EPA Won't Remove Rocket Fuel From Water
Agency Says Health Risks Are Low, Critics Say EPA Is Protecting The Pentagon From Liability
-
Photo
(AP / CBS)
-
Interactive
Eye On The Environment
Find out how global warming, air pollution and alternative forms of energy impact our world.
EPA reached the conclusion in a draft regulatory document not yet made public but reviewed Monday by The Associated Press.
The ingredient, perchlorate, has been found in at least 395 sites in 35 states at levels some scientists say could interfere with thyroid function and pose developmental health risks, particularly for babies and fetuses.
The EPA document says that mandating a cleanup level for perchlorate would not result in a "meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction for persons served by public-water systems."
The conclusion, which caps years of dispute over the issue, was denounced by Democrats and environmentalists who accused EPA of caving in to pressure from the Pentagon.
"This is a widespread contamination problem, and to see the Bush EPA just walk away is shocking," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, a Democrat who chairs the Senate's environment committee.
Lenny Siegel, director of the Center for Public Environmental Oversight in Mountain View, Calif., added: "This is an unconscionable decision not based upon science or law but on concern that a more stringent standard could cost the government significantly."
The Defense Department used perchlorate for decades in testing missiles and rockets, and most perchlorate contamination is the result of defense and aerospace activities, congressional investigators said last year.
The Pentagon could face liability if EPA set a national drinking water standard that forced water agencies around the country to undertake costly cleanup efforts. Defense officials have spent years questioning EPA's conclusions about the risks posed by perchlorate.
The Pentagon objected strongly Monday to the suggestion that it sought to influence EPA's decision.
"We have not intervened in any way in EPA's determination not to regulate perchlorate. If you read their determination, that's based on criteria in the Safe Drinking Water Act," Paul Yaroschak, Pentagon deputy director for emerging contaminants, said in an interview.
Yaroschak said the Pentagon has been working for years to clean up perchlorate at its facilities. He also contended that the Pentagon was not the source of as much perchlorate contamination as once believed, noting that it also comes from fireworks, road flares and fertilizer.
Benjamin Grumbles, EPA's assistant administrator for water, said in a statement that "science, not the politics of fear in an election year, will drive our final decision."
"We know perchlorate in drinking water presents some degree of risk, and we're committed to working with states and scientists to ensure public health is protected and meaningful opportunities for reducing risk are fully considered," Grumbles said.
Grumbles said the EPA expected to seek comment and take final action before the end of the year. The draft document was first reported Monday by the Washington Post.
Perchlorate is particularly widespread in California and the Southwest, where it has been found in groundwater and in the Colorado River, a drinking-water source for 20 million people. Its also has been found in lettuce and other foods.
In absence of federal action, states have acted on their own. In 2007, California adopted a drinking water standard of 6 parts per billion. Massachusetts has set a drinking water standard of 2 parts per billion.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



"No, rocket fuel in the water supply is perfectly safe. And there is no truth to the rumor that if you consume it and pass wind, you get blown into orbit."
This is just par for the course with this administration. It disgusts me to see the scum that the people of this country have allowed to steal our government.
"The Pentagon objected strongly Monday to the suggestion that it sought to influence EPA''s decision"
Yeah, because the Pentagon doesn''t lie and conceal the truth from Americans, especially when it comes to money or the peoples safety. Go ahead, ask them if they''ve ever lied to Americans.
Bush to the Little People: ''Heres perchlorate in your water, no extra charge!''
Yeah, those liberal Republicans that liberally ignore laws, safe guards, free trade and the Constitution.
Posted by zgomer
yeah, i hate having clean drinking water. where do these liberals get off trying to protect my health. i say let the free market decide if my water is clean or not.
LOL! Best post I''ve ever seen! You don''t write for Jon Stewart do you? You should!
sitting on Der F|hrers lap. America is absolutely PACKED with morons who to this very day have no idea what is happening here. It is time to let these fascist b*st*rds know we are ready and willing to act to protect our democracy. If the non-violent, Gandhian ways of Martin Luther King don''t work we should be willing to do whatever else it takes to preserve our freedoms for our grandchildren.
Malcolm X once told Martin Luther King that he himself had served as a broom (representing angry blacks), and King (representing a peaceful approach) had been the dustpan, and through the use of fear Malcolm had swept white America toward king and out of the way of progress. Perhaps Obama is capable of serving as the dustpan today, and perhaps we Americans of all races need to prepare to sweep our misguided fools into his arms and out of the way of America''s progress. I''m ready.
I think Malcolm X was largely a product of his environment, which (like you) hated everything about him based on one criteria: his pigmentation.
That he went as far as he did is a virtual promotion for Islam as anything I know. Truly a tribute to the religion but (in my opinion) more to the man.
Don''t judge such harsh judgments like "seeing their grandchildren die"- that could end up YOUR fate.
Put it in God''s hands. We know He is fair.
A more likely source is fluoride perchlorate- but they don''t want you to know that they are poisoning us purposely.
Fluoride shrinks brains permanently and reduced IQs 10 to 20 points.
After Malcolm X traveled to the mideast and saw there was no racism, he went against the original charlatan, "Elijah Mohammed". That split the Nation of Islam, but Farrakhan wanted it all, and so his bodyguards eventually murdered Malcolm X.
Yes, if you swallowed pure sodium or potassium perchlorate it would be harmful, but doses a MILLION times more concentrated than the "safe" levels set by California or Massachusetts (see end of the report) have been experimentally shown to have absolutely no effect whatsoever on thyroid function.
This is only to be expected. Perchlorate is simply a more powerful form of the chlorine/hypochlorite that`s already added to drinking water to make it SAFE.
In the meantime, all of you worrywarts who spend your lives creating problems where none exist can carry on wringing your hands until they`re raw :-) :-) :-)
EPA is supposed to stand for the Envrironmental Protection Agency, not the Envrironmental Pollution Agency
Have you ever noticed that children are reaching puberty earlier and earlier? Girls at 9 starting their cycles? Whatever happened to 14? Between the junk they pump into our meat, the pesticides they put on our produce and the junk in our water, there is no reason needed why there is so much cancer and disease in our society. But wait! There are plenty of drugs out there to keep us "healthy" once all that overtakes us right? People are so blind to what is going on around them. Reminds me of how people were oblivious to their lives in the Matrix. Sheeple
Must be a lot of it in the water in Texas and Wash. D.C.
"The ingredient, perchlorate, has been found in at least 395 sites in 35 states at levels some scientists say could interfere with thyroid function and pose developmental health risks, particularly for babies and fetuses."
"The EPA document says that mandating a cleanup level for perchlorate would not result in a "meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction for persons served by public-water systems."
________________
Not to mention that this will also help keep big pharma going doing additional research and selling more drugs to cure the ills caused by these "spills".
Posted by caliengineer
There''s no such thing as fluoride perchlorate. Both terms refer to negative ions that need positive ions to bond with. Thus you can have ammonium perchlorate or sodium fluoride but not fluoride perchlorate. This is Junior High chemistry - you can''t be an engineer.
Considering all the run-offs of nitrate fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides from the agricultural industry; groth hormones and antibiotics from the meat and poultry industry; and the wasted cardiac and other medications we pee and p00p out daily from the health care; what is another chemical in our water supply?
The way I figure it, in about 30 or so years we won''t need to fertilize our yards/gardent, need to take one pill to make us p00p, another to make us pee, another to lower cholesterol, one to decrease blood pressure, nitroglycerin for angina pectoris, a pill to control heart rate, a pill to control birth, a pill for dementia, another for psychotic disorders, a pill to help us sleep and another to awaken us, or a pill to control pain. All of these we will be able to get by drinking 6-8 glasses of water every day, something we should be doing anyway.
As has been said before, I want to die peacefully in my slppe like my grandfatehr did, not screaming in terror and fear like his passengers!
This is about the government deciding on ''acceptable risk'', and rolling dice with your wellbeiing. If you want to drink fertilizer, lead, rocket fuel, mercury, microbes, and arsenic, that''s up to you.
They both hired women from NJ to head their EPA - how much do you really think is going to change? Ever been there? Phew!
-
by anthonysfire
June 20, 2009 10:52 PM EDT
- Republicans? It was in the water during the Clinton administration, and it is still in the water now under yet another Democrat administration - so that means it'll get treated now, right?
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 36 CommentsThe Democrats simply sat on it for years - dropping the bomb while Bush was in office.
What are they doing to do about it now? Not a darmed thing. It's you people that put those pesky road flares up when you get flat tires - can't you read? And you wonder why we're a dying nation where the elderly are outliving their children. We use Britas. : )