Sept. 21, 2008

The "Mother of All Bailouts"

As Paulson Defends $700B Plan To Buy Bad Debt, Congress Sees No End In Sight

  • Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson appearing on

    Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson appearing on "Face The Nation."  (CBS)

  • Play CBS Video Video Will The Feds' Plan Work?

    Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson talks with Bob Schieffer about the $700 billion bailout plan the Treasury Department has proposed. Paulson describes why he thinks the plan is necessary.

(CBS)  Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson defended the Bush administration's proposal to spend up to $700 billion to buy up bad debt of financial institutions struggling with illiquid assets (such as defaulted mortgages), saying not acting would have jeopardized the possibility of anyone getting a loan - and may have jeopardized Americans' savings and retirement funds.

Over the course of the week, the stock market dropped by a thousand points, and then rallied for a thousand points on news of the government bailout. "But underneath the surface, credit markets and capital markets were freezing up. And when the capital markets freeze up, then mainstream American companies have trouble raising money to do their job; farmers will have trouble getting loans, small business people will have trouble getting loans. This would then hurt the broader economy," Paulson said.

"This was a situation that we couldn't allow to go on."

The chain reaction had its roots, Paulson said, in irresponsible behavior and lending practices, and from people borrowing money when they shouldn’t have. The illiquidity that resulted meant financial institutions could not function.

Appearing on CBS News' Face The Nation, Paulson said the $700 billion plan was the "least costly" option.

"We felt this was the best way to stabilize the situation, unclog the system so that it can work."

"I hate the fact that the taxpayer is going to be at risk, but the taxpayer was already at risk. And I think this is going to minimize the cost to the taxpayer. "

Host Bob Schieffer noted that the figures being discussed for the bailout are higher than what the United States has spent on the Iraq War.

But Paulson was quick to differentiate between money tied to Iraq and the costs associated with the administration plan to purchase bad debt.

"The Iraq war was expenditures," Paulson said. "This is purchasing assets, holding assets, reselling assets, with money coming back into the Treasury. The taxpayer is clearly at risk, but … this, I think, will minimize the risk and the cost to the taxpayer."

"We as a people always work through these situations. We will work through this situation. The markets will stabilize over time and then we will do what we need to do to clean up the mess."

But the costs of the program augur a tremendous jump in the budget deficit. How will the incoming administration handle that?

"Well, the next president is going to have some challenges," Paulson said, "and there's no doubt that debt issuance by the United States of America is going to go up. I'm not minimizing it at all, but I want to continually emphasize, because sometimes people get confused, this is different than spending money you know you're never going to get back; this is buying assets, holding assets and then selling assets. And although I can't tell people now what the cost of that process will be, and there is a risk, the ultimate cost will be determined by how quickly the economy is stabilized and what happens in the housing markets."

"Are you asking other foreign governments to help as well?" Schieffer asked.

"We have, we are urging others to do so. A number have expressed willingness to do so. This is, you know, a global financial system. I'm not saying anyone is committed to do this yet, but … we've started that dialogue."

But will the final plan that Congress approves be limited to giving money to banks, or will homeowners or others hard-hit by the financial crisis be included?

(CBS)
When asked to comment on Paulson's remark that he wanted a plan passed "clean and quick," Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said, "Secretary Paulson and I have a lot of agreement, but we have a difference on what's 'clean.'" With over six percent unemployment, Frank said, "Let's not forget other problems as we focus on this one. I don't think that dirties up the bill.

"We're on track to lose over a million private sector jobs this year, and this [crisis] is going to exacerbate an already bad situation."

Another concern was executive compensation for officers of companies who are being bailed out. "It would be a grave mistake to say that we're going to buy up the bad debt that resulted from the bad decisions of these [private sector] people and then allow them to get millions of dollars on the way out. The American people don't want that to happen and it shouldn't happen."

Frank said Congress wants to add measures that would slow down the number of foreclosures. "It's kind of hard to tell the average American that we're going to continue to have foreclosures that destabilize neighborhoods and deprive cities of revenues they need, but we're going to buy up the bad paper."

