believe this BS? I am LIVID! This is so wrong!
Reply to this comment
by rjs1955 September 24, 2008 5:24 PM EDT
*** Cheney WHERE ARE YOU NOW? Anyone notice how quiet he is? They ran a news piece the other day on his love of fishing. f@t-a$$ed, sneering ba$****,POS.
Reply to this comment
by rjs1955 September 24, 2008 5:19 PM EDT
Pass a law taxing pro football and basketball players, big-time golfers, big-business CEO''s, CFO''s,etc. about 90%. H-e-ll, they''d all still be making 7-8 figures.
A $15 million/year pro athlete taxed at 90% would earn a net pay of $1,500,000/ year, which is 39 times what I make net each year. Anyone making 39 times my salary should be able to live like a king. The full 15 mil is 390 times my salary.... Our society WANTS it this way, believe it or not... they come to the games, right, they cheer, right, they buy Peyton Manning numbered shirts, right, Michael Jordan look-alike shoes, right.
Reply to this comment
See all 27 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Does dad need a nursing home? Dr. LaPook talks with a geriatrician about navigating a difficult decision.
Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: