CBS/AP/ June 18, 2009, 6:27 PM

Candidates Continue Duel Over The Economy

Republican John McCain on Monday called for greater oversight of the Bush administration's proposed bailout of U.S. financial markets. Meanwhile, Democrat Barack Obama moved to claim the mantle of fiscal responsibility in a roiling economy, vowing on Monday to slash federal spending on contractors by 10 percent and saving $40 billion.

Urging members of his own party to be just as fiscally tough as the most conservative Republicans, Obama said the $700 billion economic bailout plan proposed by the Bush administration and congressional leaders is forcing a renewed look at federal spending.

As president, Obama said he would create a White House team headed by a chief performance officer to monitor the efficiency of government spending.

"I am not a Democrat who believes that we can or should defend every government program just because it's there," Obama said at a rally in Green Bay. "We will fire government managers who aren't getting results, we will cut funding for programs that are wasting your money and we will use technology and lessons from the private sector to improve efficiency across every level of government."

"The only way we can do all this without leaving our children with an even larger debt is if Washington starts taking responsibility for every dime that it spends," he said.

McCain said the massive $700 billion plan being crafted by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson needed broader supervision

"Never before in the history of our nation has so much power and money been concentrated in the hands of one person. This arrangement makes me deeply uncomfortable," the presidential candidate said at a rally here. "We will not solve a problem caused by poor oversight with a plan that has no oversight."

McCain praised Paulson and said he had spoken to him several times over the weekend. But the GOP presidential hopeful nonetheless called for a bipartisan oversight board to supervise the proposed bailout, to be led by Warren Buffett or another widely respected business leader.

Earlier, McCain, who just a week ago said the economy was fundamentally sound, said he believed the U.S. financial system is facing a major crisis.

Speaking on NBC's "Today" show, McCain said, "We are in the most serious crisis since World War II."

He also said that despite the ballooning national debt he would not raise taxes if elected president. "History shows us that if you raise people's taxes in tough economic times that makes problems worse," McCain said.

The Arizona senator also called on Congress to move quickly and work with the Bush administration to restore stability to the troubled financial sector. But he said the goal of any action must be to allow homeowners to stay in their homes and prevent Wall Street executives from profiting from a taxpayer bailout.

Obama also has focused tightly on the economy in recent days, and he has urged Democrats and Republicans to join forces to approve a bailout of the troubled financial industry that not only saves the industry but protects taxpayers.

"We are here because an ethic of irresponsibility has swept through our government, leaving politicians with the belief they can waste billions and billions of your money on no-bid contracts for friends and contributors, slip pork projects into bills during the dead of night and spend billions on corporate tax breaks we can't afford and old programs we don't need," said Obama.

He linked the turmoil that's rocked Wall Street to federal spending he said has soared out of control, laying the blame at the feet of Republican policies he argued that McCain is certain to continue.

President Bush ran for office on a platform of efficiency in government, Obama said, noting that Bush instead has presided over a mushrooming federal budget and deficits. Under Bush, spending on contractors has more than doubled, from $203 billion in 2000 to $412 billion in 2006.

"We cannot give a blank check to Washington with no oversight and accountability, when no oversight and accountability is what got us into this mess in the first place," said Obama. He warned that even as the government moves to bail out the financial sector there are signs that special interests are looking to profit.

Obama said he's spent the last two years running for president on a promise of change, and he mocked McCain's argument he can bring change to Washington.

"This whole change thing must be catching on," said Obama. "I've noticed that John McCain is trying to steal my signs. He trying to make up for 26 years in 26 hours. Who do you think has been running the government for the last eight years?"

He accused McCain of "an election-year conversion" that's brought change into his rhetoric.

"After 26 years of being part of this Washington culture, all that he has changed is his slogan for the fall campaign," said Obama.

Obama warned that the election is hard fought because special interests are fighting hard to keep their place at the table.

"It won't be easy, the kind of change we're looking for is never easy," said Obama. "What we are up against is a very powerful entrenched status quo in Washington who will say anything and do anything and fight with everything they've got to keep things just the way they are."

Obama spoke to 6,000 people in an arena in a state that trends Democratic, and where Obama badly needs a win.

McCain's comments came at a raucous meeting with an Irish-American group in Scranton, a working-class city in northeastern Pennsylvania that has been a hub of campaign activity and rhetoric throughout the year.

Democratic vice presidential contender Joe Biden hails from Scranton and on the campaign trail often speaks of his blue-collar roots here.

Before last spring's Pennsylvania primary, Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton also laid claim to the town, where her father grew up and is buried. Clinton defeated Obama by 10 percentage points, in part due to her strong showing among white working-class voters in the state.

At the rally, McCain was introduced by the state's Republican senator, Arlen Specter, who praised Obama as an "able fellow" who nonetheless lacked McCain's years of experience in Washington.

McCain also took a few friendly questions from the audience, including one from a woman who asked why news organizations had committed so many investigative reporters to look into the background of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, McCain's running mate.

"Shame on you, shame on you," the woman shouted to applause, while McCain looked on approvingly.

"That is a great question," McCain said. "One thing I want to assure you of is that Governor Palin - she can take it."