(CBS)
Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, thought the $700 billion estimate - which Paulson stated might be an over-estimate of actual costs - was not realistic. "It's going to be about $1 trillion at least.

"We don't know the endgame in this. And I'll tell you what bothers me about this: that I believe that the chairman of the Fed and the Treasury Secretary Paulson, with all due respect to them, they've been staggering from crisis to crisis and they haven't even said today that this will end the crisis. He said this will lubricate the financial markets if we take the financial sludge, as we call it, off the books of the banks. But as Congressman Frank said, this doesn't do anything for the homeowner. This is doing something for the banks. And if [homeowners] get any relief, it'd be incidental."

Frank said the amount of debt that the government would take on strengthens his argument for a surtax on the wealthiest Americans - those who made the mistakes in the financial market, or who profited handsomely from them at the expense of the system. "It's almost as if we let them take the economy hostage by not having appropriate financial regulation.

"I agree with the secretary, it's not going to ultimately cost all these hundreds of billions - we'll recover most of it, maybe all of it - but I do think at this point the people making over $1 million a year, a surtax on their incomes, that's one way to get the people who made these mistakes to contribute to the cost of undoing it. But I do stress, I'm speaking only for myself here."

Shelby ("I'm not a taxer") said that the burden on the taxpayer is unavoidable. "When we add an additional trillion dollars to the debt … sooner or later there's got to be a reckoning, as you allude to. And I don't know what's going to happen. But I can tell you, you add a trillion here and a trillion there, and you've got a lot more debt on the American people, and that's what I'm concerned about.

"We've been down this road before, through the thrift bailout. [It] cost the American taxpayer billions of dollars. This is the mother of all bailouts and we don't see the end in it yet."


Read the full "Face the Nation" transcript here.

By CBSNews.com producer David Morgan.

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 217 Comments
by jackwclarke September 22, 2008 3:50 PM EDT
"Nope, sorry, that''''''''s a lie, McCain and Glenn were found at NO FAULT in the Keating 5, however the democraps with them were."

Yep, he was chastised for poor judgment. Yet he was the only one of the five who was a close personal friend of Keating and the only one of the five who had relatives who stood to loose substantial sums from the increased regulation of the savings and loans.

I just wish our politicians would stop stealing from us, that''s all. Is that so wrong?
Reply to this comment
by chitown639 September 22, 2008 3:48 PM EDT
WRONGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG! McCain and Glenn were chastized for attending ONE meeting....and the democraps with them were held accountable for their part in the Keating 5....

Get your facts straight before you post this krap!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by StormeyOne

Wrong, McCain was obviously accepting bribes from Charles Keating in exchange for protection from government regulators. McCain lobbied for Charles Keating, McCain accepted huge contributions from Charles Keating, McCain invested 100s of thousands of dollars into Charles Keatings business schemes, McCain and his family even went on free vacations with Charles Keating and his family on Keatings private jet. McCain has a very long history of defending Charles Keating from government regualators. McCain costed taxpayers $125 billion de-regulating the S&L industry during the Keating 5 scandal. Now the taxpayers have to pay $700 billion for McCain de-regulating financial institutions on Wall Street!!! How much do taxpayers have to pay for McCain consistently defending corporate Americas right to scam consumers....
Reply to this comment
by usapride70 September 22, 2008 1:32 PM EDT
It features moderator George Stephanopolous saying to Sen. Biden:

You were asked if he [Obama] was ready. You said, %u201CI think he can be ready but right now I don%u2019t believe he is. The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training.%u201D

Cut to Biden who says:

I think that I stand by that statement.


The headless announcer steps in to ask, %u201CAnd what does he [Biden] say of John McCain?%u201D

Cut to a clip from Jon Stewart%u2019s %u201CThe Daily Show%u201D back in 2005 where Biden said:

I would be honored to run with or against John McCain because I think the country would be better off.
Reply to this comment
by stormeyone September 22, 2008 1:17 PM EDT
Posted by StormeyOne

Wrong, youre LYING...AGAIN!!!! McCain was criticized by the Ethics Committee for exercising ''''poor judgment'''' when he met with the federal regulators on Keating''''s behalf. McCain was lucky the commitee let him off the hook with that because it was obvious that McCain was excepting bribes in exchange for protect from the FHLBB.

McCain was criticized for ''''poor judgement''''....but your lie of saying that he was found at ''''no fault'''' is just another one of you lies.....




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by chitown639 at 10:04 AM : Sep 22, 2008

WRONGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG! McCain and Glenn were chastized for attending ONE meeting....and the democraps with them were held accountable for their part in the Keating 5....

Get your facts straight before you post this krap!
Reply to this comment
by usapride70 September 22, 2008 1:17 PM EDT
But yet now Congress is wanting to add more to what Bush has asked them to provide. Bush has warned them not to do add more. So Bush does what is needed to help our economy and Congress takes it and runs with it to dupe us out of as much as they can. Wait Congress is run by the Dems......well now doesn''t that just tell you the Dems as always in their sneaky little ways are gonna take as much money from us as they can.......and blame it on the Repubs.

Typical.
Reply to this comment
by chitown639 September 22, 2008 1:09 PM EDT
McCain and his buddies deregulated the S&L industry until its collapse in the 80s, the government had to bailout the S&L. Charles Keating, was McCains best friend. McCain lobbied and pressure government regulators not to investigate Keating, and in exchange Keating gave McCain huge contributes, free trips on Keatings private jet to Keatings resort for the McCain family. McCain invested 100s of thousands of dollars into Keatings businees deals. The Keating 5 scandal costed taxpayers nearly $125 billion. Everytime McCain deregulates the taxpayers have to pay for his mistakes. Only this time its $700 billion.....

When McCain was asked about his dealings with Charles Keating- The senators'' initial defense of his actions rested on Keating being one of his constituents; McCain said, ''I have done this kind of thing many, many times,'' and said the Lincoln case was like ''helping the little lady who didn''t get her Social Security''

McCain is such a crook!!!!
Reply to this comment
by caliguy55 September 22, 2008 1:09 PM EDT
To The Candidates and Congress:

I demand that any bailout of financial institutions and other entities with taxpayers'''' money include strict re-regulation of said institutions and strict congressional oversight of the agencies that are supposed to regulate these institutions and other entities. I demand that Congress not give the Bush Administration a blank check to accomplish this bailout with no strings attached. I''''d rather SEE NO BAILOUT AT ALL, rather than taxpayers footing the bill for those CEOs etc., who are waking away from this mess with millions of dollars.

I DEMAND THAT CONGRESS END THE PRACTICE OF CEOs RECEIVING COMPENSATION FAR IN EXCESS OF WHAT THEY''''RE WORTH AND THEN WALKING AWAY SCOTT FREE, WHEN THE INSTITUTIONS THEY MANAGE FAIL BECAUSE OF SHADY LENDING PRACTICES, ETC. AND, I DEMAND THAT ALL CEOs OF COMPANIES TO BE BAILED OUT BY TAXPAYERS UNDER PRESENT PLANS BE FORCED TO RETURN THEIR EXORBITANT COMPENSATION PACKAGES TO THE U.S. TREASURY TO HELP WITH THE BAILOUT NECESSITATED BY THEIR PRACTICES.

NOW, I know that Congress has a history of being spineless in the past, when faced with these situations. But, it''''s got to stop. Congress must stand up to the President and demand changes, especially when poor, little guys like me are being told we may have to give up some of our meager Social Security Benefits to save that system, which would not be necessary if Congress simply paid back the IOUs owed to the system. Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Reply to this comment
by chitown639 September 22, 2008 1:04 PM EDT
Nope, sorry, that''''s a lie, McCain and Glenn were found at NO FAULT in the Keating 5, however the democraps with them were.