The anti-media rant continued on a conference call later with McCain campaign manager Rick Davis and Steve Schmidt, who manages day-to-day operations and strategy. Schmidt criticized what he called a "compliant media" that he argued hadn't sufficiently investigated Obama's background and campaign claims, and singled out The New York Times, which he called a "pro-Obama advocacy organization.
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
138 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
morris61 says:
Give MORE FREE MONEY to the theives that created the mess.More Corporate welfare from the neocons,this will only stop after the US files for bankruptcy.The mortgages that back the securities were and are worthless pieces of trash,now the thieves want to dump the trash on the backs of the tax payers.The American voters are starting to figure out that the Republican and Democrats are both the problem.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
barb46usa says:
To our Congress: DO NOT, I repeat, DO NOT bail out the mortgage companies without full disclosure; or without IMPARTIAL (by impartial - I really mean people who have not backed the leaders in the Senate/House of Representatives!) committee overseers. The same people on the committee today are the same people who were the overseers of our economy for the last two (2) years. This bailout is not just for the mortgage companies, I see it as a bailout for bad decisions made by the current congress! I don''t know whether they were like the three blind mice, or the hear no evil, speak no evil or see no evil monkeys! I am a "blue collar low income, hard working American" who is completely fed up with all the politicians in this country tossing good money after bad to countries that don''t care about us or our democracy and freedoms, when our representatives in the House and Senate need to be focusing on our own country''s woes and people. I am also fed up with our "so called" representatives making sure they get raises and perks from whom ever they choose, when ever they choose - once again, overlooking the people who pay their salaries! When, oh when are all of you going to wake up and take care of YOUR COUNTRY AND PEOPLE?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
starleo146 says:
CBS: McCain said the massive $700 billion plan being crafted by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson needed broader supervision


Now he says that , Last week he was Mr. deregulator, all through the senate let me steal Ronald Reagans Views they love him, deregulate ,now oversight is needed he flip flops worse than Kerry
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
starleo146 says:
"Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency."Posted by Salih-Ibn at 12:29 PM : Sep 23, 2008

Well they are so good about these little contract details aren''t they? They want our trust ,perfect timing ,election too busy and throw panic and when it is over we find it is not exactly the way it is suppose to be, and voila sorry you can''t do nothing it says right here blah, blah . Just like the medicare bill cannot negotiate with pharmacy to get the price down and a big donut hole for the medicare patient to pay 2500.bucks they are good man they are good. AArp thought that up for medicare now which bank thought this up.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
spiritwalk says:
Yet all anyone is interested in talking about is how Palin doesn''''''''t know what is going on in Washington and how she can''''''''t be expected to do her job if elected
Doesn''''''''t anyone see the irony in this?
Posted by spiritwalk at 08:27 AM
*****
I love this post!
I also believe it is great what McCain has done.
Posted by rushlimpdrug at 08:52 AM : Sep 23, 2008
*******
This proves my point. All I said was that the 3 Senators from Washington don''t seem to know what is going on in Washington anymore than Palin does. "rushlimpdrug''" took this to indicate that I was supporting Palin. What I was saying is that we are not hearing what is really being said and just reacting to the one clip or one sound byte that effects us emotionally and then throwing our support to the person who didn''t reallysay what we think they said. We can''t criticize the media or the candidates for manipulating us with "hot button topics" when we are so willing to have our buttons pushed that we listen with emotion and not logic. I venture that "rushlimpbug" isn''t really hearing what the candidate said any more than to what I said.

reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ioweign says:
Europe To Paulson: You''re On Your Own
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
spiritwalk says:
You are all snapping at each other about "my candidate vs. your candidate". Obama is stupid, McCain is dumb...yadda,yadda.
The only candidate to even suggest the seriousness of the banking crisis was Hillary Clinton. But, because the 30 second sound bytes about what she was saying were affecting her poll numbers negatively she folded and backed off the issue.
It is obvious that neither Obama nor McCain knew what was happening, or worse, knew about it but didn''t want to bring it up because they were afraid that you voters wouldn''t like hearing it and it would effect their poll numbers. Only one conclusion can be drawn.The presidency is too important to be left in the hands of the voters.
You are all basing your decision to vote on emotional reactions to whatever propaganda the candidates are putting out. You keep listening to 30 second sound bytes, the logic of which would fall apart if you gave it another 30 seconds of thought.
Both of you are acting like mobs. Two mobs fighting in the middle of a burning house and no matter how big the fire is getting you refuse to leave because you each believe your candidate is going to rush in and save you. Now yo realize that it is your house that is on fire and you are about to lose it.
If you were too easily manipulated by slogans and bithy retorts to protect your own house, what makes you think you should be allowed to decide what to do with the White House.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
berniew4 says:
To nomav Why should McCain/Palin take questions from Liberal reporters. {Look at the ABC interview. you think it is fair. I challenge OBAMA/BIDEN to take questions from PEOPLE not reporters. Go to the town meeting format. you know Obama cannot answer unless someone prepares him . Yet McCain /Palin aswer all questions. You are a typical liberal who CANNOT EVER admit the truth which is TYPICAL !!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
recession1 says:
I WOULD DEFINATELY NOT INVEST MY MEASLY $10.00 W/ JOHN MCCAIN. THIS IS THE SAME MAN THAT SHARES VIEWS W/ PRESIDENT BUSH. HOW WOULD HE MAKE A SOUND INVESTMENT WHEN HIS BELOVED LEADER CAN''T CORRECTLY ROUTE BILLIONS??? GET REAL!! THE SAME MAN WHO THINKS THAT SARAH PALIN WILL SWAY THOSE VOTERS WHO WERE FOR HILLARY CLINTON! WHETHER YOU LIKE MCCAIN OR NOT, YOU CAN''T POSSIBLY THINK THAT SARAH PALIN IS RIGHT FOR THE WHITE HOUSE!! LETS BE SERIOUS!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
redlipsahead says:
Q. If you had $10.00 to invest, would you trust Obama to hold and invest your hard earned $10.00???

A. Absolutely Not!


That is why McCain should get your vote. You can trust John McCain. Ask everyone you know the same question. Obama can''t be trusted.
reply
See all 138 Comments