Keep lying *********, people in the know know it''''s just flat out lies.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by StormeyOne

Wrong, youre LYING...AGAIN!!!! McCain was criticized by the Ethics Committee for exercising ''poor judgment'' when he met with the federal regulators on Keating''s behalf. McCain was lucky the commitee let him off the hook with that because it was obvious that McCain was excepting bribes in exchange for protect from the FHLBB.

McCain was criticized for ''poor judgement''....but your lie of saying that he was found at ''no fault'' is just another one of you lies.....

Reply to this comment
by walt1944-2009 September 22, 2008 1:03 PM EDT
The Great Emperor Bush II has claimed that there is no money for national health insurance, there is no money for alternative fuels, there is no money to help families with college bills and hold on to their homes, there is no money for a better GI bill (whatever happened to SUPPORT THE TROOPS!), there is no money for children''s health care, and there is no money to fix and repair the country''s infrastruture.

BUT!!!!!!

There IS MONEY to bail out Wall Street, there IS MONEY to make those responsible for this mess hang onto their "golden parachutes", there is money to reward GREED, GREED, GREED!!!!

AND!!!!

Not to worry, the neocon Fascist National Socialists Nazi Republicans will just have the taxpayer and their decsendants pay for it with no questions asked and even if any are asked, no answers will be given!!!!

Are we dumb, or ARE WE DUMBER!!!!!

SIG HEIL, STICK IT TO THE TAXPAYER, BUSH!!!!
sig heil, BILLIONS FOR CORPORATE AMERICA, BUT NOT ONE CENT FOR THE PEOPLE!!!, McCain!!!!
sig heil, I HAVE A GREAT RECIPE FOR MO0OSE STEW!, Palin!!!!
Reply to this comment
by stormeyone September 22, 2008 1:02 PM EDT
McCain and his buddies deregulated the S&L industry until its collapse in the 80s, the government had to bailout the S&L. Charles Keating, was McCains best friend. McCain lobbied and pressure government regulators not to investigate Keating, and in exchange Keating gave McCain huge contributes, free trips on Keatings private jet to Keatings resort for the McCain family. McCain invested 100s of thousands of dollars into Keatings businees deals. The Keating 5 scandal costed taxpayers nearly $125 billion. Everytime McCain deregulates the taxpayers have to pay for his mistakes. Only this time its $700 billion.....


----------------------------------
----------------------------------------
------

Posted by chitown639 at 09:52 AM : Sep 22, 2008

Yeahhhh, and too bad it was your democraps up de-regulated the financial institutions, told them pour money into loser housing...and now your Congress has bailed out it''s own investmenets...

In fact 56 United States Congressmen are chief investors in these financial institutions, the top two being Nancy Pelosi and John Kerry!
Reply to this comment
by stormeyone September 22, 2008 12:59 PM EDT
StormeyOne, since I can''''t keep up with your McCAIN/PALIN style lies I''''m moving on. It''''s been real, it''''s been fun, but it hasn''''t been real fun!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by indevoter at 09:55 AM : Sep 22, 2008

Not fun at all, is it, when someone catches your lies!
Reply to this comment
by stormeyone September 22, 2008 12:57 PM EDT
Everytime McCain deregulates the taxpayers have to pay for his mistakes. Only this time its $700 billion.....


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by chitown639 at 09:52 AM : Sep 22, 2008

Sorry, but it was William Jefferson Clinton who de-regulated the financial institutions...went to congress, negotiated it, signed it, and put it into law. FACT, JACK!
Reply to this comment
by stormeyone September 22, 2008 12:54 PM EDT
McCain and his buddies deregulated the S&L industry until its collapse in the 80s, the government had to bailout the S&L. Charles Keating, was McCains best friend. McCain lobbied and pressure government regulators not to investigate Keating, and in exchange Keating gave McCain huge contributes, free trips on Keatings private jet to Keatings resort for the McCain family. McCain invested 100s of thousands of dollars into Keatings businees deals. The Keating 5 scandal costed taxpayers nearly $125 billion. Everytime McCain deregulates the taxpayers have to pay for his mistakes. Only this time its $700 billion.....


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by chitown639 at 09:52 AM : Sep 22, 2008

Nope, sorry, that''s a lie, McCain and Glenn were found at NO FAULT in the Keating 5, however the democraps with them were.

Keep lying *********, people in the know know it''s just flat out lies.
Reply to this comment
by stormeyone September 22, 2008 12:52 PM EDT
As a matter of fact it was Jimmy Carter who de-regulated the airlines and oil pricing before Reagan ever hit the White House...mainly because Carter got his arse in a crack over the oil...so he de-regulated the pricing of it.
Reply to this comment
by chitown639 September 22, 2008 12:52 PM EDT
McCain and his buddies deregulated the S&L industry until its collapse in the 80s, the government had to bailout the S&L. Charles Keating, was McCains best friend. McCain lobbied and pressure government regulators not to investigate Keating, and in exchange Keating gave McCain huge contributes, free trips on Keatings private jet to Keatings resort for the McCain family. McCain invested 100s of thousands of dollars into Keatings businees deals. The Keating 5 scandal costed taxpayers nearly $125 billion. Everytime McCain deregulates the taxpayers have to pay for his mistakes. Only this time its $700 billion.....
Reply to this comment
by stormeyone September 22, 2008 12:46 PM EDT
Wron
g again, "socialists" don''''t deregulate. I voted for Reagan twice and he ran on small government principles, to include deregulation.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by indevoter at 09:43 AM : Sep 22, 2008

Well, evidently you didn''t know what you were doing, or even saying NOW, because Jimmy Socialist Carter is the president who got the de-regulation ball rolling!
Reply to this comment
by stormeyone September 22, 2008 12:44 PM EDT
Unfortunatel
y one hell of a lot. BUSH still has an approval rating of about 30% which I find absolutely amazing. And with MCCAIN agreeing with BUSH "on every major issue", his words, not mine, I don''''t see how the race is so close.

And if McCAIN was a Democrat or Independent I would still say vote the bums out.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by indevoter at 09:41 AM : Sep 22, 2008

Well, the reason McCain''s doing that is because he knows that 95% of our economy has grown under the Bush administration at the rate of 3.2%...however the 5% of our economy de-regulated by William Jefferson Clinton has now gone BELLY UP!
Reply to this comment
by stormeyone September 22, 2008 12:40 PM EDT
Doesn''''t matter how we got to deregulation (which by the way was started by Reagan), its which candidates currently running have supported it. McCAIN has been a strong supporter and OBAMA has been consistently against it. He predicted the current conditions, while McCAIN said "the fundamentals of our economy are sound".


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by indevoter at 09:34 AM : Sep 22, 2008

Umm, NO, it wasn''t it was Jimmy Socialist Carter who sold this country on de-regulation.
Reply to this comment
by riddelup September 22, 2008 12:32 PM EDT
If this measure passes and you are republican vote the bums out.If this measure passes and you are democrat vote the bums out. If this measure passes and you are neither or both republican and or democrat vote the bums out. The worker will never benefit from this bail out of greedy capitalist who have nothing but disdain for the American worker. They tried to replace you with foreign workers, trick your into deceptive loans, keep home prices at artificially high levels then resist the natural lowering of those prices,and take those profits out of the market for their own betterment. Now the want us to give them a bailout they refused for S.S. How much abuse will the worker take without saying enough.
Reply to this comment
by gop_will_win September 22, 2008 12:27 PM EDT
Yeah, and if any of you lame brains had checked THE HISTORY OF DE-REGULATION legislation, you would find that your horror of horrors, Phil Gramm the year before de-regulation was passed, had BLOCKED a bill requiring that banks and financial institutions be required to make loans primarily in low income housing areas and people who had not the ability to guarantee pay back of their loans!

Hootie hooooooooooo!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by StormeyOne
========================
Deregulation was done by Clinton and the liberals. How much longer do you liberals think you can continue to fool people?
Reply to this comment
See all 217 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR

Exclusive Webshow

The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.
Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: